Tag Archives: communication

Cognition and mental health

Suicidal ideation and suicide in MS

Mental health problems and suicide are the underbelly of MS, the elephant in the consulting room. I have attempted to discuss these topics in a way that is not too dark, based on data from a 2026 systematic review. Please be aware, however, that the content may still be upsetting.

Key points

  • The suicide rate among people with MS is roughly twice that of the general population.
  • Several biological, psychological and social factors contribute to suicide risk:
    • depression and anxiety: a biological basis for these comorbidities exists in MS
    • MS disease-related factors: increased disability, disease duration and progression; life-changing symptoms
    • socio-demographic factors: age, male sex, living alone, education level
    • social and existential factors: loneliness, social exclusion and low perceived social support; loss of purpose and meaning; financial strain; fear of stigma.
  • Thoughts of ending one’s life – ‘suicidal ideation’ – precede suicide attempts; effective screening tools exist, are quick to complete and can identify patients at risk of suicide.
  • Systematic screening is not optional but should be part of the basic standard of care.
  • Suicide prevention in MS requires participation by the clinic, the patient (and their family) and the health system.
  • If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please reach out for help. Support groups are available.

The problem we avoid talking about …

MS is a chronic, unpredictable and often disabling neurological condition. People with MS know this, and as a result they carry a psychological burden that is usually overlooked in a 15-minute annual outpatient appointment. Mental health problems and suicide are the elephant in the MS consulting room. They sit quietly alongside the disability progression conversation, the drug treatment switch discussion, and the “How are things at home?” question that healthcare professionals (HCPs) often forget to ask.

How common are suicidal ideation and suicide in MS?

Suicidal ideation – thoughts of ending one’s life, with or without a plan – is the single most important precursor to suicide attempts, and death by suicide among people with MS is far more common than most HCPs appreciate. A landmark Canadian study in 1991 found that suicide was the third most common cause of death reported in MS clinics.1 The proportion of deaths due to suicide among people with MS (15%) was 7.5 times the proportion in an age-matched general population (2%).

More recent work suggests that the suicide rate among people with MS is roughly twice that of the general population.2 A 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of suicidal ideation in MS draws on 18 studies and more than 8,000 people with MS to provide a picture of how common it is, what drives it and where the gaps are in MS care.2 From these combined data, the authors estimate that one in five people (20%) in an MS clinic waiting room has considered suicide. This is higher than the 13% figure from a 2020 meta-analysis,3 and the authors suggest two plausible explanations:

  • an expanding evidence base that now includes more diverse settings
  • a real rise in suicidal ideation rates – perhaps linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, growing geopolitical instability and reduced stigma around reporting mental health symptoms.

Individual study prevalence ranged dramatically, from 8% in a Canadian cohort to 36% in an Iranian cohort. This is probably telling us something important about how context, culture, income level and healthcare infrastructure shape suicide risk.

In most high-income countries, lifetime suicidal ideation prevalence in the general population is around 9–10%. The recent 20% figure in people with MS2 is therefore roughly double that seen in the background population – a finding echoed by many independent studies.

Regional and temporal patterns

In the 2026 review, subgroup analysis based on country income level reported a pooled suicidal ideation prevalence of 17% among the 14 high-income countries compared with 32% in the countries with ‘upper-middle’ incomes (three studies from Iran and one from Brazil).2 This aligns with what we know about mental health inequities more broadly – poverty, housing insecurity, financial strain, limited access to psychiatric services, and stigma all worsen outcomes in lower-resource settings. (Please note, the ‘upper-middle income’ data in this review came from just two countries; therefore, we should be cautious about extrapolating to sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia or Latin America as a whole.)

Suicidal ideation prevalence figures published between 19911 and 20262 from many studies conducted across different regions of the world vary widely and may appear inconsistent. The 2026 figure of 20% still means, however, that roughly one in five people with MS has active suicidal thoughts, and global crises in the last five years may be masking an underlying deterioration that will only become visible in the next generation of studies.

Limitations of study data

The 2026 review has limitations that need to be acknowledged. Study methodologies vary widely: suicidal ideation is measured with different instruments and at different time points; diagnostic criteria for MS are inconsistently reported; variability between studies is high. The ‘20% prevalence’ figure from 2026 is therefore an estimate with uncertainty. What is not uncertain is that suicidal ideation is substantially more common in MS than in the general population, and that it is driven by modifiable factors and hence is preventable. 

Who is at risk of suicidal ideation among people with MS

No single risk factor predicts suicidal ideation in isolation. Suicide is the final common pathway of several biological, psychological and social factors. Consistent drivers can be grouped into four domains.2

1. Psychiatric comorbidity: depression and anxiety

Depression and anxiety are the most consistently reported risk factors for suicidal ideation in MS.2 Depression affects up to 50% of people with MS at some point, far exceeding the 14–21% figure in the general population. This matters because depression in MS is both more common and more severe than in the general population, and it is driven by a mixture of:

  • neuroinflammation and hormonal factors (depression in MS is not simply a ‘reaction’ to having MS – it has a biological basis)
  • lesion location, particularly in limbic and frontal lobe/cortex pathways
  • disease-modifying therapy (DMT) side effects (particularly with interferon therapy)
  • the psychological burden of uncertainty, disability and loss of role.

Anxiety, which is often under-recognised and under-treated in MS, frequently coexists with depression and independently elevates suicidal ideation risk.

2. Disease-related factors

Several disease features align with suicidal ideation across studies.

  • Greater disability – measured both by clinician-rated EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) scores and by self-reported physical impairment. The latter may be a stronger predictor than EDSS scores, because it captures the subjective experience of living with impairment.
  • Longer disease duration – though this relationship is complex. Study results vary, suggesting that some patients adapt psychologically over time, probably depending how well they adjust to living with MS.
  • Progressive MS – higher suicidal ideation rates are found in people with more advanced MS when compared with the earlier relapsing–remitting phase. Many HCPs and healthcare systems think that once someone with MS becomes disabled, the disease is not modifiable. I hope landmark studies like ocrelizumab in PPMS (O’HAND study), siponimod in SPMS (EXPAND study) and tolebrutinib in non-relapsing SPMS (HERCULES study) change this perspective. 
  • Specific symptoms – fatigue, sleep disturbance, spasms, bladder and bowel difficulties, and speech and swallowing problems also correlate with suicidal ideation. Together, these symptoms erode quality of life.

3. Sociodemographic factors

The evidence here is more mixed.

  • Age – findings are inconsistent. Some studies identify older patients (≥ 65 years) as higher risk; others find younger people with MS more vulnerable. Both extremes carry risk for different reasons; younger recently diagnosed patients face a challenge to their identity and loss of envisioned future; older patients face accumulated disability and social isolation.
  • Male sex – some (but not all) studies find men at higher risk, consistent with general population data on completed suicide.
  • Unmarried status and living alone are both associated with increased suicidal ideation in multiple studies.
  • Education level – most studies suggest that higher educational attainment is protective (better health literacy, coping strategies, economic resources); one Iranian study found the opposite, perhaps reflecting unmet expectations or awareness of prognosis.

4. Social and existential factors

This domain is the easiest to miss in a busy MS clinic but most important to address.

  • Low perceived social support, from family, friends and significant others, is a consistent risk factor.
  • Loneliness and social exclusion – ‘feeling socially excluded’ strongly correlates with suicidal ideation.
  • Hopelessness and loss of purpose – perceived loss of control, loss of masculinity/femininity and failure to achieve an expected role contribute psychologically to suicidal ideation.
  • Challenges to faith or spiritual meaning – having a sense of purpose, comfort in faith, and church membership can all be helpful and protective (in those for whom they are important).  
  • Financial strain and anticipated stigma are particularly important in lower-resource settings.

Screening for suicidal ideation in the clinic

If 20% of people with MS experience suicidal ideation but only a small fraction volunteer it spontaneously, systematic screening is not optional but should be part of the basic standard of care. Effective screening tools exist, and they are quick to complete.

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

The PHQ-9 is the most practical and widely validated mental health tool for neurological conditions, including MS; it is particularly suited to detecting suicidal ideation. Item 9 of this 9-item self-report depression screen specifically asks about thoughts of self-harm or being better off dead. It takes under 3 minutes to complete and can be done in the waiting room or electronically before the clinic. Scores above 10 indicate clinically significant depression warranting action. A positive response to item 9 should trigger a suicide risk assessment. It could be argued that every MS clinic should administer the PHQ-9 at least annually, and at every unscheduled visit where there has been a relapse, a significant disability progression, a DMT change or a major life event.

The Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSI)

The BSI is a 20-item instrument designed specifically for suicide risk. It is more detailed than the PHQ-9 and is better suited to psychiatric follow-up than to first-line screening.

The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)

The BDI-II is a broader 21-item depression measure that includes a suicide item. This is often used in research settings but takes longer to complete than the PHQ-9 in a clinic.

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

The HADS is my favoured option that captures both anxiety and depression domains. It does not, however, include a direct suicide item, so a ‘positive’ (i.e. high: 11−21) HADS score should always prompt a follow-up suicide-specific question.

What should you be asked if a screen is positive?

Clinicians often feel awkward asking directly about suicide. Evidence is unambiguous that asking about suicide does not increase the risk. A graded approach works well:

  1. ‘Have you had thoughts that life isn’t worth living, or that you’d be better off dead?’
  2. ‘Have you had thoughts of harming yourself?’
  3. ‘Have you thought about how you might do it?’ (plan)
  4. ‘Do you have access to the means?’ (access)
  5. ‘Have you taken any steps or made any preparations?’ (intent)

Presence of a plan, access to means, or preparatory behaviour indicates a high imminent risk and demands urgent psychiatric referral – ideally, the same day.

Suicide prevention: what can we do?

Suicide prevention in MS operates at three levels: the clinic, the patient and the system.

At the clinical level

  • Screen systematically. A good MS service should embed PHQ-9 into routine MS review and not rely on patients volunteering suicidal ideation. If I were setting up an MS clinic now, I would include PHQ-9 in routine screening and add it to the annual questionnaire that patients must complete before each clinic visit. 
  • Treat depression and anxiety aggressively. Depression and anxiety are the dominant modifiable risk factors. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs: sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram) are first-line, well-tolerated drugs and have no meaningful interaction with current DMTs. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) – including web-based models – has a good evidence base in MS. We should reject the dogma that ‘of course they’re depressed, they have MS’ as a reason not to proactively manage depression.
  • Address symptom burden. Fatigue, pain, sleep disturbance, bladder dysfunction and spasticity are not just quality-of-life issues – they are suicide risk factors that need to be treated. Please make sure that your MS care team provides relevant support. 
  • Be alert at transition points. Diagnosis, relapse, disability milestones (losing the ability to walk, work or drive), DMT failure, and being labelled as having secondary progressive MS are all periods of elevated risk. 
  • Assess social support explicitly. Who do you live with? Who helps you? Who would you call at 3 am? Treat loneliness and social isolation as vital potential danger signs.
  • Restrict means where appropriate. Safe storage of medications, particularly in patients with large quantities of prescribed opioids, benzodiazepines or anticholinergics, can save lives. This conversation needs to be had with the patient, their partner and their family. 
  • Document and communicate risk. A named crisis contact, a safety plan, and timely communication with the GP or primary care physician should be standard practice.

At the patient and family level

  • Psychoeducation. Many people with MS don’t know that depression is a common and treatable part of MS – they assume sadness and hopelessness are inevitable. Naming and confronting depression and suicidal ideation helps.
  • Normalise help-seeking. The stigma of psychiatric care in MS remains real. Framing mental health as part of MS care, not something separate, reduces that barrier.
  • Involve family. Family members are often the first to notice a change – withdrawal, giving away possessions, changes in sleep. They need to be taught about what to watch for.
  • Build purpose and connection. Peer support groups (e.g. MS Society, Shift.ms, MS Trust, MS International Federation resources, National MS Society [US]), vocational rehabilitation, social prescribing, church attendance, volunteering and hobbies all buffer against hopelessness. Having a purpose in life and being productive reduce the likelihood of suicidal ideation.
  • Safety planning. A written safety plan – warning signs, coping strategies, people to call, reasons for living, means restriction – is a simple but evidence-based self-administered intervention. The Stanley-Brown Safety Plan is freely available online.

At the system level

  • Integrate mental health into MS services. A neuropsychologist or clinical psychologist embedded in an MS service should not be a luxury; it is the minimum standard for a condition where one in two patients develops depression. That said, most NHS MS clinics don’t employ a neuropsychologist, and referring people with MS for assessment and management takes time.
  • Address inequity. The doubled suicidal ideation prevalence in upper-middle-income countries2 is not inevitable. It reflects under-resourced mental health services, stigma, and financial barriers to care – all modifiable at a policy level.
  • Research under-represented populations. The Bazmi review2 of 14 high-income and three upper-middle-income countries openly discusses its limitations: it includes no data from low-income countries and none from most of Asia, Africa or Latin America, beyond a single Brazilian study. MS care cannot be evidence-based at a global level if the evidence is dominated by findings from high-income countries. More research is needed. 

The bottom line

If you are an HCP and are reading this, please remember that roughly one in five of your MS patients has had thoughts of suicide. Most of them have not told you. The dominant drivers – depression, anxiety, disability, symptom burden, loneliness, hopelessness – are either treatable or modifiable, and the screening tools are simple, brief and validated. Although suicidal ideation is common in people with MS, it is driven by modifiable factors and hence is preventable. Suicide in MS is not inevitable. It is, however, easy to miss. Every person with MS deserves a clinician who asks directly, listens without flinching, and acts on what they hear.

If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please reach out for help.

In the UK, Samaritans are available 24/7 on 116 123.

In the US, the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline is available by call or text.

In other countries, the International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP) maintains a directory of crisis services at iasp.info/crisis-centres-helplines/

You are not alone, and help is available.

References

  1. Sadovnick AD, et al. Cause of death in patients attending multiple sclerosis clinics. Neurology 1991;41:1193. doi.org/10.1212/WNL.41.8.1193.
  2. Bazmi E, et al. Global prevalence and risk factors of suicidal ideation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Sci Rep 2026;9:e72331. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.72331.
  3. Kouchaki E, et al. Prevalence of suicidal ideation in multiple sclerosis patients: meta‐analysis of international studies. Soc Work Pub Health 2020;35:655–63.

Bladder and bowel, Intimate issues

Male sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis

Sexual dysfunction is a common symptom in men with MS, with a prevalence that surpasses that seen in the general population and other chronic disease states. Despite sexual dysfunction being one of the most frequently overlooked and under-addressed MS symptoms, it seldom gets documented and treated in men with MS.

Key points

  • Many men with MS experience some form of sexual difficulty; however, this important aspect of overall well-being is underdiagnosed and undertreated.
  • Such difficulties usually result from a combination of neurological, psychological, social and cognitive factors.
  • Primary dysfunction, caused by damage to the network of signals between the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves, can affect the ability to achieve an erection, orgasm or ejaculation; it may also adversely affect libido, sexual desire and genital sensation.
  • Secondary dysfunction results from other MS-related symptoms, including fatigue, spasticity, pain, weakness, bladder dysfunction and bowel dysfunction. Many of the medications used to manage such symptoms may cause or worsen sexual difficulties.
  • Tertiary dysfunction refers to the psychological, emotional and interpersonal challenges of living with MS: depression, anxiety, low self-esteem and impaired body image are among the factors that impact sexual desire and confidence.
  • Management of male sexual dysfunction requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary and personalised approach that involves the MS team, a urologist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist and a psychologist or sex therapist.
  • A wide range of medications, interventions and lifestyle modifications are available that can help couples affected by MS to adapt to the current reality and build a new, satisfying form of intimacy.

An overlooked and distressing symptom

Sexual dysfunction is a common symptom in men with MS, with a prevalence that surpasses that seen in the general population and other chronic disease states. Most studies report that 50–90% of men living with MS will experience some form of sexual difficulty during their disease course. Despite this, sexual dysfunction is one of the most frequently overlooked and under-addressed MS symptoms, and it seldom gets documented and treated in men with MS. This is a clinical paradox, an example of a ‘conspiracy of silence’ where both parties in the clinical encounter overlook a significant issue affecting quality of life.

The main reasons why sexual dysfunction in men with MS is under-recognised, underdiagnosed and undertreated are the taboos of discussing it in the clinic, both from the patient and the HCP perspective. Surveys reveal that the primary barriers to discussing sexual health on the part of HCPs include:

  • time constraints during appointments
  • the major problem that the issue is ‘outside of my role’
  • lack of professional training
  • perceived patient discomfort.

Concurrently, patients are often reluctant to initiate these conversations owing to embarrassment, shame or a deeply held belief that sexuality is somehow incompatible with having a disability. This disconnect between the reality of the patient experience and the focus of the clinical consultation means that a treatable condition that causes significant distress is often left to fester, impacting mental health and relationships. 

Far from being a peripheral concern, sexual function and sexual health are essential components of overall well-being. In men with MS, the onset of sexual dysfunction often precipitates a decline in quality of life, negatively affecting mood, self-esteem and intimate relationships. The distress frequently extends beyond the individual, impacting partners and contributing to marital conflict. The enquiry below illustrates the distress experienced by one man who contacted me for advice; his experience is not uncommon, unfortunately.

Case example

I am a 30-year-old man with relapsing MS. I was diagnosed during my first year of University, aged 18. I presented with transverse myelitis, weakness of both legs and urinary retention. I have been on natalizumab for 12 years and have done very well. However, I have sexual problems with difficulty getting and maintaining an erection. This is affecting my relationship with my wife. Whenever I bring this up with my MS nurse or neurologist, I get dismissed. My GP has given me Viagra, which helps, but its effects are unpredictable, and it often lets me down. I have gotten to the point where I now avoid sexual activity. What advice can you give to help me and others like me?

A complex range of causes

The underlying causes (aetiology) of sexual dysfunction in men with MS are usually complex, variable and dynamic. Some men with MS experience sexual dysfunction as part of a relapse, and they recover with time. However, sexual dysfunction in men with MS usually results from a combination of neurological, psychological, social and cognitive factors. It is therefore vital to approach it from three different perspectives.

  1. Primary dysfunction arises directly from MS lesions within the central nervous system that disrupt the neural pathways governing sexual response.
  2. Secondary dysfunction is the consequence of other MS symptoms, such as fatigue, pain, spasticity, or bladder and bowel issues, which create physical barriers to sexual activity.
  3. Tertiary dysfunction encompasses the psychosocial, emotional and cultural issues that stem from living with a chronic illness, including depression, altered body image and changes in relationships.

Clinical presentations of male sexual dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction

This is the most commonly and widely studied sexual problem in men with MS. Defined as the consistent inability to achieve or maintain a penile erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance, erectile dysfunction (ED) affects a large majority of men with MS who report sexual issues, with some estimates as high as 80%. Across the entire male MS population, approximately 70% experience erectile problems at some point after an MS diagnosis.

Ejaculatory and orgasmic dysfunction

While ED receives the most attention, disorders of ejaculation and orgasm are also common and can be even more distressing for patients owing to a lack of effective treatments. Studies estimate that 35–50% of men with MS experience problems with ejaculation. The Male Sexual Health Questionnaire is used as a screen for dysejaculation. Ejaculatory disorders manifest as:

  • delayed ejaculation or anejaculation: difficulty or complete inability, respectively, to ejaculate despite adequate stimulation
  • premature ejaculation: climaxing too rapidly for sexual satisfaction
  • anorgasmia: the failure to reach orgasm
  • altered orgasmic sensation: a less intense or less pleasurable orgasmic experience.

Disorders of libido or sexual desire

A diminished or absent interest in sex is another crucial component of sexual dysfunction in men with MS. Though less rigorously studied than ED, one report suggests that reduced libido affects approximately 40% of men with MS. Loss of libido is particularly complex, often arising from a combination of damage to the brain’s centres that impact desire, the secondary effect of fatigue, and tertiary psychological factors like depression and anxiety.

Altered genital sensation

The direct neurological impact of MS can manifest as abnormal sensations in the genital area, including numbness (decreased sensation), paraesthesias (e.g. pins and needles) or dysaesthesias (unpleasant or painful sensations, such as burning). These sensory disturbances can fundamentally alter the experience of sexual touch, making it less pleasurable or even painful, thereby directly interfering with arousal and orgasm.

The focus on ED in both MS research and clinical practice is driven in part by the availability of effective pharmacological treatments for this issue; this creates an incomplete picture of the patient’s experience. A management plan that successfully restores erectile function, for example, but fails to address a co-existing inability to ejaculate or a profound lack of sexual desire will ultimately fail to improve the patient’s overall sexual satisfaction and quality of life. A thorough clinical evaluation that assesses all phases of the sexual response cycle is therefore needed.

Functional changes underlying male sexual dysfunction in MS

Primary dysfunction

Normal human sexual function is a complex process that requires the integration of signals between the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves. MS damages this network in several ways, causing primary sexual dysfunction.

Cerebral and brainstem lesions

MS lesions in the brain and brainstem affect libido, arousal and orgasm.

  • Libido and arousal: Sexual desire is not merely a hormonal process; it originates in the brain. Lesions in higher cortical areas, particularly the limbic system (the brain’s emotional centre) and the hypothalamus, can diminish libido and impair the capacity to process sensory or psychological cues as erotic. MRI studies have correlated dysfunction in arousal and erection with lesions in specific brain regions, including the frontal lobe, prefrontal cortex, temporal lobe, insula and hippocampus.
  • Orgasm: Orgasm is also vulnerable to cerebral damage, and orgasmic dysfunction is associated with lesions in the pons (part of the brainstem), left temporal lobe and right occipital areas.

Spinal cord lesions

The spinal cord relays neuronal signals from the brain to the genitals and transmits sensory information back up to the brain. Lesions along the spinal tracts are the leading cause of ED and ejaculatory disorders.

  • Erectile function: Penile erection is a neurovascular phenomenon mediated by two distinct pathways, both of which can be compromised by MS. A psychogenic erection, initiated by erotic thoughts or sensory stimuli processed by the brain, depends on intact nerve signals travelling down the spinal cord to the pelvic organs. A reflexogenic erection, triggered by direct physical touch to the genitals, relies on a reflex arc located in the sacral segments of the spinal cord (S2−S4). MS lesions can disrupt these pathways individually or in combination. Consequently, depending on the specific location of the spinal damage, a man might be able to achieve an erection from direct touch but not from psychological arousal, or vice versa.
  • Ejaculation: Ejaculation is a far more complex reflex than erection, involving the coordinated contraction of multiple pelvic muscles and requiring precise, intact communication between the brain and the entire length of the spinal cord. This complexity makes it exceptionally vulnerable to disruption by MS lesions, which helps explain why ejaculatory problems in MS are so common and difficult to treat.

Autonomic and hormonal factors

The autonomic nervous system, which controls involuntary bodily functions, plays a pivotal role in regulating erection and ejaculation. MS can cause autonomic dysfunction, further contributing to these problems. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that chronic inflammation associated with MS, as well as hypothalamic lesions, can disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. This can lead to altered levels of sex hormones, such as testosterone, and has even been linked to impaired sperm quality.

Secondary dysfunction

Secondary sexual dysfunction arises from other MS-related symptoms and the side effects of medications used to treat these symptoms.

  • Fatigue: Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling MS-associated symptoms that directly undermines sexual function by reducing the physical energy and motivation required for intimacy. When daily life is already exhausting, sexual activity can feel like an insurmountable task.
  • Spasticity, pain and weakness: Spasticity, chronic pain, and muscle weakness can make movement difficult and some sexual positions uncomfortable or impossible. Painful muscle spasms can be triggered by the movements of sexual activity, leading to a conditioned avoidance of sex.
  • Bladder dysfunction and bowel dysfunction: The fear of urinary or faecal incontinence during sexual activity is a potent psychological deterrent. With more than 50% of people with MS experiencing bladder and bowel issues, this is a widespread concern. The anxiety and embarrassment associated with a potential accident can cause individuals and their partners to avoid physical intimacy altogether.
  • Side effects of medication: Many of the medications prescribed to manage the symptoms of MS can, ironically, cause or exacerbate sexual dysfunction. Antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants, are well known for causing decreased libido, ED and anorgasmia. Similarly, medications for spasticity, neuropathic pain and urinary frequency can also interfere with sexual responses.

Tertiary dysfunction

Tertiary dysfunction refers to the complex web of psychological, emotional and interpersonal challenges that arise from living with a chronic, unpredictable illness like MS. These factors can be just as debilitating to a person’s sexual health as any physical symptom.

  • Depression and anxiety: There is a strong, two-way, destructive relationship between MS, depression and sexual dysfunction. Depression affects 30–50% of individuals with MS, and it is an independent predictor of sexual dysfunction. The experience of sexual failure can, in turn, trigger or worsen feelings of depression, despair and isolation, creating a vicious cycle that is difficult to break.
  • Body image and self-esteem: The physical changes brought on by MS – such as a limp, the need for a cane or wheelchair, weight gain from steroids or inactivity, or tremors – can profoundly damage a man’s body image and sense of masculinity. This may lead to feelings of being ‘flawed’, ‘broken’ or ‘unattractive’ that erode self-esteem and sexual confidence.
  • Relationship dynamics and role changes: MS does not just affect the individual; it impacts the entire relationship. Performance anxiety and fear of rejection can lead to avoidance of intimacy. A particularly challenging dynamic arises when an intimate partner must assume significant caregiving responsibilities. This ‘role reversal’ can blur the lines between lover and caregiver, disrupting the emotional foundation of the sexual relationship. The partner’s own sexual satisfaction and quality of life are also frequently diminished, highlighting the two-way nature of sexual dysfunction.

Management of male sexual dysfunction in MS

A single treatment approach towards sexual dysfunction in MS often fails because it is a multifactorial problem that requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach. This includes the MS team, a urologist, a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist and a psychologist or sex therapist. Failure to implement an interdisciplinary approach is usually because the MS team is reluctant to initiate the conversation about sexual health or lacks knowledge.

Before any medication or therapy is initiated, it is essential to break the ‘conspiracy of silence’ and create a safe, confidential environment for open communication between the patient, their partner and the healthcare provider. For the MS HCP, this involves routinely and proactively asking about sexual health as part of a holistic review of systems, often alongside questions about bladder and bowel function. For the patient, having ‘permission’ to discuss these sensitive issues can be profoundly therapeutic, reducing shame and ‘validating’ their experience as a legitimate medical concern.

Management of primary sexual dysfunction

Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction

  • Oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors: Medications such as sildenafil (Viagra), tadalafil (Cialis), vardenafil (Levitra) and avanafil (Spedra) are the first-line pharmacological treatments for ED in men with MS. Vardenafil is generally not available on the NHS, and avanafil is prescribed via specialist sexual dysfunction clinics. Sildenafil (Viagra) has a short half-life and needs to be taken before intercourse is planned. In comparison, tadalafil (Cialis) has a long half-life and is called the weekend Viagra. Some men with MS find that combining the two drugs is synergistic. Please note that they come in different doses, so you will need to titrate the dose to find the one that works best for you. These drugs do not create an erection spontaneously; they work by enhancing the natural erectile process, increasing penile blood flow in response to sexual arousal. Clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy, but they may be effective in only about 50% of men with MS (a lower rate than in the general population), likely due to the underlying neurological deficits. These drugs are contraindicated in men taking nitrate medications for heart conditions.
  • Injectable and intraurethral medications: For men who do not respond to or cannot take oral PDE-5 inhibitors, these locally administered medications are highly effective second-line options. Alprostadil, a synthetic prostaglandin, can be injected directly into the erectile tissue of the penis (intracavernosal injection) or inserted as a small suppository into the urethra. These methods induce an erection directly and are often successful when oral agents are not.

Management of ejaculatory and orgasmic disorders

This remains an area of unmet clinical need, as there are currently no medications specifically approved or consistently effective for treating delayed ejaculation or failure to reach orgasm (anorgasmia) in MS. Some antidepressants (e.g. SSRIs) may be used ‘off-label’ to treat premature ejaculation thanks to their side effect of delaying orgasm. For delayed ejaculation or anorgasmia, the focus shifts to enhancing stimulation through manual or oral techniques or with the use of assistive devices like penile vibrators.

Addressing low libido and sensory changes

A review of the patient’s current medications is needed because many drugs, especially SSRIs, can suppress libido. Switching to an alternative antidepressant with a more favourable sexual side effect profile, such as bupropion or certain SNRIs (serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors), may be beneficial. If blood tests reveal low testosterone levels, hormone replacement therapy may be considered to improve desire and energy. For altered genital sensation, the goal is to compensate for the diminished nerve signals by increasing the intensity and focus of stimulation using vibrators, different types of touch, or other sexual aids.

Management of secondary sexual dysfunction

  • Fatigue: Energy conservation is paramount. This involves planning sexual activity for times of day when energy is highest (often the morning), taking a nap beforehand, and collaborating with a partner to find less physically demanding sexual positions, such as spooning.
  • Spasticity: Proactive management can prevent painful muscle spasms from disrupting intimacy. This may include gentle stretching or massage before sex, taking an antispasticity medication like baclofen approximately 30–60 minutes before sexual activity, and/or experimenting with positions that minimise muscle tightness and discomfort.
  • Bladder and bowel issues: Careful planning can alleviate the anxiety surrounding potential incontinence. Strategies include restricting fluid intake for a few hours before sex, ensuring the bladder and bowel are emptied immediately beforehand and using intermittent self-catheterisation if needed. Using a condom can also provide a sense of security against urinary leakage.
  • Cognitive changes: For individuals whose concentration is affected by MS, creating an environment conducive to focusing is helpful. This means minimising external distractions, such as television or phones, and maximising sensual stimuli, including lighting, music and scent, to help maintain focus on the intimate experience.

Psychological counselling and sex therapy are the cornerstone of a holistic management plan and include cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). CBT can be effective for challenging and reframing the unhelpful thoughts and beliefs that fuel performance anxiety and negative body image. Couples counselling provides a structured forum to improve communication, openly discuss fears and frustrations, and collaboratively explore the changes MS has brought to the relationship, including the sensitive shift from partner to caregiver.

Sensate focus and body mapping are specific sex therapy techniques that are particularly valuable for couples affected by MS. These exercises involve non-demand, non-goal-oriented sensual touching, shifting the focus away from intercourse and orgasm and toward the rediscovery of pleasure. This is especially important when genital sensation has been altered, as it helps couples identify new erogenous zones and broaden their definition of intimacy.

Rehabilitation and lifestyle interventions

These approaches focus on improving physical function and overall health to support sexual well-being.

Pelvic floor exercises are crucial for maintaining erectile rigidity and for the muscular contractions associated with ejaculation. A specialised physiotherapist can design an exercise programme (for example, Kegel exercises) to strengthen these muscles, potentially improving erectile and ejaculatory control. While much of the research into pelvic floor training has focused on women, the principles are also directly applicable to men.

General health has a direct impact on sexual function. Lifestyle modifications such as adopting a heart and brain-healthy diet, engaging in regular physical activity as tolerated, maintaining a healthy weight and quitting smoking can all improve vascular health.

Assistive devices for erectile dysfunction

For men with ED that is refractory to medication, mechanical aids are an important and effective option. Vacuum constriction devices consist of a plastic cylinder placed over the penis, a hand-held pump that creates a vacuum to draw blood into the penis, and a constriction band that is slipped onto the base of the penis to trap the blood and maintain the erection for up to 30 minutes.

Vacuum constriction device operated by a hand-held pump.

Penile prostheses or penile implants are a surgical solution for severe, intractable ED. A device is surgically implanted into the penis that allows the man to create a rigid erection mechanically. This uses saline to inflate the cylinder that is implanted in the penis. The saline can be pumped from a reservoir into the prosthesis or erectile cylinder to mimic an erection. The saline can then be pumped from the cylinder back into the reservoir to cause detumescence. This is typically considered a third-line treatment when all other options have failed.

Penile implant for severe erectile dysfunction

Education, education, education ….

Providing clear, accurate information to the patient and their partner about how MS can affect sexual function helps to demystify the problem, correct common misconceptions (e.g. that sexual activity will worsen the disease), and empower the couple to explore solutions collaboratively.

A management plan for male sexual dysfunction needs to be personalised to address specific primary, secondary and tertiary factors. The goal is often not just to restore previous sexual function but to help the man with MS to adapt to a new reality, encouraging him and his partner to build a new, satisfying form of intimacy.

This calls for improved clinical education of MS healthcare professionals, the integration of standardised screening tools into routine care, and a fundamental shift in clinical culture toward a more holistic model of well-being that values sexual health as a core component of MS management.