Multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment has evolved rapidly, with 11 classes of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) now available in the UK. I will summarise them briefly and explain how they fit within a treatment paradigm for effective and safe use.
Maintenance therapies versus immune reconstitution: what’s the difference?
There is a divide between the two main treatment philosophies: maintenance ̶ escalation versus immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs).
An IRT is given as a short course – a one-off treatment in the case of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) or intermittently for alemtuzumab, cladribine or mitoxantrone. IRTs are not given continuously, and additional courses are given only if inflammatory activity recurs. IRTs can induce long-term remission and, in some cases, potentially a cure.
Maintenance therapies, by comparison, are given continuously without an interruption in dosing (‘continuous’ administration may be daily, one or more times weekly, monthly or even once every few months). Although maintenance therapies can induce long-term remission, they cannot, by definition, result in a cure. The recurrence or continuation of inflammatory activity indicates a suboptimal response to treatment and typically requires a treatment switch. Ideally, this switch should be an escalation to a more effective class of DMT.
An article in our list of key questions, entitled How do I want my MS to be treated?, provides a more detailed comparison of maintenance and IRT therapies, including frequency of administration, efficacy, risks, use in pregnancy, vaccine response and potential for a cure.
The DMTs currently licensed in the UK (in August 2024) are listed in the table under the relevant category.
Disease-modifying therapies for MS licensed in the UK. *Please note, Bonspri is available in other markets but not the UK.
How effective are the different DMTs?
The measures used to assess the effectiveness of a DMT include its ability to reduce or prevent relapses, focal inflammatory activity (that is, new or enlarging lesions) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and disability progression. Additional factors that can help to assess the relative efficacy of DMTs include the proportion of clinical trial subjects who experience improvement in disability and the impact of the treatment on brain volume loss.
The MS-Selfie InfoCardsare an easy-to-use resource to help people with MS compare the key features of each DMT. They contain bite-sized information designed to aid treatment choices and an overview of the key aspects of each DMT.
Efficacy of the licensed DMTs for MS can be visualised as pyramid, with the moderately effective treatments at the bottom and the more effective approaches at the top. What determines the most appropriate DMT efficacy level for an individual depends on several factors, such as baseline prognostic profile, family planning requirements, local or national treatment guidelines, socioeconomic factors, consideration of any co-existing illnesses, cognitive impairment, risk aversion and lifestyle issues.
UK licensed DMTs for MS, in ascending order of efficacy. HSCT/AHSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation/autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
What is the goal of treatment? Introducing NEIDA as a target
In the past, we used no evident disease activity (NEDA) as a treatment target. ‘Disease activity’ included progression or disease worsening independent of relapse activity (termed smouldering MS). Although some of the more effective DMTs may modify this stage of the disease, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching or stopping a DMT based simply on smouldering MS disease activity.
Relapses and ongoing focal MRI activity are associated with a worse short-term to intermediate-term prognosis. These observations have led to the increasing adoption of ‘no evident inflammatory disease activity’ (NEIDA) as a new treatment target. For more information about treatment targets, please see the article in our key questions, Do I understand the concepts of treat-2-target and NEDA?
Many healthcare professionals (HCPs) remain sceptical of using NEIDA as a treatment target, fearing that this could lead to more people with MS being on ‘riskier’ high-efficacy therapies. However, achieving long-term remission, or NEIDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated-to-target of NEIDA from the outset do better than those whose treatment is escalated following breakthrough disease (at a clinical or subclinical/MRI level)1. I would, therefore, strongly encourage people with MS and their HCPs to adopt NEIDA as an initial treatment target.
Flipping the pyramid
The effectiveness, or relative effectiveness, of individual DMTs becomes less critical in the context of a treatment target of NEIDA. Choosing a DMT with a lower efficacy rate simply means that a greater proportion of treated people with MS will need to be switched to higher efficacy therapies over time to achieve NEIDA. We refer to the latter of these three approaches – starting with high-efficacy treatment – as flipping the pyramid. In recent trials of alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab, people with MS randomised to 2 years of lower efficacy DMTs (interferon-beta-1a or teriflunomide) had poorer outcomes than those receiving highly active therapy from the outset. Real-world data from registries also support this; groups of people with MS with delayed access to high-efficacy DMTs did worse than those who received high-efficacy treatments early.1,2
Horizontal versus vertical switching
If we consider the conventional step care paradigm, people with MS who switch horizontally from interferon-beta to glatiramer acetate, or vice-versa (i.e. from one moderate efficacy DMT to another moderate efficacy DMT) do less well than those who switch vertically to fingolimod, a highly effective DMT. Similarly, people with MS escalating to natalizumab, a very high-efficacy DMT, do better than those being escalated to the less effective, but still high-efficacy, DMT fingolimod.
Continuous and intermittent immunosuppression
Another useful way of classifying DMTs is whether they are immunosuppressive, that is, they reduce the activation, or effectiveness, of the immune system. Drug regulators stipulate that a drug may be classified as immunosuppressive if it (1) causes significant lymphopaenia (low lymphocyte count) or leukopenia (low white blood cell count), (2) is associated with opportunistic infections, (3) reduces the antibody and immune response to vaccines and (4) increases the risk of secondary malignancies.
The duration and intensity of immunosuppression further determine the risks. For example, short-term or intermittent immunosuppression associated with IRTs front-loads the risks, which are substantially lower once the immune system has reconstituted itself. In comparison, long-term continuous or persistent immunosuppression, which occurs with some of the maintenance DMTs, accumulates problems over time, particularly opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies. You can read more detail on this topic in the key question How immunosuppressed am I? The following table summarises the main attributes of intermittent and persistent immunosuppression.
The main characteristics of continuous (persistent) and short-term (intermittent) immunosuppression. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.2 AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.
Adverse effects, monitoring and risk reduction
The complications associated with immunosuppression vary from DMT to DMT. Each individual drug summary in the DMTs section of MS-Selfie contains detailed information about the main adverse events, key monitoring requirements, use (or contraindication) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and response to vaccines. The MS-Selfie InfoCards provide bite-sized summaries of several practical aspects, including side effects, to enable easy comparison of any treatments you are considering; some of this information is collated below for easy reference.
Short-term versus long-term adverse effects
Each drug has been given scores from 1 to 10 based on published analyses of its short-term and long-term side effects. Short-term refers to side effects that emerge when a treatment is started and decrease in severity or disappear within days or weeks. A well-known example of short-term side effects on starting interferon-beta is flu-like symptoms that typically abate within 4 ̶ 8 weeks.
A long-term side effect persists for months or doesn’t disappear on continuing the DMT. Examples include intermittent but persistent flushing after taking dimethyl fumarate, or low B lymphocyte counts with anti-CD20 therapies that may lead to low antibody or immunoglobulin levels (hypogammaglobulinaemia).
A low score denotes few or rare side effects; a high score denotes many or frequent side effects. The score does not correlate to a percentage. More information can be found in each drug summary and the manufacturer’s Summary of Product Characteristics.
Scores for short-term and long-term side effects assigned to the individual DMTs summarised in the MS-Selfie InfoCards, based on a published network meta-analysis.3 Alem, alemtuzumab; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFN-beta; interferon-beta; Nat, natalizumab.
Monitoring and risk reduction
Numerous tests are carried out at the start of treatment, and ongoing monitoring is required for many factors, to reduce the risk from adverse events. The key question, How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?, explains what needs to be done at the start of DMT administration (baseline) and during subsequent monitoring. The specifics vary from DMT to DMT; please refer to the individual summaries for details such as baseline tests, follow-up, infection prevention, cancer risk, pregnancy, breastfeeding and vaccination. It is important to remember that all licensed MS DMTs have had a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment, and their benefits are considered to outweigh the potential risks.
Administration and other practical considerations
Routes and frequency of administration
The MS-Selfie InfoCards contain a symbol for each DMT, showing how it is administered. Some DMTs are available in more than one formulation (e.g. tablets and injection). The frequency of administration varies greatly from DMT to DMT; please consult the relevant summary in the DMTs section and discuss your preferences and priorities with your MS HCP.
The route of administration for each drug in the MS-Selfie InfoCards is clearly identified by the relevant symbol. (If a DMT is available in more than one formulation, there is a separate card for each delivery route.)
Number of clinic visits
It may be important for you to consider the frequency of clinic visits. This will depend on factors such as the delivery route of your DMT, the monitoring requirements of the drug regulators and the risk of specific side effects. The table below summarises the assessments from the MS-Selfie InfoCards. This is another factor to consider in discussions with your MS HCPs about the most appropriate DMT for you.
Conclusions
People with MS must understand the objectives of MS treatments and the different treatment strategies currently available to achieve these objectives. Although the MS therapeutic landscape is complex and hence may seem overwhelming, framing the choices using a relatively simple construct should help each individual to make informed decisions about managing their MS. MS-Selfie aims to guide you in the process of deciding on the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and specific DMT for treating your disease.
References
Rotstein D, et al. Association of No Evidence of Disease Activity with no long-term disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2022;99:e209̶ ̶ 20.
Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.
Cladribine is an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) that works by depleting your lymphocytes and allowing them to recover over several months. It is selective, mainly targeting B lymphocytes. After your immune system recovers, hopefully without the cells that cause MS, it can fight infections, respond to vaccines and provide peripheral immune surveillance for tumours. Cladribine is given as two courses of oral tablets, each of 2 treatment weeks, during which a patient receives 10 or 20 mg daily for 4 or 5 days.
Cladribine’s mode of action triggers a process called programmed cell death or apoptosis. This means that lymphocytes don’t release their contents via cell lysis but are gradually taken up by cells of the immune system by phagocytosis. As a result, lymphocyte cell death occurs slowly after cladribine administration, and there is no cell lysis syndrome. Therefore, cladribine-treated patients with MS don’t get infusion-type reactions, nor do they need steroids and antihistamines to prevent such reactions.
Cladribine is a highly effective disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with a high rate of no evident inflammatory disease activity (NEIDA), and it slows down disability worsening. It is very well tolerated, with very few side effects. The most common adverse effects are infections, usually mild. A minority of patients may experience a non-specific headache post-cladribine. No delayed secondary autoimmunity is seen, differentiating cladribine from other IRTs used to treat MS.
Cladribine is unlikely to be associated with an increased risk of secondary malignancies, but it is contraindicated in MS patients with active malignancies. Many patients treated with cladribine go into long-term remission. Whether these individuals are cured or not will require much longer follow-up. Cladribine works similarly to alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) or AHSCT (autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation) but is a much safer treatment option.
Trade name
Mavenclad.
Mode of action
As an IRT, cladribine aims to kill the cells that cause MS and then reboot the immune system to reset the regulatory mechanisms that keep autoreactive cells under control. It works similarly to alemtuzumab and AHSCT but does not cause infusion-type reactions.
Efficacy
High, with a positive impact on annual relapse rate, 3-month disability progression and rates of no evident disease activity (NEDA).
Class
Selective immune reconstitution therapy (IRT).
Immunosuppression
Yes, short-term, whilst the immune system is depleted.
Dosing
Two courses of oral tablets over 2 years, with a recommended cumulative dose of 1.75 mg/kg per year.
Year 1: month 1, week 1, days 1 ̶ 5; month 2, week 1, days 1 ̶ 5. Each treatment week consists of 4 or 5 days on which a patient receives 10 or 20 mg daily.
Year 2: as in year 1 but starting the first dosing week any time up to month 6.
No further cladribine treatment is required in subsequent years unless there is a recurrence of disease activity. No anti-inflammatory pretreatments or prophylactic antivirals and/or antibiotics are required to prevent infusion reactions or infections with cladribine. For fuller details, please refer to Dosing section of cladribine full details summary.
Main adverse events
Herpes zoster due to reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV).
Increased likelihood of infections.
Pharmacovigilance monitoring requirements
Full range of tests and infection screening at baseline, plus negative urine pregnancy test.
Cladribine is contraindicated in MS patients with active malignancies.
Full blood count and liver function tests 2 and 6 months after the start of treatment in each treatment year.
Be vigilant for unexplained bleeding, bruising, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, loss of appetite, jaundice and/or dark urine and any symptoms of an infection.
A rebaseline MRI is recommended 18 ̶ 24 months after starting treatment, including Gd-enhancement. A monitoring MRI annually thereafter.
Cladribine is a highly effective DMT; follow-up of participants from clinical trials suggests it has a long-lasting treatment effect, especially when used early in the disease course.
It has demonstrated improvements in annual relapse rate, disability progression and decreased brain volume loss compared to placebo.
Cladribine-treated patients with MS don’t get infusion-type reactions, nor do they need steroids and antihistamines to prevent such reactions.
Cladribine works similarly to alemtuzumab and AHSCT but is a much safer treatment option. It is very well tolerated, with very few side effects.
Reasons for caution
Cladribine is an immunosuppressive therapy and may increase the likelihood of infections. Routine infection screening before starting treatment is essential, as is ongoing monitoring and prompt treatment if infection is detected.
Herpes zoster is the most common clinically significant adverse event reported with cladribine.
A lymphocyte count above 800/mm3 is recommended before starting course 2 of cladribine (in year 2) and before switching to cladribine from most other DMTs.
Disease breakthrough after the second course of cladribine (before the end of year 2) is considered a treatment failure, particularly if associated with poor depletion of lymphocytes.
Cladribine is contraindicated in MS patients with active malignancies. All cladribine-treated people with MS are advised to follow standard, country-specific cancer screening guidelines.
Cladribine may cause birth defects. Patients are advised not to fall pregnant or father a child until at least 6 months after the last exposure to cladribine.
Cladribine will cross over into the breast milk. We advise pregnant women to wait until 10 days after the last exposure to cladribine before breastfeeding.
Interferon and glatiramer acetate
In general, cladribine can be started immediately after discontinuation of interferon or glatiramer acetate. All the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews must be done before starting cladribine.
Natalizumab
Owing to the risk of rebound activity on stopping natalizumab, a prolonged wash-out period is not recommended. Most often, the reason for switching from natalizumab to cladribine, or another DMT, is to reduce the risk of carry-over PML from natalizumab. In our centre, we do an MRI and a lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis to exclude JC virus-DNA on polymerase chain reaction testing. Provided these two tests are clear, we would typically initiate cladribine as soon as possible after the last natalizumab infusion. All the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews must be done before starting cladribine.
S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod and ponesimod)
Because fingolimod has quite a long half-life, some neurologists recommend a short washout period, i.e. 4 ̶ 6 weeks; this may be appropriate, depending on the reason for switching. I recommend waiting for the total peripheral lymphocyte counts to exceed 800/mm3 to exclude the uncommon occurrence of persistent lymphopaenia following S1P modulator administration. All the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews must be done before starting cladribine. If you are switching because of abnormal liver function tests on an S1P modulator, you would ideally want the liver enzymes to normalise or at least drop to below three times the upper limit of normal before starting cladribine.
Fumarates
It is important that all the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews are done before starting cladribine. If lymphopaenia is the main reason for switching from a fumarate, I recommend waiting for the total peripheral lymphocyte counts to exceed 800/mm3 before starting cladribine.
Teriflunomide
It is important that all the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews are done before starting cladribine. I recommend that the total peripheral lymphocyte counts are above 800/mm3 before starting cladribine. We don’t routinely do an accelerated washout of teriflunomide before starting cladribine.
It is important that all the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews are done before starting cladribine. If patients are switching for safety concerns, it would be advisable to wait for B cell counts to recover first. If patients are switching for lack or loss of efficacy on an anti-CD20, there is no need to wait for B-cell recovery.
Mitoxantrone/alemtuzumab/AHSCT
I recommend waiting for the neutrophil and total peripheral lymphocyte counts to go above 1,000/mm3 and 800/mm3, respectively. All the recommended baseline screening tests must be done before starting cladribine.
Cladribine is an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) that works by depleting your lymphocytes and allowing them to recover over several months. It is selective, mainly targeting B lymphocytes. After your immune system recovers, hopefully without the cells that cause MS, it can fight infections, respond to vaccines and provide peripheral immune surveillance for tumours. Cladribine is given as two courses of oral tablets, each of 2 treatment weeks, during which a patient receives 10 or 20 mg daily for 4 or 5 days.
Cladribine’s mode of action triggers a process called programmed cell death or apoptosis. This means that lymphocytes don’t release their contents via cell lysis but are gradually taken up by cells of the immune system by phagocytosis. As a result, lymphocyte cell death occurs slowly after cladribine administration, and there is no cell lysis syndrome. Therefore, cladribine-treated patients with MS don’t get infusion-type reactions, nor do they need steroids and antihistamines to prevent such reactions.
Cladribine is a highly effective disease-modifying therapy (DMT) with a high rate of no evident inflammatory disease activity (NEIDA), and it slows down disability worsening. It is very well tolerated, with very few side effects. The most common adverse effects are infections, usually mild. A minority of patients may experience a non-specific headache post-cladribine. No delayed secondary autoimmunity is seen, differentiating cladribine from other IRTs used to treat MS.
Cladribine is unlikely to be associated with an increased risk of secondary malignancies, but it is contraindicated in MS patients with active malignancies. Many patients treated with cladribine go into long-term remission. Whether these individuals are cured or not will require much longer follow-up. Cladribine works similarly to alemtuzumab (Lemtrada) or AHSCT (autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation) but is a much safer treatment option.
Trade name
Mavenclad.
Mode of action
Cladribine or 2-chloro-2′-deoxyadenosine [2-CdA] is a purine analogue. It is taken up by cells via specific transporter proteins. Cladribine is inactive but, once inside a cell, it is activated by the addition of three phosphate groups by an enzyme called deoxycytidine kinase (DCK). In its triphosphorylated state, it is incorporated into DNA, which then blocks further extension of the DNA chain by the so-called DNA polymerases. The cell senses its inability to extend or repair its DNA, which triggers a process called programmed cell death or apoptosis. Cells that die by apoptosis don’t release their contents via cell lysis but are gradually taken up by cells of the reticuloendothelial system by phagocytosis. Therefore, lymphocyte cell death occurs slowly after cladribine administration, and there is no cell lysis syndrome. This explains why cladribine-treated patients with MS don’t get infusion-type reactions, nor do they need steroids and antihistamines to prevent these reactions.
A group of enzymes called the 5′-nucleotidases (5’-NT) can dephosphorylate activated cladribine. Purines and purine analogues are usually broken down by an enzyme called adenosine deaminase (ADA), but cladribine is relatively resistant to breakdown by ADA. The ratio of DCK:5’-NT, which is very high in lymphocytes compared to other cell types, and cladribine’s resistance to metabolism by ADA explain why cladribine selectively targets lymphocytes (particularly B lymphocytes) and not other cells. Interestingly, when it comes to lymphocytes, B cells are more sensitive to cladribine than T cells, i.e. they are depleted to a greater extent, and cells from the innate immune system are relatively resistant to the effects of cladribine. This unique depletion pattern, particularly of memory B cells, explains why cladribine-treated patients are not at high risk of opportunistic or common bacterial infections or of delayed secondary autoimmunity.
As an IRT, cladribine works by rebooting the immune system. It aims to kill the cells that cause MS or reset the regulatory mechanisms that keep autoreactive cells under control when the immune system recovers.
Efficacy
High. Compared to placebo, cladribine reduced the annual relapse rate in the pivotal trial by nearly 60% and 3-month disability progression by one-third. The rates of no evident disease activity (NEDA) across the 2 years of the trial were close to 50%. Cladribine also slowed down accelerated brain volume loss by ~0.56% per annum. The impact on brain volume loss was more pronounced in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (<0.2% per annum), indicating that cladribine’s effect is greatest when used early. Cladribine is licensed in the UK as a therapy for people with rapidly evolving severe MS naive to treatment or as a second- or third-line therapy for people with highly active MS. It works similarly to alemtuzumab and AHSCT but is a much safer treatment option.
A minority of patients treated with cladribine go into long-term remission with NEIDA. In a long-term follow-up study of 394 participants from the pivotal phase 3 trials population, over 50% of subjects had not started another DMT more than 13 years after last exposure to cladribine, indicating it has a long-term treatment effect.1 Whether some of these individuals are cured or not requires much longer follow-up. Cladribine penetrates the central nervous system (CNS), with levels in the spinal fluid reaching around 25% of those in the blood; this is a sufficiently high level for cladribine to have a treatment effect in CNS-resident lymphocytes.
Class
Selective immune reconstitution therapy (IRT).
Immunosuppression
Yes, short-term, whilst the immune system is depleted. The immune system is competent once reconstitution occurs, typically 6 ̶ 9 months after treatment.
Dosing
Cladribine is given as two courses of oral tablets with a recommended cumulative dose of 3.5 mg/kg body weight over 2 years, i.e. 1.75 mg/kg per year. Each treatment course consists of 2 treatment weeks, one at the beginning of the first month and one at the beginning of the second month of the respective treatment year. The treatment course in year 2 can be delayed for up to 6 months if the lymphocyte counts have not recovered above 800/mm3 (Table 1). Each treatment week consists of 4 or 5 days on which a patient receives 10 or 20 mg (one or two tablets) daily (Table 2).
Table 1. Dose of cladribine per treatment week by patient weight in each treatment year.
Following completion of the two treatment courses, no further cladribine treatment is required in subsequent years unless there is a recurrence of disease activity. Additional courses are given if breakthrough activity occurs later. Although the label states that no treatment is required in years 3 and 4, retreatment can be safely given with a similar safety profile to the initial two courses. The problem with retreatment in years 3 and 4 relates mainly to reimbursement of the drug because it is licensed as a treatment for a period of 4 years. In many countries, Merck, the manufacturer of Mavenclad, will provide the drug for free in years 3 and 4.
Table 2. Cladribine 10 mg tablets per weekday, given over 4 or 5 days. Dosage (number of tablets per week) is based on patient’s weight (see Table 1).
Recurrent MS disease activity
If you have recurrent disease activity in year 1 after the first cladribine course, we can bring the second course forward by 3 ̶ 4 months, provided your total lymphocyte count has recovered to 800/mm3. Breakthrough disease activity in year 1 occurs in about one in ten patients. This does not necessarily mean cladribine has failed you, but simply means you need the second course to control your MS disease activity. Disease breakthrough after the second course of cladribine in year 2, particularly if associated with poor depletion of lymphocytes, is considered a treatment failure. Poor depletion of lymphocytes occurs in a very small number of people with MS (<2 ̶ 3% of treated subjects) and likely indicates resistance to cladribine’s mode of action.
As with other IRTs, recurrent MS disease activity after year 2 does not necessarily mean cladribine has failed you. It is simply an indication for retreatment, i.e. giving a third or fourth course of cladribine. Under the NHS England treatment algorithm, we only have permission to administer additional courses after year 4. This is based on NHS England’s cost-effectiveness model and not the science behind cladribine’s mode of action. Please note that if someone has breakthrough MS disease activity after cladribine, there is no reason why another MS DMT cannot be started, provided all the baseline tests are done for that DMT first.
Pre-treatment and prophylaxis treatment
Importantly, no anti-inflammatory pretreatments or prophylactic antivirals and/or antibiotics are required to prevent infusion reactions or infections with cladribine. This differentiates cladribine from the other IRTs, i.e. mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab and AHSCT.
Parenteral cladribine
Oncologists have used intravenous and subcutaneous cladribine (brand names Leustat and Litak) for decades to treat a rare type of leukaemia called hairy cell leukaemia and some types of lymphoma. Therefore, some units offer off-label parenteral cladribine to treat MS. Parenteral cladribine is off patent and is relatively cheap. Hence, it is one of the drugs on the MS-Selfie off-label essential DMT list for treating MS in resource-poor environments. Cladribine as a 10-mg tablet is one of three DMTs added to the 2023 WHO List of Essential Medicines, which indirectly supports the use of parenteral cladribine in its place. The latter will hopefully change when oral cladribine comes off patent and cheaper generic tablets are licensed and become available.
Main adverse events
Herpes zoster virus reactivation
The most common clinically significant adverse event reported with cladribine is herpes zoster, due to reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV). In clinical trials, the risk of zoster was increased when associated with grade 3 or 4 lymphopenia (<500/mm³). Grade 3 or 4 lymphopaenia was most common in year 2 and tended to occur in subjects who received the second course of cladribine before their lymphocyte counts had recovered to above 800/mm3 following the first course. Delaying the second course of cladribine until the lymphocyte count recovers to above 800/mm3 is recommended: it decreases the likelihood of grade 3 or 4 lymphopaenia and means that VZV infection is less common. In the UK, the Shingrex vaccine is now recommended to all patients with MS before starting immunosuppressive therapies; this is to boost immunity to VZV and further lower the risk of developing zoster (see further information on decreasing your chances of adverse events and Derisking guide).
Infections and other adverse events
As cladribine is an immunosuppressive therapy, it may increase the likelihood of infections. To derisk infections, we recommend routine baseline screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), syphilis, hepatitis B and C and tuberculosis. In addition, we screen for exposure to VZV and, if seronegative, we recommend VZV vaccination before starting cladribine. This is because cladribine only partially depletes the T lymphocytes but leaves enough of them to protect from opportunistic infections, which are uncommon in cladribine-treated patients. For example, to my knowledge, there has been no progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in people with MS treated with cladribine. A minority of patients may experience a non-specific headache post-cladribine. No delayed secondary autoimmunity is seen, differentiating cladribine from other IRTs used to treat MS.
Cladribine is unlikely to be associated with an increased risk of secondary malignancies, but it is contraindicated in MS patients with active malignancies.
Less common adverse events after cladribine include liver toxicity, rash, hypersensitivity reactions, hair loss and neutropaenia.
Understanding the apparent ‘cancer signal’
The Mavenclad SmPC (Summary of Product Characteristics) states that cladribine is associated with an increased incidence of cancers. This risk has dissipated as more data have emerged. Therefore, on balance and based on the evidence and further analyses explained below, I don’t think cladribine is associated with a secondary malignancy risk.
Clinical trial results
Results from the phase 3 CLARITY trial (two doses of oral cladribine versus placebo in relapsing forms of MS) showed an imbalance in cancers, which resulted in an obvious cancer signal, i.e. an increased risk of developing cancer in the future. Four subjects in the two treatment arms developed cancers, compared with no cancers in the placebo arm, i.e. a two-to-zero ratio.2 When you have zero in the denominator, there will always be a signal. This is why the regulators include cancer as a risk in the Mavenclad label and why it is part of a black-box warning in the USA.
When my colleagues assessed the cancer rate in cladribine-treated trial subjects, they found it was very similar to cancer rates associated with other MS DMTs.3 The cancer rate, however, was abnormally low in the placebo-treated arm of the CLARITY trial. This low cancer rate in the comparator (placebo) arm rather than a high rate in the treatment arm is, I believe, what was driving the apparent cancer signal in the trial. Just one cancer in the placebo arm would have removed the treatment-associated cancer signal.
Cancer types and timing
Moreover, emerging data suggest the risk recorded in the Mavenclad label is not an obvious cancer signal, at least not in the short-to-intermediate term. The types of cancers seen in CLARITY (one case each of breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, melanoma and choriocarcinoma of the uterus) are not those associated with immunosuppression. Apart from choriocarcinoma, which is derived from the placenta and is pregnancy related, the other three cancers may take years to evolve and were probably developing before cladribine exposure. The cancers typically seen with immunosuppression are basal and squamous cell cancers of the skin and lymphomas; reassuringly, we haven’t seen excess numbers of cancers these in cladribine-treated patients.
When we followed up the placebo-treated patients a few years after the phase 3 trials, they had a higher cancer rate than patients in the active treatment arms who were exposed to cladribine. This suggests the placebo-treated subjects didn’t develop their cancers during the trial but did so afterwards; this type of lag-time bias can happen by chance.
Comparison with global cancer rates
We then compared the cancer rate in the cladribine-treated patients to what is expected in the general population. To do this you compare the rates in cladribine-exposed patients to the cancer rate in the global cancer registry. This gives a standardised incidence rate (SIR) very close to one, i.e. the expected cancer rate. Over time, the SIR has remained close to one (no increased risk); more importantly, however, the confidence intervals around this value have become very small or narrow. This makes it highly likely that no cancer signal is associated with cladribine treatment.
Another clue to the cladribine cancer signal being a false-positive comes from the oncology registers of patients who have received cladribine and related drugs for hairy cell and chronic lymphoid leukaemia. In this register, there was no increased cancer signal despite these patients being much older than people with MS treated with cladribine.4
Perception inferred from oncology indication
Finally, contrary to what many people think, cladribine is not a mutagen. Although it works through DNA mechanisms, by triggering apoptosis or cell death, it does not cause direct mutations in DNA. The correct term for a drug like this is a clastogen. I suspect the legacy of cladribine has been determined by the fact it was repurposed from oncology; therefore, it is assumed by inference to be a mutagen that must damage DNA and be cytotoxic. Cladribine’s mode of action is very nuanced, and it is not a cytotoxic therapy. Cladribine gradually causes apoptosis of cells that occurs over weeks to months and is not associated with cell lysis syndrome.
Although the Mavenclad SmPC states cladribine is contraindicated in people with MS with active malignancies, the decision is more complex than this and an individual benefit:risk evaluation should be performed before initiating cladribine. Because cladribine is an IRT with only moderate, short-term immunosuppression it provides an advantage in some patients with prior malignancy because it puts MS into remission and allows normal immune function after immune reconstitution. Please note that all cladribine-treated people with MS should be advised to follow standard cancer screening guidelines, which differ from country to country.
Pharmacovigilance monitoring requirements
Baseline
Full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, thyroid function tests, serum immunoglobulin levels, serology (VZV, human immunodeficiency virus 1 and 2, hepatitis B and C, TB ELISpot), up-to-date cervical smear and/or human papillomavirus testing, a pregnancy test and baseline blood pressure are done.
Follow-up
Lymphocyte counts should be determined before initiating the second course of cladribine in year 2. A full blood count and liver function tests are done 2 and 6 months after the start of treatment in each treatment year. If the lymphocyte count is below 500 cells/mm³, some neurologists advise viral prophylaxis and actively monitor lymphocyte counts until they increase again. This is not my practice because the onset of zoster infection is not always synchronised with the period of lymphopaenia and if you don’t treat cladribine-induced lymphopaenia there is little point in monitoring it frequently. Cladribine-treated patients are told to be vigilant for any clinical signs and/or symptoms such as unexplained bleeding, bruising, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, loss of appetite, jaundice and/or dark urine and a temperature or other symptoms of an infection. As with all immunosuppressive therapies, it is essential to detect infections early to treat them promptly.
Rebaselining
A rebaseline MRI scan needs to be done after cladribine. I recommend this is done 18 ̶ 24 months after starting treatment and that Gd-enhancement is included as part of the rebaselining MRI. A monitoring MRI is then done annually thereafter.
Women of childbearing potential and pregnancy
If you are a woman of childbearing age, before starting cladribine we require a negative urine pregnancy test. Cladribine is potentially teratogenic, i.e. it may cause birth defects. We don’t advise patients to fall pregnant or father a child until at least 6 months after the last exposure to cladribine. However, in the case of an unplanned pregnancy in the so-called at-risk period, we would not recommend a termination of pregnancy. Cladribine has a short half-life and is undetectable after a week of dosing. We simply refer patients to the high-risk pregnancy clinic for close monitoring. Ideally, women with MS should delay falling pregnant until after they have completed their second course of cladribine. If a woman falls pregnant before the second course, we simply delay the treatment until after delivery and once breastfeeding has stopped.
Breastfeeding
We don’t recommend cladribine whilst breastfeeding. It is a small molecule and will cross over into the breast milk. We advise pregnant women to wait until 10 days after the last exposure to cladribine before breastfeeding.
Fertility
There is no evidence that cladribine affects either male or female fertility. In animal studies, cladribine did not affect male fertility, but transiently decreased sperm counts. This is why we recommend that men treated with cladribine wait for 6 months after completing a treatment course before trying to father a child.
Vaccination
It is recommended that cladribine patients are immune to VZV prior to treatment. Patients should also be offered the Shingrex component or inactive vaccine to boost immunity to VZV prior to treatment. There is no reason why patients receiving cladribine can’t receive component or inactivated vaccines. However, the use of live attenuated vaccines may carry a risk of infections and – based on the current recommendation – should be avoided whilst immunosuppressed. However, once patients have reconstituted their immune function, they can receive live vaccines safely. The latter is one of the advantages of cladribine and other IRTs.
Travel
People with MS need to be aware that being on cladribine may affect travel; for example, some countries require vaccination against yellow fever, which is a live attenuated vaccine. The yellow fever vaccine will therefore have to be given prior to starting cladribine or after immune reconstitution if planning travel to countries affected by yellow fever.
In general, cladribine can be started immediately after discontinuation of interferon or glatiramer acetate. All the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews must be done before starting cladribine.
Natalizumab
Owing to the risk of rebound activity on stopping natalizumab, a prolonged wash-out period is not recommended. Most often, the reason for switching from natalizumab to cladribine, or another DMT, is to reduce the risk of carry-over PML from natalizumab. In our centre, we do an MRI and a lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis to exclude JC virus-DNA on polymerase chain reaction testing. Provided these two tests are clear, we would typically initiate cladribine as soon as possible after the last natalizumab infusion. All the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews must be done before starting cladribine.
S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod and ponesimod)
Because fingolimod has quite a long half-life, some neurologists recommend a short washout period, i.e. 4 ̶ 6 weeks; this may be appropriate, depending on the reason for switching. I recommend waiting for the total peripheral lymphocyte counts to exceed 800/mm3 to exclude the uncommon occurrence of persistent lymphopaenia following S1P modulator administration. All the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews must be done before starting cladribine. If you are switching because of abnormal liver function tests on an S1P modulator, you would ideally want the liver enzymes to normalise or at least drop to below three times the upper limit of normal before starting cladribine.
Fumarates
It is important that all the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews are done before starting cladribine. If lymphopaenia is the main reason for switching from a fumarate, I recommend waiting for the total peripheral lymphocyte counts to exceed 800/mm3 before starting cladribine.
Teriflunomide
It is important that all the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews are done before starting cladribine. I recommend that the total peripheral lymphocyte counts are above 800/mm3 before starting cladribine. We don’t routinely do an accelerated washout of teriflunomide before starting cladribine.
It is important that all the recommended baseline screening tests and vaccination reviews are done before starting cladribine. If patients are switching for safety concerns, it would be advisable to wait for B cell counts to recover first. If patients are switching for loss of efficacy on an anti-CD20, there is no need to wait for B-cell recovery.
Mitoxantrone/alemtuzumab/AHSCT
I recommend waiting for the neutrophil and total peripheral lymphocyte counts to go above 1,000/mm3 and 800/mm3, respectively. All the recommended baseline screening tests must be done before starting cladribine.
References
Giovannoni G, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis from the CLARITY/CLARITY Extension cohort of CLASSIC-MS: An ambispective study. Mult Scler 2023;29:719 ̶ 30.
Giovannoni G, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of oral cladribine for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2010;362:416 ̶ 26.
This section explains how relapse is managed during breastfeeding and provides detailed guidance on which DMTs are safe (or not safe) to use while breastfeeding.
Will I be able to breastfeed after delivery?
Yes, I see no reason why you can’t breastfeed if you have MS. However, certain DMTs cross over into the breast milk and may affect the baby; these include teriflunomide, cladribine and S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod and ponesimod). Although monoclonal antibodies (natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab) cross over in small amounts, the levels are generally too low to affect the newborn. In addition, the level of the antibodies will likely be further reduced by their digestion as proteins in the baby’s intestinal tract.
Please be aware that most DMTs are licensed with no breastfeeding safety data. Hence, the information in the manufacturer’s Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) is not the same as that given to you by neurologists and other HCPs. For example, SmPC information for the fumarates (dimethyl fumarate and diroximel fumarate) states:
“It is unknown whether dimethyl fumarate or its metabolites are excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. A decision must be made whether to discontinue breastfeeding or to discontinue Tecfidera therapy. The benefit of breastfeeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the woman should be taken into account.”
This is very unhelpful as their active compound, monomethyl fumarate, is a naturally occurring metabolite compounded with many other medications considered safe in pregnancy, e.g. ferrous fumarate, an iron supplement. This is why I tell my female patients on fumarates they can breastfeed without concern for their baby.
We normally don’t recommend alemtuzumab treatment during breastfeeding simply because it carries the risk of listeriosis and infusion reactions, and the medications used to prevent these adverse events cross over into breast milk. In addition, the acute immunosuppression associated with alemtuzumab may increase the risk of breast infections. In general, I advise my female patients to breastfeed for 4 ̶ 6 weeks to give the baby the health benefits of breastfeeding and then to start or be retreated with alemtuzumab after this period.
For cladribine, it is important not to breastfeed whilst being dosed with the drug and for 10 days after the last pill. The recommended 10-day requirement is probably a bit long as cladribine is undetectable in the body after 48 ̶ 72 hours. In my experience, the requirement of a 14- or 15-day gap (4 or 5 days of dosing plus an additional 10 days) in breastfeeding is hard; therefore, most women who want to be treated with cladribine either delay treatment until they have completed breastfeeding or breastfeed for 4 ̶ 6 weeks before stopping and being treated with cladribine.
Guidance for women who are considering whether it is safe to breastfeed while taking a specific DMT.
I am aware that many women feel pressured into breastfeeding. However, if you are anxious about having MS rebound post-partum, deciding not to breastfeed and starting or resuming your DMT as soon as possible is not unreasonable. The decision is a personal choice.
How is a relapse managed during breastfeeding?
In the event of a relapse during breastfeeding, a short course of high-dose corticosteroids can be considered. Methylprednisolone – the steroid often used to manage MS relapses – is transferred into breast milk. However, the amount an infant is exposed via breast milk is low (equivalent to less than 1% of the adult dose). Some clinicians recommend women breastfeed before a steroid infusion, express breast milk 1 ̶ 2 hours after the infusion and discard it, to limit the baby’s exposure to methylprednisolone. I don’t think this is necessary.
Other articles in this series on Pregnancy and childbirth Planning for pregnancy Managing MS during pregnancy Preparing to give birth Concerns about parenting
Opinion on how MS impacts pregnancy is based largely on data that predate the current era of active treatment and the newer generation of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). In this section I have therefore addressed many of the important issues that women who are considering pregnancy need to understand, including:
the effect of pregnancy on the course of MS
how to manage relapse during pregnancy
the role of naturally occurring interferon-beta and its possible implications for women with MS taking therapeutic interferon-beta
management of MS symptoms and morning sickness during pregnancy
the crucial issue of DMT safety and possible teratogenic effects on the developing foetus.
Will pregnancy affect the course of my MS?
Yes, pregnancy effects on MS have been observed at a group level, though it is difficult to notice changes in individuals. It is well known that MS attack rates drop during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and relapses rebound again in the first 6 months after delivery. However, only a minority of women with MS have post-partum relapses. Breastfeeding may blunt the post-partum rebound, but this is not absolute. Therefore, most neurologists now recommend starting or restarting DMTs soon after delivery to try and prevent post-partum relapses.
At a population level, the more children you have, the better your overall prognosis. This effect is small and is based on studies done in the pre-DMT era. It may be due to the immunological effects of pregnancy that work like a DMT in MS. Immunologists have tried to understand this phenomenon in the hope of developing treatments for MS that mimic the pregnancy state.
How is a relapse managed during pregnancy?
In the event of having a relapse during pregnancy, a short course of high-dose corticosteroids can be considered. However, I limit using steroids to disabling and/or severe relapses, especially early in the first trimester, as there is a small risk of orofacial abnormalities (cleft lip and palate) and reduced birth weight from exposure of the developing foetus to high-dose steroids. There is also a risk of precipitating gestational diabetes in women receiving high doses of steroids during pregnancy. In the rare situation of a severe relapse unresponsive to high-dose steroids, plasma exchange may need to be considered.
Could neutralising antibodies to therapeutic interferon-beta affect my baby?
Naturally occurring interferon-beta is a cytokine (cell-signalling agent) produced by the body to help fight infections. As there is only one human interferon-beta, antibodies to therapeutic interferon-beta (IFN-beta) will neutralise the body’s own natural interferon-beta. If you are taking IFN-beta for your MS, there is thus a theoretical risk that neutralising antibodies (NABs) to the DMT might cross the placenta and affect the role of human interferon-beta in foetal development.
Interferon-beta is important for innate immunity and neutralising your own interferon-beta may put you at risk of getting viral infections. Interferon-beta also plays a role in foetal bone development, but the placenta does not mature in relation to immunoglobulin transfer until near the end of the second trimester of pregnancy, so it is unlikely that sufficient NABs cross the blood ̶ placental barrier to affect foetal bone development. However, in the third trimester, NABs will cross over the placenta into the foetal circulation and may impact the baby’s innate immunity. Despite these theoretical concerns, there is no indication from published data to support these potential adverse effects of NABs on IFN-beta.
If I fall pregnant while on a DMT, will this affect the baby?
This depends on which DMT you are taking and what you mean by ‘affecting the baby’. We worry most about teratogenic effects, which describe congenital malformations. Teriflunomide, S1P modulators and cladribine are generally classified as drugs that may be teratogenic, and hence precautions need to be taken so as not to fall pregnant on these agents. Foetal malformations usually occur very early in foetal development, often before the woman knows she is pregnant; therefore, it is difficult to do anything about it once foetal exposure occurs. Despite this, even for women who are on these agents and fall pregnant, we don’t automatically recommend termination of pregnancy. We refer them to the high-risk pregnancy clinic to discuss the options with an obstetrician. Many women continue their pregnancies with an uneventful outcome and a normal baby. On the other hand, some women choose the option of terminating their pregnancy.
A large amount of data from MS pregnancy registries and post-marketing surveillance indicates no increased risk of major congenital anomalies or spontaneous abortions (miscarriages) after exposure to interferon-betaor glatiramer acetate. Most neurologists are, therefore, comfortable with their female patients falling pregnant on these agents, continuing the treatment through pregnancy and then breastfeeding their babies.
Fumarates (dimethyl fumarate [Tecfidera], diroximel fumarate [Vumerity]) are not teratogenic and are unlikely to have a negative impact on pregnancy outcomes. We need more data from registries and post-marketing surveillance before we can be confident that the fumarates are safe during pregnancy. However, these agents are prodrugs and converted to monomethyl fumarate, which is part of our metabolism, so it is very unlikely that the fumarates will cause problems. I don’t have an issue with women falling pregnant on the fumarates and continuing them through pregnancy, but there is conflicting advice about this.
Should I continue taking drugs for my MS symptoms during pregnancy?
Yes and no. It depends on what the medications are for and whether they are safe during pregnancy. Ideally, you should wean off any symptomatic therapies or at least change to alternative medications that are safe to take during pregnancy. It is important to try and plan your pregnancy and if necessary be referred to a special medical pregnancy clinic so that these issues can be addressed. Many women with MS find that their MS-related symptoms improve during pregnancy, and they can do without symptomatic therapies. However, unless you are prepared to wean yourself off symptomatic therapies you won’t know.
Physical therapies should be continued during pregnancy. One could argue that everyone with MS should be physically active and do pelvic floor exercises. Pregnancy and childbirth may impact bladder and bowel function, so it is important to see a pelvic floor therapist to start pelvic floor exercises. The latter are taught to women in antenatal classes.
How do you treat morning sickness or hyperemesis gravidarum during pregnancy?
Treating morning sickness or hyperemesis gravidarum is no different in women with MS than in the general population. It involves hydration, vitamin supplements (in particular, thiamine) and the judicious use of antiemetics (for example, cyclizine, prochlorperazine, promethazine, chlorpromazine, metoclopramide and domperidone). If the vomiting extends into the second trimester, ondansetron can be used. In very severe cases of morning sickness, steroids may be required; for example, hydrocortisone 100 mg twice daily can be converted to prednisolone 40 ̶ 50 mg daily by mouth, which can then be tapered to the lowest level that still controls symptoms. For patients taking a fumarate, try and take your medication later in the morning when you are less likely to vomit.
What dose of vitamin D do you advise during pregnancy?
During pregnancy vitamin D requirements are increased and I recommend doubling the dose for supplementation from 4,000 IU of vitamin D3 to 8,000 IU per day. At the same time, women who are pregnant should be on iron and folate supplements that should ideally be started before falling pregnant.
Other articles in this series on Pregnancy and childbirth Planning for pregnancy Preparing to give birth Breastfeeding if you are on a DMT Concerns about parenting
This article discusses the effects of MS on fertility, decisions about starting or stopping a DMT, the use and safety of oral contraceptives and the possible impact of in vitro fertilisation on MS disease course.
Does MS affect my fertility?
No, MS does not affect fertility. Women and men with MS are as fertile as people without MS. However, MS does not protect women and men from other causes of infertility. Fertility treatment may impact MS (see below). Please be aware that mitoxantrone, AHSCT (autologous haemopoietic stem cell treatment) and other chemotherapy treatments, such as cyclophosphamide used off-label to treat MS, may be toxic to ovarian and testicular function and require egg and sperm banking before treatment.
Should I go onto a DMT and get my MS under control before starting a family or first start my family?
In general, I recommend that women with active MS delay pregnancy until their disease is under control, optimise their general health and prepare properly for becoming a parent. There is no point in having active MS, not starting a DMT and having a catastrophic relapse in the period during which you are trying to fall pregnant.
However, a desire to start or extend your family should not change the way you want your MS managed. Early effective treatment, treating to a target of NEIDA, potentially flipping the pyramid, preventing end-organ damage and the holistic management of MS are all compatible with pregnancy. There are no rules for implementing this strategy in pregnancy because all decisions should be personalised. For example, a woman with rapidly evolving severe MS may choose natalizumab and stay on it throughout pregnancy and while breastfeeding because her MS was so active and potentially devastating. Another woman who is young, risk adverse and with a very good prognosis may choose to delay starting a DMT until she has had a child. Yet another woman, diagnosed at 40, may not want to delay falling pregnant and may opt for a DMT that is safe during pregnancy.
It is up to the person with MS, their partner and sometimes their extended family to make the final decisions about how to manage their MS during pregnancy. The healthcare professional (HCP) is there to provide information and guidance in this process.
Are oral contraceptives safe in people with MS?
To my knowledge, contraceptives are safe and effective in women with MS. The same contraindications and relative contraindications to specific contraceptives apply to women with MS as to the general population. Hormonal contraceptives are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis; women with MS who are immobile thus have a higher risk of deep vein thrombosis than those who are mobile.
Which contraceptive would you recommend?
MS should not be the deciding factor around the choice of contraceptive unless the degree of MS-related disability makes managing menstrual hygiene difficult. In this case, contraceptives that suppress menstruation have advantages, for example, continuous hormonal contraceptives or the progestin-tipped intrauterine contraceptive device (Mirena).
Inclusion criteria for participation in specific drug trials sometimes mandate double contraception, for example, a hormonal contraceptive and a barrier method. This is to try and avoid accidental pregnancies while taking an investigational compound without a safety track record in humans.
How long before I fall pregnant must I stop my DMT?
It depends on which DMT you are taking. Only the DMTs that are teratogenic or potentially teratogenic (i.e., may cause foetal malformations) need to be stopped before you fall pregnant. It is essential to allow sufficient time for these agents to be eliminated from the body.
Teriflunomide
Teriflunomide has the potential to cause birth defects; therefore, patients must have effective contraception whilst on this treatment. It has a very long half-life because it is reabsorbed in the intestine and is eliminated slowly from the plasma. Without an accelerated elimination procedure, it takes up to 8 months to reach plasma concentrations of less than 0.02 mg/l, which are considered safe. Remarkably, due to individual variations in teriflunomide clearance, it may take up to 2 years to fall to acceptable levels. An accelerated elimination procedure with cholestyramine or activated charcoal can be used at any time after the discontinuation of teriflunomide.
Teriflunomide accelerated elimination procedure
After stopping treatment with teriflunomide:
• Cholestyramine 8 g is administered three times daily for 11 days, or cholestyramine 4 g three times a day can be used if cholestyramine 8 g three times a day is not well tolerated.
• Alternatively, 50 g of activated powdered charcoal is administered every 12 hours for 11 days.
Following either of the accelerated elimination procedures, it is recommended to verify elimination by checking teriflunomide blood levels and allow a waiting period of 1.5 months between the first occurrence of a plasma concentration below 0.02 mg/l and planned fertilisation.
S1P modulators
S1P modulators are contraindicated during pregnancy, owing to the risk to the foetus. Before starting treatment in women of childbearing potential, we do a urine pregnancy test. Women taking an S1P modulator must use effective contraception during treatment and then continue for:
2 months after stopping treatment with fingolimod (Gilenya)
10 days after stopping treatment with siponimod (Mayzent)
3 months after stopping treatment with ozanimod (Zeposia)
7 days after stopping treatment with ponesimod (Ponvory).
Stopping the S1P modulators brings the potential for rebound disease activity, so most neurologists now prefer to transition women on one of these therapies to another class of DMT that is considered safer in pregnancy.
Safer options
Safer options during pregnancy include an injectable (interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate), a fumarate, an anti-CD20 therapy, natalizumab or an immune reconstitution therapy (cladribine or alemtuzumab). I cover some of the issues related to anti-CD20 therapies in the MS-Selfie case study ‘Wait to fall pregnant or start a DMT now?’.
The good news is that several DMT options are now available to women with MS wanting to fall pregnant.
Can I have IVF, and what will IVF do to my MS?
There is no reason why a person with MS cannot have IVF (in vitro fertilisation). However, there appears to be a slightly increased risk of relapse after IVF and egg harvesting. Whether this is due to stopping DMTs before undergoing IVF or due to the drugs used to stimulate ovulation is unknown. Studies reporting an increase in disease activity after IVF are more likely to be published than studies not showing such an increase so that publication bias may affect the findings. I recommend viewing IVF as a planned pregnancy and giving women with MS the option of receiving a DMT that is relatively safe in pregnancy or treating their MS with immune reconstitution therapy before IVF.
Other articles in this series on Pregnancy and childbirth: Managing MS during pregnancy Preparing to give birth Breastfeeding if you are on a DMT Concerns about parenting
Before you start taking a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), your MS team will carry out routine tests and investigations, many of which are repeated during subsequent monitoring or before switching to another DMT. The regulatory authorities that license the drugs specify their monitoring requirements. What gets monitored and how frequently depends on the individual DMT.
All licensed MS DMTs have undergone a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment by the drug regulators, and the benefits of these treatments are considered to outweigh the potential risks. The table below summarises the main monitoring requirements of individual DMTs or DMT classes. For more detailed information, see the post on reducing your chances of adverse events.
Has anyone discussed a treatment target with you, including the need to rebaseline your disease activity? Have the concepts of preventing end-organ damage to the central nervous system (the ‘end-organ’ in MS) and brain volume loss or atrophy been broached?
Key points
Achieving long-term remission is a well-established treatment target in MS and several other autoimmune diseases.
Key measures of MS disease activity are used to define composite treatment targets; they provide objective means for monitoring and decision-making.
To demonstrate a target of no evident disease activity (NEDA) requires a minimum of three criteria to be met: no relapses, no MRI activity and no disability progression.
More stringent definitions of NEDA targets have evolved and will continue to do so as new predictors of treatment response are developed.
If you are on a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), what is the objective or treatment target for your MS? This is another question to be answered before committing yourself to a specific treatment strategy.
Treat-2-target
Relapses and ongoing focal inflammatory activity on MRI (new or enlarging T2 lesions and T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions [Gd-enhancing]) are associated with poor outcomes. This has led to the adoption of ‘no evident disease activity’ (NEDA) as a treatment target in MS. NEDA, or NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of MS disease activity: (i) no relapses, (ii) no MRI activity (new or enlarging T2 lesions or Gd-enhancing lesions) and (iii) no disability progression. NEDA is an important goal for treating individuals with MS.
When to rebaseline
To use NEDA as a treatment target in day-to-day clinical practice, it is advisable to be ‘rebaselined’ after the onset of action of the DMT you have been started on. The timing of the MRI to provide a new baseline depends on the DMT concerned. The recommendations for immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) are very different from those for maintenance therapies. In the case of an IRT (for example alemtuzumab or cladribine, which are given as short courses), breakthrough disease activity can be used as an indicator to retreat rather than necessarily to switch therapy. Therefore, a rebaselining MRI should be delayed until after the final course of therapy, e.g. 2 years, or close enough to the time when a third, or subsequent course, can be administered.
Determining treatment failure: IRTs
Questions remain of how many treatment cycles need to be given before considering that a specific IRT has not been effective.
For alemtuzumab, the threshold is three cycles under NHS England’s treatment algorithm (based on their cost-effectiveness analysis). Alemtuzumab is a biological or protein-based treatment, so the risk of developing neutralising anti-drug antibodies increases with each infusion.
Cladribine on the other hand is a small molecule, so neutralising antibodies are not a problem and there is no real limit on the number of courses that can be given.
Although HSCT tends to be a one-off treatment, there are rare reports of people with MS receiving more than one cycle.
Please note there are potentially cumulative risks associated with multiple cycles of an IRT: secondary malignancies in the case of HSCT and persistent lymphopaenia with cladribine.
In comparison to IRTs, if you have disease activity on a particular maintenance DMT, and provided you have been adherent to your treatment, this is usually interpreted as a suboptimal response or non-response and it should trigger a switch to another class of DMT.
A criticism of NEDA is the omission of so-called ‘non-relapse-associated disease worsening’ as a component of the treatment target (in addition to evidence of incomplete recovery from relapses). I refer to this disease worsening as smouldering MS. Worsening disability in the absence of relapses may have little to do with ongoing focal inflammatory activity. It may simply represent a delayed dying-off of axons and nerve fibres following earlier focal inflammatory lesions. As a result, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching, or stopping a DMT, based simply on non-relapse-associated worsening disability. For more information, please see Getting worse – smouldering MS.
Beyond NEDA-3
The definition of NEDA is evolving with clinical practice. Some centres are now testing for brain volume loss (that is, brain atrophy) and/or increased neurofilament light chain (NFL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as part of the NEDA-3 treatment target. NEDA-4 builds on NEDA-3, by including the target of normalising brain atrophy rates to within the normal range. The problem we have found with this is that the measurement of brain atrophy in an individual with MS level is very unreliable. For example, dehydration, excessive alcohol consumption and some symptomatic medications can cause the brain to shrink temporarily. We, therefore, think that CSF NFL levels are a better treatment target, less prone to misinterpretation. Neurofilaments are proteins that are found in nerves and axons (nerve fibres) and are released in proportion to the amount of nerve fibre damage that occurs in MS. Normalising CSF NFL levels, which would indicate that nerve damage is stopped, is referred to as NEDA-5. From a scientific perspective, including a more objective end-organ biomarker makes sense and will almost certainly be incorporated into our treatment target in the future.
The components of NEDA-recommended targets are expanding as our ability to measure predictors of treatment response grows. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; NEDA, no evident disease activity; NEIDA, no evident inflammatory disease activity; NFL, neurofilament light; PROMS, patient-related outcome measures.
End-organ damage
The combination of relapses, the development of new MRI lesions and brain volume loss over 2 years in clinical trials predicts quite accurately who will become disabled over the same time period. From a treatment perspective, it is important to stop relapses, new MRI lesions and brain volume loss if we are to prevent or slow down worsening disability. Therefore, we must go beyond NEIDA (no evident inflammatory activity), which refers to relapses and focal MRI activity, and normalise brain volume loss if we can.
Alternatives to NEDA?
Many neurologists are critical of using NEDA as a treatment target in clinical practice, fearing that it encourages people with MS to take highly effective DMTs that they consider may be ‘more risky’ (see short summaries of the available DMTs for information about individual drugs). Such neurologists, therefore, promote a less proactive approach and allow for some residual MS disease activity, but at a lower level. This treatment target is referred to as minimal evidence of disease activity, or MEDA.
In my opinion, MEDA flies in the face of the science of focal inflammatory lesions being ‘bad’ and it is associated with poor short-term, intermediate and long-term outcomes. If most people with MS end up receiving so-called high-efficacy therapies because of breakthrough disease activity, then this is what they probably need, that is, to have their MS treated adequately. Compelling evidence has emerged from trials, large registries and real-world data that people with MS treated early with highly effective DMTs (flipping the pyramid) do better than those who have delayed access to more effective DMTs.1,2,3 You can find a short summary of some key findings on the MS Brain Health website.
Implementing NEDA in clinical practice
Please note that achieving long-term remission, or NEDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune kidney disease and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated to a target of NEDA do better than those with breakthrough disease activity. I would therefore strongly encourage you to discuss this treatment target with your own MS neurologist.
The flowchart below illustrates how we implement a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy. The important take-home message is that the treatment targets in MS have moved; goal-setting and the active monitoring of outcomes is now required to achieve these goals.
Recommended approaches to implementing a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy, using maintenance ̶ escalation or immune reconstitution therapy (IRT). The dotted lines indicate that if treatment fails you can either switch within the class (maintenance or IRT) or reassess the strategy. From Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.4 Alem, alemtuzumab; Clad, cladribine; DMF, dimethyl fumarate; Fingo, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFNβ, interferon-beta; Mitox, mitoxantrone; NEDA, no evident disease activity; Nz, natalizumab; Ocre, ocrelizumab; Ofat, ofatumumab; Teri, teriflunomide.
There is also a clear need to update the definition of NEDA regularly as new technologies become available and are validated as predictors of treatment response. I therefore envisage the definition of NEDA changing still further in future to include more objective measures, particularly ones measuring end-organ damage and the inclusion of patient-related outcome measures.
References
Harding K et al. Clinical outcomes of escalation vs early intensive disease-modifying therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis.JAMA Neurol 2019;76:536-41.
Merkel B et al. Timing of high-efficacy therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. Autoimmun Rev 2017;16:658-65.
Do you understand the difference between short-term intermittent and long-term continuous immunosuppression? Here we address another of the key questions to consider before deciding on a specific disease-modifying therapy (DMT).
Key points
Immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) reduce the immune system’s effectiveness.
It is important to weigh up the benefits and risks of short-term versus continuous immunosuppression.
Non-selective DMTs suppress the adaptive and innate immune systems; selective DMTs do not affect the innate immune system and are thus associated with a low risk of bacterial infections.
The implications of immunosuppression need to be considered within the context of other health and lifestyle factors.
Which DMTs cause immunosuppression?
A useful way of thinking about DMTs is based on whether they are immunosuppressive. Broadly speaking, an immunosuppressive is any DMT that reduces the immune system’s activation or effectiveness.
From a regulatory perspective, for a drug to be classified as immunosuppressive, it should:
cause significant lymphopaenia or leukopenia (reduced white cell counts)
be associated with opportunistic infections (infections that don’t occur in people with a normal, healthy immune system)
reduce antibody and/or T-cell responses to vaccines
increase the risk of secondary malignancies.
Based on the above criteria, the interferon-beta preparations and glatiramer acetate are immunomodulatory rather than immunosuppressive. Teriflunomide is also an immunomodulatory therapy with the potential, albeit small, to cause immunosuppression. In real life, however, very few people with MS treated with teriflunomide develop significant lymphopaenia or leukopenia; if they do, we tend to stop the drug. The other licensed DMTs are immunosuppressive to a greater or lesser degree.
Short-term versus continuous immunosuppression
The duration and intensity of immunosuppression further determine the risks. Short-term or intermittent immunosuppression associated with an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) front-loads the risks, which decrease substantially once the immune system has reconstituted itself. In comparison, long-term continuous or persistent immunosuppression, which occurs with most maintenance DMTs, accumulates problems over time, particularly opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies.
Live vaccines are, in general, contraindicated in patients on continuous immunosuppressive therapies. However, someone with MS on an IRT who has reconstituted their immune system can tolerate and respond to live vaccines. The benefits of administering live vaccines always need to be balanced against the risks of the vaccine.
The main characteristics of continuous persistent and short-term (intermittent) immunosuppression. Modifiedfrom Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1 AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.
Selective versus non-selective immunosuppression
Immunosuppression that accompanies DMTs may be selective or non-selective. Non-selective therapies deplete and/or suppress both the adaptive immune system (T cells and B cells) and the innate immune system (monocytes, neutrophils and natural killer [NK] cells). Alemtuzumab, AHSCT (autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and mitoxantrone are non-selective and are therefore associated with acute bacterial infections such as listeriosis, nocardiosis and cytomegalovirus reactivation. In comparison, anti-CD20 agents (ocrelizumab and ofatumumab) and cladribine are selective, do not affect the innate immune system and are therefore associated with a low risk of acute bacterial infections.
Classification of disease-modifying therapies for relapsing forms of MS. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1 AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Other considerations
Please note that the implications of immunosuppression are not black and white but interact with other factors such as:
These factors have been highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in relation to the risk of severe COVID-19 and the variations in vaccine responses among people with MS (including waning of the immune response).
It is important to realise that we can derisk (reduce the risk of) some complications associated with long-term immunosuppression and the use of DMTs. Please see the post entitled How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?
References
Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.