Tag Archives: cerebral cortex

Male sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis

Sexual dysfunction is a common symptom in men with MS, with a prevalence that surpasses that seen in the general population and other chronic disease states. Despite sexual dysfunction being one of the most frequently overlooked and under-addressed MS symptoms, it seldom gets documented and treated in men with MS.

Key points

  • Many men with MS experience some form of sexual difficulty; however, this important aspect of overall well-being is underdiagnosed and undertreated.
  • Such difficulties usually result from a combination of neurological, psychological, social and cognitive factors.
  • Primary dysfunction, caused by damage to the network of signals between the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves, can affect the ability to achieve an erection, orgasm or ejaculation; it may also adversely affect libido, sexual desire and genital sensation.
  • Secondary dysfunction results from other MS-related symptoms, including fatigue, spasticity, pain, weakness, bladder dysfunction and bowel dysfunction. Many of the medications used to manage such symptoms may cause or worsen sexual difficulties.
  • Tertiary dysfunction refers to the psychological, emotional and interpersonal challenges of living with MS: depression, anxiety, low self-esteem and impaired body image are among the factors that impact sexual desire and confidence.
  • Management of male sexual dysfunction requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary and personalised approach that involves the MS team, a urologist, physiotherapist, occupational therapist and a psychologist or sex therapist.
  • A wide range of medications, interventions and lifestyle modifications are available that can help couples affected by MS to adapt to the current reality and build a new, satisfying form of intimacy.

An overlooked and distressing symptom

Sexual dysfunction is a common symptom in men with MS, with a prevalence that surpasses that seen in the general population and other chronic disease states. Most studies report that 50–90% of men living with MS will experience some form of sexual difficulty during their disease course. Despite this, sexual dysfunction is one of the most frequently overlooked and under-addressed MS symptoms, and it seldom gets documented and treated in men with MS. This is a clinical paradox, an example of a ‘conspiracy of silence’ where both parties in the clinical encounter overlook a significant issue affecting quality of life.

The main reasons why sexual dysfunction in men with MS is under-recognised, underdiagnosed and undertreated are the taboos of discussing it in the clinic, both from the patient and the HCP perspective. Surveys reveal that the primary barriers to discussing sexual health on the part of HCPs include:

  • time constraints during appointments
  • the major problem that the issue is ‘outside of my role’
  • lack of professional training
  • perceived patient discomfort.

Concurrently, patients are often reluctant to initiate these conversations owing to embarrassment, shame or a deeply held belief that sexuality is somehow incompatible with having a disability. This disconnect between the reality of the patient experience and the focus of the clinical consultation means that a treatable condition that causes significant distress is often left to fester, impacting mental health and relationships. 

Far from being a peripheral concern, sexual function and sexual health are essential components of overall well-being. In men with MS, the onset of sexual dysfunction often precipitates a decline in quality of life, negatively affecting mood, self-esteem and intimate relationships. The distress frequently extends beyond the individual, impacting partners and contributing to marital conflict. The enquiry below illustrates the distress experienced by one man who contacted me for advice; his experience is not uncommon, unfortunately.

Case example

I am a 30-year-old man with relapsing MS. I was diagnosed during my first year of University, aged 18. I presented with transverse myelitis, weakness of both legs and urinary retention. I have been on natalizumab for 12 years and have done very well. However, I have sexual problems with difficulty getting and maintaining an erection. This is affecting my relationship with my wife. Whenever I bring this up with my MS nurse or neurologist, I get dismissed. My GP has given me Viagra, which helps, but its effects are unpredictable, and it often lets me down. I have gotten to the point where I now avoid sexual activity. What advice can you give to help me and others like me?

A complex range of causes

The underlying causes (aetiology) of sexual dysfunction in men with MS are usually complex, variable and dynamic. Some men with MS experience sexual dysfunction as part of a relapse, and they recover with time. However, sexual dysfunction in men with MS usually results from a combination of neurological, psychological, social and cognitive factors. It is therefore vital to approach it from three different perspectives.

  1. Primary dysfunction arises directly from MS lesions within the central nervous system that disrupt the neural pathways governing sexual response.
  2. Secondary dysfunction is the consequence of other MS symptoms, such as fatigue, pain, spasticity, or bladder and bowel issues, which create physical barriers to sexual activity.
  3. Tertiary dysfunction encompasses the psychosocial, emotional and cultural issues that stem from living with a chronic illness, including depression, altered body image and changes in relationships.

Clinical presentations of male sexual dysfunction

Erectile dysfunction

This is the most commonly and widely studied sexual problem in men with MS. Defined as the consistent inability to achieve or maintain a penile erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual performance, erectile dysfunction (ED) affects a large majority of men with MS who report sexual issues, with some estimates as high as 80%. Across the entire male MS population, approximately 70% experience erectile problems at some point after an MS diagnosis.

Ejaculatory and orgasmic dysfunction

While ED receives the most attention, disorders of ejaculation and orgasm are also common and can be even more distressing for patients owing to a lack of effective treatments. Studies estimate that 35–50% of men with MS experience problems with ejaculation. The Male Sexual Health Questionnaire is used as a screen for dysejaculation. Ejaculatory disorders manifest as:

  • delayed ejaculation or anejaculation: difficulty or complete inability, respectively, to ejaculate despite adequate stimulation
  • premature ejaculation: climaxing too rapidly for sexual satisfaction
  • anorgasmia: the failure to reach orgasm
  • altered orgasmic sensation: a less intense or less pleasurable orgasmic experience.

Disorders of libido or sexual desire

A diminished or absent interest in sex is another crucial component of sexual dysfunction in men with MS. Though less rigorously studied than ED, one report suggests that reduced libido affects approximately 40% of men with MS. Loss of libido is particularly complex, often arising from a combination of damage to the brain’s centres that impact desire, the secondary effect of fatigue, and tertiary psychological factors like depression and anxiety.

Altered genital sensation

The direct neurological impact of MS can manifest as abnormal sensations in the genital area, including numbness (decreased sensation), paraesthesias (e.g. pins and needles) or dysaesthesias (unpleasant or painful sensations, such as burning). These sensory disturbances can fundamentally alter the experience of sexual touch, making it less pleasurable or even painful, thereby directly interfering with arousal and orgasm.

The focus on ED in both MS research and clinical practice is driven in part by the availability of effective pharmacological treatments for this issue; this creates an incomplete picture of the patient’s experience. A management plan that successfully restores erectile function, for example, but fails to address a co-existing inability to ejaculate or a profound lack of sexual desire will ultimately fail to improve the patient’s overall sexual satisfaction and quality of life. A thorough clinical evaluation that assesses all phases of the sexual response cycle is therefore needed.

Functional changes underlying male sexual dysfunction in MS

Primary dysfunction

Normal human sexual function is a complex process that requires the integration of signals between the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerves. MS damages this network in several ways, causing primary sexual dysfunction.

Cerebral and brainstem lesions

MS lesions in the brain and brainstem affect libido, arousal and orgasm.

  • Libido and arousal: Sexual desire is not merely a hormonal process; it originates in the brain. Lesions in higher cortical areas, particularly the limbic system (the brain’s emotional centre) and the hypothalamus, can diminish libido and impair the capacity to process sensory or psychological cues as erotic. MRI studies have correlated dysfunction in arousal and erection with lesions in specific brain regions, including the frontal lobe, prefrontal cortex, temporal lobe, insula and hippocampus.
  • Orgasm: Orgasm is also vulnerable to cerebral damage, and orgasmic dysfunction is associated with lesions in the pons (part of the brainstem), left temporal lobe and right occipital areas.

Spinal cord lesions

The spinal cord relays neuronal signals from the brain to the genitals and transmits sensory information back up to the brain. Lesions along the spinal tracts are the leading cause of ED and ejaculatory disorders.

  • Erectile function: Penile erection is a neurovascular phenomenon mediated by two distinct pathways, both of which can be compromised by MS. A psychogenic erection, initiated by erotic thoughts or sensory stimuli processed by the brain, depends on intact nerve signals travelling down the spinal cord to the pelvic organs. A reflexogenic erection, triggered by direct physical touch to the genitals, relies on a reflex arc located in the sacral segments of the spinal cord (S2−S4). MS lesions can disrupt these pathways individually or in combination. Consequently, depending on the specific location of the spinal damage, a man might be able to achieve an erection from direct touch but not from psychological arousal, or vice versa.
  • Ejaculation: Ejaculation is a far more complex reflex than erection, involving the coordinated contraction of multiple pelvic muscles and requiring precise, intact communication between the brain and the entire length of the spinal cord. This complexity makes it exceptionally vulnerable to disruption by MS lesions, which helps explain why ejaculatory problems in MS are so common and difficult to treat.

Autonomic and hormonal factors

The autonomic nervous system, which controls involuntary bodily functions, plays a pivotal role in regulating erection and ejaculation. MS can cause autonomic dysfunction, further contributing to these problems. Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that chronic inflammation associated with MS, as well as hypothalamic lesions, can disrupt the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. This can lead to altered levels of sex hormones, such as testosterone, and has even been linked to impaired sperm quality.

Secondary dysfunction

Secondary sexual dysfunction arises from other MS-related symptoms and the side effects of medications used to treat these symptoms.

  • Fatigue: Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling MS-associated symptoms that directly undermines sexual function by reducing the physical energy and motivation required for intimacy. When daily life is already exhausting, sexual activity can feel like an insurmountable task.
  • Spasticity, pain and weakness: Spasticity, chronic pain, and muscle weakness can make movement difficult and some sexual positions uncomfortable or impossible. Painful muscle spasms can be triggered by the movements of sexual activity, leading to a conditioned avoidance of sex.
  • Bladder dysfunction and bowel dysfunction: The fear of urinary or faecal incontinence during sexual activity is a potent psychological deterrent. With more than 50% of people with MS experiencing bladder and bowel issues, this is a widespread concern. The anxiety and embarrassment associated with a potential accident can cause individuals and their partners to avoid physical intimacy altogether.
  • Side effects of medication: Many of the medications prescribed to manage the symptoms of MS can, ironically, cause or exacerbate sexual dysfunction. Antidepressants, particularly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants, are well known for causing decreased libido, ED and anorgasmia. Similarly, medications for spasticity, neuropathic pain and urinary frequency can also interfere with sexual responses.

Tertiary dysfunction

Tertiary dysfunction refers to the complex web of psychological, emotional and interpersonal challenges that arise from living with a chronic, unpredictable illness like MS. These factors can be just as debilitating to a person’s sexual health as any physical symptom.

  • Depression and anxiety: There is a strong, two-way, destructive relationship between MS, depression and sexual dysfunction. Depression affects 30–50% of individuals with MS, and it is an independent predictor of sexual dysfunction. The experience of sexual failure can, in turn, trigger or worsen feelings of depression, despair and isolation, creating a vicious cycle that is difficult to break.
  • Body image and self-esteem: The physical changes brought on by MS – such as a limp, the need for a cane or wheelchair, weight gain from steroids or inactivity, or tremors – can profoundly damage a man’s body image and sense of masculinity. This may lead to feelings of being ‘flawed’, ‘broken’ or ‘unattractive’ that erode self-esteem and sexual confidence.
  • Relationship dynamics and role changes: MS does not just affect the individual; it impacts the entire relationship. Performance anxiety and fear of rejection can lead to avoidance of intimacy. A particularly challenging dynamic arises when an intimate partner must assume significant caregiving responsibilities. This ‘role reversal’ can blur the lines between lover and caregiver, disrupting the emotional foundation of the sexual relationship. The partner’s own sexual satisfaction and quality of life are also frequently diminished, highlighting the two-way nature of sexual dysfunction.

Management of male sexual dysfunction in MS

A single treatment approach towards sexual dysfunction in MS often fails because it is a multifactorial problem that requires a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach. This includes the MS team, a urologist, a physiotherapist, an occupational therapist and a psychologist or sex therapist. Failure to implement an interdisciplinary approach is usually because the MS team is reluctant to initiate the conversation about sexual health or lacks knowledge.

Before any medication or therapy is initiated, it is essential to break the ‘conspiracy of silence’ and create a safe, confidential environment for open communication between the patient, their partner and the healthcare provider. For the MS HCP, this involves routinely and proactively asking about sexual health as part of a holistic review of systems, often alongside questions about bladder and bowel function. For the patient, having ‘permission’ to discuss these sensitive issues can be profoundly therapeutic, reducing shame and ‘validating’ their experience as a legitimate medical concern.

Management of primary sexual dysfunction

Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction

  • Oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors: Medications such as sildenafil (Viagra), tadalafil (Cialis), vardenafil (Levitra) and avanafil (Spedra) are the first-line pharmacological treatments for ED in men with MS. Vardenafil is generally not available on the NHS, and avanafil is prescribed via specialist sexual dysfunction clinics. Sildenafil (Viagra) has a short half-life and needs to be taken before intercourse is planned. In comparison, tadalafil (Cialis) has a long half-life and is called the weekend Viagra. Some men with MS find that combining the two drugs is synergistic. Please note that they come in different doses, so you will need to titrate the dose to find the one that works best for you. These drugs do not create an erection spontaneously; they work by enhancing the natural erectile process, increasing penile blood flow in response to sexual arousal. Clinical trials have demonstrated their efficacy, but they may be effective in only about 50% of men with MS (a lower rate than in the general population), likely due to the underlying neurological deficits. These drugs are contraindicated in men taking nitrate medications for heart conditions.
  • Injectable and intraurethral medications: For men who do not respond to or cannot take oral PDE-5 inhibitors, these locally administered medications are highly effective second-line options. Alprostadil, a synthetic prostaglandin, can be injected directly into the erectile tissue of the penis (intracavernosal injection) or inserted as a small suppository into the urethra. These methods induce an erection directly and are often successful when oral agents are not.

Management of ejaculatory and orgasmic disorders

This remains an area of unmet clinical need, as there are currently no medications specifically approved or consistently effective for treating delayed ejaculation or failure to reach orgasm (anorgasmia) in MS. Some antidepressants (e.g. SSRIs) may be used ‘off-label’ to treat premature ejaculation thanks to their side effect of delaying orgasm. For delayed ejaculation or anorgasmia, the focus shifts to enhancing stimulation through manual or oral techniques or with the use of assistive devices like penile vibrators.

Addressing low libido and sensory changes

A review of the patient’s current medications is needed because many drugs, especially SSRIs, can suppress libido. Switching to an alternative antidepressant with a more favourable sexual side effect profile, such as bupropion or certain SNRIs (serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors), may be beneficial. If blood tests reveal low testosterone levels, hormone replacement therapy may be considered to improve desire and energy. For altered genital sensation, the goal is to compensate for the diminished nerve signals by increasing the intensity and focus of stimulation using vibrators, different types of touch, or other sexual aids.

Management of secondary sexual dysfunction

  • Fatigue: Energy conservation is paramount. This involves planning sexual activity for times of day when energy is highest (often the morning), taking a nap beforehand, and collaborating with a partner to find less physically demanding sexual positions, such as spooning.
  • Spasticity: Proactive management can prevent painful muscle spasms from disrupting intimacy. This may include gentle stretching or massage before sex, taking an antispasticity medication like baclofen approximately 30–60 minutes before sexual activity, and/or experimenting with positions that minimise muscle tightness and discomfort.
  • Bladder and bowel issues: Careful planning can alleviate the anxiety surrounding potential incontinence. Strategies include restricting fluid intake for a few hours before sex, ensuring the bladder and bowel are emptied immediately beforehand and using intermittent self-catheterisation if needed. Using a condom can also provide a sense of security against urinary leakage.
  • Cognitive changes: For individuals whose concentration is affected by MS, creating an environment conducive to focusing is helpful. This means minimising external distractions, such as television or phones, and maximising sensual stimuli, including lighting, music and scent, to help maintain focus on the intimate experience.

Psychological counselling and sex therapy are the cornerstone of a holistic management plan and include cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). CBT can be effective for challenging and reframing the unhelpful thoughts and beliefs that fuel performance anxiety and negative body image. Couples counselling provides a structured forum to improve communication, openly discuss fears and frustrations, and collaboratively explore the changes MS has brought to the relationship, including the sensitive shift from partner to caregiver.

Sensate focus and body mapping are specific sex therapy techniques that are particularly valuable for couples affected by MS. These exercises involve non-demand, non-goal-oriented sensual touching, shifting the focus away from intercourse and orgasm and toward the rediscovery of pleasure. This is especially important when genital sensation has been altered, as it helps couples identify new erogenous zones and broaden their definition of intimacy.

Rehabilitation and lifestyle interventions

These approaches focus on improving physical function and overall health to support sexual well-being.

Pelvic floor exercises are crucial for maintaining erectile rigidity and for the muscular contractions associated with ejaculation. A specialised physiotherapist can design an exercise programme (for example, Kegel exercises) to strengthen these muscles, potentially improving erectile and ejaculatory control. While much of the research into pelvic floor training has focused on women, the principles are also directly applicable to men.

General health has a direct impact on sexual function. Lifestyle modifications such as adopting a heart and brain-healthy diet, engaging in regular physical activity as tolerated, maintaining a healthy weight and quitting smoking can all improve vascular health.

Assistive devices for erectile dysfunction

For men with ED that is refractory to medication, mechanical aids are an important and effective option. Vacuum constriction devices consist of a plastic cylinder placed over the penis, a hand-held pump that creates a vacuum to draw blood into the penis, and a constriction band that is slipped onto the base of the penis to trap the blood and maintain the erection for up to 30 minutes.

Vacuum constriction device operated by a hand-held pump.

Penile prostheses or penile implants are a surgical solution for severe, intractable ED. A device is surgically implanted into the penis that allows the man to create a rigid erection mechanically. This uses saline to inflate the cylinder that is implanted in the penis. The saline can be pumped from a reservoir into the prosthesis or erectile cylinder to mimic an erection. The saline can then be pumped from the cylinder back into the reservoir to cause detumescence. This is typically considered a third-line treatment when all other options have failed.

Penile implant for severe erectile dysfunction

Education, education, education ….

Providing clear, accurate information to the patient and their partner about how MS can affect sexual function helps to demystify the problem, correct common misconceptions (e.g. that sexual activity will worsen the disease), and empower the couple to explore solutions collaboratively.

A management plan for male sexual dysfunction needs to be personalised to address specific primary, secondary and tertiary factors. The goal is often not just to restore previous sexual function but to help the man with MS to adapt to a new reality, encouraging him and his partner to build a new, satisfying form of intimacy.

This calls for improved clinical education of MS healthcare professionals, the integration of standardised screening tools into routine care, and a fundamental shift in clinical culture toward a more holistic model of well-being that values sexual health as a core component of MS management.

What are the consequences of not treating MS?

Are there valid reasons not to treat MS with a disease-modifying therapy? What are the consequences of not treating MS? Is watchful waiting justified?

Key points

  • Untreated MS will, given time, result in physical disability, impaired quality of life and ‘hidden’ problems such as cognitive impairment, anxiety and depression.
  • Brain atrophy, or shrinkage, occurs at a faster rate in people with MS than in healthy individuals.
  • Optic neuritis, inflammation or destruction of nerve fibres in the brain and spinal cord, and extensive damage to the cerebral cortex (grey matter) are some consequences of MS lesion development.
  • Quality of life impacts may include reduced mobility, relationship difficulties, increased likelihood of unemployment and memory impairment.
  • Without treatment, the life expectancy of people with MS is reduced by about 6 ̶ 8 years.
  • There are, however, several valid reasons why some people with MS prefer not to receive disease-modifying treatments.

Risks from no disease-modifying treatment

Many patients ask me what will happen to their MS if they don’t take a disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and how effective DMTs are at preventing negative outcomes. Here I try and address questions you need to ask yourself before starting a DMT.

If you are an individual with MS, predicting your disease course is difficult. However, many studies monitoring groups of people with MS show patterns in relation to the progression of the disease and its outcome, with various data sets being consistent.

Given sufficient time, most people with MS who are not treated will become disabled. Most people focus on physical disability, but MS causes many hidden problems, such as cognitive impairment, anxiety and depression.

How untreated MS can progress – headline results

The slides below summarise some of the outcomes of untreated MS; these include brain changes (atrophy), further MS lesion development, reduced health-related quality of life, long-term impact on physical and mental health and shorter life expectancy. (To enlarge an individual slide, click on the arrow at the top right.)

Brain changes
MS lesion development
Quality of life impact
Long-term outlook

DMTs have changed the landscape

It is important to note that these outcomes are from the pre-DMT era and don’t apply to populations of people with MS treated with DMTs. New real-life data indicate that DMTs, particularly high-efficacy DMTs, are preventing many of these problems. By not being on a DMT, if you have active MS, you are at risk of acquiring damage from focal inflammatory lesions. Early in the disease course, you may not be aware of this damage because of the remarkable capacity of the nervous system to compensate for damage (neurological reserve). However, once the compensatory mechanisms have been exhausted, further damage results in overt disability. It is important to regard DMTs as preventive treatments, i.e. their aim is to delay, and hopefully prevent, future disability.

Possible reasons for not receiving a DMT

Many people with MS will not be on a DMT, for a variety of reasons. The list below is probably not extensive; if you know of other reasons why someone who qualifies is not taking a DMT, please let me know.

Inactive MS

Someone with inactive MS will not be eligible for a DMT. There is no standard definition of active MS. To me, active MS is recent evidence of focal inflammatory disease activity, defined as:

  • clinical relapse(s) in the last 2 years
  • OR magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity in the last 12 ̶ 36 months (new or enlarging T2 lesions or T1 Gd-enhancing lesions)
  • OR a raised cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light chain level in the last 12 months.

Worsening disability in MS without focal inflammatory disease activity is not active disease. It can be due to damage caused by past inflammation, smouldering MS or the effects of premature ageing; anti-inflammatory DMTs can’t address this problem. We need different types of DMTs to address these mechanisms – for example, neuroprotective and/or remyelination therapies and anti-ageing therapies.

Watchful waiting

In many situations, some neurologists think someone with MS will end up having benign disease, so they are not prepared to start treatment until the patient develops some overt disability. I abhor this practice and it is one of the reasons I spend so much of my time disseminating knowledge and getting involved with health politics. Watchful waiting, in terms of treating MS, is not supported by data. The earlier and more effectively you treat MS, the better the outcome. The only situation I could condone watchful waiting in someone with active MS is when the diagnosis of MS is in question. Sometimes in neurology, time is the best diagnostician. If the person has MS, it will declare itself with further disease activity, and this would be the trigger to start a DMT.

Family planning

Trying to fall pregnant, pregnancy or breastfeeding are common reasons to interrupt or stop DMTs. Please note that most neurologists now have options to treat MS during pregnancy and while breastfeeding, so this is becoming a less common reason for not taking a DMT.

Risk aversion

Some people with MS are not prepared to take the potential risks associated with DMTs.

Personal reasons

Some people with MS don’t believe in having their MS treated, preferring to try alternative medicines and turn down traditional DMTs. If you are one of these people, I would recommend you continue to interact with your MS team and have regular monitoring of your MS (clinical, MRI, patient-related outcome measures [PROMS] and possibly CSF analyses). Then, if these alternative strategies don’t work, you will keep open the option of treatment with a ‘traditional DMT‘. Most alternative treatment strategies for MS are compatible with DMTs and hence should be viewed as complementary. Understanding the difference between complementary and alternative treatments is important. Complementary treatment strategies are part of the holistic management of MS.

Financial constraints

In some parts of the world, MS treatment is not covered by a national health service or medical insurance scheme and some people with MS simply can’t afford DMTs. Even in rich countries, people with MS who are disenfranchised don’t have access to treatment; these may include illegal immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers waiting for their applications to be processed.

Progressive or more advanced MS

In most countries, neurologists don’t initiate treatment in patients with more advanced MS. This approach is based on a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of DMTs in this population. However, we are increasingly offering ocrelizumab (for active primary progressive MS), siponimod (for active secondary progressive MS) or off-label therapies on a compassionate basis to people with more advanced MS. In addition, there is also the potential to participate in clinical trials of new treatments for more advanced MS.

Ageism

Some healthcare systems and some neurologists are reluctant to start DMTs in people with MS who are over a certain age. This is based on a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of DMTs in this population, and it is why we need to do clinical trials in older people with MS.

Comorbidities

Many people have other medical problems for which the treatment takes priority over the treatment of MS. For example, a patient of mine was diagnosed with stage four bowel cancer. After her surgery, she started an intensive period of chemotherapy during which we stopped her DMT.

References

  1. Fisher E, et al. Gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Ann Neurol 2008;64:255–65.
  2. Barkhof F, et al. Imaging outcomes for neuroprotection and repair in multiple sclerosis trials. Nat Rev Neurol 2009;5:256–66.
  3. Simon JH. Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: what we know and would like to know. Mult Scler 2006;12:679–87.
  4. Ziemssen T, et al. Optimizing treatment success in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2016;263:1053–65.
  5. Hickman SJ, et al. Detection of optic nerve atrophy following a single episode of unilateral optic neuritis by MRI using a fat-saturated short-echo fast FLAIR sequence. Neuroradiology 2001;43:123–8.
  6. Trapp BD, et al. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:278–85.
  7. Peterson JW, et al. Transected neurites, apoptotic neurons, and reduced inflammation in cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Ann Neurol 2001;50:389–400.
  8. Orme M, et al. The effect of disease, functional status, and relapses on the utility of people with multiple sclerosis in the UK. Value Health 2007;10:54–60.
  9. Pfleger CC, et al. Social consequences of multiple sclerosis (1): early pension and temporary unemployment – a historical prospective cohort study. Mult Scler 2010;16:121–6.
  10. Kobelt G, et al. Costs and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis in Europe. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:918–26.
  11. Feuillet L, et al. Early cognitive impairment in patients with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2007;13:124–7
  12. Confavreux C and Compston A. Chapter 4. The natural history of multiple sclerosis. In: McAlpine’s Multiple Sclerosis, Fourth Edition, 2006; 183 ̶ 272. Churchill Livingstone.
  13. Weinshenker BG et al. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study. I. Clinical course and disability. Brain 1989;112:133 ̶ 46.
  14. Torkildsen GN, et al. Survival and cause of death in multiple sclerosis: results from a 50-year follow-up in Western Norway. Mult Scler 2008;14:1191–8.
  15. Kingwell E, et al. Relative mortality and survival in multiple sclerosis: findings from British Columbia, Canada. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:61–6.
  16. Sadovnick AD, et al. Cause of death in patients attending multiple sclerosis clinics. Neurology 1991;41:1193–6.
  17. Brenner P, et al. Multiple sclerosis and risk of attempted and completed suicide – a cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2016;23:1329–36

Do I have active MS?

Before deciding to start a disease-modifying therapy you need to know if you have active MS.

Key points

  • To qualify for a disease-modifying treatment for MS you must have active disease.
  • Active MS is characterised by relapses (new symptomatic or asymptomatic lesions); the clinical diagnosis of relapse may be supported by MRI or CSF evidence of activity.
  • Different levels of disease activity qualify for different types of DMT.
  • Diagnostic criteria for MS have evolved considerably over the past two decades; this has helped to make treatment decisions earlier and easier, both for MS neurologists and for people with MS.

To be eligible for disease-modifying therapy (DMT) you must have ‘active MS’. This term is increasingly used to refer to current or recent evidence of focal inflammatory activity, i.e. new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or a relapse. Inflammation damages axons, or nerve processes. When a lesion develops, the effects of inflammatory mediators can cut (transect) axons, demyelinate them or stop them from working.

By contrast, the gradual worsening of disability that occurs in people with more advanced MS (which may, or may not, occur in the presence of focal inflammatory activity) has many potential causes, only one of which is focal inflammation.

Signs of active MS

Relapses

When a new MS lesion occurs in an eloquent part of the central nervous system it causes new symptoms or exacerbates old ones – this is usually interpreted as a relapse. Relapses, by definition, last at least 24 hours in the absence of infection or fever.

Criteria for ‘active’ MS accepted by many MS health professionals. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; NFL, neurofilament light.
*Some neurologists accept 24 months, 36 months or even more when assessing MRI activity. There is no international consensus on the gap between the baseline and new MRI scan to define active disease.

Asymptomatic lesions

Most focal MS disease activity does not cause any overt symptoms because the brain has a way of compensating for damage. For every clinical relapse, there are at least 10 or more lesions on MRI. Therefore, what we see clinically in terms of relapses is the tip of the iceberg. Even standard MRI is relatively insensitive in detecting and monitoring MS disease activity; it misses new lesions that are smaller than 3 ̶ 4 mm in size and does not detect most lesions that occur in the grey matter of the brain (cortex and deep grey matter nuclei, e.g. thalamus and basal ganglia). Therefore, MRI scans also reveal just the tip of the iceberg. This is one of the reasons we also use cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament levels as a marker of this microscopic activity.

Disease activity levels

Inactive MS

Many people with MS experience frequent intermittent symptoms or ‘pseudorelapses’ that come on when they are tired, after exercise or have a raised body temperature from a fever, exercise, hot bath or a warm environment. These intermittent symptoms are usually quite stereotyped and last minutes to hours. They are indicative of a previously damaged pathway but do not represent a relapse or disease activity.

Active MS

Most neurologists require evidence of disease activity in the last 12 months, with some of us accepting a 24-month or 36-month window if there is no serial or regular MRI support. However, if you have had no relapses or MRI evidence of new lesions in the last 24 months, then your MS is defined as inactive. (This does not mean your MS is necessarily stable; you could have worsening disability as part of the progressive or smouldering phase of the disease.) Inactive MS needs to be monitored in case it reactivates, in which case you could become eligible for treatment.

Inactive MS - format updated 180625 SS

Schematic showing different levels of MS disease activity.
*Some neurologists accept MRI activity in the last 24 months, 36 months or even longer as a criterion for active MS.

Highly active MS and rapidly evolving severe MS

Active MS has been divided into an additional two categories that have implications for DMT prescribing (depending on where you live).

  • Highly active MS describes MS with unchanged or increased relapse rates, or ongoing severe relapses compared with the previous year, despite treatment with beta-interferon or another so-called first-line therapy. In England, patients in this subgroup are eligible for natalizumab, alemtuzumab, fingolimod and cladribine.
  • Rapidly evolving severe MS (RES) is defined as two disabling relapses and MRI evidence of activity within a 12-month period. In England, patients in this subgroup are eligible for natalizumab, alemtuzumab and cladribine.

Evolution of diagnostic criteria

In the early 2000s, disease activity was defined using clinical criteria only; you needed at least two documented relapses in the last 2 years to be eligible for DMT.1 This meant that a neurologist had to examine you to confirm abnormalities compatible with a relapse. However, many people with MS without rapid access to a neurologist would recover before being assessed, meaning that their relapses often could not be documented. This was very frustrating for someone wanting to start a DMT. If patients had MRI evidence to support recent disease activity, how could we deny them access to a DMT because they were not seen in a timely way to have their relapse documented in the clinical notes?

In 2009, the criteria for diagnosing MS incorporated MRI into the definition to allow us to treat so-called high-risk patients with CIS (clinically isolated syndromes compatible with demyelination). These criteria required patients with CIS to have nine or more T2 lesions on MRI or at least one gadolinium-enhancing lesion. These MRI criteria were based on the McDonald diagnostic criteria at the time.2 These eligibility criteria evolved further in 2014, once alemtuzumab was licensed, to include clinical or MRI activity.


References

  1. McDonald WI, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosisAnn Neurol 2001;50:121–7.
  2. Polman CH, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292–302.