Category Archives: Cognition and mental health

Cognition and mental health

MS and obsessive–compulsive disorder

Comorbid obsessive–compulsive disorder and obsessive–compulsive behaviour are more common than one might realise in people with MS. This section describes in detail how these conditions develop and manifest in MS, with links at the end to download rating scales for self-assessment. 

Key points

  • People with MS are 3.25 times more likely than healthy controls to develop obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) or obsessive–compulsive behaviour (OCB).
  • Neurodegeneration that causes the physical disability of MS also disrupts brain circuits responsible for inhibition and emotional regulation. Obsessive–compulsive symptoms therefore become more likely as physical disability in MS increases.
  • Specific cognitive deficits associated with OCD further compound the cognitive impairment caused by MS.
  • OCD also impacts adherence to MS treatment, leading to missed doses, chaotic dosing or double-dosing.
  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the mainstay of OCD drug treatment; tricyclic antidepressants areoften used as a second-line treatment.
  • Standard psychological therapies for OCD must be adapted to allow for reduced levels of physical stamina and cognitive reserve in many people with MS.

Introduction

People with MS commonly develop psychiatric symptoms over and above the reactive psychological responses to having MS; such comorbidities are often manifestations of the underlying nervous system damage.

Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and obsessive–compulsive behaviour (OCB) tend to be underdiagnosed in people with MS, and they complicate its management. ‘Organic’ or ‘secondary’ OCD in MS is driven by distinct pathophysiological mechanisms (i.e. factors relating to the underlying MS disease processes and the damage they cause). These mechanisms involve the disruption of cortico-striato–thalamo-cortical circuits (see brain chemistry section below), atrophy of grey matter in specific, key areas of the central nervous system (CNS), and a proinflammatory environment. The clinical implications of OCD may be significant and are associated with greater physical disability, a higher disease burden and, often, poor adherence to medication. 

Clinical symptoms of OCD in people with MS

OCD in people with MS is characterised by obsessions and compulsions – similar to its presentation in the wider population. In MS, however, OCD often carries distinct nuances related to an individual’s experience of the disease. For example, unpredictable, fluctuating sensory symptoms (paraesthesias, numbness, pain) may develop into obsessive ‘body checking’. A benign itch or twitch may be catastrophised as a new relapse, leading to compulsive reassurance-seeking from medical providers, repeated self-examinations or excessive researching of symptoms. This overlaps with, but is distinct from, illness anxiety disorder due to the presence of ritualised behaviours.

Given that many people with MS are taking an immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapy (DMT), fears of infection are rational. However, in OCD, these fears become excessive and incompatible with an individual’s true self. A person with MS may engage in ritualised hand-washing or sterilisation of their environment that goes far beyond medical necessity, causing skin damage or social isolation. The distinction between prudent caution and compulsion is often defined by the level of distress and the rigidity of the behaviour.

Cognitive deficits in people with MS, particularly in working memory, can exacerbate checking rituals. Someone with MS may repeatedly check whether the stove is off, not purely out of anxiety, but because they genuinely cannot retain the act of turning it off in their working memory. This double deficit of anxiety plus amnesia makes checking rituals particularly resistant to standard cognitive interventions. OCD is associated with specific cognitive deficits, particularly in executive function. In MS, these deficits overlap with the disease’s own cognitive burden, creating a compound impairment.

A case scenario

I am 44 years of age, and I have had MS for 16 years. I was on fingolimod before switching to ocrelizumab. I have weakness in both legs and can manage about 200 yards with a stick. I also have bladder and bowel problems. Over the last few years, I have developed obsessive–compulsive symptoms. I have a germ phobia and can’t touch anything; I keep washing my hands, so they are raw from using soap and alcohol spray. As a solution, I have started using latex gloves when I go out. I also started worrying about my ocrelizumab infusion being contaminated, and this caused me to have a panic attack. My family doctor has started me on fluoxetine and has referred me to see a psychiatrist.

The need for symmetry or exactness is another feature of MS-related OCB. This may be related to subtle sensorimotor deficits or to the disruption of error-processing networks in the cerebellum and basal ganglia.

Both OCD and MS are associated with impairments in response inhibition and in set-shifting (cognitive flexibility, or task switching).  A person with MS and comorbid OCD may show profound difficulties in shifting gears mentally. Once an obsessive thought enters the stream of consciousness, the brakes (inhibition) fail and the steering (set-shifting) locks, leading to cognitive rigidity and perseverance. Research suggests that memory impairments in OCD are often secondary to executive dysfunction (problems with organising information during encoding) rather than to primary retrieval deficits. In MS, both primary retrieval deficits (from hippocampal/temporal lobe damage) and secondary executive deficits (due to frontal lobe damage) can occur.

OCD prevalence and risk factors

The odds of developing OCD are estimated to be 3.25 times higher in people with MS than in healthy controls. While the lifetime prevalence of OCD in the general global population is around 1.3–3%, studies in MS cohorts consistently report higher rates. A meta-analysis of 10 studies established a pooled prevalence of OCD among people with MS of almost 11%.1 OCB is not a rare but a frequent psychiatric complication of MS, and it is comparable in impact, if not incidence, to both depression and anxiety. 

OCD table

Causes, risk factors and prevalence of primary OCD and secondary MS-related OCD compared.

OCD in the general population often starts either in childhood or in early adulthood and exhibits gender variances depending on the age of onset. However, in the context of MS, there is no correlation between gender and the presence of OCD. There is also no correlation between OCD frequency and age of onset, educational level or marital status within MS cohorts. 

In idiopathic OCD (that arises without a known underlying medical cause), family history is an important risk factor, with high heritability rates. Data in MS populations is mixed. Some studies report no significant correlation between comorbid OCD–MS and a positive family history of OCD; this supports the hypothesis that the psychiatric symptoms are secondary to the neurological damage from MS rather than a primary genetic disorder. Conversely, some studies hint at shared genetic vulnerabilities, suggesting that MS may unmask a latent genetic predisposition.

Development of OCD in people with MS

The development of OCD in the MS population is significantly correlated with a rise in EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) scores, indicating that as physical disability accumulates, so does the prevalence of obsessive–compulsive symptoms. This correlation challenges the notion of OCD as merely a psychological reaction to illness; rather, it implies that the neurodegeneration due to MS, driving motor and sensory disability, is simultaneously affecting the neuronal circuits responsible for cognitive inhibition and emotional regulation.

OCD development is also positively correlated with the duration of MS disease; people with a long history of MS have a higher lesion burden and greater brain atrophy than those recently diagnosed, which increases the probability of damage to OCD-relevant networks. Specific neurological deficits are strongly associated with OCD, including cerebellar, sensory, motor and cranial nerve involvement. The cerebellar association is intriguing, given the cerebellum‘s emerging role in the cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome, where damage leads to deficits in executive function and emotional control similar to those seen in OCD.

Effects of MS on brain chemistry

The cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical network is a region of the brain that normally helps us regulate repetitive actions, recognise mistakes and dismiss unwanted thoughts or behaviours. This network links the areas involved in decision-making (orbitofrontal cortex), emotional control (anterior cingulate cortex), and regulation of voluntary movements (basal ganglia). Hyperactivity and dysfunction within these circuits contribute to the development of ‘idiopathic’ or primary OCD. The causes of OCD in people with MS, however, differ from those seen in primary OCD. In MS, OCD is thought to result mainly from the effects of inflammation and damage within the brain and nervous system.

Damage to the brain caused by MS lesions, nerve fibre loss, and shrinkage of brain tissue can interrupt these cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits at several points. Research has shown that people with both MS and OCD tend to have loss of brain volume in areas involved in self-control, flexible thinking and emotional processing. One important region affected is the inferior frontal gyrus, which helps the brain stop inappropriate thoughts or actions. Damage here may make it harder to suppress intrusive thoughts (obsessions) or stop repetitive behaviours (compulsions). Other affected regions are connected to the brain’s emotional centres (the temporal lobes and limbic system). Damage in these areas may contribute to the intense anxiety, uncertainty and persistent doubt that are common in OCD.

OCD symptoms in primary, idiopathic MS are thought to arise from suppression of the normal inhibitory signals from the basal ganglia (resulting in ‘disinhibition’). In MS, inflammatory lesions and iron deposition occurring within the basal ganglia cause tissue damage that may interfere with the brain’s ability to block (or inhibit) repetitive or unwanted thoughts and actions – creating problems like those seen in primary OCD.

MS may also damage the white matter pathways (the cingulum bundle and the uncinate fasciculus) that connect different brain regions, including the pathway linking the emotional centres with brain areas responsible for judgement and decision-making. Damage in this area may alter emotional processing, leading to abnormal interpretation of intrusive thoughts.

Immune activity in the CNS associated with MS may also contribute to psychiatric symptoms through the release of inflammatory chemicals called cytokines. These chemicals can interfere with neurotransmitters, particularly serotonin, which plays a key role in OCD.           

Normally, the body uses a substance called tryptophan to produce serotonin. However, inflammation in MS increases the activity of the enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which shifts tryptophan away from serotonin production towards a chemical pathway that produces quinolinic acid. The resulting overstimulation of nerve cells may reduce serotonin levels in the brain and produce potentially harmful, neurotoxic substances.

Studies of patients with MS-related OCD have demonstrated reduced serotonin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid, supporting the idea that inflammation and serotonin disruption are both involved in OCD.

There may also be some shared genetic vulnerability between MS and OCD. Researchers are continuing to investigate several genes that may increase susceptibility to both conditions, notably STAT3 (Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3) and NTRK2 (Neurotrophic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 2).

Impact of OCD on the management of MS

Impact on treatment adherence

One of the most clinically significant aspects of comorbid OCD in MS is its impact on adherence to disease-modifying treatment. For people with MS on injectable DMTs (e.g. interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, ofatumumab), obsessive fears regarding needles can lead to severe or ritualised avoidance behaviours. While ‘injection anxiety’ is common, in OCD it manifests as catastrophic thinking about the injection process (e.g. ‘If I hit a vein, I will die’). The anticipatory anxiety can trigger panic attacks, leading to missed doses.

People with MS with contamination obsessions may view their medication as ‘toxic’ or ‘impure’. This is particularly relevant for infusion therapies such as ocrelizumab, ublituximab and natalizumab, where the recipient has no control over the environment’s sterility. They may also fear that the medication is permanently altering their body in a ‘contaminated’ way, leading to non-adherence driven by a desire for body purity.

Effects of irregular dosing on DMT efficacy

The ‘doubt’ inherent in OCD can lead to chaotic dosing. People with MS may obsess over whether they took their pill, leading to either missed doses (from fear of accidental overdose) or double-dosing (from fear of missing a dose). For oral DMTs with short half-lives, this inconsistency can compromise efficacy. Patients may misinterpret benign physiological sensations (e.g. a headache or flush) as severe adverse events or allergic reactions, leading to premature discontinuation of therapy.

Conversely, dimensions of OCD that overlap with perfectionism or symmetry can lead to hyper-adherence. People with MS who rely on strict daily rituals may incorporate medication-taking into an immutable schedule. Never missing a dose, they appear to be ‘model patients’; an inflated sense of responsibility (a core cognitive distortion in OCD) may lead them to feel that missing a dose is a moral failure or will cause immediate, catastrophic disability. However, this ‘good’ adherence is pathological if it comes at the cost of extreme distress. An MS patient who has a panic attack because they took their medication 10 minutes late is adherent, but they are not well. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) must look beyond the adherence rate to the quality of the patient’s engagement with their treatment.

Differential diagnosis

Distinguishing organic OCD, secondary to MS, from a primary psychiatric disorder is important for management. MS-related OCD often starts late in life or coincides with an MS relapse or the appearance of new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients with organic OCD may have less ‘insight’ into the senselessness of the behaviour or be resistant to standard monotherapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). The standard classification systems of mental disorders, DSM-5 and ICD-11, increasingly recognise OCD due to other medical conditions. Key flags for organic OCD include:

  • its temporal relationship to the neurological condition
  • the presence of atypical neurological signs, e.g. subtle movement disorders or frontal release signs (these involuntary reflexes are suppressed as an infant’s brain matures but may return if the frontal lobes are damaged and inhibitions are ‘released’)
  • other focal neurological signs or symptoms of localised damage.
OCD table 1

Clinical characteristics and MRI findings of primary OCD and secondary MS-related OCD compared.
EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Drug treatment

The pharmacological management of OCD in MS requires navigating the complex interactions between DMTs and psychotropic medications, primarily SSRIs and TCAs (tricyclic antidepressants).

Psychotropic medications: important interactions

SSRIs are the mainstay of OCD treatment; agents such as sertraline, fluoxetine, paroxetine and fluvoxamine are commonly used. However, their side effect profiles can mimic or exacerbate MS symptoms. A common side effect is that they can worsen the fatigue already present in MS. SSRIs can also worsen MS-related sexual dysfunction (erectile dysfunction, loss of sensation). Some SSRIs and TCAs have anticholinergic properties that can worsen urinary symptoms and trigger urinary retention.

Clomipramine, a TCA with potent serotonergic effects, is often used as a second-line treatment for OCD. However, its anticholinergic burden is high. It should be used with caution in patients with significant dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system.

MS DMTs: important interactions

Siponimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulator used in secondary progressive MS (SPMS), is extensively metabolised by hepatic enzymes (CYP2C9 and CYP3A4). Fluvoxamine, an SSRI used to treat OCD, is a potent inhibitor of CYP1A2 and a moderate-to-strong inhibitor of both CYP2C9 and CYP3A4. Co-administration blocks siponimod’s metabolic clearance; the resulting elevated siponimod levels could increase the risk of bradyarrhythmia and lymphopaenia. Therefore, fluvoxamine should not be used in people with MS on siponimod. Alternative SSRIs with low CYP inhibition potential (e.g. citalopram, escitalopram) are preferred.

Initiation of fingolimod (another S1P modulator) is associated with transient bradycardia and AV conduction delays. It can also prolong the QT interval. Many SSRIs, particularly citalopram (and to a lesser extent escitalopram and fluoxetine), cause dose-dependent QT interval prolongation, which increases the risk of Torsades de Pointes and sudden cardiac death. Therefore, a pre-treatment electrocardiogram is mandatory. If citalopram is needed in someone on fingolimod, the dose should be limited to a maximum of 20 mg/day in adults and 10 mg/day in the elderly. Sertraline or paroxetine are safer cardiac alternatives to co-administer with fingolimod.

Ozanimod, an S1P modulator, has active metabolites (CC112273 and CC1084037) that inhibit monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) in vitro (e.g. in the laboratory setting). Therefore, combining an inhibitor of MAO (which prevents the breakdown of serotonin) with serotonergic drugs (SSRIs, TCAs and SNRIs [serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors]) theoretically risks the serotonin syndrome (hypertensive crisis, hyperthermia, myoclonus). While ozanimod’s label carries a warning against coadministration with MAO‑B inhibitors, the potential for interaction has not been studied and clinical data suggest that MAO-B inhibition is weak. 

Psychological therapy

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with exposure and response prevention (ERP) is a standard psychotherapy for OCD. However, standard protocols assume a level of physical stamina and cognitive reserve that many people with MS lack. Successful treatment requires significant adaptation.

Fatigue is the most common and debilitating symptom of MS. ERP is cognitively and emotionally exhausting; a standard 50-minute session involving high-intensity exposure can trigger ‘post-exertional malaise’ or a ‘cognitive crash’ in people with MS. Therefore, exposures must be graded not just by anxiety level but by energy expenditure. Micro-exposures (shorter duration) may be necessary. Sessions and homework should be scheduled during the patient’s peak energy window (often mid-morning). Therapists should integrate spoon theory or energy conservation techniques into the ERP plan (e.g. sitting during exposures if standing causes fatigue).

Executive dysfunction can hinder the cognitive component of CBT (e.g. the need to challenge irrational thoughts) and a person’s ability to remember their behavioural homework. Therapy should rely less on abstract cognitive restructuring and more on concrete behavioural change. Use of written summaries, smartphone reminders and visual cues can be helpful.

Involving a caregiver to act as a ‘co-therapist’ can help reinforce homework and prevent avoidance, particularly if the patient has memory deficits. Reducing the complexity of cognitive interventions and focusing on pure ‘behavioural extinction’ (i.e. gradually weakening and eventually eliminating an unhelpful learned behaviour, using ERP) is often more effective than CBT alone in patients with cognitive impairment.

In patients with significant disability, some exposures (e.g. touching a public bathroom door) may be physically impossible. Utilising detailed scripts to vividly imagine the feared scenario and resist the compulsive mental ritual are primary tools. Emerging virtual reality therapies simulate environments (e.g. a dirty kitchen) for homebound or wheelchair-dependent patients, allowing controlled exposure without physical risk.

Group CBT can be highly effective for people with MS and OCD. The group format provides validation by reducing the isolation that comes with having two diseases; seeing others with disabilities successfully engage in ERP can also help.

Recommendations

Routine screening of people with MS, particularly those with EDSS scores > 3.0 or long disease duration, may help identify those with OCD and OCB. Standard screening tools include the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) or the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory Revised (OCI-R).

You can download the Y-BOCS and OCI-R and rate yourself.

The Y-BOCS score breakdown is as follows:

  • 0–7: Subclinical (no significant symptoms)
  • 8–15: Mild OCD
  • 16–23: Moderate OCD
  • 24–31: Severe OCD
  • 32–40: Extreme OCD 

For the OCI-R, a cutoff score of 12 is used to estimate the likelihood of an OCD diagnosis (sensitivity 82%, specificity 83%).

People with MS and HCPs must remain vigilant about MS-related OCD in patients with adult-onset symptoms, atypical presentations or new temporal/frontal lesions on MRI. If you have MS and need treatment for OCD, please ask your therapists to modify CBT and ERP to include pacing for fatigue and possible simplification in case of executive dysfunction. HCPs should specifically ask patients if they experience needle phobia, contamination fears or obsessive doubting as barriers to DMT adherence.

Reference

  1. Mirmosayyeb O, et al. Obsessive-compulsive disorder in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Belg 2026. doi: 10.1007/s13760-026-02990-5.
Cognition and mental health

How common is post-traumatic stress disorder in people with MS?

Many people with MS are traumatised by how their MS was diagnosed. It doesn’t have to be this way, and there are things you can do to relieve the symptoms.

Key points

  • Despite advances in knowledge about MS, a diagnosis of the disease can be traumatic, especially if it is communicated in an insensitive, abrupt way.
  • More than one in 20 people with MS have a confirmed diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) relating to their diagnostic experience.
  • Symptoms of PTSD include flashbacks of the trauma, panic attacks or racing pulse when remembering it, nightmares and difficulty sleeping.
  • Interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), mindfulness and psychotherapy remain the mainstay of treatment for PTSD.

Public perceptions about MS

Jacqueline du Pré, the celebrated British cellist, tragically died from MS in 1987 at the age of 42. Her death was extensively covered on TV and in the newspapers, and this publicity most likely helped to shape the general public’s view of MS in the late ‘80s and ‘90s: MS was a disease that struck when you were young and invariably caused disability and early death. Back then, most people in the general population knew little about MS. Their perceptions were potentially coloured by advertising such as that from the MS charities, showing young people with MS in wheelchairs – a campaign intended to prompt donations for research.

Fortunately, things have changed and the modern approach to fund raising by MS charities is more positive, thoughtful and sensitive. In addition, most people who turn out to have MS already suspect their diagnosis because they have asked ‘Dr Google’ or their favourite AI large language model. Despite this, many people with MS are traumatised from the diagnosis and subsequently meet the diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) specifically related to their MS diagnosis and outlook.

Symptoms of post-traumatic stress

The following symptoms are associated with PTSD.

  1. Poor concentration
  2. Flashbacks or vivid memories of the trauma as if it was recurring
  3. Intrusive thoughts of the traumatic event
  4. Avoidance of people and places, to reduce symptoms
  5. Nightmares, thoughts or memories of the trauma while asleep
  6. Anxiety
  7. Panic attacks or racing pulse, excessive sweating, shaking or chills when remembering the trauma
  8. Depression
  9. Hyper-alertness in situations that remind you of the traumatic event
  10. Difficulty sleeping; struggling to get to sleep or to stay asleep
  11. Anger as a result of the traumatic experience
  12. Anhedonia or loss of enjoyment of things you found pleasurable before the event
  13. A feeling of detachment from friends and family, or those closest to you
  14. Change in life goals you had before the trauma.

Case study

A patient of mine, now in her late 60s, was diagnosed with MS in the early 1990s. She has benign MS and has done very well. Apart from mild gait unsteadiness, back pain and a weak right leg that causes a slight limp when she is tired, she is fully functional. She was treated with interferon-beta for 14 years; her only ‘MS medication’ currently is a low dose of gabapentin at night, which helps to dull the back pain so that she can get a good night’s sleep. 

Despite having a good prognosis, she suffers from PTSD in relation to how her MS was diagnosed all those years ago. The private neurologist she consulted was not an MS expert and he had not prepared her for the diagnosis. During her diagnostic appointment, he simply walked up to a backlight X-ray displaying her MRI scans and announced, with his back to her, that she had a lot of white blobs on her MRI, which confirmed his suspicions that she had MS. He then turned around and said he would write to her GP with the details. And that was the end of the consultation; no time for questions, no information on MS, its treatment or prognosis.

My patient recalls walking out of the consultation with a cold panic enveloping her. On catching the tube home, she encountered a poster from an MS charity of a young person leaning forward in a wheelchair, with a zip down their spine. The implication was that damage to the spinal cord from MS had caused the disability. To this day, she gets regular and intrusive flashbacks of these experiences. The flashbacks are associated with feelings of anxiety or panic, palpitations, hyperventilation, hot flushes, sweating and a feeling of doom. They can come on spontaneously, but they typically happen before a hospital appointment and particularly when she has an MRI scan. In fact, MRI is such a problem that she now refuses to have repeat scans. The white blobs have become monsters that she imagines are expanding and suffocating her.

Her GP has diagnosed PTSD and prescribed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). This helped to reduce the frequency and intensity of the flashbacks. However, it caused weight gain, so she stopped taking it. She has subsequently found cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and mindfulness or meditation helpful, though not a cure.

My patient above may be an extreme example, but asking the relevant questions reveals that about one-quarter of people with MS have symptoms of PTSD, and more than one in 20 have a confirmed diagnosis of PTSD. Why, then, are healthcare professionals in general so bad at communicating the diagnosis of MS? What can they do to improve the experience? 

Personal reflection

After sustaining multiple life-threatening injuries in a pedestrian road traffic accident in 2020, I have flashbacks about the accident. These are not intrusive and are typically triggered by crossing the road, approaching a traffic intersection or hearing a motorcycle in the distance. These flashbacks are fleeting and are not associated with any systemic symptoms. I, therefore, suspect flashbacks are a normal phenomenon for people who have just suffered a traumatic experience. However, experiencing them for myself has provided a context and a deeper understanding of how traumatic it can be to be diagnosed with MS or indeed with any chronic disabling disease. 

Management of post-traumatic stress disorder

Neuropsychological interventions such as CBT, mindfulness and psychotherapy remain the mainstay of treatment for PTSD. Some people find that exposure therapy (being reminded of the trauma) helps to reduce the frequency of flashbacks and the severity of anxiety and panic attacks. Exposure therapy is becoming high tech, with immersive virtual reality scenarios.

Medications that can help with PTSD include SSRIs and other classes of antidepressants. Some people find psychedelics helpful, for example psilocybin and MDMA (commonly known as magic mushrooms and ecstasy, respectively); these are being studied in PTSD. Alternative treatments such as yoga and acupuncture may help. Exercise when done regularly is also useful.  

If you have symptoms of PTSD that are troubling you, please seek advice from your healthcare professional. 

Shift.ms

George Pepper, a co-founder of a social network for people with MS, describes his diagnostic experience as very poor, with no support offered to people like him. This prompted him to set up Shift.ms, to create an online resource centre and supportive community to help people, particularly young people, come to terms with the diagnosis of MS. The Shift.ms YouTube movie ‘Gallop’ is almost autobiographical and captures some of George’s experiences before and during the diagnostic phase of MS. I would highly recommend watching the video.
Cognition and mental health

Dissociative states and MS

This MS-related group of symptoms is probably neglected in routine MS neurological practice and may fall through the cracks.

Key points

  • Dissociative states in people with MS may arise for different reasons: organic (resulting from damage to the temporal and parietal lobes), psychogenic (following psychological trauma) or iatrogenic (induced by drug treatments).
  • Such states range from transient feelings of unreality to recurring episodes of depersonalisation and/or derealisation. Other presentations may also occur.
  • Depersonalisation feels like being detached from one’s own body or thoughts, feeling like an ‘outside observer’ of one’s life.
  • Derealisation feels like being detached from the external world, which may appear foggy, dreamlike, lifeless or two-dimensional.
  • In MS, dissociation often has a physical (organic) basis in the brain. This article explores the specific effects of damage to each of the four lobes of the human brain.
  • Managing dissociative states in MS requires a dual approach: biological (treating the underlying MS disease) and psychological.
  • To differentiate between physical and psychological causes, doctors must consider the possibility of an MS relapse, an infection or the effects of an MS-related treatment. Checks for balance, hearing and psychological screening are also needed.

Causes and range of dissociative states

People with MS have an elevated risk of experiencing dissociative phenomena that give rise to alterations of consciousness, self-perception and reality testing (being able to assess what is real versus what is imagined). These dissociative states − ranging from transient feelings of unreality to chronic depersonalisation−derealisation disorder (DPDR) and non-epileptic seizures − are often undiagnosed. They may arise for different reasons.

  • Organic dissociation results from damage(lesions)to the temporal and parietal lobes, which can disrupt neural networks responsible for ‘embodied self-awareness’ (the constant experience of oneself through physical sensations, emotions and bodily signals).
  • Psychogenic dissociative states can occur in people with MS following the psychological trauma of diagnosis and the high prevalence of comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
  • Iatrogenic dissociative states can be induced by drug treatments, particularly high-dose corticosteroids and psychoactive symptomatic treatments.

Dissociation is typically characterised by disruption in the normal integration of consciousness, memory, identity, emotion, perception, body representation, motor control and behaviour.  The most frequently reported dissociative symptoms in the MS population fall under the spectrum of depersonalisation−derealisation.

Depersonalisation (the fragmentation of self)

Depersonalisation is characterised by a persistent or recurring feeling of being detached from one’s own body or thoughts. People with MS describe this as feeling like an ‘outside observer’ of their life, like watching oneself in a movie, or like a ‘robot’ with no control over their speech or actions. In MS, depersonalisation is associated with damage to the parietal lobe or the spinal cord – areas that help the brain detect body position and movement (proprioception). People with damage to these areas may feel as though a limb does not belong to them. This is not a delusion, because the person may see their limb move and intellectually know it is theirs. Rather, it is a sensory problem with the ‘body schema’ (the brain’s internal map of your body), that no longer matches your physical body.

Derealisation (the distortion of the world)

Derealisation involves a feeling of being detached from your surroundings. The external world may appear foggy, dreamlike, lifeless, colourless or artificially two-dimensional. Objects may appear distorted in size or shape; sounds may seem muted or distant. Derealisation is often worsened by sensory problems in people with MS (affecting sight, sound, touch, taste, smell or movement). Optic neuritis, a common early sign of MS, causes visual blurring, reduced colour intensity and visual field defects (gaps); see Colour vision and Driving at night. When the brain receives unclear visual input, it struggles to construct a vivid, real-feeling model of the environment, which can lead to a secondary sense of derealisation.

Problems with balance (vestibular dysfunction, leading to vertigo, dizziness and gait instability) are often associated with derealisation; conflicting signals from the eyes and inner ear can cause people with MS to feel disoriented. 

Non-epileptic seizures

Non-epileptic seizures, also referred to as dissociative seizures, resemble epileptic seizures − involving convulsive movements, apparent loss of consciousness and stiffening of the body. However, they are not caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain (usually visible on an electroencephalogram) but are psychological, most likely a mechanism for managing distress or trauma. Care is needed to determine the correct cause in each individual because people with MS are actually at increased risk for epilepsy due to brain lesions. Studies of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans suggest that damage in the right brain hemisphere or the frontal lobes may increase the risk of non-epileptic seizures.

Dissociative amnesia and brain fog

Dissociative amnesia is the inability to recall important personal information, far beyond ordinary forgetting. It is usually related to stress or trauma. In MS, this poses a diagnostic challenge because many patients already experience cognitive dysfunction that affects processing speed and working memory. A study differentiating organic (‘true’) memory loss from dissociative amnesia in MS found that people who reported memory problems often had high levels of dissociation and anxiety but did not show major problems on formal memory testing.1 This implies that the ‘memory loss’ experienced by many people with MS may be an attention problem due to a mild dissociative state or emotional overload, rather than a result of permanent damage to memory structures in the brain.

Dissociative identity disorder

While rare, cases of dissociative identity disorder (DID) have been reported in people with MS. DID is characterised by the presence of two or more distinct personality states. Affected individuals typically have experienced childhood trauma, which makes them more prone to develop dissociation. A diagnosis of MS acts as a further stressor that challenges their sense of identity. Other symptoms of DID may include physical weakness and sensory loss, which can mimic an MS relapse and lead to misdiagnosis. 

Underlying disease processes in MS

In the general psychiatric population, dissociative disorders are usually regarded as psychological in origin. In MS, however, dissociation often has a physical basis in the brain. MS damages myelin (the protective covering of nerve fibres), severs nerve connections and affects grey matter, all of which disrupts communication between different brain regions. When these connections are broken, the brain cannot integrate sensation, emotion and thought into a conscious experience.

Structure of the brain

Structure of the brain, showing the left and right cerebral hemispheres (left) and the four lobes (frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital; right) in each cerebral hemisphere. Each individual lobe has particular key roles; however, they do not function in isolation but as part of a wider system of neural networks. From Gemini Pro.

Temporal lobe

The temporal lobes play a central role in processing memory and emotions as well as in combining auditory and visual information. MS-related damage in these areas is associated with psychiatric symptoms, including psychosis and dissociation. The temporal lobe also houses the limbic system, comprising the amygdala (which processes emotion) and the hippocampus (which supports memory). If there is damage to the white matter pathways between the limbic system and the frontal cortex (a region known as the uncinate fasciculus) or to sensory regions, the emotional content of experiences can be lost. For example, when a person with MS sees a familiar object or person, the visual cortex sends information to the limbic system, thus activating the appropriate emotional response (e.g. warmth, recognition). If MS disrupts this connection, the person may recognise the object but feel no emotional familiarity. This mismatch, i.e. recognition without feeling, is central to derealisation and to the jamais vu phenomenon (the strange feeling that something familiar is suddenly unfamiliar or new) that is often reported in temporal lobe disorders.

sagittal

A sagittal (longitudinal) view of the human brain showing the interconnected network of the limbic system, a key regulator of emotion, memory and spatial navigation. From Gemini Pro 3.0.

Temporal lobe epilepsy

MS lesions in the temporal lobe can sometimes trigger epileptic activity. Even in the absence of full-blown convulsions, abnormal electrical activity there can cause ‘dreamy states,’ profound déjà vu or feelings of unreality similar to the warning phase (aura) of temporal lobe epilepsy. Symptoms of depersonalisation disorder overlap with those experienced in temporal lobe epilepsy, particularly unusual body experiences and memory distortions.

Parietal lobe

The parietal lobe combines sensory information from different sources to form a single perception (cognition) and helps the brain build a map of the body and the world around us. The brain constantly updates this map, or ‘body schema’, using signals from the spinal cord. MS lesions in the parietal lobe or spinal cord can interrupt this information and deprive the brain of body map data.

When the brain ceases to receive reliable input from a limb, because of MS-related damage, it may ‘dissociate’ that body part from its self-image. This can manifest as:

  • asomatognosia (the inability to recognise a part of one’s own body)
  • somatoparaphrenia (the delusion that a limb belongs to someone else)
  • depersonalisation (see above).

Temporoparietal junction

The temporoparietal junction, where the temporal and parietal lobes meet, is a hub for integrating balance, visual and somatosensory signals to locate the ‘self’ in space. Electrical stimulation of this area can cause out-of-body experiences. In MS, lesions affecting the temporoparietal junction or the balance pathways in the brainstem can trigger dissociative events (for example, a feeling of floating above one’s body or viewing oneself from outside. These episodes are often linked to balance problems, suggesting that the brain is trying to make sense of conflicting signals.

Occipital lobe

The occipital lobe is the main visual processing centre of the brain. Damage in this region or in visual pathways can lead to complex visual distortions that trigger derealisation. ‘Alice in Wonderland Syndrome’ is a perceptual distortion in which objects appear much smaller (micropsia) or much larger (macropsia) than they really are. When damage from MS affects the visual association areas, vision may appear two-dimensional, with the world looking ‘flat’ or like a painted backdrop. This loss of depth perception contributes to the feeling of living in a movie or a simulation.

Clinico-radiological paradox

The clinico-radiological paradox refers to the discrepancy between the number and volume of MS lesions seen on MRI and a patient’s level of physical disability. Some people with MS have extensive brain lesions but relatively normal movement and minimal disability scores. While these patients may appear physically ‘fine’, lesions in high-level areas of the cortex (frontal, parietal and temporal lobes) can disrupt cognitive and emotional networks.  Such individuals may be at high risk for subjective dissociation − feeling fragmented or cognitively detached − while objective observers (and disability scales) fail to register any deficit. These hidden symptoms can worsen the patient’s sense of isolation and unreality.

Trauma-related causes

Receiving a diagnosis of MS

While localised MS lesions create the ‘hardware failure’ in the brain that enables dissociation, psychological factors often provide the ‘software trigger’. Receiving a diagnosis of MS may be considered a medical trauma, often involving invasive procedures (lumbar punctures), frightening MRI experiences (claustrophobia) and hospitalisations. These repeated exposures to threat and a feeling of helplessness and vulnerability can induce a state of chronic hyperarousal and subsequent dissociation, consistent with the dissociative subtype of PTSD. Many people with MS meet the diagnostic criteria for PTSD specifically related to their MS diagnosis and outlook (please see, How common is post-traumatic stress disorder in people with MS?). Developing an ongoing, incurable and potentially disabling neurological condition can shatter one’s expectations for the future. By detaching from the reality of their diagnosis, people with MS may attempt to shield themselves from overwhelming anxiety and grief. Dissociation serves as an adaptive defence mechanism – a ‘mental flight’ when physical flight is impossible. This sounds dramatic, but it may explain why some people with MS develop dissociative disorders. 

Childhood trauma

Research has demonstrated a potential relationship between childhood trauma, dissociation and the development of MS. Severe stress, neglect or abuse in childhood permanently dysregulates the hypothalamic−pituitary−adrenal axis (a system that is crucial for the body’s stress management). It consists of three organs that each release hormones to eventually raise cortisol levels in the body. This results in a chronic proinflammatory state and altered cortisol responses, which may increase biological susceptibility to developing MS later in life. Large-scale cohort studies indicate that women who experienced childhood abuse are significantly more likely to develop MS in the future.2

Treatment-related causes

The management of MS involves disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and corticosteroids for acute relapse management. Many of these agents have significant neuropsychiatric side effects that can mimic, induce or exacerbate dissociative states.

Corticosteroids. High doses of the intravenous corticosteroid methylprednisolone (e.g. 1000 mg daily for 3−5 days) are the standard of care for speeding up the recovery from acute MS relapses. It is known to cause acute psychiatric adverse effects in many patients (dependent on the corticosteroid dose).  Symptoms often begin with insomnia and euphoria but can progress to severe mood lability, anxiety and frank dissociation and delirium. Patients may experience a ‘steroid high’ followed by a crash into depression; some develop acute psychosis with hallucinations and confusion. Corticosteroids enhance dopamine activity. They may cause acute, reversible reductions in hippocampal volume. Their effect on the brain presumably decouples the patient from reality, leading to a temporary dissociative or psychotic state that resolves upon tapering the steroid dosage.

Interferon-beta has a longstanding association with depression and anxiety. Interferons are cytokines that induce a proinflammatory response similar to ‘sickness behaviour,’ which includes social withdrawal, fatigue and anhedonia (inability to feel pleasure in activities that are usually considered to be pleasurable). They may also decrease serotonin levels in the brain. While direct dissociation is less common, the severe anxiety and depression induced by interferons presumably lower the threshold for the onset of stress-induced depersonalisation.

Natalizumab is a highly effective monoclonal antibody, but it carries specific risks. The ‘wearing off’ effect in the week preceding the next infusion can be characterised by intensifying fatigue, cognitive fog and mood instability, which may manifest as a feeling of detachment or unreality.  The most severe risk associated with natalizumab is progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; this causes extensive, rapid demyelination that can lead to confusion, personality changes and cognitive decline. These symptoms can be misinterpreted as psychiatric dissociation or dementia in the early stages.

Fingolimod, an S1P modulator, has been associated with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. This condition involves swelling in the posterior brain regions (parietal/occipital lobes) caused by leakage of fluid from capillaries. It presents with acute confusion, visual changes, headaches and altered consciousness − a constellation of symptoms that could mimic derealisation and dissociation.

Symptomatic treatments. Abrupt withdrawal of baclofen and tizanidine, which are used for spasticity, can cause severe delirium, hallucinations and dissociation. Similarly, gabapentin and pregabalin, which are often used in people with MS to manage neuropathic pain, can cause sedation and cognitive clouding (‘zombie-like’ feeling) that contribute to depersonalisation.

Diagnosis

When someone with MS develops dissociative symptoms, doctors must first rule out physical (organic) causes before assuming the problem is purely psychological. A diagnostic algorithm should do the following.

1. Rule out an MS relapse
Any new onset of psychiatric or dissociative symptoms warrants an MRI scan with gadolinium. New lesions in the temporal, parietal or frontal lobes can directly cause these symptoms.

2. Rule out infection
Urinary tract infections are extremely common in MS and are the leading cause of acute confusional states (delirium) that can mimic dissociation. A urinalysis and a workup for other infections are mandatory.

3. Review medication
Assess for recent steroid use, cumulative damage from anticholinergic drugs (e.g. for bladder dysfunction) or withdrawal from muscle relaxants (baclofen and tizanidine).

4. Check balance and hearing
‘Neuro-otological examination’ is a specialised assessment for dizziness, vertigo, hearing loss and balance disorders. Checking for nystagmus (uncontrollable eye movements) helps to diagnose balance disorders. Treating vertigo may resolve the derealisation.

5. Carry out psychological screening
Your health professional can use the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II) or the Dissociative Disorders Interview Schedule to quantify symptom severity. People with MS generally score in the normal range on DES-II unless they have comorbid DID or PTSD.

Differentiating organic from psychiatric dissociation is difficult. It may require referral to a neuropsychiatrist. MS-related brain fog or cognitive impairment with an organic basis is characterised by slowed processing speed, word-finding difficulties and fatigue. Patients try to engage but fail. In comparison, psychiatric dissociation is characterised by a subjective sense of detachment (‘I am not here’). Patients may have preserved processing speed but feel emotionally disconnected. As noted above, MS cog-fog often contains a dissociative component driven by anxiety. Treating the anxiety usually clears the ‘cog-fog’ more effectively than cognitive rehabilitation alone.

Management

Managing dissociative states in MS requires a dual approach: biological (i.e. treating the underlying MS disease) and psychological. 

Drug treatments

The primary prevention of organic dissociation involves preventing new lesion formation. High-efficacy DMTs are the best way to preserve brain volume and connectivity. Psychotropics such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (e.g. fluoxetine, sertraline) can help manage the anxiety and depression that underlie DPDR. They may also help with MS-related fatigue. Antipsychotics (e.g. quetiapine, olanzapine) may be rarely indicated for managing steroid-induced psychosis or organic paranoia related to temporal lobe lesions. Lamotrigine and other anticonvulsants (e.g. carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine) can be used to treat both seizures and depersonalisation; they are particularly beneficial in patients with temporal lobe pathology. 

Psychological interventions

Cognitive behavioural therapy is the gold standard for treating DPDR. It helps patients reframe the terrifying sensation of ‘going crazy’ or ‘disappearing’ as a harmless (albeit distressing) symptom of anxiety or the disease. This reduces the catastrophic thinking that perpetuates the dissociation. 

Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) can be effective for MS-related PTSD (medical trauma) or childhood trauma. However, standard EMDR can be overwhelming for patients with dissociation. Modified (e.g. ‘titrated’) EMDR protocols can prevent flooding the patient with traumatic memories before they have stabilisation skills. EMDR is available via some UK NHS psychiatric services. 

Grounding and mindfulness techniques (e.g. holding an ice cube, describing the environment) anchor the patient in the present moment and help them to manage acute episodes of derealisation. Mindfulness-based stress reduction has shown efficacy in improving the quality of life and reducing depressive symptoms in people with MS.

Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) is a specialised, exercise-based physical therapy designed to reduce vertigo, dizziness and imbalance. It should be offered to people with MS where derealisation is driven by vertigo. VRT helps the brain compensate for inner-ear deficits through personalised exercises that focus on gaze stabilisation, balance training and habituation. Physical therapy to improve balance and gaze stability can directly reduce the feeling of unreality. 

Conclusions

To self-manage dissociative states effectively, individuals with MS can proactively apply several key principles highlighted above. During acute episodes of derealisation or dissociation, employing practical grounding and mindfulness techniques – such as holding an ice cube or actively describing the immediate environment – can serve as vital tools to anchor oneself in the present moment. Furthermore, individuals can apply cognitive behavioural principles by ‘reframing’ their experiences. Recognising that terrifying feelings of ‘disappearing’ or ‘going crazy’ are often harmless symptoms of anxiety or the disease itself can help reduce the catastrophic thinking that perpetuates dissociation.

Effective self-management also involves staying vigilant about physical triggers (e.g. monitoring for signs of urinary tract infections or medication side effects) and pursuing targeted physical interventions, such as vestibular rehabilitation exercises, if feelings of unreality are driven by dizziness and balance issues. By combining these practical coping strategies with a clear understanding of the biological and psychological origins of their symptoms, individuals with MS can regain a sense of control and significantly reduce the impact of dissociative states on their daily lives.

References

  1. Bruce J, et al. Self-reported memory problems in multiple sclerosis: influence of psychiatric status and normative dissociative experiences. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2010;25:39–48.
  2. Rehan ST, et al. Association of adverse childhood experiences with adulthood multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of observational studies. Brain Behav 2023;13:e3024.
Cognition and mental health

MS and bipolar disorder: understanding the link

The association between multiple sclerosis (MS) and depression is well-established. Are people with MS also at risk of developing bipolar disorder?

Key points

  • Bipolar disorder is significantly more common in people with MS than in the general population.
  • This is not merely a byproduct of the stress of chronic illness; it also has to do with changes in the brain, caused by MS, that affect mood as well as physical function.
  • Mood symptoms may be caused by MS lesions, disease-related inflammation, or medications (steroids in particular).
  • Differentiating ‘primary’ (organic) mania from ‘secondary’ (MS-related) mania is crucial to ensure the correct diagnosis and treatment.
  • Key features that distinguish MS-related mania from organic mania include:
    • Late onset, often after age 35–40 years, or onset associated with MS disease progression
    • Weak or absent family history of bipolar disorder
    • Lack of response to standard treatments for bipolar disorder
  • Treatment for people with MS who experience bipolar disorder is available and effective. With coordinated care, they can successfully manage their symptoms.

MS affects movement, sensation and other bodily functions, but it also impacts the brain systems involved in thinking, emotions and behaviour. Here, I discuss the relationship between MS and bipolar disorder, a mental health condition that causes episodes of unusually high mood (mania or hypomania) and low mood (depression). Bipolar disorder has received less attention than depression in people with MS, despite its substantial effect on quality of life, treatment adherence and prognosis.

For some people with MS, symptoms of bipolar disorder appear for the first time as their disease develops. In others, existing mood symptoms may be made worse by inflammation, brain lesions or medications used to treat MS. This article explains why bipolar symptoms occur in MS, how they may present, how they can be recognised early and how they can be effectively managed.

How common is bipolar disorder in MS?

Research consistently shows that bipolar disorder is more common in people with MS than in the general population. In the general population, bipolar disorder affects roughly 1–2.4% of people. In MS, studies report current and lifetime prevalence rates of about 3% and 8%, respectively. This means people with MS have approximately double or even treble the usual risk.

Importantly, this increased risk is not simply because people with MS interact with healthcare systems more frequently than the general population, which increases the likelihood of mental health conditions being detected (we call this the ‘admission rate’ bias). Nor is it merely a byproduct of the stress of chronic illness (which might explain depression). Large studies that compare people with MS to similar individuals without MS still show a higher rate of bipolar disorder in the MS group. This suggests the association is real and probably related to changes in the brain caused by MS.

What factors cause MS-related mania?

Researchers believe there are three main mechanisms that drive cognitive and behavioural changes in MS; they can occur alone or together.

  • MS lesions that affect mood-regulating circuits
  • inflammation and immune changes
  • treatment-related factors.

Understanding these mechanisms allows clinicians to distinguish MS-related mania from ‘primary’ (organic) psychiatric illness and to deliver appropriate management.

MS lesions that affect mood-regulating circuits

This mechanism disrupts the ‘hardware’ that controls mood. MS causes inflammation and lesions (scarring) in the brain. Areas that are especially important for controlling emotions and behaviour include:

  • the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) – involved in regulating social behaviour, judgement and impulse control
  • the temporal lobes – important for memory and emotional processing
  • the white-matter pathways that connect these regions with deeper emotional and reward centres such as the amygdala and thalamus.

If MS lesions interfere with these circuits, the balance between emotional impulses and rational control can be disrupted. This may lead to behaviours that are characteristic of mania, including disinhibition (reduced ‘internal brakes’), uncontrolled emotions, euphoria (unusually elevated mood) and impulsivity. This pattern is sometimes called secondary mania (mania caused directly by a brain condition such as MS).

There is evidence that right-sided frontal or temporal injury leads to mania-like behaviours in other conditions (e.g. stroke, traumatic brain injury, tumours).

Understanding right- and left-sided brain functions

Consistent with literature on secondary mania from stroke or tumours, MS-associated mania is most often associated with right-sided brain lesions. The right hemisphere is dominant for processing negative emotions and withdrawal behaviours, while the left hemisphere processes positive emotions and approach behaviours. A lesion in the right hemisphere may impair the processing of negative emotions, leading to an unopposed ‘positive’ or euphoric affect (‘highs’) driven by the intact left hemisphere.

Inflammation and immune changes

During MS relapses or periods of immune activation, inflammatory molecules disrupt how brain cells communicate (think of it as a disruption to the brain’s ‘software’). One important system involved is the kynurenine pathway, which controls how the body uses tryptophan (an amino acid essential for the creation of compounds such as serotonin and melatonin).

Inflammation increases the activity of an enzyme called indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase. This shifts tryptophan away from serotonin production towards production of quinolinic acid, a substance that overly stimulates nerve cells through NMDA receptors (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors). This ‘excitatory overload’ can lead to symptoms like those seen in primary mania, such as agitation, mood instability, sleep disturbance and racing thoughts.

Kynurenic pathway - MS-Selfie gg1

The kynurenine pathway in inflammation-induced pathology of the central nervous system. Activation of IDO in peripheral immune cells (e.g. macrophages) or in the brain leads to production of kynurenine. This is converted to kynurenic acid in astrocytes and to quinolinic acid in microglia. Kynurenic acid can block the release of glutamate and dopamine, contributing to cognitive dysfunction. Quinolinic acid, by contrast, can increase glutamate release, which contributes to neurodegeneration. Figure modified from Haroon et al.

3-HAO, 3-hydroxy-anthranilic acid oxygenase; IDO, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase; KAT II, kynurenine aminotransferase II; KMO, kynurenine-3-monooxygenase; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate.

This pathway is one of the clearest biochemical links between MS inflammation and bipolar-type symptoms.

Treatment-related factors

Some medications used in MS influence mood and may contribute to manic symptoms.

Steroids

High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, typically 1000 mg/day for 3–5 days, is the most common cause of drug-induced mania in MS. Up to 12% of people treated with corticosteroids experience symptoms of mania, and nearly 65% of those with psychiatric side effects present with a mix of mania and psychosis.

A history of prior steroid-induced mood changes, female sex, older age and higher steroid doses increase risk. Steroid-induced mania typically appears 3 − 4 days after starting treatment (median 11 days in some studies) and may involve:

  • severe insomnia
  • pressured speech
  • irritability or agitation
  • grandiosity
  • psychosis in severe cases.

Symptoms usually resolve when the dose is tapered (within roughly 3 weeks), but they can persist longer in individuals with underlying bipolar disorder. I therefore try to avoid treating MS relapses with steroids. However, this is not always possible.

Other agents that may cause mania

  • Amantadine, used for fatigue, can trigger mania in susceptible individuals.
  • Modafinil and methylphenidate, also used for fatigue, have been linked to sudden switching between manic and depressive symptoms.
  • Cannabinoids may destabilise mood or cognition.
  • Interferons more commonly cause depression than mania, but irritability, aggression and mania have been reported. The risk of new psychiatric symptoms is low, and patients with stable mood disorders can usually tolerate interferons with careful monitoring.
  • Fingolimod is linked to mood changes; severe rebound inflammatory activity after discontinuation could theoretically trigger mania.

Diagnosis of MS-related mania

Distinguishing between primary bipolar disorder, secondary MS-related mania and steroid-induced mania can be difficult. Accurate diagnosis is essential for effective management, as treatment for one form may exacerbate another. Below are some of the ‘atypical’ features of MS-related mania that deviate from classic bipolar disorder.

Late onset of symptoms

Primary bipolar disorder usually begins in adolescence or early adulthood. In contrast, secondary mania associated with MS can appear later, often after age 35–40 or during disease progression. A manic or psychotic episode may sometimes be the first manifestation of MS, occurring months or years before a neurological diagnosis.

Mania coinciding with an MS relapse

A sudden change in mood, sleep or behaviour that coincides with new neurological symptoms (e.g. numbness, vision changes, weakness) may indicate that inflammation or new lesions are affecting mood circuits. There may also be evidence of disease progression from MRI scans.

Weak family history

Primary bipolar disorder often runs in families; the absence of a family history suggests a secondary cause (i.e. MS-related pathology).

Disproportionate cognitive decline

Impulse control and executive functions, such as planning, organising and paying attention, are impaired – possibly reflecting frontal lobe involvement.

Mania as an MS relapse

A minority of patients present with isolated psychiatric symptoms (mania, psychosis, delirium) as the only manifestation of a relapse. MRI often reveals new frontal or temporal lesions, even when motor or sensory signs are absent.

Lack of response to standard treatments

Failure to respond to standard mood stabilisers, or paradoxical worsening with antidepressants, warrants a re-evaluation for organic causes.

Genetic considerations

Is the risk solely environmental (inflammation/lesions), or do MS and bipolar disorder share a genetic root? The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) on chromosome 6 is the primary genetic risk factor for MS (specifically the HLA-DRB1*15:01 allele). Interestingly, Genome-Wide Association Studies have suggested that the MHC region is also involved in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.
There is some evidence that, in certain familial clusters, a gene located near the HLA locus (possibly involving the HLA-DR2 antigen) could confer susceptibility to both autoimmune demyelination and bipolar disorder. Other studies have indicated the opposite: that specific MS risk alleles in the HLA region are associated with decreased schizophrenia risk. The results are therefore mixed; some haplotypes may increase the risk of severe mental illness, while others appear protective against it. It is likely that environmental factors (inflammation, lesion burden) play a greater role than genetics in most cases.

Is the risk solely environmental (inflammation/lesions), or do MS and bipolar disorder share a genetic root? The Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) on chromosome 6 is the primary genetic risk factor for MS (specifically the HLA-DRB1*15:01 allele). Interestingly, Genome-Wide Association Studies have suggested that the MHC region is also involved in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

There is some evidence that, in certain familial clusters, a gene located near the HLA locus (possibly involving the HLA-DR2 antigen) could confer susceptibility to both autoimmune demyelination and bipolar disorder. Other studies have indicated the opposite: that specific MS risk alleles in the HLA region are associated with decreased schizophrenia risk. The results are therefore mixed; some haplotypes may increase the risk of severe mental illness, while others appear protective against it. It is likely that environmental factors (inflammation, lesion burden) play a greater role than genetics in most cases.

Management

Treatment of MS-related mania depends on the cause.

Steroid-induced mania

If steroids triggered the symptoms, the steroids should be tapered or discontinued if safe.
Short-term antipsychotic medications, such as quetiapine, olanzapine or risperidone, can help stabilise mania symptoms. Quetiapine has the added benefit of aiding sleep, which is commonly disrupted in people with MS. Use of low-dose benzodiazepines during the steroid course can help to reduce the insomnia that often precedes or triggers mania.

Mania caused by MS inflammation

If mania is part of an organic, MS relapse, treating the inflammation is important. High-dose steroids may then be necessary, even though they can in other circumstances cause mania.
This crucial distinction underscores the need for close coordination between neurology and psychiatry.

Mood swings

Lithium is still the gold standard mood stabiliser and is generally safe for psychiatric management in MS. The anticonvulsants valproate, lamotrigine and carbamazepine are useful alternatives in people with MS; they treat both the mania and other MS-related comorbidities, such as neuropathic pain and trigeminal neuralgia.

Managing future steroid treatment

People with a known history of bipolar disorder or steroid-induced instability may benefit from:

  • starting a low-dose mood stabiliser (e.g. lithium) before the steroid course
  • adding an antipsychotic temporarily (e.g. olanzapine)
  • using sleep support (e.g. low-dose benzodiazepines) to prevent insomnia (a common trigger for mania).

Long-term management

Any MS patient presenting with new-onset mania requires a comprehensive workup, including MRI (to check for new frontal/temporal lesions) and a review of recent medication changes, rather than a direct referral to psychiatry. Ongoing coordination between neurologists and psychiatrists is, however, essential. A neurologist might misinterpret mania as ‘euphoria’ related to frontal lobe damage (pseudobulbar affect), while a psychiatrist might miss the neurological signs of an MS relapse that is driving the mood change. Screening tools (e.g. Mood Disorder Questionnaire) may help identify individuals at higher risk but should not replace clinical judgement.

Recognising the distinguishing features of MS-related mania allows clinicians to intervene promptly, reduce misdiagnosis and optimise care. With integrated neurological and psychiatric management, most people with MS experiencing bipolar symptoms can achieve stable, effective control of their mood and maintain a high quality of life.

Reference

Haroon, E et al. Psychoneuroimmunology meets neuropsychopharmacology: translational implications of the impact of inflammation on behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology Rev; 2011:1–26.

Cognition and mental health

Management of mental health disorders in people with MS

Emotional problems in people with MS must be recognised, addressed and treated, rather than dismissed as an inevitable consequence of living with this chronic condition.

Key points

  • An MS diagnosis naturally triggers emotions similar to the stages of grief (denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance); in addition, the unpredictability of MS causes anxiety in many patients.
  • Anxiety, often combined with depression, is linked to a poorer quality of life, cognitive dysfunction, increased risk of suicide, and significant occupational and social problems.
  • Emotional problems in MS are typically exacerbated by fatigue, pain and poor sleep – all of which interfere with therapy and lifestyle adjustments.
  • Emotional changes in MS require treatment, just as physical symptoms do. This should comprise routine screening, targeted drug treatment and structured psychological and behavioural therapies.
  • Motivational coping styles that involve direct problem-solving and active participation in treatment planning (i.e. self-management) help people with MS adjust to their diagnosis.
  • Avoidance coping strategies generally lead to poorer psychological outcomes.
  • The presence of social support is a critical protective factor.

Impact of emotional changes

Emotional disorders have an adverse effect in people with MS, potentially impairing their ability to cope with disability and reducing overall health-related quality of life. Living with MS can also adversely affect relationships, for complex reasons, including both emotional and physical problems associated with the disease. Therefore, such symptoms must be recognised, addressed and treated, rather than dismissed as an inevitable or acceptable consequence of living with a chronic condition such as MS.

Emotional disturbances in people with MS may be reactive, i.e. a natural, adaptive psychological response to being diagnosed with a long-term, unpredictable and potentially disabling disease. Common emotions include grief, sadness, worry, fear, irritability and moodiness. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross in 1969 described five common stages of grief, best known by the acronym DABDA. We have added an extra A, for Anxiety about the future, to include the emotional reaction to a diagnosis of MS. The expands the mnemonic to six stages: DABDAA.

Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, Acceptance, Anxiety

These emotional stages are considered ‘normal’ and an understandable coping mechanism. As with grieving, if they are prolonged, dominant and impact your social and occupational functioning, they are considered abnormal and require intervention. Remaining angry, resentful and depressed for decades will negatively impact your functioning. 

Anxiety and depression in MS

Anxiety affects people with MS with a frequency often matching or exceeding that of depression. The highest prevalence of anxiety is observed in people with MS with low physical disability, defined by an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of less than 3.0. This finding suggests that anxiety is driven less by accumulated physical deficit than by the psychological factors of worry, fear and the inherent unpredictability of MS.

Maladaptive coping strategies are strongly associated with an increased risk of developing mood symptoms. A tendency to use avoidance coping – disengaging from problems rather than confronting them – is a significant predictor of poorer psychological outcomes. Similarly, psychological traits such as low optimism or a less positive attitude can heighten the risk of anxiety.

For a significant subset of patients, MS may first present not to a neurologist, but to a primary care physician, a therapist or a psychiatrist, with symptoms of anxiety or depression. Because the symptoms are psychiatric, the underlying neurological cause is not yet suspected.

Quality of life and daily functioning

Anxiety is a major contributor to the overall disease burden of MS, affecting nearly every aspect of life. Studies show that anxiety, often combined with depression, is linked to a poorer quality of life, cognitive dysfunction, increased risk of suicide, and significant occupational and social problems.

The impact of anxiety on many of the most challenging symptoms of MS – notably fatigue, pain and sleep problems – may be greater even than the effect of depression.  MS symptoms can trigger or worsen anxiety, and the resulting anxiety intensifies the perception and severity of those same symptoms, thus creating a negative feedback loop.

Damaging health behaviours linked to undiagnosed and untreated anxiety can further compromise a patient’s well-being. For example, alcohol and substance abuse, as well as smoking, not only have their own intrinsic health risks but can also interfere with MS management and adherence to treatment. 

Anxiety as a reaction to living with MS

The direct impact of the disease on the brain’s emotional circuits occurs in parallel with the profound psychological and existential challenges of living with MS. Even in the absence of any direct neurological damage to mood-regulating centres, the lived experience of MS itself provides rationale for the development of severe anxiety. 

The unpredictability of the disease and the constant knowledge that a relapse could occur at any time, potentially worsening MS symptoms and existing function, create a state of chronic hypervigilance and worry. This pervasive sense of a loss of control over one’s own body and life is a catalyst for anxiety. Anxiety creates a vicious, self-perpetuating cycle where the physical and psychiatric symptoms mutually reinforce one another.

Anxiety cycle

Multiple stressors

Beyond this overarching uncertainty, living with MS entails a host of stressors.

  • Diagnosis. The diagnostic journey is a period of intense anxiety, often involving a prolonged period of uncertainty as symptoms are investigated. Once diagnosed, patients face a continuous process of adjusting and readjusting to changing abilities.
  • Hidden problems. The invisibility of some of the most burdensome symptoms, such as debilitating fatigue, cognitive fog, or sensory disturbances, can lead to a profound sense of feeling misunderstood, isolated and frustrated.
  • Visible symptoms. Conversely, the emergence of visible symptoms, like a limp or the need for a mobility aid, can bring its own anxieties related to stigma and self-image.
  • Daily life. Financial concerns related to healthcare costs, employment and the ability to continue working, as well as the impact of MS on relationships and potential parenting, may further increase anxiety. 

Existential threat

Profound existential and symbolic threats to a person’s sense of self can further exacerbate anxiety. The sense of loss triggered by a diagnosis of MS – loss of a healthy body, a previously held future and a former identity – is followed by changes in fundamental life roles. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy, guilt and a crisis of identity – perceived as a threat to one’s core self. The constant need to adapt to new limitations can feel like a continuous erosion of the self, and the fear of future disability becomes a fear of further loss of identity.

Addressing this existential dimension of anxiety is crucial for promoting long-term psychological adjustment and overall well-being. Treatment often involves helping individuals grieve their losses, redefine their sense of self and purpose within the context of their illness, and find new sources of meaning and value in their lives. 

Cognitive impairment

The impact of anxiety on cognitive function is well documented. Cognitive impairment, particularly slowed information processing speed, is a common and debilitating feature of MS. Anxiety has a detrimental effect on cognitive domains that are already compromised, such as attention and executive functions. It does this by increasing an individual’s awareness of task-irrelevant, often threat-related, stimuli, which interferes with the goal-oriented cognitive processing required for the task at hand. Thus, the underlying cognitive deficit from MS is compounded by the cognitive interference from anxiety, leading to a greater overall level of impairment than either condition would cause alone. Importantly, therefore, treating a patient’s anxiety can lead to measurable improvements in their cognitive functioning. 

Mood, fatigue, pain and sleep – a vicious cycle

Emotional problems rarely occur in isolation in MS; they are typically part of a clinical syndrome including fatigue, pain and poor sleep. This interconnected symptom cluster reduces health-related quality of life and establishes significant barriers to therapy and lifestyle modification.

Fatigue

Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling symptoms of MS, and it is strongly and consistently correlated with anxiety. This is not a simple correlation but a predictive relationship. Higher levels of anxiety at one point in time can predict the severity of fatigue at a later date. Conversely, higher levels of fatigue can predict the later development or worsening of anxiety.

The severity of depression in highly fatigued people with MS also makes the management of fatigue a high priority in reducing the overall psychiatric burden and allowing patients to engage in psychological interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT).

Pain and emotional distress

A two-way relationship also exists between pain and anxiety, where anxiety is associated with higher reported pain intensity and greater interference of pain with daily activities.  The pain symptoms cause distress and anxiety, and the physical and mental state of anxiety (e.g. muscle tension, worry, poor sleep) in turn exacerbates the symptoms. Moderate or severe intensity pain that interferes with work, household activities or enjoyment of life affects about one-third of people with MS.

Sleep

Sleep is probably the most neglected MS-related problem in routine clinical practice; most people with MS have a sleep disorder. Depression, anxiety, pain and many other MS-related symptoms affect sleep quality. Therefore, it is challenging to manage MS-related emotional disorders without addressing sleep quality.

Lifestyle management and adherence

The cyclical nature of this grouping of mood disorder, fatigue, pain and poor sleep creates barriers to effective management. Emotional distress and physical symptoms can hamper efforts to start or maintain a healthy lifestyle. Since modifiable lifestyle factors (e.g. exercise) are associated with reduced pain burden, a vicious cycle is established: the disease causes emotional distress, the emotional distress prevents adherence to healthy behaviours, and the lack of healthy behaviours exacerbates physical symptoms.

Inappropriate laughing and crying

Inappropriate laughing and crying (pseudobulbar affect, PBA) are two neglected symptoms that often go undetected and untreated in people with MS. This doesn’t have to be the case. They are a further sign of significant damage to the brain and yet another reason to diagnose and treat MS early and effectively.

Case study 

When I first met her, she was in her early fifties. She had had MS for over 20 years. Her family now kept her at home, isolated from the wider world. Her behaviour would embarrass them. Why?

She suffered from pathological laughter and occasionally inappropriate crying; her husband and children could not deal with this in public. She was clearly very disabled when I met her; she was unsteady on her feet and had slurred speech and dancing eyes from cerebellar problems. She had gross cognitive impairment. When I introduced myself to her, she burst into tears. Within 2−3 months of starting sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), her husband informed me that her laughing and crying episodes had improved by over 50% and the family were now taking her out regularly. He was very grateful that I had been able to educate them about her symptoms and, more importantly, help her and them as a family deal with this problem.

PBA is diagnosed using standardised scales or questionnaires, which can be self-administered (Center for Neurologic Study-Lability Scale [CNS-LS]). These symptoms respond to tricyclic and SSRI antidepressants and to a combination pill (Nuedexta®; licensed in the USA) that includes dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate. 

Management of emotional disorders                                                     

Routine screening, targeted drug treatment and structured psychological and behavioural therapies are core components of integrated care in MS. Emotional changes in MS require treatment, just as physical symptoms do.

Screening and education

Routine screening for both anxiety and depression should be part of standard MS care and should be conducted at all scheduled neurological visits. You may be asked to complete different screening questionnaires for depression, anxiety, fatigue and poor sleep. Ideally these should be done before your appointment so that the healthcare professional (HCP) can act on them during the consultation. 

HCPs should educate their patients and their families about potential emotional changes associated with MS, in particular, irritability, crying and mood swings. This education should help reduce the stigma and embarrassment associated with emotional outbursts and enable the patient’s support network to develop coping strategies.

Drug treatment

Drug treatment must be tailored to the specific diagnosis and emotional disorder.

  • Depression and anxiety: The standard use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin−norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) is recommended for the management of clinical depression and anxiety disorders.
  • Irritability: Treatment options for irritability include SSRI antidepressants, which are often needed in addition to CBT. 
  • Pseudobulbar affect (PBA): Low-dose tricyclic or SSRI antidepressants can be effective in the treatment of PBA, but their use is off-label. In the USA, the combination of dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulfate has been approved for PBA. In other countries, the combination of these two drugs can be effective in PBA, but again, the use of these two drugs separately is off-label and not recommended.
  • Apathy: Therapeutic strategies, such as cognitive rehabilitation, that enhance cognitive processing speed and executive function are more appropriate for apathy than antidepressants. However, such approaches are hard to access on the UK NHS and are not available in many healthcare systems. There are no licensed medications for apathy, but anecdotal evidence suggests that fampridine and some stimulants may help.
  • Further research: Properly randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the effectiveness of drugs that some patients obtain and use without a prescription. These include cannabis, psychedelics and ketamine, which are currently not licensed for managing anxiety in MS and are not advised.

Psychological and behavioural interventions

Evidence-based structured psychological interventions are as important as drug treatment for the management of anxiety and depression and should be considered a first-line approach in MS. CBT can address maladaptive thought patterns (e.g. catastrophic thinking about the future) and avoidant behaviours common in anxiety. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) focuses on promoting psychological flexibility and acceptance, which is crucial for managing the reactive distress, grief and fear stemming from the unpredictable nature of the disease. Mindfulness, relaxation techniques and structured exercise programs have also been shown to manage anxiety and stress effectively. 

Interventions such as physical activity and social therapies enable some people with MS to process the grief and losses imposed by MS. Simple behavioural strategies, such as taking a break from a conversation when emotions escalate, can also be beneficial. 

Protective factors

Several protective factors can bolster resilience and lower the risk of anxiety. Motivational coping styles that involve direct problem-solving and active participation in treatment planning (i.e. self-management) are associated with better adjustment. One of the most critical protective factors is the presence of social support. Robust practical and emotional help from friends and family, and the knowledge that help is available if needed, significantly reduces the risk of mood symptoms. Finding ways to continue participating in previously enjoyed activities, albeit with new limitations, are key to coping. Interventions aimed at strengthening coping skills, fostering optimism and building social support networks can play a crucial role in preventing and treating anxiety in this population.

The therapeutic challenge

There is substantial symptom overlap between anxiety and depression (e.g. sleep disturbance, fatigue, difficulty concentrating) and between these mood disorders and the primary symptoms of MS. This can make it challenging for HCPs to discern whether a specific symptom, e.g. fatigue, is primarily a neurological symptom of MS, a physical symptom of depression, a consequence of the hyperarousal and poor sleep of anxiety, or a combination of all three. Use of appropriate screening tools can help to ensure that both anxiety and depression are accurately identified and appropriately treated.

Conclusion

MS profoundly affects emotional health across a broad and complex spectrum, manifesting as major depressive disorders, high levels of anxiety, the neurological syndrome of pseudobulbar affect, the cognitive−behavioural syndrome of apathy and, rarely, mania. These emotional changes are driven by primary damage to cortical-subcortical and brainstem circuits, coupled with reactive psychological distress resulting from living with a chronic, unpredictable illness. The current standard of care mandates routine screening, targeted drug treatments and psychological support utilising CBT and ACT. 

Cognition and mental health

Mental ill-health in MS: prevalence and causes

It is now well established that the burden of MS extends far beyond the purely neurological problems to include mental health.

Key points

  • Many patients with MS experience both anxiety and depression.
  • Other emotional and behavioural changes associated with MS include cognitive changes, apathy, inappropriate laughing and crying, euphoria, mania and bipolar disorder.
  • Physical symptoms like fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, numbness, tingling and dizziness may occur both in MS and in anxiety states, complicating diagnosis.
  • Unless severe anxiety symptoms are formally diagnosed as an anxiety disorder, individuals miss out on targeted treatments.
  • There is growing evidence that MS-related emotional changes are not necessarily a psychological consequence of living with a disability.
    • They may have a biological origin related to structural damage in the brain, caused by the MS disease process.
    • Brain imaging techniques that measure activity reveal how these brain networks function in real time.
  • Emotional changes sometimes occur as a side effect of medications used in the management of MS, including steroids used to treat MS relapses..

Background and introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that is typically defined by its physical manifestations, such as motor weakness, sensory disturbances and fatigue. However, the burden of MS extends far beyond the purely neurological problems to include cognitive changes and mental health disorders such as anxiety, depression, apathy, mania and uncontrolled laughter and crying.

Anxiety and depression in people with MS

Among the most prevalent mental health problems in MS is anxiety, a condition that for many years was overshadowed by the clinical and research focus on depression. Anxiety is not a secondary issue but a core component of the disease experience for many people with MS. Anxiety and depression in MS are closely related, with many patients experiencing both simultaneously. Indeed, the presence of depression in people with MS is a strong predictor of the future development of anxiety, and vice versa. Both conditions share common underlying psychological risk factors such as avoidant coping styles and low optimism as well as unhealthy behaviours like smoking or lack of exercise.

Many large-scale studies have shown that anxiety is more prevalent in the MS population than in the general population. Two meta-analyses published in 2017 and 2023 assessed more than 50 published studies; based on pooled results, they estimated that 22% and 36%, respectively, of people with MS experienced anxiety.1,2 The prevalence rates for depressive disorders in people with MS are about 20−30%. Further research, utilising the UK MS Register, suggests that more than half (54%) of the 4000 patients recorded in the database have experienced clinically significant anxiety and 47% have experienced depression.3

MH anxiety

The proportions of people with different levels of anxiety (normal, mild, moderate or severe) and who have a depression score of 8 or above (N = 1961). Data from UK MS Register.3

MH depression

The proportions of people with different levels of depression (normal, mild, moderate or severe) and who have an anxiety score of 8 or above (N = 2268).  Data from UK MS Register.3

By contrast, the lifetime prevalence of any anxiety disorder in the general population in the USA is around 29% (though the prevalence at a specific point in time is lower). Anxiety is also significantly more prevalent in MS than in many other chronic neurological conditions, suggesting a relationship that may be specific to the pathophysiology or lived experience of MS.

Psychiatric symptoms versus psychiatric disorders

A critical nuance in understanding the epidemiology of anxiety in MS lies in the distinction between clinically significant anxiety symptoms and formally diagnosed anxiety disorders. The two are related but not interchangeable, and the disparity between their prevalence rates reveals a crucial aspect of the clinical challenge. The 2017 meta-analysis that found a 22% prevalence for anxiety disorders also found a substantially higher (34%) prevalence of clinically significant anxiety symptoms. This discrepancy indicates that for every ten patients who meet the formal diagnostic criteria for a specific anxiety disorder, such as generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) or panic disorder, there are approximately 15 patients who experience a level of anxiety that is severe enough to cause distress and impair functioning but is not formally identified and diagnosed in a clinical setting. The result is that these individuals miss out on targeted interventions such as specific psychotherapies or drug treatment that they might otherwise receive.

This large population of symptomatic but undiagnosed individuals may exist for several reasons. First, there is considerable symptom overlap between anxiety and MS itself. Physical symptoms like fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, numbness, tingling and dizziness can be manifestations of either MS or an anxiety state, creating a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and confusion for people with MS. Second, both patients and clinicians may view anxiety as an ’understandable’ or ’normal’ psychological reaction to living with a chronic, unpredictable illness, rather than as a distinct, treatable clinical entity. Finally, the historical research emphasis on depression may have led to less routine screening for anxiety in clinical practice. As an MSologist, it is also essential to differentiate formal depressive disorders from clinically significant depressive symptoms, which are much commoner than disorders.

Among those who do meet the criteria for a formal disorder, GAD appears to be the most prevalent, followed by panic disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Recognising the full spectrum of anxiety, from subclinical symptoms to formal disorders, is essential for developing effective screening protocols and ensuring that all people with MS experiencing anxiety receive appropriate care (see article on management of mental ill-health in MS).

Other emotional and behavioural changes

MS impairs neuropsychiatric function (the interplay between neurological and psychological functioning) in a similar manner to its effects on other neurological functions. Living with MS can result in personality changes and subsequent relationship problems.

Cognitive changes

Cognitive impairment (i.e. dysfunction), particularly slowed information processing speed, is a common, well-documented and debilitating feature of MS. Anxiety has a demonstrably detrimental effect on cognitive domains that are often already compromised in MS, such as attention and executive functions.

Apathy

Apathy, characterised by profound loss of interest, blunted affect and reduced motivation, is also common in MS, particularly advanced MS. It is often misdiagnosed as depression. Apathy is not merely a component of low mood but is linked to executive dysfunction. Predictors identified include depressive symptoms, poor global quality of life, and poor attention and information processing speeds, probably due to MS lesions in the frontal lobe.

Inappropriate laughing and crying

Pathological laughing and crying, also known as pseudobulbar affect (PBA), are common but under-recognised and undertreated symptoms of MS that can be highly distressing and embarrassing for the patient and their relatives. The sudden, involuntary and explosive expressions of laughter or crying characteristic of PBA are often disproportionate or unrelated to the individual’s underlying emotional state.PBA is also associated with cognitive and mood problems, though the sudden and disproportionate emotional reactivity differentiates it from depression. The clinical presentation is due to frontal lobe or brainstem damage resulting from MS, which disrupts motor control pathways for emotional expression.  

Rare affective changes

Euphoria and mania are relatively uncommon in people with MS but are often triggered by high-dose steroids used to treat MS relapses.

Bipolar disorder is significantly more common in people with MS than in the general population; please see the separate post/chapter on this. The diagnosis must be made and treated by psychiatrists and involves lifelong therapy. 

The biological basis of mental illness in MS

MS-related emotional and mood changes are not necessarily a consequence of disability; they are often intrinsic to the MS disease process. This was recognised by the French neurologist Charcot, who, in 1877, noted pathological laughing, weeping, euphoria and depression in his patients who had MS.

Anxiety as a manifestation of MS pathology

While the psychological stress of living with a chronic illness contributes to anxiety in MS, there is growing evidence that anxiety is not solely a reactive or psychological phenomenon. The same autoimmune attack that damages myelin and axons, leading to physical disability, also targets and disrupts the complex neural circuits responsible for mood regulation, threat perception and emotional processing. 

Neuroinflammation and demyelination (damage to nerve insulation) are directly implicated in the development of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. MS lesions are not confined to areas of the brain responsible for motor and sensory function but also occur within the networks that govern emotion and mood.

Structural and functional brain changes

Research has shown that people with MS can develop gradual grey matter loss in brain regions involved in emotion and motivation, particularly the limbic system and the basal ganglia. The limbic system includes the hippocampus, amygdala and cingulate cortex, and it plays a central role in processing emotions. Changes in the shape of the hippocampus have also been observed.

MH limbic system

Primary components of the limbic system. Modified from Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.

These structural changes are thought to contribute to the development of mood and anxiety problems in MS. When MS-related inflammation, demyelination (damage to nerve insulation) or atrophy affects these areas, the brain’s ability to regulate fear and emotional responses can be disrupted. This creates a biological vulnerability to anxiety. From a structural perspective, therefore, anxiety in MS can be viewed as a direct consequence of neurological damage, in the same way that damage to the optic nerve causes visual impairment, or damage to the spinal cord leads to motor weakness.

In people with MS, depressive symptoms are consistently correlated with the volume of lesions in the brain and the degree of damage to connections between the cortex and subcortex. Neuroimaging studies show an association between depression and damage in the frontal and temporal areas of the cortex. In contrast, PBA is associated with lesions in the brainstem.

Brain imaging techniques that measure activity, such as functional MRI (fMRI), help to explain how these structural changes translate into anxiety symptoms. Rather than only showing where structural damage exists, fMRI studies reveal how brain networks function in real time. One key process identified in anxious people with MS is ‘fear overgeneralisation’. This occurs when the brain reacts to safe or neutral situations as if they were dangerous. For example, an individual learns to associate a specific signal (e.g. a picture of a circle) with a negative outcome (e.g. a mild electric shock). Anxious individuals tend to ’overgeneralise’ this fear, responding with fear to a similar but harmless signal (e.g. an oval), thus expanding their perception of danger in everyday life.

fMRI studies show that this process mainly involves the hippocampus (which is responsible for comparing incoming new experiences with ‘learned’ memories of danger) and the anterior insula (which plays a key role in generating the physical and emotional feeling of fear). In MS patients with anxiety, the physical pathways connecting these two regions are often disrupted, so that accurate information from the hippocampus is less effectively communicated to the anterior insula. As a result, the anterior insula may generate strong fear responses even when a situation is only mildly threatening or even safe.

fMRI studies have also revealed that many MS patients exhibit greater brain responses or increased recruitment of key emotional regions (e.g. prefrontal cortex and amygdala) compared to healthy controls. This likely reflects compensatory mechanisms the brain deploys to limit the clinical expression of emotional symptoms. The damaged MS brain tries to cope.

Neurological versus psychological causes

MS can trigger primary psychopathology as a result of demyelination and damage to specific functional circuits within the brain, as described above. It can be challenging to differentiate primary organic issues from reactive psychological problems, which is why people with MS may be referred for psychiatric assessments. 

I have, however, also seen patients in whom the initial symptoms were psychiatric, e.g. depression or (rarely) mania, but who were later found to have MS. The link between MS-related CNS damage and emotional symptoms is based on lesion location and lesion burden. For example, MS patients with lesions affecting the functional parts of the brain (rather than the connecting structures) exhibit a higher burden of emotional symptoms than those with lesions confined to the spinal cord. Our emotions are part of brain function in a similar way to motor function. Therefore, it is not surprising that MS impacts emotions. 

Lesion location and emotional symptoms

The evidence for a direct correlation between lesion location and anxiety is inconsistent. Some researchers suggest that, unlike depression, anxiety in MS may be driven more by psychosocial pressures and the psychological reaction to the illness rather than by focal brain damage. This discrepancy does not necessarily invalidate the biological basis of anxiety in MS. It may be that anxiety is related to more diffuse or subtle pathological changes, such as microstructural damage in white matter tracts or widespread neuroinflammation, that are not easily captured by conventional MRI lesion analysis. It is also possible that the broad distribution of the brain’s anxiety circuits means that damage to any number of different locations could produce a similar clinical outcome, making it difficult to pinpoint a single ’anxiety-causing’ lesion location. 

Other contributing factors

Emotional changes may occur as a side effect of medications used in the management of MS, including certain disease-modifying therapies. People with MS are also susceptible to the effects of the menopause, seasonal affective disorder and comorbidities associated with depression and anxiety, such as alcohol and other substance misuse disorders. It is advisable, therefore, to have a complete assessment before having a mood disorder labelled as being due to MS. 

Anxiety in MS may also be caused by high-dose corticosteroids, which are the standard treatment for MS relapses. Steroids have significant neuropsychiatric side effects, including anxiety, mania, insomnia and psychosis. For someone with MS already dealing with the stress of a relapse, the addition of steroid-induced anxiety can be particularly distressing.

‘Prodromal’ MS and psychiatric symptoms

Psychiatric comorbidities, such as anxiety and depression, have historically been viewed as consequences that follow the diagnosis of MS. Recent research, however, points to the existence of an ‘MS prodrome’, during which anxiety and depression occur years before the first classical neurological event.4 Increased rates of anxiety are a significant feature of this prodromal phase, suggesting that anxiety and/or depression may be early signs of MS, not merely a consequence. This body of recent research supports the idea that psychiatric symptoms in MS have a biological origin. This is most likely driven by the same low-level, diffuse neuroinflammatory and neurodegenerative processes that are smouldering away in the CNS long before the first eloquent MS lesion.

References

  1. Boeschoten, RE et al. Prevalence of depression and anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci 2017;372:331−341.
  2. Zhang X et al. The prevalence and risk factors of anxiety in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurosci 2023;17:1120541.
  3. Jones KH, et al. A large-scale study of anxiety and depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a survey via the web portal of the UK MS Register. PLoS ONE 2012;7:e41910.
  4. Ruiz-Algueró, M et al. Health care use before multiple sclerosis symptom onset. JAMA Netw Open 2025;8:e2524635.
Clinical decisions, Cognition and mental health

Medical gaslighting – what is it, and how to avoid it?

Doctors have a long history of ignoring patients’ symptoms and complaints. In MS, this phenomenon tends to affect the so-called ‘hidden’ symptoms and related problems that are difficult to treat. 

Key points

  • Medical ‘gaslighting’, where healthcare professionals (HCPs) dismiss or downplay a patient’s symptoms, is an issue that patients and HCPs should be aware of. It affects women more than men.
  • Safety-netting is a legitimate strategy whereby the HCP and the patient adopt a wait-and-see approach to avoid over-investigation and overdiagnosis. It is part of a shared decision-making process and should not be interpreted as gaslighting.
  • Medical gaslighting can be subtle, but useful strategies exist for detecting and avoiding it.
  • If you are being gaslighted, despite efforts to push back, don’t be afraid to make your healthcare system aware of the problem rather than suffer in silence.

A case scenario

Whenever I see my neurologist, he seems to fob me off as if I don’t have a problem. He disagrees with me when I tell him that my MS is getting worse. He tells me I am not getting worse as my MRI is stable and my neuro exam is unchanged. He doesn’t believe me when I tell him that I am becoming more forgetful and that my fatigue is affecting the quality of my work.  

Origin of the term ‘gaslighting’

The volume of medicolegal case studies where doctors have ignored patients’ symptoms and complaints illustrates the extent of a problem that is now being referred to as medical gaslighting. Medical gaslighting may occur if:

  • your symptoms or concerns are dismissed of ignored without cause
  • your symptoms are dismissed as being normal, without explanation
  • you are made to feel your healthcare provider is blaming you.

The term ‘gaslighting’ comes from the 1944 film Gaslight starring Ingrid Bergman. The movie tells of a man who manipulates his wife to such an extent that she begins to doubt her own sanity. Since then, the term gaslighting has been used to describe emotional abuse that makes someone question their version of reality. People are beginning to share their personal experiences of medical gaslighting on social media with the hashtag #medicalgaslighting. 

Prevalence and severity of medical gaslighting

An article in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) suggests women are more likely than men to suffer from medical gaslighting, particularly with ‘health problems such as endometriosis, fibromyalgia, and irritable bowel syndrome’.1 Worryingly, the article states: ‘when compared with men, women face longer waits to be given a diagnosis of cancer or heart disease’. The article goes on to imply that medical gaslighting is becoming more common and the term has been ‘used widely in connection with long COVID, particularly early on in the pandemic’, when some patients who were still experiencing symptoms months after infection with SARS-CoV-2 thought they were not treated seriously or investigated fully.

A short online survey I did among MS-Selfie readers in 2022 revealed that 88% of 423 responders reported being gaslighted.

Responses to the survey question, ‘Have you ever experienced medical gaslighting in relation to your MS?’ (based on results from 423 MS-Selfie readers).

I am probably guilty of medical gaslighting too; in some cases, this may be deliberate. Many patients come to me with pages of problems, and I simply don’t have the time to deal with all of them. Time, or more correctly, lack of time is therefore one reason for medical gaslighting. Another is lack of knowledge or experience and not being able to admit you don’t know. However, the most worrying reason is the power dynamic, with HCPs wanting to be in control or remain in control. 

MS-Selfie as an initiative tries to address this power dynamic by giving you useful information to self-manage your MS – or at least to ask the right questions. 

Safety-netting

I suspect safety-netting may be misinterpreted as gaslighting. Safety-netting describes activities both within the HCP consultation and at healthcare systems levels (diagnostic and treatment algorithms) to avoid over-investigation and overdiagnosis. Many symptoms are non-specific and because of uncertainty the HCP and the patient adopt a wait-and-see approach. The patient is given clear instructions on how to identify the need to seek further medical help if their condition fails to improve, changes, or if they have ongoing concerns about the problem. Safety-netting is considered good clinical practice. A recent BMJ article2 on safety-netting makes the following points:

  • Aggressively treating or investigating all patients with early undifferentiated illness is poor medical practice and can be harmful.
  • Time is an important diagnostic tool but creates a period of uncertainty and risk for patients with serious underlying conditions.
  • Safety-netting can help mitigate this risk, and a traffic light framework provides a structure for delivering safety-netting advice.

The point about safety-netting is that it needs to be done as a part of a shared-decision making process and it should therefore not be interpreted as gaslighting. 

How to identify and tackle medical gaslighting

A New York Times article on medical gaslighting warns that it can be subtle, and lists some red flags to watch for.3 

  1. Your HCP continually interrupts you, doesn’t allow you to elaborate and doesn’t appear to be an engaged listener.
  2. Your HCP minimises or downplays your symptoms, for example questioning whether you have pain.
  3. Your HCP refuses to discuss your symptoms.
  4. Your HCP will not order key investigations to rule out or confirm a diagnosis.
  5. You feel that your HCP is being rude, condescending or belittling. Your symptoms are blamed on a mental problem, but you are not provided with a mental health referral or screened for such a problem.

Now that we have recognised medical gaslighting as a significant problem in MS, please don’t allow a neurologist to gaslight you. The New York Times article suggests practical steps you can take to prevent this. 

  • Keep detailed notes and records. Patient-held notes transform consultations and force you to become a partner in your healthcare.
  • Record the consultation. Many HCPs don’t like this; just tell them you must listen to the conversation again to ensure you don’t forget things or miss important information. You will be surprised how this changes the HCP’s behaviour. 
  • Ask questions. Then ask some more. And don’t be fobbed off; if you are dissatisfied with the answer, ask the question again. 
  • Take someone with you for support. Having a witness during the consultation has a similar effect to recording the conversation or documenting it with notes. 
  • Focus on your most pressing issues to make the best use of your consultation time. If your HCP is pressed for time, say you understand, but you would like to prioritise the following issues today. This helps you to frame the limits of the consultation and promote a two-way discussion. Also, don’t expect the HCP to have all the answers at their fingertips, but do expect them to come back to you later with the answers.
  • Try and pin down the next steps for your problem; ask what the action points are. For example, if the MRI shows this, how will that change my management? Do I need further investigations? How soon should I switch treatments?

If you are still being ignored, here are some of your options.

Get a second opinion and ask to switch to a new HCP
Look to support groups or forums. Many MS charities have helplines where you can discuss these issues
Appeal to a higher authority, the person above your HCP (their line manager). In the NHS, we have a straightforward procedure for patients to complain or question their care. It is called PALS (Patient Advice and Liaison Service)

Some courses of action open to you if you experience medical gaslighting.

Abuse, manipulation, gaslighting and delaying a diagnosis are potentially reportable events which HCPs need to know about. Therefore, make your healthcare system aware of the problem rather than suffer in silence. 

Healthcare systems and the medical professions

We need to include medical gaslighting as part of the medical curriculum so that HCPs are made aware of it during their training. HCPs must buy into the model of patients being equal partners in the diagnosis and management of their disease. The paternalistic or older patronising model of healthcare where the HCP knows best is outmoded.

Gaslighting is another form of abuse or discriminatory behaviour, no different from sexism, racism or ageism. This raises the question, is it deliberate or an institutional problem, i.e. part of the dominant medical culture? I suspect the latter, and this is why it will need a wider campaign to tackle the problem, with clearly defined carrots (incentives/rewards) and sticks (disincentives/punishment) to change our behaviour. 

References

  1. Wise J. Sixty seconds on . . . medical gaslighting. BMJ 2022;378:o1974.
  2. Edwards PJ et al. Safety-netting in the consultation. BMJ 2022;378:e069094.
  3. Caron C. Feeling dismissed? How to spot ‘medical gaslighting’ and what to do about it. New York Times, 29 July 2022.