Tag Archives: relapse

Cognition and mental health

Management of mental health disorders in people with MS

Emotional problems in people with MS must be recognised, addressed and treated, rather than dismissed as an inevitable consequence of living with this chronic condition.

Key points

  • An MS diagnosis naturally triggers emotions similar to the stages of grief (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance); in addition, the unpredictability of MS causes anxiety in many patients.
  • Anxiety, often combined with depression, is linked to a poorer quality of life, cognitive dysfunction, increased risk of suicide, and significant occupational and social problems.
  • Emotional problems in MS are typically exacerbated by fatigue, pain and poor sleep – all of which interfere with therapy and lifestyle adjustments.
  • Emotional changes in MS require treatment, just as physical symptoms do. This should comprise routine screening, targeted drug treatment and structured psychological and behavioural therapies.
  • Motivational coping styles that involve direct problem-solving and active participation in treatment planning (i.e. self-management) help people with MS adjust to their diagnosis.
  • Avoidance coping strategies generally lead to poorer psychological outcomes.
  • The presence of social support is a critical protective factor.

Impact of emotional changes

Emotional disorders have an adverse effect in people with MS, potentially impairing their ability to cope with disability and reducing overall health-related quality of life. Living with MS can also adversely affect relationships, for complex reasons, including both emotional and physical problems associated with the disease. Therefore, such symptoms must be recognised, addressed and treated, rather than dismissed as an inevitable or acceptable consequence of living with a chronic condition such as MS.

Emotional disturbances in people with MS may be reactive, i.e. a natural, adaptive psychological response to being diagnosed with a long-term, unpredictable and potentially disabling disease. Common emotions include grief, sadness, worry, fear, irritability and moodiness. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross in 1969 described five common stages of grief, best known by the acronym DABDA. We have added an extra A, for Anxiety about the future, to include the emotional reaction to a diagnosis of MS. The expands the mnemonic to six stages: DABDAA.

Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance, Anxiety

These emotional stages are considered ‘normal’ and an understandable coping mechanism. As with grieving, if they are prolonged, dominant and impact your social and occupational functioning, they are considered abnormal and require intervention. Remaining angry, resentful and depressed for decades will negatively impact your functioning. 

Anxiety and depression in MS

Anxiety affects people with MS with a frequency often matching or exceeding that of depression. The highest prevalence of anxiety is observed in people with MS with low physical disability, defined by an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of less than 3.0. This finding suggests that anxiety is driven less by accumulated physical deficit than by the psychological factors of worry, fear and the inherent unpredictability of MS.

Maladaptive coping strategies are strongly associated with an increased risk of developing mood symptoms. A tendency to use avoidance coping – disengaging from problems rather than confronting them – is a significant predictor of poorer psychological outcomes. Similarly, psychological traits such as low optimism or a less positive attitude can heighten the risk of anxiety.

For a significant subset of patients, MS may first present not to a neurologist, but to a primary care physician, a therapist or a psychiatrist, with symptoms of anxiety or depression. Because the symptoms are psychiatric, the underlying neurological cause is not yet suspected.

Quality of life and daily functioning

Anxiety is a major contributor to the overall disease burden of MS, affecting nearly every aspect of life. Studies show that anxiety, often combined with depression, is linked to a poorer quality of life, cognitive dysfunction, increased risk of suicide, and significant occupational and social problems.

The impact of anxiety on many of the most challenging symptoms of MS – notably fatigue, pain and sleep problems – may be greater even than the effect of depression.  MS symptoms can trigger or worsen anxiety, and the resulting anxiety intensifies the perception and severity of those same symptoms, thus creating a negative feedback loop.

Damaging health behaviours linked to undiagnosed and untreated anxiety can further compromise a patient’s well-being. For example, alcohol and substance abuse, as well as smoking, not only have their own intrinsic health risks but can also interfere with MS management and adherence to treatment. 

Anxiety as a reaction to living with MS

The direct impact of the disease on the brain’s emotional circuits occurs in parallel with the profound psychological and existential challenges of living with MS. Even in the absence of any direct neurological damage to mood-regulating centres, the lived experience of MS itself provides rationale for the development of severe anxiety. 

The unpredictability of the disease and the constant knowledge that a relapse could occur at any time, potentially worsening MS symptoms and existing function, create a state of chronic hypervigilance and worry. This pervasive sense of a loss of control over one’s own body and life is a catalyst for anxiety. Anxiety creates a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle where the physical and psychiatric symptoms mutually reinforce one another.

Anxiety cycle

Multiple stressors

Beyond this overarching uncertainty, living with MS entails a host of stressors.

  • Diagnosis. The diagnostic journey is a period of intense anxiety, often involving a prolonged period of uncertainty as symptoms are investigated. Once diagnosed, patients face a continuous process of adjusting and readjusting to changing abilities.
  • Hidden problems. The invisibility of some of the most burdensome symptoms, such as debilitating fatigue, cognitive fog, or sensory disturbances, can lead to a profound sense of feeling misunderstood, isolated and frustrated.
  • Visible symptoms. Conversely, the emergence of visible symptoms, like a limp or the need for a mobility aid, can bring its own anxieties related to stigma and self-image.
  • Daily life. Financial concerns related to healthcare costs, employment and the ability to continue working, as well as the impact of MS on relationships and potential parenting, may further increase anxiety. 

Existential threat

Profound existential and symbolic threats to a person’s sense of self can further exacerbate anxiety. The sense of loss triggered by a diagnosis of MS – loss of a healthy body, a previously held future and a former identity – is followed by changes in fundamental life roles. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy, guilt and a crisis of identity – perceived as a threat to one’s core self. The constant need to adapt to new limitations can feel like a continuous erosion of the self, and the fear of future disability becomes a fear of further loss of identity.

Addressing this existential dimension of anxiety is crucial for promoting long-term psychological adjustment and overall well-being. Treatment often involves helping individuals grieve their losses, redefine their sense of self and purpose within the context of their illness, and find new sources of meaning and value in their lives. 

Cognitive impairment

The impact of anxiety on cognitive function is well documented. Cognitive impairment, particularly slowed information processing speed, is a common and debilitating feature of MS. Anxiety has a detrimental effect on cognitive domains that are already compromised, such as attention and executive functions. It does this by increasing an individual’s awareness of task-irrelevant, often threat-related, stimuli, which interferes with the goal-oriented cognitive processing required for the task at hand. Thus, the underlying cognitive deficit from MS is compounded by the cognitive interference from anxiety, leading to a greater overall level of impairment than either condition would cause alone. Importantly, therefore, treating a patient’s anxiety can lead to measurable improvements in their cognitive functioning. 

Mood, fatigue, pain and sleep – a vicious cycle

Emotional problems rarely occur in isolation in MS; they are typically part of a clinical syndrome including fatigue, pain and poor sleep. This interconnected symptom cluster reduces health-related quality of life and establishes significant barriers to therapy and lifestyle modification.

Fatigue

Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms of MS, and it is strongly and consistently correlated with anxiety. This is not a simple correlation but a predictive relationship. Higher levels of anxiety at one point in time can predict the severity of fatigue at a later date. Conversely, higher levels of fatigue can predict the later development or worsening of anxiety.

The severity of depression in highly fatigued people with MS also makes the management of fatigue a high priority in reducing the overall psychiatric burden and allowing patients to engage in psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT).

Pain and emotional distress

A two-way relationship also exists between pain and anxiety, where anxiety is associated with higher reported pain intensity and greater interference of pain with daily activities.  The pain symptoms cause distress and anxiety, and the physical and mental state of anxiety (e.g. muscle tension, worry, poor sleep) in turn exacerbates the symptoms. Moderate or severe intensity pain that interferes with work, household activities or enjoyment of life affects about one-third of people with MS.

Sleep

Sleep is probably the most neglected MS-related problem in routine clinical practice; most people with MS have a sleep disorder. Depression, anxiety, pain and many other MS-related symptoms affect sleep quality. Therefore, it is challenging to manage MS-related emotional disorders without addressing sleep quality.

Lifestyle management and adherence

The cyclical nature of this grouping of mood disorder, fatigue, pain and poor sleep creates barriers to effective management. Emotional distress and physical symptoms can hamper efforts to start or maintain a healthy lifestyle. Since modifiable lifestyle factors (e.g. exercise) are associated with reduced pain burden, a vicious cycle is established: the disease causes emotional distress, the emotional distress prevents adherence to healthy behaviours, and the lack of healthy behaviours exacerbates physical symptoms.

Inappropriate laughing and crying

Inappropriate laughing and crying (pseudobulbar affect, PBA) are two neglected symptoms that often go undetected and untreated in people with MS. This doesn’t have to be the case. They are a further sign of significant damage to the brain and yet another reason to diagnose and treat MS early and effectively.

Case study 

When I first met her, she was in her early fifties. She had had MS for over 20 years. Her family now kept her at home, isolated from the wider world. Her behaviour would embarrass them. Why?

She suffered from pathological laughter and occasionally inappropriate crying; her husband and children could not deal with this in public. She was clearly very disabled when I met her; she was unsteady on her feet and had slurred speech and dancing eyes from cerebellar problems. She had gross cognitive impairment. When I introduced myself to her, she burst into tears. Within 2−3 months of starting sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), her husband informed me that her laughing and crying episodes had improved by over 50% and the family were now taking her out regularly. He was very grateful that I had been able to educate them about her symptoms and, more importantly, help her and them as a family deal with this problem.

PBA is diagnosed using standardised scales or questionnaires, which can be self-administered (Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale [CNS-LS]). These symptoms respond to tricyclic and SSRI antidepressants and to a combination pill (Nuedexta®; licensed in the USA) that includes dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate. 

Management of emotional disorders                                                     

Routine screening, targeted drug treatment and structured psychological and behavioural therapies are core components of integrated care in MS. Emotional changes in MS require treatment, just as physical symptoms do.

Screening and education

Routine screening for both anxiety and depression should be part of standard MS care and should be conducted at all scheduled neurological visits. You may be asked to complete different screening questionnaires for depression, anxiety, fatigue and poor sleep. Ideally these should be done before your appointment so that the healthcare professional (HCP) can act on them during the consultation. 

HCPs should educate their patients and their families about potential emotional changes associated with MS, in particular, irritability, crying and mood swings. This education should help reduce the stigma and embarrassment associated with emotional outbursts and enable the patient’s support network to develop coping strategies.

Drug treatment

Drug treatment must be tailored to the specific diagnosis and emotional disorder.

  • Depression and anxiety: The standard use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin−norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) is recommended for the management of clinical depression and anxiety disorders.
  • Irritability: Treatment options for irritability include SSRI antidepressants, which are often needed in addition to CBT. 
  • Pseudobulbar affect (PBA): Low-dose tricyclic or SSRI antidepressants can be effective in the treatment of PBA, but their use is off-label. In the USA, the combination of dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate has been approved for PBA. In other countries, the combination of these two drugs can be effective in PBA, but again, the use of these two drugs separately is off-label and not recommended.
  • Apathy: Therapeutic strategies, such as cognitive rehabilitation, that enhance cognitive processing speed and executive function are more appropriate for apathy than antidepressants. However, such approaches are hard to access on the UK NHS and are not available in many healthcare systems. There are no licensed medications for apathy, but anecdotal evidence suggests that fampridine and some stimulants may help.
  • Further research: Properly randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the effectiveness of drugs that some patients obtain and use without a prescription. These include cannabis, psychedelics and ketamine, which are currently not licensed for managing anxiety in MS and are not advised.

Psychological and behavioural interventions

Evidence-based structured psychological interventions are as important as drug treatment for the management of anxiety and depression and should be considered a first-line approach in MS. CBT can address maladaptive thought patterns (e.g. catastrophic thinking about the future) and avoidant behaviours common in anxiety. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) focuses on promoting psychological flexibility and acceptance, which is crucial for managing the reactive distress, grief and fear stemming from the unpredictable nature of the disease. Mindfulness, relaxation techniques and structured exercise programs have also been shown to manage anxiety and stress effectively. 

Interventions such as physical activity and social therapies enable some people with MS to process the grief and losses imposed by MS. Simple behavioural strategies, such as taking a break from a conversation when emotions escalate, can also be beneficial. 

Protective factors

Several protective factors can bolster resilience and lower the risk of anxiety. Motivational coping styles that involve direct problem-solving and active participation in treatment planning (i.e. self-management) are associated with better adjustment. One of the most critical protective factors is the presence of social support. Robust practical and emotional help from friends and family, and the knowledge that help is available if needed, significantly reduces the risk of mood symptoms. Finding ways to continue participating in previously enjoyed activities, albeit with new limitations, are key to coping. Interventions aimed at strengthening coping skills, fostering optimism and building social support networks can play a crucial role in preventing and treating anxiety in this population.

The therapeutic challenge

There is substantial symptom overlap between anxiety and depression (e.g. sleep disturbance, fatigue, difficulty concentrating) and between these mood disorders and the primary symptoms of MS. This can make it challenging for HCPs to discern whether a specific symptom, e.g. fatigue, is primarily a neurological symptom of MS, a physical symptom of depression, a consequence of the hyperarousal and poor sleep of anxiety, or a combination of all three. Use of appropriate screening tools can help to ensure that both anxiety and depression are accurately identified and appropriately treated.

Conclusion

MS profoundly affects emotional health across a broad and complex spectrum, manifesting as major depressive disorders, high levels of anxiety, the neurological syndrome of pseudobulbar affect, the cognitive−behavioural syndrome of apathy and, rarely, mania. These emotional changes are driven by primary damage to cortical-subcortical and brainstem circuits, coupled with reactive psychological distress resulting from living with a chronic, unpredictable illness. The current standard of care mandates routine screening, targeted drug treatments and psychological support utilising CBT and ACT. 

Cognition and mental health

Mental ill-health in MS: prevalence and causes

It is now well established that the burden of MS extends far beyond the purely neurological problems to include mental health.

Key points

  • Many patients with MS experience both anxiety and depression.
  • Other emotional and behavioural changes associated with MS include cognitive changes, apathy, inappropriate laughing and crying, euphoria, mania and bipolar disorder.
  • Physical symptoms like fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, numbness, tingling and dizziness may occur both in MS and in anxiety states, complicating diagnosis.
  • Unless severe anxiety symptoms are formally diagnosed as an anxiety disorder, individuals miss out on targeted treatments.
  • There is growing evidence that MS-related emotional changes are not necessarily a psychological consequence of living with a disability.
    • They may have a biological origin related to structural damage in the brain, caused by the MS disease process.
    • Brain imaging techniques that measure activity reveal how these brain networks function in real time.
  • Emotional changes sometimes occur as a side effect of medications used in the management of MS, including steroids used to treat MS relapses..

Background and introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that is typically defined by its physical manifestations, such as motor weakness, sensory disturbances and fatigue. However, the burden of MS extends far beyond the purely neurological problems to include cognitive changes and mental health disorders such as anxiety, depression, apathy, mania and uncontrolled laughter and crying.

Anxiety and depression in people with MS

Among the most prevalent mental health problems in MS is anxiety, a condition that for many years was overshadowed by the clinical and research focus on depression. Anxiety is not a secondary issue but a core component of the disease experience for many people with MS. Anxiety and depression in MS are closely related, with many patients experiencing both simultaneously. Indeed, the presence of depression in people with MS is a strong predictor of the future development of anxiety, and vice versa. Both conditions share common underlying psychological risk factors such as avoidant coping styles and low optimism as well as unhealthy behaviours like smoking or lack of exercise.

Many large-scale studies have shown that anxiety is more prevalent in the MS population than in the general population. Two meta-analyses published in 2017 and 2023 assessed more than 50 published studies; based on pooled results, they estimated that 22% and 36%, respectively, of people with MS experienced anxiety.1,2 The prevalence rates for depressive disorders in people with MS are about 20−30%. Further research, utilising the UK MS Register, suggests that more than half (54%) of the 4000 patients recorded in the database have experienced clinically significant anxiety and 47% have experienced depression.3

MH anxiety

The proportions of people with different levels of anxiety (normal, mild, moderate or severe) and who have a depression score of 8 or above (N = 1961). Data from UK MS Register.3

MH depression

The proportions of people with different levels of depression (normal, mild, moderate or severe) and who have an anxiety score of 8 or above (N = 2268).  Data from UK MS Register.3

By contrast, the lifetime prevalence of any anxiety disorder in the general population in the USA is around 29% (though the prevalence at a specific point in time is lower). Anxiety is also significantly more prevalent in MS than in many other chronic neurological conditions, suggesting a relationship that may be specific to the pathophysiology or lived experience of MS.

Psychiatric symptoms versus psychiatric disorders

A critical nuance in understanding the epidemiology of anxiety in MS lies in the distinction between clinically significant anxiety symptoms and formally diagnosed anxiety disorders. The two are related but not interchangeable, and the disparity between their prevalence rates reveals a crucial aspect of the clinical challenge. The 2017 meta-analysis that found a 22% prevalence for anxiety disorders also found a substantially higher (34%) prevalence of clinically significant anxiety symptoms. This discrepancy indicates that for every ten patients who meet the formal diagnostic criteria for a specific anxiety disorder, such as generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) or panic disorder, there are approximately 15 patients who experience a level of anxiety that is severe enough to cause distress and impair functioning but is not formally identified and diagnosed in a clinical setting. The result is that these individuals miss out on targeted interventions such as specific psychotherapies or drug treatment that they might otherwise receive.

This large population of symptomatic but undiagnosed individuals may exist for several reasons. First, there is considerable symptom overlap between anxiety and MS itself. Physical symptoms like fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, numbness, tingling and dizziness can be manifestations of either MS or an anxiety state, creating a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and confusion for people with MS. Second, both patients and clinicians may view anxiety as an ’understandable’ or ’normal’ psychological reaction to living with a chronic, unpredictable illness, rather than as a distinct, treatable clinical entity. Finally, the historical research emphasis on depression may have led to less routine screening for anxiety in clinical practice. As an MSologist, it is also essential to differentiate formal depressive disorders from clinically significant depressive symptoms, which are much commoner than disorders.

Among those who do meet the criteria for a formal disorder, GAD appears to be the most prevalent, followed by panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Recognising the full spectrum of anxiety, from subclinical symptoms to formal disorders, is essential for developing effective screening protocols and ensuring that all people with MS experiencing anxiety receive appropriate care (see article on management of mental ill-health in MS).

Other emotional and behavioural changes

MS impairs neuropsychiatric function (the interplay between neurological and psychological functioning) in a similar manner to its effects on other neurological functions. Living with MS can result in personality changes and subsequent relationship problems.

Cognitive changes

Cognitive impairment (i.e. dysfunction), particularly slowed information processing speed, is a common, well-documented and debilitating feature of MS. Anxiety has a demonstrably detrimental effect on cognitive domains that are often already compromised in MS, such as attention and executive functions.

Apathy

Apathy, characterised by profound loss of interest, blunted affect and reduced motivation, is also common in MS, particularly advanced MS. It is often misdiagnosed as depression. Apathy is not merely a component of low mood but is linked to executive dysfunction. Predictors identified include depressive symptoms, poor global quality of life, and poor attention and information processing speeds, probably due to MS lesions in the frontal lobe.

Inappropriate laughing and crying

Pathological laughing and crying, also known as pseudobulbar affect (PBA), are common but under-recognised and undertreated symptoms of MS that can be highly distressing and embarrassing for the patient and their relatives. The sudden, involuntary and explosive expressions of laughter or crying characteristic of PBA are often disproportionate or unrelated to the individual’s underlying emotional state.PBA is also associated with cognitive and mood problems, though the sudden and disproportionate emotional reactivity differentiates it from depression. The clinical presentation is due to frontal lobe or brainstem damage resulting from MS, which disrupts motor control pathways for emotional expression.  

Rare affective changes

Euphoria and mania are relatively uncommon in people with MS but are often triggered by high-dose steroids used to treat MS relapses.

Bipolar disorder is significantly more common in people with MS than in the general population; please see the separate post/chapter on this. The diagnosis must be made and treated by psychiatrists and involves lifelong therapy. 

The biological basis of mental illness in MS

MS-related emotional and mood changes are not necessarily a consequence of disability; they are often intrinsic to the MS disease process. This was recognised by the French neurologist Charcot, who, in 1877, noted pathological laughing, weeping, euphoria and depression in his patients who had MS.

Anxiety as a manifestation of MS pathology

While the psychological stress of living with a chronic illness contributes to anxiety in MS, there is growing evidence that anxiety is not solely a reactive or psychological phenomenon. The same autoimmune attack that damages myelin and axons, leading to physical disability, also targets and disrupts the complex neural circuits responsible for mood regulation, threat perception and emotional processing. 

Neuroinflammation and demyelination (damage to nerve insulation) are directly implicated in the development of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. MS lesions are not confined to areas of the brain responsible for motor and sensory function but also occur within the networks that govern emotion and mood.

Structural and functional brain changes

Research has shown that people with MS can develop gradual grey matter loss in brain regions involved in emotion and motivation, particularly the limbic system and the basal ganglia. The limbic system includes the hippocampus, amygdala and cingulate cortex, and it plays a central role in processing emotions. Changes in the shape of the hippocampus have also been observed.

MH limbic system

Primary components of the limbic system. Modified from Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.

These structural changes are thought to contribute to the development of mood and anxiety problems in MS. When MS-related inflammation, demyelination (damage to nerve insulation) or atrophy affects these areas, the brain’s ability to regulate fear and emotional responses can be disrupted. This creates a biological vulnerability to anxiety. From a structural perspective, therefore, anxiety in MS can be viewed as a direct consequence of neurological damage, in the same way that damage to the optic nerve causes visual impairment, or damage to the spinal cord leads to motor weakness.

In people with MS, depressive symptoms are consistently correlated with the volume of lesions in the brain and the degree of damage to connections between the cortex and subcortex. Neuroimaging studies show an association between depression and damage in the frontal and temporal areas of the cortex. In contrast, PBA is associated with lesions in the brainstem.

Brain imaging techniques that measure activity, such as functional MRI (fMRI), help to explain how these structural changes translate into anxiety symptoms. Rather than only showing where structural damage exists, fMRI studies reveal how brain networks function in real time. One key process identified in anxious people with MS is ‘fear overgeneralisation’. This occurs when the brain reacts to safe or neutral situations as if they were dangerous. For example, an individual learns to associate a specific signal (e.g. a picture of a circle) with a negative outcome (e.g. a mild electric shock). Anxious individuals tend to ’overgeneralise’ this fear, responding with fear to a similar but harmless signal (e.g. an oval), thus expanding their perception of danger in everyday life.

fMRI studies show that this process mainly involves the hippocampus (which is responsible for comparing incoming new experiences with ‘learned’ memories of danger) and the anterior insula (which plays a key role in generating the physical and emotional feeling of fear). In MS patients with anxiety, the physical pathways connecting these two regions are often disrupted, so that accurate information from the hippocampus is less effectively communicated to the anterior insula. As a result, the anterior insula may generate strong fear responses even when a situation is only mildly threatening or even safe.

fMRI studies have also revealed that many MS patients exhibit greater brain responses or increased recruitment of key emotional regions (e.g. prefrontal cortex and amygdala) compared to healthy controls. This likely reflects compensatory mechanisms the brain deploys to limit the clinical expression of emotional symptoms. The damaged MS brain tries to cope.

Neurological versus psychological causes

MS can trigger primary psychopathology as a result of demyelination and damage to specific functional circuits within the brain, as described above. It can be challenging to differentiate primary organic issues from reactive psychological problems, which is why people with MS may be referred for psychiatric assessments. 

I have, however, also seen patients in whom the initial symptoms were psychiatric, e.g. depression or (rarely) mania, but who were later found to have MS. The link between MS-related CNS damage and emotional symptoms is based on lesion location and lesion burden. For example, MS patients with lesions affecting the functional parts of the brain (rather than the connecting structures) exhibit a higher burden of emotional symptoms than those with lesions confined to the spinal cord. Our emotions are part of brain function in a similar way to motor function. Therefore, it is not surprising that MS impacts emotions. 

Lesion location and emotional symptoms

The evidence for a direct correlation between lesion location and anxiety is inconsistent. Some researchers suggest that, unlike depression, anxiety in MS may be driven more by psychosocial pressures and the psychological reaction to the illness rather than by focal brain damage. This discrepancy does not necessarily invalidate the biological basis of anxiety in MS. It may be that anxiety is related to more diffuse or subtle pathological changes, such as microstructural damage in white matter tracts or widespread neuroinflammation, that are not easily captured by conventional MRI lesion analysis. It is also possible that the broad distribution of the brain’s anxiety circuits means that damage to any number of different locations could produce a similar clinical outcome, making it difficult to pinpoint a single ’anxiety-causing’ lesion location. 

Other contributing factors

Emotional changes may occur as a side effect of medications used in the management of MS, including certain disease-modifying therapies. People with MS are also susceptible to the effects of the menopause, seasonal affective disorder and comorbidities associated with depression and anxiety, such as alcohol and other substance misuse disorders. It is advisable, therefore, to have a complete assessment before having a mood disorder labelled as being due to MS. 

Anxiety in MS may also be caused by high-dose corticosteroids, which are the standard treatment for MS relapses. Steroids have significant neuropsychiatric side effects, including anxiety, mania, insomnia and psychosis. For someone with MS already dealing with the stress of a relapse, the addition of steroid-induced anxiety can be particularly distressing.

‘Prodromal’ MS and psychiatric symptoms

Psychiatric comorbidities, such as anxiety and depression, have historically been viewed as consequences that follow the diagnosis of MS. Recent research, however, points to the existence of an ‘MS prodrome’, during which anxiety and depression occur years before the first classical neurological event.4 Increased rates of anxiety are a significant feature of this prodromal phase, suggesting that anxiety and/or depression may be early signs of MS, not merely a consequence. This body of recent research supports the idea that psychiatric symptoms in MS have a biological origin. This is most likely driven by the same low-level, diffuse neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes that are smouldering away in the CNS long before the first eloquent MS lesion.

References

  1. Boeschoten, RE et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2017;372:331−341.
  2. Zhang X et al. The prevalence and risk factors of anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci 2023;17:1120541.
  3. Jones KH, et al. A large-scale study of anxiety and depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a survey via the web portal of the UK MS Register. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e41910.
  4. Ruiz-Algueró, M et al. Health care use before multiple sclerosis symptom onset. JAMA Netw Open 2025;8:e2524635.
Detail, DMTsDetail, Treatment strategy

What are the attributes of the specific DMTs?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment has evolved rapidly, with 11 classes of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) now available in the UK. I will summarise them briefly and explain how they fit within a treatment paradigm for effective and safe use.

Maintenance therapies versus immune reconstitution: what’s the difference?

There is a divide between the two main treatment philosophies: maintenance ̶ escalation versus immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs).

An IRT is given as a short course – a one-off treatment in the case of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) or intermittently for alemtuzumab, cladribine or mitoxantrone. IRTs are not given continuously, and additional courses are given only if inflammatory activity recurs. IRTs can induce long-term remission and, in some cases, potentially a cure.

Maintenance therapies, by comparison, are given continuously without an interruption in dosing (‘continuous’ administration may be daily, one or more times weekly, monthly or even once every few months). Although maintenance therapies can induce long-term remission, they cannot, by definition, result in a cure. The recurrence or continuation of inflammatory activity indicates a suboptimal response to treatment and typically requires a treatment switch. Ideally, this switch should be an escalation to a more effective class of DMT.

An article in our list of key questions, entitled How do I want my MS to be treated?, provides a more detailed comparison of maintenance and IRT therapies, including frequency of administration, efficacy, risks, use in pregnancy, vaccine response and potential for a cure.

The DMTs currently licensed in the UK (in August 2024) are listed in the table under the relevant category.

table format updated 180625 SS

Disease-modifying therapies for MS licensed in the UK. *Please note, Bonspri is available in other markets but not the UK.

How effective are the different DMTs?

The measures used to assess the effectiveness of a DMT include its ability to reduce or prevent relapses, focal inflammatory activity (that is, new or enlarging lesions) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and disability progression. Additional factors that can help to assess the relative efficacy of DMTs include the proportion of clinical trial subjects who experience improvement in disability and the impact of the treatment on brain volume loss.

The MS-Selfie InfoCards are an easy-to-use resource to help people with MS compare the key features of each DMT. They contain bite-sized information designed to aid treatment choices and an overview of the key aspects of each DMT.

Efficacy of the licensed DMTs for MS can be visualised as pyramid, with the moderately effective treatments at the bottom and the more effective approaches at the top. What determines the most appropriate DMT efficacy level for an individual depends on several factors, such as baseline prognostic profile, family planning requirements, local or national treatment guidelines, socioeconomic factors, consideration of any co-existing illnesses, cognitive impairment, risk aversion and lifestyle issues.

Pyramid format updated 180625 SS

UK licensed DMTs for MS, in ascending order of efficacy.
HSCT/AHSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation/autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

What is the goal of treatment? Introducing NEIDA as a target

In the past, we used no evident disease activity (NEDA) as a treatment target. ‘Disease activity’ included progression or disease worsening independent of relapse activity (termed smouldering MS). Although some of the more effective DMTs may modify this stage of the disease, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching or stopping a DMT based simply on smouldering MS disease activity. 

Relapses and ongoing focal MRI activity are associated with a worse short-term to intermediate-term prognosis. These observations have led to the increasing adoption of ‘no evident inflammatory disease activity’ (NEIDA) as a new treatment target. For more information about treatment targets, please see the article in our key questions, Do I understand the concepts of treat-2-target and NEDA?

Many healthcare professionals (HCPs) remain sceptical of using NEIDA as a treatment target, fearing that this could lead to more people with MS being on ‘riskier’ high-efficacy therapies. However, achieving long-term remission, or NEIDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated-to-target of NEIDA from the outset do better than those whose treatment is escalated following breakthrough disease (at a clinical or subclinical/MRI level)1. I would, therefore, strongly encourage people with MS and their HCPs to adopt NEIDA as an initial treatment target.

Flipping the pyramid

The effectiveness, or relative effectiveness, of individual DMTs becomes less critical in the context of a treatment target of NEIDA. Choosing a DMT with a lower efficacy rate simply means that a greater proportion of treated people with MS will need to be switched to higher efficacy therapies over time to achieve NEIDA. We refer to the latter of these three approaches – starting with high-efficacy treatment – as flipping the pyramid. In recent trials of alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab, people with MS randomised to 2 years of lower efficacy DMTs (interferon-beta-1a or teriflunomide) had poorer outcomes than those receiving highly active therapy from the outset. Real-world data from registries also support this; groups of people with MS with delayed access to high-efficacy DMTs did worse than those who received high-efficacy treatments early.1,2

Horizontal versus vertical switching

If we consider the conventional step care paradigm, people with MS who switch horizontally from interferon-beta to glatiramer acetate, or vice-versa (i.e. from one moderate efficacy DMT to another moderate efficacy DMT) do less well than those who switch vertically to fingolimod, a highly effective DMT. Similarly, people with MS escalating to natalizumab, a very high-efficacy DMT, do better than those being escalated to the less effective, but still high-efficacy, DMT fingolimod. 

Continuous and intermittent immunosuppression

Another useful way of classifying DMTs is whether they are immunosuppressive, that is, they reduce the activation, or effectiveness, of the immune system. Drug regulators stipulate that a drug may be classified as immunosuppressive if it (1) causes significant lymphopaenia (low lymphocyte count) or leukopenia (low white blood cell count), (2) is associated with opportunistic infections, (3) reduces the antibody and immune response to vaccines and (4) increases the risk of secondary malignancies.

The duration and intensity of immunosuppression further determine the risks. For example, short-term or intermittent immunosuppression associated with IRTs front-loads the risks, which are substantially lower once the immune system has reconstituted itself. In comparison, long-term continuous or persistent immunosuppression, which occurs with some of the maintenance DMTs, accumulates problems over time, particularly opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies. You can read more detail on this topic in the key question How immunosuppressed am I? The following table summarises the main attributes of intermittent and persistent immunosuppression.

How immunosuppressed are you table updated format 180625 SS

The main characteristics of continuous (persistent) and short-term (intermittent) immunosuppression. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.2
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Adverse effects, monitoring and risk reduction

The complications associated with immunosuppression vary from DMT to DMT. Each individual drug summary in the DMTs section of MS-Selfie contains detailed information about the main adverse events, key monitoring requirements, use (or contraindication) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and response to vaccines. The MS-Selfie InfoCards provide bite-sized summaries of several practical aspects, including side effects, to enable easy comparison of any treatments you are considering; some of this information is collated below for easy reference.

Short-term versus long-term adverse effects

Each drug has been given scores from 1 to 10 based on published analyses of its short-term and long-term side effects. Short-term refers to side effects that emerge when a treatment is started and decrease in severity or disappear within days or weeks. A well-known example of short-term side effects on starting interferon-beta is flu-like symptoms that typically abate within 4 ̶ 8 weeks.

A long-term side effect persists for months or doesn’t disappear on continuing the DMT. Examples include intermittent but persistent flushing after taking dimethyl fumarate, or low B lymphocyte counts with anti-CD20 therapies that may lead to low antibody or immunoglobulin levels (hypogammaglobulinaemia).

A low score denotes few or rare side effects; a high score denotes many or frequent side effects. The score does not correlate to a percentage. More information can be found in each drug summary and the manufacturer’s Summary of Product Characteristics.

Scores for short-term and long-term side effects assigned to the individual DMTs summarised in the MS-Selfie InfoCards, based on a published network meta-analysis.3
Alem, alemtuzumab; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFN-beta; interferon-beta; Nat, natalizumab.

Monitoring and risk reduction

Numerous tests are carried out at the start of treatment, and ongoing monitoring is required for many factors, to reduce the risk from adverse events. The key question, How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?, explains what needs to be done at the start of DMT administration (baseline) and during subsequent monitoring. The specifics vary from DMT to DMT; please refer to the individual summaries for details such as baseline tests, follow-up, infection prevention, cancer risk, pregnancy, breastfeeding and vaccination. It is important to remember that all licensed MS DMTs have had a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment, and their benefits are considered to outweigh the potential risks.

Administration and other practical considerations

Routes and frequency of administration

The MS-Selfie InfoCards contain a symbol for each DMT, showing how it is administered. Some DMTs are available in more than one formulation (e.g. tablets and injection). The frequency of administration varies greatly from DMT to DMT; please consult the relevant summary in the DMTs section and discuss your preferences and priorities with your MS HCP.

The route of administration for each drug in the MS-Selfie InfoCards is clearly identified by the relevant symbol. (If a DMT is available in more than one formulation, there is a separate card for each delivery route.)

Number of clinic visits

It may be important for you to consider the frequency of clinic visits. This will depend on factors such as the delivery route of your DMT, the monitoring requirements of the drug regulators and the risk of specific side effects. The table below summarises the assessments from the MS-Selfie InfoCards. This is another factor to consider in discussions with your MS HCPs about the most appropriate DMT for you.

Conclusions

People with MS must understand the objectives of MS treatments and the different treatment strategies currently available to achieve these objectives. Although the MS therapeutic landscape is complex and hence may seem overwhelming, framing the choices using a relatively simple construct should help each individual to make informed decisions about managing their MS. MS-Selfie aims to guide you in the process of deciding on the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and specific DMT for treating your disease.

References

  1. Rotstein D, et al. Association of No Evidence of Disease Activity with no long-term disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2022;99:e209̶ ̶ 20.
  2. Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.
  3. Samjoo IA, et al. Efficacy classification of modern therapies in multiple sclerosis. J Comp Eff Res 2021;10:495–507.
Pregnancy and childbirth, Women's health

Breastfeeding if you are on a DMT

This section explains how relapse is managed during breastfeeding and provides detailed guidance on which DMTs are safe (or not safe) to use while breastfeeding.

Will I be able to breastfeed after delivery?

Yes, I see no reason why you can’t breastfeed if you have MS. However, certain DMTs cross over into the breast milk and may affect the baby; these include teriflunomide, cladribine and S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod and ponesimod). Although monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab) cross over in small amounts, the levels are generally too low to affect the newborn. In addition, the level of the antibodies will likely be further reduced by their digestion as proteins in the baby’s intestinal tract.

Please be aware that most DMTs are licensed with no breastfeeding safety data. Hence, the information in the manufacturer’s Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is not the same as that given to you by neurologists and other HCPs. For example, SmPC information for the fumarates (dimethyl fumarate and diroximel fumarate) states:

“It is unknown whether dimethyl fumarate or its metabolites are excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. A decision must be made whether to discontinue breastfeeding or to discontinue Tecfidera therapy. The benefit of breastfeeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the woman should be taken into account.”

This is very unhelpful as their active compound, monomethyl fumarate, is a naturally occurring metabolite compounded with many other medications considered safe in pregnancy, e.g. ferrous fumarate, an iron supplement. This is why I tell my female patients on fumarates they can breastfeed without concern for their baby.

We normally don’t recommend alemtuzumab treatment during breastfeeding simply because it carries the risk of listeriosis and infusion reactions, and the medications used to prevent these adverse events cross over into breast milk. In addition, the acute immunosuppression associated with alemtuzumab may increase the risk of breast infections. In general, I advise my female patients to breastfeed for 4 ̶ 6 weeks to give the baby the health benefits of breastfeeding and then to start or be retreated with alemtuzumab after this period.

For cladribine, it is important not to breastfeed whilst being dosed with the drug and for 10 days after the last pill. The recommended 10-day requirement is probably a bit long as cladribine is undetectable in the body after 48 ̶ 72 hours. In my experience, the requirement of a 14- or 15-day gap (4 or 5 days of dosing plus an additional 10 days) in breastfeeding is hard; therefore, most women who want to be treated with cladribine either delay treatment until they have completed breastfeeding or breastfeed for 4 ̶ 6 weeks before stopping and being treated with cladribine.

Breastfeeding

Guidance for women who are considering whether it is safe to breastfeed while taking a specific DMT.

I am aware that many women feel pressured into breastfeeding. However, if you are anxious about having MS rebound post-partum, deciding not to breastfeed and starting or resuming your DMT as soon as possible is not unreasonable. The decision is a personal choice.

How is a relapse managed during breastfeeding?

In the event of a relapse during breastfeeding, a short course of high-dose corticosteroids can be considered. Methylprednisolone – the steroid often used to manage MS relapses – is transferred into breast milk. However, the amount an infant is exposed via breast milk is low (equivalent to less than 1% of the adult dose). Some clinicians recommend women breastfeed before a steroid infusion, express breast milk 1 ̶ 2 hours after the infusion and discard it, to limit the baby’s exposure to methylprednisolone. I don’t think this is necessary.

References

Krysko KM et al. Treatment of women with multiple sclerosis planning pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2021;23:11.

Other articles in this series on Pregnancy and childbirth
Planning for pregnancy
Managing MS during pregnancy
Preparing to give birth
Concerns about parenting

Pregnancy and childbirth, Women's health

Managing MS during pregnancy

Opinion on how MS impacts pregnancy is based largely on data that predate the current era of active treatment and the newer generation of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In this section I have therefore addressed many of the important issues that women who are considering pregnancy need to understand, including:

  • the effect of pregnancy on the course of MS
  • how to manage relapse during pregnancy
  • the role of naturally occurring interferon-beta and its possible implications for women with MS taking therapeutic interferon-beta
  • management of MS symptoms and morning sickness during pregnancy
  • the crucial issue of DMT safety and possible teratogenic effects on the developing foetus.

Will pregnancy affect the course of my MS?

Yes, pregnancy effects on MS have been observed at a group level, though it is difficult to notice changes in individuals. It is well known that MS attack rates drop during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and relapses rebound again in the first 6 months after delivery. However, only a minority of women with MS have post-partum relapses. Breastfeeding may blunt the post-partum rebound, but this is not absolute. Therefore, most neurologists now recommend starting or restarting DMTs soon after delivery to try and prevent post-partum relapses.

At a population level, the more children you have, the better your overall prognosis. This effect is small and is based on studies done in the pre-DMT era. It may be due to the immunological effects of pregnancy that work like a DMT in MS. Immunologists have tried to understand this phenomenon in the hope of developing treatments for MS that mimic the pregnancy state.

How is a relapse managed during pregnancy?

In the event of having a relapse during pregnancy, a short course of high-dose corticosteroids can be considered. However, I limit using steroids to disabling and/or severe relapses, especially early in the first trimester, as there is a small risk of orofacial abnormalities (cleft lip and palate) and reduced birth weight from exposure of the developing foetus to high-dose steroids. There is also a risk of precipitating gestational diabetes in women receiving high doses of steroids during pregnancy. In the rare situation of a severe relapse unresponsive to high-dose steroids, plasma exchange may need to be considered.

Could neutralising antibodies to therapeutic interferon-beta affect my baby?

Naturally occurring interferon-beta is a cytokine (cell-signalling agent) produced by the body to help fight infections. As there is only one human interferon-beta, antibodies to therapeutic interferon-beta (IFN-beta) will neutralise the body’s own natural interferon-beta. If you are taking IFN-beta for your MS, there is thus a theoretical risk that neutralising antibodies (NABs) to the DMT might cross the placenta and affect the role of human interferon-beta in foetal development.

Interferon-beta is important for innate immunity and neutralising your own interferon-beta may put you at risk of getting viral infections. Interferon-beta also plays a role in foetal bone development, but the placenta does not mature in relation to immunoglobulin transfer until near the end of the second trimester of pregnancy, so it is unlikely that sufficient NABs cross the blood ̶ placental barrier to affect foetal bone development. However, in the third trimester, NABs will cross over the placenta into the foetal circulation and may impact the baby’s innate immunity. Despite these theoretical concerns, there is no indication from published data to support these potential adverse effects of NABs on IFN-beta.

If I fall pregnant while on a DMT, will this affect the baby?

This depends on which DMT you are taking and what you mean by ‘affecting the baby’. We worry most about teratogenic effects, which describe congenital malformations. Teriflunomide, S1P modulators and cladribine are generally classified as drugs that may be teratogenic, and hence precautions need to be taken so as not to fall pregnant on these agents. Foetal malformations usually occur very early in foetal development, often before the woman knows she is pregnant; therefore, it is difficult to do anything about it once foetal exposure occurs. Despite this, even for women who are on these agents and fall pregnant, we don’t automatically recommend termination of pregnancy. We refer them to the high-risk pregnancy clinic to discuss the options with an obstetrician. Many women continue their pregnancies with an uneventful outcome and a normal baby. On the other hand, some women choose the option of terminating their pregnancy.

A large amount of data from MS pregnancy registries and post-marketing surveillance indicates no increased risk of major congenital anomalies or spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) after exposure to interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate. Most neurologists are, therefore, comfortable with their female patients falling pregnant on these agents, continuing the treatment through pregnancy and then breastfeeding their babies.

Fumarates (dimethyl fumarate [Tecfidera], diroximel fumarate [Vumerity]) are not teratogenic and are unlikely to have a negative impact on pregnancy outcomes. We need more data from registries and post-marketing surveillance before we can be confident that the fumarates are safe during pregnancy. However, these agents are prodrugs and converted to monomethyl fumarate, which is part of our metabolism, so it is very unlikely that the fumarates will cause problems. I don’t have an issue with women falling pregnant on the fumarates and continuing them through pregnancy, but there is conflicting advice about this.

Should I continue taking drugs for my MS symptoms during pregnancy?

Yes and no. It depends on what the medications are for and whether they are safe during pregnancy. Ideally, you should wean off any symptomatic therapies or at least change to alternative medications that are safe to take during pregnancy. It is important to try and plan your pregnancy and if necessary be referred to a special medical pregnancy clinic so that these issues can be addressed. Many women with MS find that their MS-related symptoms improve during pregnancy, and they can do without symptomatic therapies. However, unless you are prepared to wean yourself off symptomatic therapies you won’t know.

Physical therapies should be continued during pregnancy. One could argue that everyone with MS should be physically active and do pelvic floor exercises. Pregnancy and childbirth may impact bladder and bowel function, so it is important to see a pelvic floor therapist to start pelvic floor exercises. The latter are taught to women in antenatal classes.

How do you treat morning sickness or hyperemesis gravidarum during pregnancy?

Treating morning sickness or hyperemesis gravidarum is no different in women with MS than in the general population. It involves hydration, vitamin supplements (in particular, thiamine) and the judicious use of antiemetics (for example, cyclizine, prochlorperazine, promethazine, chlorpromazine, metoclopramide and domperidone). If the vomiting extends into the second trimester, ondansetron can be used. In very severe cases of morning sickness, steroids may be required; for example, hydrocortisone 100 mg twice daily can be converted to prednisolone 40 ̶ 50 mg daily by mouth, which can then be tapered to the lowest level that still controls symptoms. For patients taking a fumarate, try and take your medication later in the morning when you are less likely to vomit.

What dose of vitamin D do you advise during pregnancy?

During pregnancy vitamin D requirements are increased and I recommend doubling the dose for supplementation from 4,000 IU of vitamin D3 to 8,000 IU per day. At the same time, women who are pregnant should be on iron and folate supplements that should ideally be started before falling pregnant.

References

Krysko KM et al. Treatment of women with multiple sclerosis planning pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2021;23:11.

Other articles in this series on Pregnancy and childbirth
Planning for pregnancy
Preparing to give birth
Breastfeeding if you are on a DMT
Concerns about parenting

Pregnancy and childbirth, Women's health

Planning for pregnancy

This article discusses the effects of MS on fertility, decisions about starting or stopping a DMT, the use and safety of oral contraceptives and the possible impact of in vitro fertilisation on MS disease course.

Does MS affect my fertility?

No, MS does not affect fertility. Women and men with MS are as fertile as people without MS. However, MS does not protect women and men from other causes of infertility. Fertility treatment may impact MS (see below). Please be aware that mitoxantrone, AHSCT (autologous haemopoietic stem cell treatment) and other chemotherapy treatments, such as cyclophosphamide used off-label to treat MS, may be toxic to ovarian and testicular function and require egg and sperm banking before treatment.

Should I go onto a DMT and get my MS under control before starting a family or first start my family?

In general, I recommend that women with active MS delay pregnancy until their disease is under control, optimise their general health and prepare properly for becoming a parent. There is no point in having active MS, not starting a DMT and having a catastrophic relapse in the period during which you are trying to fall pregnant.

However, a desire to start or extend your family should not change the way you want your MS managed. Early effective treatment, treating to a target of NEIDA, potentially flipping the pyramid, preventing end-organ damage and the holistic management of MS are all compatible with pregnancy. There are no rules for implementing this strategy in pregnancy because all decisions should be personalised. For example, a woman with rapidly evolving severe MS may choose natalizumab and stay on it throughout pregnancy and while breastfeeding because her MS was so active and potentially devastating. Another woman who is young, risk adverse and with a very good prognosis may choose to delay starting a DMT until she has had a child. Yet another woman, diagnosed at 40, may not want to delay falling pregnant and may opt for a DMT that is safe during pregnancy.

It is up to the person with MS, their partner and sometimes their extended family to make the final decisions about how to manage their MS during pregnancy. The healthcare professional (HCP) is there to provide information and guidance in this process.

Are oral contraceptives safe in people with MS?

To my knowledge, contraceptives are safe and effective in women with MS. The same contraindications and relative contraindications to specific contraceptives apply to women with MS as to the general population. Hormonal contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis; women with MS who are immobile thus have a higher risk of deep vein thrombosis than those who are mobile.

Which contraceptive would you recommend?

MS should not be the deciding factor around the choice of contraceptive unless the degree of MS-related disability makes managing menstrual hygiene difficult. In this case, contraceptives that suppress menstruation have advantages, for example, continuous hormonal contraceptives or the progestin-tipped intrauterine contraceptive device (Mirena).

Inclusion criteria for participation in specific drug trials sometimes mandate double contraception, for example, a hormonal contraceptive and a barrier method. This is to try and avoid accidental pregnancies while taking an investigational compound without a safety track record in humans.

How long before I fall pregnant must I stop my DMT?

It depends on which DMT you are taking. Only the DMTs that are teratogenic or potentially teratogenic (i.e., may cause foetal malformations) need to be stopped before you fall pregnant. It is essential to allow sufficient time for these agents to be eliminated from the body.

Teriflunomide

Teriflunomide has the potential to cause birth defects; therefore, patients must have effective contraception whilst on this treatment. It has a very long half-life because it is reabsorbed in the intestine and is eliminated slowly from the plasma. Without an accelerated elimination procedure, it takes up to 8 months to reach plasma concentrations of less than 0.02 mg/l, which are considered safe. Remarkably, due to individual variations in teriflunomide clearance, it may take up to 2 years to fall to acceptable levels. An accelerated elimination procedure with cholestyramine or activated charcoal can be used at any time after the discontinuation of teriflunomide.

Teriflunomide accelerated elimination procedure

After stopping treatment with teriflunomide:

• Cholestyramine 8 g is administered three times daily for 11 days, or cholestyramine 4 g three times a day can be used if cholestyramine 8 g three times a day is not well tolerated.

• Alternatively, 50 g of activated powdered charcoal is administered every 12 hours for 11 days.

Following either of the accelerated elimination procedures, it is recommended to verify elimination by checking teriflunomide blood levels and allow a waiting period of 1.5 months between the first occurrence of a plasma concentration below 0.02 mg/l and planned fertilisation.

S1P modulators

S1P modulators are contraindicated during pregnancy, owing to the risk to the foetus. Before starting treatment in women of childbearing potential, we do a urine pregnancy test. Women taking an S1P modulator must use effective contraception during treatment and then continue for:

  • 2 months after stopping treatment with fingolimod (Gilenya)
  • 10 days after stopping treatment with siponimod (Mayzent)
  • 3 months after stopping treatment with ozanimod (Zeposia)
  • 7 days after stopping treatment with ponesimod (Ponvory).

Stopping the S1P modulators brings the potential for rebound disease activity, so most neurologists now prefer to transition women on one of these therapies to another class of DMT that is considered safer in pregnancy.

Safer options

Safer options during pregnancy include an injectable (interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate), a fumarate, an anti-CD20 therapy, natalizumab or an immune reconstitution therapy (cladribine or alemtuzumab). I cover some of the issues related to anti-CD20 therapies in the MS-Selfie case study ‘Wait to fall pregnant or start a DMT now?’.

The good news is that several DMT options are now available to women with MS wanting to fall pregnant.

Can I have IVF, and what will IVF do to my MS?

There is no reason why a person with MS cannot have IVF (in vitro fertilisation). However, there appears to be a slightly increased risk of relapse after IVF and egg harvesting. Whether this is due to stopping DMTs before undergoing IVF or due to the drugs used to stimulate ovulation is unknown. Studies reporting an increase in disease activity after IVF are more likely to be published than studies not showing such an increase so that publication bias may affect the findings. I recommend viewing IVF as a planned pregnancy and giving women with MS the option of receiving a DMT that is relatively safe in pregnancy or treating their MS with immune reconstitution therapy before IVF.

References

Krysko KM et al. Treatment of women with multiple sclerosis planning pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2021;23:11.

Other articles in this series on Pregnancy and childbirth:
Managing MS during pregnancy
Preparing to give birth
Breastfeeding if you are on a DMT
Concerns about parenting

Pregnancy and childbirth, Women's health

What impact does MS have on pregnancy and having children?

MS affects mainly women during their childbearing years and, as a result, impacts pregnancy, family planning and decisions about starting or extending a family. Opinion on this subject is based largely on data that predate the current era of active treatment and the newer generation of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). I have addressed the many issues around this subject by answering several questions that have arisen in my MS practice over the years. Please see below for details of topics that you can find in the section on Pregnancy and childbirth.

Planning for pregnancy

Here I discuss the effects of MS on fertility, decisions about starting or stopping a DMT, the use and safety of oral contraceptives and the possible impact of in vitro fertilisation on MS disease course.

Read more

Managing MS during pregnancy

Some important topics discussed in this section include:

  • the effect of pregnancy on the course of MS
  • how to manage relapse during pregnancy
  • the role of naturally occurring interferon-beta, and its possible implications for women with MS taking therapeutic interferon-beta
  • management of MS symptoms and morning sickness during pregnancy
  • the crucial issue of DMT safety and possible teratogenic effects on the developing foetus.

Read more

Preparing to give birth

Some of the concerns that people with MS raise about giving birth are covered here, such as the possible need for assisted delivery, the likelihood of a normal vaginal delivery and the use of pain-relieving measures.

Read more

Breastfeeding if you are on a DMT

This section explains how relapse is managed during breastfeeding and provides detailed guidance on which DMTs are safe (or not safe) to use while breastfeeding.

Read more

Concerns about parenting

Being disabled or unemployed because of MS does not mean you cannot be a good parent. In this section, I consider some important issues to explore with your partner and/or family before deciding. I also discuss the anxiety many of you may have about your children getting MS and the steps you can take to reduce this potential risk.

Read more

You may find the following review of managing pregnancy in women with MS helpful:

Krysko KM et al. Treatment of women with multiple sclerosis planning pregnancy. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2021;23:11.

Treatment strategy

Do I understand the concepts of treat-2-target and NEDA?

Has anyone discussed a treatment target with you, including the need to rebaseline your disease activity? Have the concepts of preventing end-organ damage to the central nervous system (the ‘end-organ’ in MS) and brain volume loss or atrophy been broached?

Key points

  • Achieving long-term remission is a well-established treatment target in MS and several other autoimmune diseases.
  • Key measures of MS disease activity are used to define composite treatment targets; they provide objective means for monitoring and decision-making.
  • To demonstrate a target of no evident disease activity (NEDA) requires a minimum of three criteria to be met: no relapses, no MRI activity and no disability progression.
  • More stringent definitions of NEDA targets have evolved and will continue to do so as new predictors of treatment response are developed.

If you are on a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), what is the objective or treatment target for your MS? This is another question to be answered before committing yourself to a specific treatment strategy.

Treat-2-target

Relapses and ongoing focal inflammatory activity on MRI (new or enlarging T2 lesions and T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions [Gd-enhancing]) are associated with poor outcomes. This has led to the adoption of ‘no evident disease activity’ (NEDA) as a treatment target in MS. NEDA, or NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of MS disease activity: (i) no relapses, (ii) no MRI activity (new or enlarging T2 lesions or Gd-enhancing lesions) and (iii) no disability progression. NEDA is an important goal for treating individuals with MS.

When to rebaseline

To use NEDA as a treatment target in day-to-day clinical practice, it is advisable to be ‘rebaselined’ after the onset of action of the DMT you have been started on. The timing of the MRI to provide a new baseline depends on the DMT concerned. The recommendations for immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) are very different from those for maintenance therapies. In the case of an IRT (for example alemtuzumab or cladribine, which are given as short courses), breakthrough disease activity can be used as an indicator to retreat rather than necessarily to switch therapy. Therefore, a rebaselining MRI should be delayed until after the final course of therapy, e.g. 2 years, or close enough to the time when a third, or subsequent course, can be administered.

Determining treatment failure: IRTs

Questions remain of how many treatment cycles need to be given before considering that a specific IRT has not been effective.

  • For alemtuzumab, the threshold is three cycles under NHS England’s treatment algorithm (based on their cost-effectiveness analysis). Alemtuzumab is a biological or protein-based treatment, so the risk of developing neutralising anti-drug antibodies increases with each infusion.
  • Cladribine on the other hand is a small molecule, so neutralising antibodies are not a problem and there is no real limit on the number of courses that can be given.
  • Although HSCT tends to be a one-off treatment, there are rare reports of people with MS receiving more than one cycle.

Please note there are potentially cumulative risks associated with multiple cycles of an IRT: secondary malignancies in the case of HSCT and persistent lymphopaenia with cladribine. 

Determining treatment failure: maintenance therapies

In comparison to IRTs, if you have disease activity on a particular maintenance DMT, and provided you have been adherent to your treatment, this is usually interpreted as a suboptimal response or non-response and it should trigger a switch to another class of DMT. 

A criticism of NEDA is the omission of so-called ‘non-relapse-associated disease worsening’ as a component of the treatment target (in addition to evidence of incomplete recovery from relapses). I refer to this disease worsening as smouldering MS. Worsening disability in the absence of relapses may have little to do with ongoing focal inflammatory activity. It may simply represent a delayed dying-off of axons and nerve fibres following earlier focal inflammatory lesions. As a result, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching, or stopping a DMT, based simply on non-relapse-associated worsening disability. For more information, please see Getting worse – smouldering MS.

Beyond NEDA-3

The definition of NEDA is evolving with clinical practice. Some centres are now testing for brain volume loss (that is, brain atrophy) and/or increased neurofilament light chain (NFL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as part of the NEDA-3 treatment target. NEDA-4 builds on NEDA-3, by including the target of normalising brain atrophy rates to within the normal range. The problem we have found with this is that the measurement of brain atrophy in an individual with MS level is very unreliable. For example, dehydration, excessive alcohol consumption and some symptomatic medications can cause the brain to shrink temporarily. We, therefore, think that CSF NFL levels are a better treatment target, less prone to misinterpretation. Neurofilaments are proteins that are found in nerves and axons (nerve fibres) and are released in proportion to the amount of nerve fibre damage that occurs in MS. Normalising CSF NFL levels, which would indicate that nerve damage is stopped, is referred to as NEDA-5. From a scientific perspective, including a more objective end-organ biomarker makes sense and will almost certainly be incorporated into our treatment target in the future.  

Table format updated 180625 SS

The components of NEDA-recommended targets are expanding as our ability to measure predictors of treatment response grows.
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; NEDA, no evident disease activity; NEIDA, no evident inflammatory disease activity; NFL, neurofilament light; PROMS, patient-related outcome measures.

End-organ damage

The combination of relapses, the development of new MRI lesions and brain volume loss over 2 years in clinical trials predicts quite accurately who will become disabled over the same time period. From a treatment perspective, it is important to stop relapses, new MRI lesions and brain volume loss if we are to prevent or slow down worsening disability. Therefore, we must go beyond NEIDA (no evident inflammatory activity), which refers to relapses and focal MRI activity, and normalise brain volume loss if we can. 

Alternatives to NEDA?

Many neurologists are critical of using NEDA as a treatment target in clinical practice, fearing that it encourages people with MS to take highly effective DMTs that they consider may be ‘more risky’ (see short summaries of the available DMTs for information about individual drugs). Such neurologists, therefore, promote a less proactive approach and allow for some residual MS disease activity, but at a lower level. This treatment target is referred to as minimal evidence of disease activity, or MEDA.

In my opinion, MEDA flies in the face of the science of focal inflammatory lesions being ‘bad’ and it is associated with poor short-term, intermediate and long-term outcomes. If most people with MS end up receiving so-called high-efficacy therapies because of breakthrough disease activity, then this is what they probably need, that is, to have their MS treated adequately. Compelling evidence has emerged from trials, large registries and real-world data that people with MS treated early with highly effective DMTs (flipping the pyramid) do better than those who have delayed access to more effective DMTs.1,2,3 You can find a short summary of some key findings on the MS Brain Health website.

Implementing NEDA in clinical practice

Please note that achieving long-term remission, or NEDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune kidney disease and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated to a target of NEDA do better than those with breakthrough disease activity. I would therefore strongly encourage you to discuss this treatment target with your own MS neurologist. 

The flowchart below illustrates how we implement a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy. The important take-home message is that the treatment targets in MS have moved; goal-setting and the active monitoring of outcomes is now required to achieve these goals. 

Treat to target NEDA algorithm

Recommended approaches to implementing a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy, using maintenance ̶ escalation or immune reconstitution therapy (IRT). The dotted lines indicate that if treatment fails you can either switch within the class (maintenance or IRT) or reassess the strategy. From Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.4
Alem, alemtuzumab; Clad, cladribine; DMF, dimethyl fumarate; Fingo, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFNβ, interferon-beta; Mitox, mitoxantrone; NEDA, no evident disease activity; Nz, natalizumab; Ocre, ocrelizumab; Ofat, ofatumumab; Teri, teriflunomide.

There is also a clear need to update the definition of NEDA regularly as new technologies become available and are validated as predictors of treatment response. I therefore envisage the definition of NEDA changing still further in future to include more objective measures, particularly ones measuring end-organ damage and the inclusion of patient-related outcome measures.

References

Causes and prevention of MS

What is multiple sclerosis?

This is the first of a series of basic lessons to help you understand multiple sclerosis (MS).

Key points

  • MS is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks the central nervous system.
  • Its exact cause is unknown; some contributory environmental factors are outlined.
  • Common manifestations of MS include lesions, relapses and intermittent symptoms, which often worsen with fatigue.
  • Early treatment is important to help prevent the damage that occurs with MS.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an organ-specific autoimmune disease. Autoimmune simply means that the immune system, whose primary role is to fight infections and cancers, goes awry and attacks itself. Organ-specific means that a disease is limited to one organ. So, in the case of MS, the immune system attacks the central nervous system (CNS), which consists of the brain, spinal cord and optic nerves.

Every organ in the body has its specific autoimmune disease. For example:

  • joints: rheumatoid arthritis
  • skin: psoriasis 
  • insulin-producing cells of the pancreas: type 1 diabetes
  • intestines: inflammatory bowel disease
  • kidneys: autoimmune nephritis (interstitial or glomerulonephritis).

The cause of MS

At present, the exact cause of MS is unproven. MS is a complex disease that occurs due to the environment’s interaction with inherited or genetic factors.1 Some of the main environmental factors are:

  • low vitamin D levels or a lack of sunshine
  • smoking 
  • Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), the virus that causes infectious mononucleosis (glandular fever) 
  • obesity, particularly in adolescence.

What we don’t know is how these genetic and environmental factors interact to cause MS. There are many genetic variants that predispose someone to get MS, but only a minority of people who have these variants will get the disease. Similarly, only a minority of people exposed to environmental risk factors get the disease.

Mechanisms that underlie the common manifestations of MS

Lesions

MS is characterised by inflammatory lesions – areas of damage or scarring (sclerosis) in the CNS – that come and go. The clinical manifestations of MS depend on where these inflammatory lesions occur. If, for example, a lesion involves the optic nerve, it will cause impaired vision; if it involves the brain stem, it causes double vision, vertigo or unsteadiness of gait; a spinal cord lesion leads to loss of feeling, limb weakness or bladder and bowel problems.  

Relapses

A new MS lesion in a site that is eloquent will cause symptoms and neurological signs; if these last for at least a day, they are called an attack or a relapse. If a lesion occurs in a site not associated with overt symptoms, this is often referred to as a subclinical or asymptomatic relapse. Subclinical relapses can be detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). It is said that for every clinical attack there are 10 or more sub-clinical attacks (new MRI lesions).2 

Damage frequently occurs at the site of MS lesions. The inflammation strips the myelin covering the nerve processes and may cut through axons. Axons are the nerve processes that transmit electrical impulses or signals. When the axons are stripped of their myelin sheath, and/or are cut, they can’t transmit electrical signals. This causes loss of function, which manifests with specific symptoms.

Demyelination: loss of the myelin sheath that insulates nerves, leading to disruption of electrical signals. Image courtesy of Timonina/shutterstock.com. 

Intermittent symptoms

Surviving axons that pass through the lesion are able to recover function, by synthesising and distributing so-called ion channels across the demyelinated segment or by being remyelinated. Both these processes are not perfect. For example, the new sodium channels may not function normally, so they sometimes fire spontaneously. The spontaneous firing of axons may cause positive symptoms, for example, pins and needles, pain or spasms. The new myelin is typically thinner and shorter than normal and is temperature, fatigue and stretch sensitive. 

Stretch sensitivity

If someone with MS has a lesion in their spinal cord, electric shock-like sensations may occur when they stretch the spinal cord by bending or flexing their neck; this is known as Lhermitte’s sign.  

Temperature sensitivity

Recurrent symptoms may occur when body temperature rises, for example following fever, exercise or a hot bath. The MS symptoms (which may vary among individuals) disappear when the fever resolves or the body cools down. The temperature sensitivity is often referred to as Uhtoff’s phenomenon. 

Fatigue

Symptoms tend to worsen with physical and/or mental fatigue; for example, someone with MS may begin dragging a leg or dropping their foot after 20–30 minutes of walking. This is because the transmission in the functioning nerves, which have been previously damaged, begins to fail. This failure may be related to a lack of energy and/or to temperature changes that occur with exercise. 

Worsening MS (also called progressive MS)

If the axons, or nerve processes, above and below an MS lesion die off, the surviving axons may sprout to take over the function of the axons below the lesion. This puts an unnecessary strain on the surviving axons, which makes them vulnerable to die off in the future. A reduction in the number of nerves in a neuronal system reduces the neurological reserve of that system, making it more vulnerable to future attacks. In other words, the ability to recover from future attacks is reduced, and the neuronal pathway is susceptible to delayed degeneration and premature ageing. Clearly, if no treatment is given and focal inflammatory lesions continue to come and go, this will cause worsening of the disease. If enough damage is allowed to accrue, even switching off new inflammatory lesions may not prevent the so-called delayed neurodegeneration. This is why one of the primary principles of managing MS is early treatment to prevent damage from occurring in the first place. We have also discovered that the neuronal systems with the longest nerve fibres, in particular the bladder and legs, are much more susceptible to damage. We think this is simply because the longest pathways provide the greatest scope to be hit by multiple MS lesions.

Ageing and MS

As we get older our nervous systems degenerate. If we live long enough, we will all develop age-related neurological problems, such as unsteadiness of gait, loss of memory, reduced vision, loss of hearing, and poor coordination. 

What protects people with MS from becoming disabled and developing age-related neurodegeneration are brain reserve and cognitive reserve. Brain reserve is simply the size of your brain or the number of nerve cells you have. Cognitive reserve, in comparison, relates to how well these nerves function; it is associated with your level of education and how well you enrich your life by using your brain. From about 35 years of age, our brains start to shrink. In MS, this brain shrinkage is in general much greater than normal, and the resulting reduction in brain and cognitive reserve almost certainly primes the nervous system to age earlier. This is one of the reasons why people with MS continue to develop worsening disability later in the course of their disease. This insight is one of the main reasons why we promote early effective treatment of MS to protect and maintain brain and cognitive reserves.  

References

  1. Olsson T, et al. Interactions between genetic, lifestyle and environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2017;13:25–36.
  2. Gafson A, et al. The diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: From Charcot to McDonald. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2012;1:9–14

DMTs, Treatment strategy

Am I eligible for an MS disease-modifying therapy?

Key points

Do you know the eligibility criteria for MS disease-modifying therapies? And who decides what drugs can be prescribed for your MS?

  • Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) change the long-term trajectory of MS and protect the central nervous system from further damage.
  • Regulators such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) decide in which group(s) of patients a particular drug can be used, based on the results of clinical trials.
  • Once a drug has been licensed in your region, local payers decide whether to make it available within your country, based on cost-effective assessments.
  • If you have active MS, your level of disease activity, its severity and speed of development will determine which DMTs you can be offered.
  • In some countries, ocrelizumab has been approved for the treatment of active primary progressive MS (PPMS) and siponimod has been approved for the treatment of active secondary progressive MS.
  • Protecting upper limb function has been a neglected area; studies are now ongoing, however, with a view to finding DMTs that limit the progression of upper limb disability.

What do disease-modifying drugs do?

Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are treatments that change the natural history – that is, the long-term trajectory – of the disease. They reduce the rate of disability worsening and so protect the end-organ (in the case of MS, this is the central nervous system). To simplify, let’s say that a person with MS on no treatment may manage for an average of 18-20 years before needing to use a walking stick (corresponding to Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 6.0), while someone on treatment might manage without aid for 24 years, i.e. a 4-6-year delay, then the treatment can be called disease-modifying. (Please note, the treatment effect or 4-6-year delay in reaching EDSS 6.0 is an average and some people with MS will do better than others. Conversely, some will do worse than average.) 

Is interferon a DMT?

In the early days of interferon therapy, there was debate about whether simply reducing the relapse rate by 30% relative to placebo treatment, without slowing down the worsening of the disease over 2 years, was disease-modification. However, subsequent trials and follow-up of people with MS treated with interferon-beta showed a slowing down of disease worsening, delays in developing secondary progressive MS and a favourable impact on survival.1 

Do symptomatic treatments modify the disease?

Symptomatic treatments improve the symptoms associated with MS without affecting the natural history. Treatments are classified as symptomatic in relation to their mode of action; but some classes of treatment may yet prove to be disease-modifying. For example, we often use sodium channel blocking agents, such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine, for MS-related neuralgia and other pain syndromes. However, there is evidence that this class of therapy may be neuroprotective and hence disease-modifying. 

Who decides on eligibility for a licensed DMT?

Regulators decide in which group of people with MS the DMT can be used, and they grant a licence for its use. Regulators include the EMA, the FDA and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA in the UK).

Payers hold the purse strings and decide which licensed drugs to make available. They makecost-effectiveness assessments to try and optimise the use of the drug in clinical practice. Payers include medical insurance companies and the NHS in the UK. 

Guidelines are formulated to help healthcare professionals use DMTs in the most appropriate way within a particular healthcare system. Guidelines often go much further than the regulators and payers, in that they try to address potential ambiguities in the prescribing of DMTs. National, regional or local guidelines that provide expert clinical guidance include the UK NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) MS management guidelines and the Association of British Neurologists guidelines. 

In the NHS in England, we must abide by NHS England’s algorithm that is predominantly based on NICE technology appraisals, NICE standards of care and the Association of British Neurologists guidelines. To navigate the specifics of the eligibility criteria is quite complex. However, a simpler way of looking at this is to start by defining how active your MS is. 

How does disease activity affect my treatment options?

To be eligible for DMTs, you must have active MS. A summary of the four categories of disease activity is given below. Further details can be found in the section entitled Do I have active MS?

  1. Inactive MS – you are not currently eligible for DMTs.
  2. Active MS – you should be eligible for a so-called platform therapy (interferon-beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate or ponesimod) and ocrelizumab or ofatumumab.
  3. Highly active MS – you are eligible for all therapies except natalizumab. Please note in England fingolimod can only be used as a second-line therapy (after another DMT has failed).
  4. Rapidly evolving severe MS – you should be eligible for all DMTs.

Advanced or progressive MS

Ocrelizumab and siponimod are now approved in several countries for the treatment of active PPMS and active SPMS, respectively. A classification of active PPMS requires recent MRI evidence of disease activity, that is, the formation of new T2 lesions and/or the presence of gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the last 3 years. Active SPMS is confirmed by the occurrence of superimposed relapses and/or the presence of new T2 lesions and/or gadolinium-enhancing lesions in the last 2 years. Based on these very narrow definitions, most patients with PPMS and SPMS will not be eligible for ocrelizumab or siponimod, respectively. The differences between the MRI criteria for active PPMS and active SPMS reflect the reality that people with PPMS are less likely to be having regular monitoring MRI scans.

Stages of MS currently not eligible for treatment

In the UK, people with MS who are wheelchair users are not eligible for DMTs. The reason for this is that patients with more advanced MS have generally been excluded from phase 3 clinical trials; hence there are no data to show whether licensed DMTs are effective in this group.

There is a long-held view that inflammation is reduced or absent in advanced MS. However, clinical, imaging and pathological data show that inflammation still plays a large, and possibly a major, role in advanced MS. Therefore, not targeting more advanced MS with an anti-inflammatory is counterintuitive.

The importance of upper limb function

In 2016, the #ThinkHand campaign was launched to raise awareness of the importance of hand and arm function in people with MS and the need for clinical trials in this population. Studies currently ongoing that focus on limiting upper limb disability progression include ChariotMS (oral cladribine)2 in people with advanced MS (UK only) and the global, multicentre O’HAND trial  (ocrelizumab)3 in participants with PPMS. 

Once someone with MS becomes a wheelchair user, they still have neuronal systems that are potentially modifiable – for example, upper limb, bulbar (speech and swallowing), cognition and visual function. There is an extensive evidence base showing that several licensed DMTs can slow the worsening of upper limb function despite subjects having advanced MS. Now that ocrelizumab and siponimod have been licensed for active primary and secondary progressive MS, respectively, these DMTs may form the platform for future add-on trials. 

References

  1. Goodin DS, et al. Survival in MS: a randomized cohort study 21 years after the start of the pivotal IFNβ-1b trial. Neurology 2012;78:1315 ̶ 22.
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). MS clinical trial to focus on people who can’t walk. November 2020. Available at https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news/ms-clinical-trial-to-focus-on-people-who-cant-walk/26227 (accessed June 2022).
  3. US National Library of Medicine. A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in Adults With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (O’HAND). First posted July 2019. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04035005 (accessed June 2022).