Tag Archives: reconstitution therapy

DMTsSafety, Monitoring MS

How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?

The complications associated with immunosuppression vary from DMT to DMT. You will find it helpful to understand what investigations to expect before and during treatment and how these may vary depending on the DMT(s) you are considering.

Key points

  • Numerous tests are carried out at the start of your treatment (baseline); these include blood, urine and tests for a range of infections.
  • Some patients will need tests or procedures specific to their DMT that are inappropriate for everyone with MS – for example, vaccination against some infections; pregnancy and/or genetic counselling; prevention of cardiovascular complications; and management of infusion reactions.
  • Ongoing monitoring is required for many but not all of the above factors.
  • All licensed MS DMTs have had a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment, and their benefits are considered to outweigh the potential risks.

Standard tests … and why we do them

If you have read the article on immunosuppression, you will know that immunosuppressive DMTs may reduce white blood cell counts and antibody responses to vaccines and increase the likelihood of some infections and cancers. However, we can reduce the risk of many complications associated with long-term immunosuppression (we use the shorthand ‘de-risk’). This article explains what needs to be done at the start of DMT administration (baseline) and during subsequent monitoring. The specifics, however, vary from DMT to DMT.

Baseline tests

Tests at baseline (before starting DMT administration) include full blood count, platelets, liver, kidney and thyroid function tests, and a urine screen. Recording baseline immunoglobulin levels is particularly important if you are about to start an anti-CD20 therapy (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab or rituximab) so that we have a reference level for future comparisons. 

Serum protein electrophoresis is done for patients considering starting interferon-beta; having a so-called monoclonal gammopathy (an abnormal immunoglobulin) is a contraindication to starting an interferon-beta formulation in people with MS. The drug has been associated with a form of capillary leak syndrome, leading in rare cases to death from an adult respiratory distress syndrome.

The table below summarises the routine investigations required at baseline; subsequent sections provide further detail.

Tests routinely carried out at the start of treatment (baseline).
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DMT, disease-modifying therapy; EBV, Epstein ̶ Barr virus; ECG, electrocardiogram; FBC, full blood count; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, human papillomavirus; JCV, JC virus; LFTs, liver function tests; MMR, measles/mumps/rubella; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PCP, pneumocystis pneumonia; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; TB ELISpot, tuberculosis enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot; TFTs, thyroid function tests; U&E, urea and electrolytes; VZV, varicella zoster virus.

Infection screening

At our centre, we screen for a relatively large number of infectious diseases so that we can treat any subclinical infection before starting a DMT. This is particularly relevant for HIV-1 and 2, hepatitis B and C, syphilis and tuberculosis (TB).  

Screening for the JC virus (JCV), which causes progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), is only really needed for people with MS considering starting natalizumab. Even if you are JCV positive, you can be treated with natalizumab for 6 ̶ 12 months and sometimes longer if you are prepared to take on the risk of PML and the extra monitoring required to detect PML early. 

We only check measles/mumps/rubella (MMR) status in patients without documentation of full vaccination as children. We check varicella zoster virus (VZV) status before starting immunosuppression and vaccinate seronegative individuals. Currently, we are still using the live VZV vaccine. This will change, and we will likely be offering all people with MS in the UK the component inactive VZV vaccine (Shingrix, that has had its licence extended) to reduce the chances of zoster reactivation in all adults starting immunosuppression. This new Shingrix indication is similar to the pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax). Our centre is only recommending Pneumovax in patients about to start an anti-CD20. However, when Shingrix becomes available on the NHS, it will make sense to bundle this with the Pneumovax and make it routine for all people with MS before starting immunosuppressive therapy. Please check with your healthcare team which products are available locally.

Routine tests and monitoring for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are only needed for subjects undergoing autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), which causes profound short-term immunosuppression that can result in CMV and EBV reactivation. CMV reactivation also occurs with alemtuzumab, so this needs to be considered when investigating patients who develop complications after receiving alemtuzumab (please see Opportunistic infection in MS). 

For patients starting long-term immunosuppression, it is advisable to screen for active human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (by cervical smear or vaginal swab) and for warts or active infection with molluscum contagiosum. Warts are caused by HPV skin infection; molluscum contagiosum is due to a relatively benign pox virus that typically affects young children but occasionally affects adults. Warts and molluscum contagiosum can spread rapidly in patients receiving alemtuzumab, so I recommend treating these skin infections before starting immunosuppression for MS. 

Vaccinations

We encourage all patients to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and seasonal flu; outside the flu vaccine season, we remind people to get vaccinated during the next vaccine season. 

Hepatitis B, meningococcal and Haemophilus influenzae vaccines are considered only for people with MS who are at high risk of infection and have not had these vaccines as part of a national vaccine programme, i.e. healthcare and laboratory workers for hepatitis B, school and university students and military recruits for meningococcal vaccine and paediatric patients for Haemophilus influenzae. 

The issue around having the HPV vaccine as an adult is more complex. For example, in the UK, the NHS does not cover the cost of the vaccine for people over 25. In addition, most people have only had the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil-4), which covers about two-thirds of the strains that cause cancer. Some people with MS may want to upgrade their immunity with the polyvalent vaccine (Gardasil-9) that covers over 95% of the cancer-causing strains of HPV. For more information on HPV vaccination, please see Case study: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and ocrelizumab.

MMR is a live vaccine given in childhood (see MMR vaccine: to vaccinate or not? ). Owing to vaccine hesitancy, however, many people do not receive this vaccine as children. Therefore, if an adult with MS is about to start immunosuppressive therapy and has not been vaccinated against MMR, we advise them to do so. This is particularly important for people about to start natalizumab because these viruses are neurotropic and can infect the brain. Natalizumab blocks immune response within the brain; hence, exposure to a neurotropic virus could cause serious infection, similar to what we see with the JC virus – which causes PML.

Travel vaccines for people who travel as part of their work or plan to travel shortly need to be considered. In particular, the yellow fever vaccine is a live vaccine (made from a weakened yellow fever virus strain) and it should ideally be given before someone starts on immunosuppressive therapy. 

Cardiovascular screening

You may need an ECG (electrocardiogram), to rule out an abnormal heart rhythm or electrical conduction abnormality and to check your left ventricular function (ejection fraction). These abnormalities are a relative contraindication to using the S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, ponesimod), which may affect the conduction of the heart. In patients treated with mitoxantrone, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) must be done at baseline and regularly monitored because mitoxantrone is toxic to the heart. If the LVEF drops significantly, further dosing of mitoxantrone is contraindicated. 

Pregnancy, family planning and genetic testing

Many chemotherapy agents used in AHSCT for ablating (extracting) the bone marrow are toxic to the ovaries and testes. Therefore, patients receive counselling before treatment and can have eggs (oocytes) or sperm banked for future use. Egg banking is also a consideration for women with MS being treated with mitoxantrone. Men receiving mitoxantrone do not need to bank sperm, however, because mitoxantrone does not cross the testes ̶ blood barrier. 

Genetic testing is only required at present if you wish to receive siponimod. Siponimod is metabolised by a specific liver enzyme (biological catalyst) with two functional variants – slow metabolising and fast metabolising. People who carry two slow-metabolising variants of the enzyme cannot receive siponimod. Intermediate metabolisers (those that carry one slow- and one fast-metabolising version of the enzyme) receive low-dose siponimod, while those with two fast-metabolising enzymes receive high-dose siponimod. 

Protecting against progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

I have included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing for JCV among the baseline tests. This is specific to patients at high risk of developing PML who are switching from natalizumab to a depleting immune reconstitution therapy such as alemtuzumab or another therapy that depletes their immune system (e.g. cladribine or an anti-CD20 therapy). These tests are done to exclude asymptomatic PML, which will otherwise be carried over to the new treatment. The effects of these immunosuppressive therapies on your immune system cannot be rapidly reversed, which is a problem because immune reconstitution is needed to clear PML. Most MS centres do not mandate CSF testing in this situation because it does not always reveal the presence of PML. However, I still request this test on my patients to gain as much information as possible on which to base potentially life-changing decisions.

Prophylactic antivirals and antibiotics

Patients in our centre undergoing AHSCT or receiving alemtuzumab will be given antivirals and antibiotics to reduce the likelihood of certain infections. This is particularly relevant for listeriosis, which is a rare infection transmitted via food. We also encourage all our patients to start and maintain a specific diet to reduce the chances of listeriosis. The risk of listeriosis is only present for a short period when both the adaptive and innate immune systems are compromised, that is, for 4 weeks after receiving alemtuzumab, so we recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for 4 weeks. Our online resource provides more information about listeriosis. If you live in the UK, you can order our free listeriosis prevention kit, which contains a booklet (also downloadable) and various practical items to help keep you safe.

Strategies for limiting the risks from immune reconstitution therapies and infusion DMTs.

Infusion reactions

When you use agents that cause cell lysis (breakdown), such as alemtuzumab and intravenous anti-CD20 therapies, the contents of cells cause infusion reactions. To prevent such reactions or reduce their severity, we pretreat patients with corticosteroids, antihistamines and antipyretics. The exact protocols for each DMT differ; for example, ocrelizumab infusion reactions are generally only a problem with the first and second doses; therefore, many centres don’t give steroids with the third and subsequent infusions. The latter was particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic when it was shown that the recent administration of high-dose steroids increased your chances of severe COVID-19. 

Ongoing monitoring

Once someone has been treated with a DMT, ongoing monitoring is required. What gets monitored and how frequently depends on the individual DMT. For a list of DMTs associated with important adverse events, please see our summary Table in ‘De-risking’ guide: monitoring requirements of individual DMTs.

The regulatory authorities usually put in place specific monitoring requirements, which can differ worldwide. It is important that you also enrol in your national cancer screening programmes. Being on chronic immunosuppression increases your chances of developing secondary malignancies, so please remain vigilant. 

Tests carried out regularly as part of ongoing monitoring.
FBC, full blood count; LFTs, liver function tests; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; TFTs, thyroid function tests; U&E, urea and electrolytes.

I want to reassure you that all licensed MS DMTs have undergone a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment by the drug regulators, and the benefits of these treatments are considered to outweigh the potential risks. On balance, the level of immunosuppression associated with MS DMTs is typically mild to moderate; hence, the complications are relatively uncommon. MS is a serious disease and, if left to run its natural course, would result in most patients becoming disabled. To learn more about the natural course of MS, please read the section entitled What are the consequences of not treating MS?

Treatment strategy

Do I understand the concepts of treat-2-target and NEDA?

Has anyone discussed a treatment target with you, including the need to rebaseline your disease activity? Have the concepts of preventing end-organ damage to the central nervous system (the ‘end-organ’ in MS) and brain volume loss or atrophy been broached?

Key points

  • Achieving long-term remission is a well-established treatment target in MS and several other autoimmune diseases.
  • Key measures of MS disease activity are used to define composite treatment targets; they provide objective means for monitoring and decision-making.
  • To demonstrate a target of no evident disease activity (NEDA) requires a minimum of three criteria to be met: no relapses, no MRI activity and no disability progression.
  • More stringent definitions of NEDA targets have evolved and will continue to do so as new predictors of treatment response are developed.

If you are on a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), what is the objective or treatment target for your MS? This is another question to be answered before committing yourself to a specific treatment strategy.

Treat-2-target

Relapses and ongoing focal inflammatory activity on MRI (new or enlarging T2 lesions and T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions [Gd-enhancing]) are associated with poor outcomes. This has led to the adoption of ‘no evident disease activity’ (NEDA) as a treatment target in MS. NEDA, or NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of MS disease activity: (i) no relapses, (ii) no MRI activity (new or enlarging T2 lesions or Gd-enhancing lesions) and (iii) no disability progression. NEDA is an important goal for treating individuals with MS.

When to rebaseline

To use NEDA as a treatment target in day-to-day clinical practice, it is advisable to be ‘rebaselined’ after the onset of action of the DMT you have been started on. The timing of the MRI to provide a new baseline depends on the DMT concerned. The recommendations for immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) are very different from those for maintenance therapies. In the case of an IRT (for example alemtuzumab or cladribine, which are given as short courses), breakthrough disease activity can be used as an indicator to retreat rather than necessarily to switch therapy. Therefore, a rebaselining MRI should be delayed until after the final course of therapy, e.g. 2 years, or close enough to the time when a third, or subsequent course, can be administered.

Determining treatment failure: IRTs

Questions remain of how many treatment cycles need to be given before considering that a specific IRT has not been effective.

  • For alemtuzumab, the threshold is three cycles under NHS England’s treatment algorithm (based on their cost-effectiveness analysis). Alemtuzumab is a biological or protein-based treatment, so the risk of developing neutralising anti-drug antibodies increases with each infusion.
  • Cladribine on the other hand is a small molecule, so neutralising antibodies are not a problem and there is no real limit on the number of courses that can be given.
  • Although HSCT tends to be a one-off treatment, there are rare reports of people with MS receiving more than one cycle.

Please note there are potentially cumulative risks associated with multiple cycles of an IRT: secondary malignancies in the case of HSCT and persistent lymphopaenia with cladribine. 

Determining treatment failure: maintenance therapies

In comparison to IRTs, if you have disease activity on a particular maintenance DMT, and provided you have been adherent to your treatment, this is usually interpreted as a suboptimal response or non-response and it should trigger a switch to another class of DMT. 

A criticism of NEDA is the omission of so-called ‘non-relapse-associated disease worsening’ as a component of the treatment target (in addition to evidence of incomplete recovery from relapses). I refer to this disease worsening as smouldering MS. Worsening disability in the absence of relapses may have little to do with ongoing focal inflammatory activity. It may simply represent a delayed dying-off of axons and nerve fibres following earlier focal inflammatory lesions. As a result, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching, or stopping a DMT, based simply on non-relapse-associated worsening disability. For more information, please see Getting worse – smouldering MS.

Beyond NEDA-3

The definition of NEDA is evolving with clinical practice. Some centres are now testing for brain volume loss (that is, brain atrophy) and/or increased neurofilament light chain (NFL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as part of the NEDA-3 treatment target. NEDA-4 builds on NEDA-3, by including the target of normalising brain atrophy rates to within the normal range. The problem we have found with this is that the measurement of brain atrophy in an individual with MS level is very unreliable. For example, dehydration, excessive alcohol consumption and some symptomatic medications can cause the brain to shrink temporarily. We, therefore, think that CSF NFL levels are a better treatment target, less prone to misinterpretation. Neurofilaments are proteins that are found in nerves and axons (nerve fibres) and are released in proportion to the amount of nerve fibre damage that occurs in MS. Normalising CSF NFL levels, which would indicate that nerve damage is stopped, is referred to as NEDA-5. From a scientific perspective, including a more objective end-organ biomarker makes sense and will almost certainly be incorporated into our treatment target in the future.  

Table format updated 180625 SS

The components of NEDA-recommended targets are expanding as our ability to measure predictors of treatment response grows.
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; NEDA, no evident disease activity; NEIDA, no evident inflammatory disease activity; NFL, neurofilament light; PROMS, patient-related outcome measures.

End-organ damage

The combination of relapses, the development of new MRI lesions and brain volume loss over 2 years in clinical trials predicts quite accurately who will become disabled over the same time period. From a treatment perspective, it is important to stop relapses, new MRI lesions and brain volume loss if we are to prevent or slow down worsening disability. Therefore, we must go beyond NEIDA (no evident inflammatory activity), which refers to relapses and focal MRI activity, and normalise brain volume loss if we can. 

Alternatives to NEDA?

Many neurologists are critical of using NEDA as a treatment target in clinical practice, fearing that it encourages people with MS to take highly effective DMTs that they consider may be ‘more risky’ (see short summaries of the available DMTs for information about individual drugs). Such neurologists, therefore, promote a less proactive approach and allow for some residual MS disease activity, but at a lower level. This treatment target is referred to as minimal evidence of disease activity, or MEDA.

In my opinion, MEDA flies in the face of the science of focal inflammatory lesions being ‘bad’ and it is associated with poor short-term, intermediate and long-term outcomes. If most people with MS end up receiving so-called high-efficacy therapies because of breakthrough disease activity, then this is what they probably need, that is, to have their MS treated adequately. Compelling evidence has emerged from trials, large registries and real-world data that people with MS treated early with highly effective DMTs (flipping the pyramid) do better than those who have delayed access to more effective DMTs.1,2,3 You can find a short summary of some key findings on the MS Brain Health website.

Implementing NEDA in clinical practice

Please note that achieving long-term remission, or NEDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune kidney disease and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated to a target of NEDA do better than those with breakthrough disease activity. I would therefore strongly encourage you to discuss this treatment target with your own MS neurologist. 

The flowchart below illustrates how we implement a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy. The important take-home message is that the treatment targets in MS have moved; goal-setting and the active monitoring of outcomes is now required to achieve these goals. 

Treat to target NEDA algorithm

Recommended approaches to implementing a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy, using maintenance ̶ escalation or immune reconstitution therapy (IRT). The dotted lines indicate that if treatment fails you can either switch within the class (maintenance or IRT) or reassess the strategy. From Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.4
Alem, alemtuzumab; Clad, cladribine; DMF, dimethyl fumarate; Fingo, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFNβ, interferon-beta; Mitox, mitoxantrone; NEDA, no evident disease activity; Nz, natalizumab; Ocre, ocrelizumab; Ofat, ofatumumab; Teri, teriflunomide.

There is also a clear need to update the definition of NEDA regularly as new technologies become available and are validated as predictors of treatment response. I therefore envisage the definition of NEDA changing still further in future to include more objective measures, particularly ones measuring end-organ damage and the inclusion of patient-related outcome measures.

References

DMTs, Treatment strategy

How immunosuppressed am I?

Do you understand the difference between short-term intermittent and long-term continuous immunosuppression? Here we address another of the key questions to consider before deciding on a specific disease-modifying therapy (DMT).

Key points

  • Immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) reduce the immune system’s effectiveness.
  • It is important to weigh up the benefits and risks of short-term versus continuous immunosuppression.
  • Non-selective DMTs suppress the adaptive and innate immune systems; selective DMTs do not affect the innate immune system and are thus associated with a low risk of bacterial infections.
  • The implications of immunosuppression need to be considered within the context of other health and lifestyle factors.

Which DMTs cause immunosuppression?

A useful way of thinking about DMTs is based on whether they are immunosuppressive. Broadly speaking, an immunosuppressive is any DMT that reduces the immune system’s activation or effectiveness. 

From a regulatory perspective, for a drug to be classified as immunosuppressive, it should: 

  • cause significant lymphopaenia or leukopenia (reduced white cell counts)
  • be associated with opportunistic infections (infections that don’t occur in people with a normal, healthy immune system)
  • reduce antibody and/or T-cell responses to vaccines 
  • increase the risk of secondary malignancies. 

Based on the above criteria, the interferon-beta preparations and glatiramer acetate are immunomodulatory rather than immunosuppressive. Teriflunomide is also an immunomodulatory therapy with the potential, albeit small, to cause immunosuppression. In real life, however, very few people with MS treated with teriflunomide develop significant lymphopaenia or leukopenia; if they do, we tend to stop the drug. The other licensed DMTs are immunosuppressive to a greater or lesser degree. 

Short-term versus continuous immunosuppression

The duration and intensity of immunosuppression further determine the risks. Short-term or intermittent immunosuppression associated with an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) front-loads the risks, which decrease substantially once the immune system has reconstituted itself. In comparison, long-term continuous or persistent immunosuppression, which occurs with most maintenance DMTs, accumulates problems over time, particularly opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies.

Live vaccines are, in general, contraindicated in patients on continuous immunosuppressive therapies. However, someone with MS on an IRT who has reconstituted their immune system can tolerate and respond to live vaccines. The benefits of administering live vaccines always need to be balanced against the risks of the vaccine.

How immunosuppressed are you table updated format 180625 SS

The main characteristics of continuous persistent and short-term (intermittent) immunosuppression. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Selective versus non-selective immunosuppression

Immunosuppression that accompanies DMTs may be selective or non-selective. Non-selective therapies deplete and/or suppress both the adaptive immune system (T cells and B cells) and the innate immune system (monocytes, neutrophils and natural killer [NK] cells). Alemtuzumab, AHSCT (autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and mitoxantrone are non-selective and are therefore associated with acute bacterial infections such as listeriosis, nocardiosis and cytomegalovirus reactivation. In comparison, anti-CD20 agents (ocrelizumab and ofatumumab) and cladribine are selective, do not affect the innate immune system and are therefore associated with a low risk of acute bacterial infections. 

How immunosuppressed are you_MET vs IRT_2 Dec 2024

Classification of disease-modifying therapies for relapsing forms of MS. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Other considerations

Please note that the implications of immunosuppression are not black and white but interact with other factors such as:

These factors have been highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in relation to the risk of severe COVID-19 and the variations in vaccine responses among people with MS (including waning of the immune response).

It is important to realise that we can derisk (reduce the risk of) some complications associated with long-term immunosuppression and the use of DMTs. Please see the post entitled How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?

References

  1. Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.
DMTs, Treatment strategy

How do I want my MS to be treated?

What is the difference between a maintenance ̶ escalation DMT and an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT)? Why is it important to understand the distinction?

Key points

  • Maintenance–escalation and immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) are two approaches to MS treatment currently favoured.
  • IRT is a one-off, short course which acts on immune system cells in three stages: reduction, repopulation and reconstitution.
  • Maintenance–escalation is given continuously without interruption. If it does not work well, the treatment is changed to a more effective DMT (known as ‘escalation’).
  • Additional future approaches are likely to include induction ̶ maintenance and/or combination therapy.

If I had MS, how would I want to be treated? This is a difficult question, and one that many of my patients ask me. The answer depends on your life stage, what risks you are prepared to take, personal factors such as family planning considerations and the extent of your understanding of MS and how we approach its treatment.

Currently, there are two main philosophies regarding the treatment of MS with DMTs: maintenance/escalation versus immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs). 

What is an immune reconstitution therapy?

By definition, an IRT is given as a short course, i.e. as a one-off treatment in the case of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) or intermittently in the case of alemtuzumab, cladribine or mitoxantrone. IRTs are not given continuously, and additional courses of the therapy are given only if there is a recurrence of MS inflammatory activity. IRTs can induce long-term remission and, arguably, in some cases a potential cure.

IRTs have three phases to their mode of action, which I refer to as the ‘three Rs’.

  1. Reduction, or depletion, when we try to kill the autoimmune cells that cause MS.
  2. Repopulation, when the immune system recovers from stem cell transplantation and, hopefully, the autoimmune cells don’t return.
  3. Reconstitution, when the immune system is recovered and fully competent. The recovered immune system following treatment with an IRT is different from what was there before. Some people like to think of an IRT as a reboot of the immune system, but without MS.
Slide1

The three Rs of immune reconstitution therapy: reduction, repopulation and reconstitution. From Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1 

What is an MS ’cure’?

One attempt at a definition describes an MS cure as no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) 15 years after the administration of an IRT. I justify using 15 years because it is the time-point most accepted for defining ‘benign MS‘ and is also beyond the average time to onset of secondary progressive MS in natural history studies.

What is a maintenance therapy?

A maintenance therapy is given continuously without an interruption in dosing. Although maintenance therapies can induce long-term remission (i.e. NEDA), they cannot result in a cure. The recurrence or continuation of inflammatory disease activity with maintenance therapies is an indication of a suboptimal response to treatment and typically results in a treatment switch. Ideally, this switch should be to a more effective class of DMTs – hence the term ‘escalation’. 

What would I recommend?

I can’t choose for you. The debate is complex and depends on many factors. One important consideration is vaccine readiness: will I be able to mount an adequate immune response to a vaccine? IRTs have the advantage that they allow reconstitution of the immune system; once it recovers, vaccine responses are restored, and even live vaccines can be given.

The table below highlights key differentiators. Further, detailed information about most of the products listed in the Table can be accessed through the DMT comparison tool available at ClinicSpeak or via the Multiple Sclerosis Trust MS Decisions aid.

Similarities and differences between maintenance treatments and immune reconstitution therapies. Registered trade names (UK market) of the generic drugs listed are shown in brackets. *How to define a ‘cure’ in MS is controversial. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1
DMT, disease-modifying therapy; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplant; IRT, immune reconstitution therapy.

The future

I envisage two more treatment strategies emerging.

  • One approach is induction ̶ maintenance therapy, using an IRT followed by an immunomodulatory therapy rather than an immunosuppressive DMT (which is a safer option) the aim is to keep MS in long-term remission. This approach is used in oncology, where the cancer is hit hard with induction chemotherapy and then kept at bay with a well-tolerated maintenance therapy (e.g. antihormonal therapies in breast cancer).
  • Another approach is combination maintenance therapy; the aim would be to combine an anti-inflammatory therapy with, say, neuroprotective therapies to target smouldering MS.

The diagram below illustrates the scheduling of the four approaches discussed in this section. You may like to try out the DMT comparison tool to find out how some of the drugs listed in the comparison Table above align with your personal life choices and priorities.

Slide5

Four approaches discussed in this section. The white panels illustrate the two approaches currently available; the shaded panels illustrate two strategies that may emerge in the future. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1

References

  1. Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.