Tag Archives: infection

Bladder and bowel, Intimate issues

Detecting and preventing urinary tract infections

Frequent and severe urinary tract infections (UTIs) increase the likelihood that MS will progress. I recommend regular dipstick testing at home, as part of your MS self-management, to increase the chances of early detection and treatment of a UTI.

Urinary tract infection and disease progression

Infections, both viral and bacterial, are a known trigger of relapse. Frequent and severe urinary tract infections (UTIs) increase the likelihood that your MS will progress. This is why it is important to improve the management of bladder problems in people with MS to prevent or reduce urinary tract infections. You can do this in several ways, such as increasing the frequency of ISC.

Drinking plenty of liquids to flush the bladder reduces infection rates. Changing the pH of your urine by drinking citric acid (citro soda or lemonade) also helps. Making your urine more alkaline or more acidic may work, depending on the bacterial species colonising your bladder. Cranberry extract, for example, contains proanthocyanidins, a substance that reduces bacterial colonisation of the bladder. (You need to use the extract and not the juice because the proanthocyanidin concentration in the juice is too low to have an effect.)

Another very effective option (but infrequently used) is a bladder instillation with a liquid containing sodium hyaluronate (Cystistat), which replaces the glycosaminoglycan layer, or glycocalyx, of the bladder wall. This makes it difficult for bacteria to stick to the bladder wall to cause infections and is one way of preventing bacterial biofilms, or slime, from forming. Biofilms are a significant problem because they prevent antibiotics from reaching the bacteria to kill them and act as a breeding place for recurrent infections.

Urinary antiseptics are antibiotics, given in low concentrations, that may help to reduce urinary tract infection rates. They are typically administered in tablet form; they work by being concentrated by the kidneys and making the urine antiseptic, which helps to prevent or treat urinary tract infections. The agents I use currently are trimethoprim, cephalexin and nitrofurantoin. (Methenamine, another urinary antiseptic, is not readily available in the UK due to supply issues.) Cycling their use, every 3 ̶ 4 months, prevents the bladder bacteria from becoming resistant to a specific antibacterial. We have stopped using nalidixic acid and other drugs in the oxolinic acid class because they are associated with tendonitis and tendon ruptures.

Interpretation of urine dipstick results

Early detection of urinary tract infections (UTIs) means that they can be treated promptly to prevent symptomatic infection or complications such as pyelonephritis (kidney infection) and septicaemia (a common cause of death in people with advanced MS). Dipstick testing can be carried out at home, as part of self-management of your MS. I recommend doing dipstick monitoring once or twice a week, not daily. If positive, you must drop off a clean urine sample to your healthcare provider for proper laboratory analysis (microscopy, culture and sensitivity). This is to confirm the presence of a UTI, to culture and isolate the bacteria causing the infection, and to test the sensitivity of the bacteria to antibiotics. You must send your urine specimen for analysis before you start antibiotics. 

For UTI monitoring, the leukocyte and nitrite tests are the most important, with backup from the protein, blood and pH tests. The guidance in the table below explains how to interpret some of the key dipstick test results relevant to UTIs and what the different readings on a typical urine dipstick mean. You need to wait up to 2 minutes to read the results; if in doubt, take a picture of the test strip with your mobile phone and email it to your HCP for interpretation.

Dipstick results

Guidance to help you interpret the dipstick results relevant to urinary tract infection (UTI). You should wait for up to 2 minutes before reading the results (2 minutes for leukocytes, at least 60 seconds for other results shown here).
*If you have been treated with alemtuzumab, new-onset proteinuria in the presence of blood may indicate Goodpasture’s syndrome, a rare autoimmune complication of alemtuzumab treatment. Please consult your HCP.
UTI, urinary tract infection.

The image below shows what the different readings on a typical urine dipstick mean; the readings for white blood cells, nitrite, protein, pH and blood are important for detecting the presence of a UTI (more information is in the Table above). Further details about readings for urobilinogen,  specific gravity, ketone levels, bilirubin and glucose are available in my newsletter entitled How to interpret a urine dipstick result.

An example of results from a urine dipstick test; the readings most relevant to interpreting urinary tract infections are white blood cells, nitrite, protein, pH and blood. Information about additional results from dipstick testing are available in my newsletter entitled How to interpret a urine dipstick result.

Fatigue and insomnia, Sleep disorders

Fatigue in MS – a disabling symptom

Fatigue in MS is common, but it is often not investigated or managed properly. This post highlights the complexity of MS-related fatigue and explains why and how to manage it holistically. 

Key points

  • The different mechanisms underlying MS-related fatigue are explained.
  • The MS disease process, the burden of living with MS, and other factors such as drug side effects, comorbidities and lifestyle choices may all contribute to fatigue in MS.
  • Practical guidance is provided on managing many aspects of MS-related fatigue, using a holistic and systematic approach.
  • Not all fatigue is MS-related; it is important to ascertain if your fatigue could be due to another disease process.

Fatigue is one of the most disabling of all the symptoms of MS. It is the symptom that over 50% of people with MS would most like to be rid of. MS-related fatigue has several underlying mechanisms.

Fatigue caused by MS disease processes

Inflammation in the brain

Inflammatory mediators or cytokines associated with MS – in particular, interleukin-1 (IL-1) and TNF-alpha – trigger ‘sickness behaviour’. This is the response to inflammation that forces us to rest and sleep so that our body can recover. Sickness behaviour is also the body’s response to a viral infection such as flu; in fact, many people with MS describe their fatigue as being like the fatigue they experience with flu. 

Sickness behaviour from an evolutionary perspective is well conserved and occurs in most animals. This type of fatigue needs to be managed by switching off ongoing inflammation in the brain. Many people with MS who take a highly effective DMT report feeling much better and free from fatigue and/or brain fog. This is why recent-onset fatigue that cannot be explained by other factors (see below) may indicate MS disease activity. At present, fatigue on its own does not constitute a relapse.

Many patients with MS who have had COVID-19 tell me that MS-related cog-fog and fatigue feel like the cog-fog and fatigue of COVID-19 and long-COVID. As many as one in four people with long-COVID experience cog-fog, which includes problems in attention, language fluency, processing speed, executive function, and memory: these are the same problems that affect people with MS. 

Cog-fog related to MS and to COVID-19 could be linked to the same inflammatory mechanisms. This syndrome of systemic inflammation causing profound fatigue and cog-fog is not new. Some people with MS who have a systemic infection take weeks or months to return to normal; some patients with more advanced MS never return to their original baseline. This is why, as part of the holistic management of MS, we need to treat and prevent systemic infections as best we can.

The overlap between COVID-19 and MS-related cog-fog raises the question whether both are due to viral infections. There is some evidence of recent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation in patients with long-COVID,1 suggesting that the EBV rather than the SARS-CoV-2 may be causing long-COVID symptoms. This is important because chronic EBV infection has been associated with chronic fatigue syndrome. It has also been suggested that chemo-brain is due to similar mechanisms, i.e. chemotherapy triggers CNS inflammation, which causes cog-fog.

Neural plasticity

When parts of the brain are damaged by MS, other areas are co-opted to help take over, or supplement, the function of the damaged area. In other words, people with MS use more brain power than people without MS to complete the same task. This usually manifests as mental fatigue and is why people with MS have difficulty concentrating for prolonged periods and multitasking. At present we have no specific treatment for this type of fatigue, but some patients find amantadine or modafinil helpful. There is also some emerging evidence that fampridine may help with cognitive fatigue. However, preventing damage in the first place should prevent this type of fatigue.

Exercise-related conduction block

Damage to axons that conduct electrical impulses is the reason why people with MS notice their legs getting weaker or another neurological symptom getting worse with exercise. We think this is due to demyelinated or remyelinated axons failing to conduct electrical impulses when they become exhausted. Exercise-induced fatigue is probably the same as temperature-related fatigue; a rise in body temperature also causes vulnerable axons to block and stop conducting. To deal with this type of fatigue we need therapies to promote remyelination and to increase conduction. These types of fatigue are treated by rest, cooling and possibly drugs such as fampridine that improve conduction. At the heart of this type of fatigue is localised energy failure.

Fatigue from living with MS symptoms

Temperature sensitivity

Many people with MS are temperature sensitive. Typically, high temperatures worsen fatigue, but low temperatures also affect some patients. Many people with MS manipulate their behaviour to avoid hot or cold environments. Some find it helpful to use cooling suits, but these are costly and are not covered by NHS funding. Cold or ice baths, swimming and air conditioning can all help with temperature-related fatigue.

Case example

One of my patients had a walk-in butcher’s fridge installed in her house, and she spends 30 minutes there 4 ̶ 5 times a day to manage her fatigue. She is a wheelchair user, and she sits in her wheelchair in the fridge.

Menstrual and menopausal fatigue

Menstrual (or catamenial) fatigue is a form of temperature-related fatigue that occurs in women during the second half of the menstrual cycle when their body temperature increases. It responds to paracetamol and to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as ibuprofen and naproxen. Fatigue is a common symptom of menopause too; some women with MS who are menopausal and have fatigue find hormone replacement therapy helpful. 

Whether or not men go through a ‘menopause’ is a moot point. Testosterone levels do drop with age, however, and some male patients find that testosterone replacement therapy helps their MS-related fatigue. In the UK, the indications for testosterone replacement therapy are very well defined and do not include MS-related fatigue, so most people with MS who want to try this therapy need to pay for a private prescription.

Bladder problems

Intermittent waking due to bladder problems may result in fatigue from disrupted sleep. Bladder problems may also contribute to insomnia, with the affected individual needing to visit the bathroom frequently and unable to relax into sleep. For detailed guidance on managing bladder problems, particularly at night, please see the bladder and bowel section of the website, particularly the article on nocturia.  

Insomnia due to pain and discomfort

Other disease-related factors that contribute to fatigue include insomnia from pain, discomfort of being unable to turn in bed and restless legs syndrome (RLS). RLS is common in people with MS, affects sleep quality and is associated with poor cognition. For detailed guidance on managing these MS symptoms, please see the post entitled Sleep disrupted by pain and discomfort.  

A case scenario

“A 28-year-old woman with early relapsing ̶ remitting MS, on glatiramer acetate, and little overt neurological impairment suffers from severe fatigue, which is worse during the latter half of her menstrual cycle. She has recently split up with her long-term partner because of the impact her symptoms have had on her relationship. She has also had to stop working as a bank clerk because of her fatigue.”

Prof G’s response
This patient needs to be examined and will need an MRI and a lumbar puncture to measure her spinal fluid neurofilament levels. If she has evident inflammatory disease activity, her DMT will need to be switched. She needs a full medical assessment, which includes a screen for comorbidities.

The patient complains of cognitive fatigue and, despite not having much physical disability, she was found to have a high brain MS lesion load and noticeable brain volume loss. A formal neuropsychological assessment to establish if she has cognitive impairment would allow her to be referred to a cognitive rehabilitation programme; this can target specific areas to help her cope with her cognitive deficits.

To combat fatigue during her menstrual cycle, this patient did well on naproxen, which is longer acting than ibuprofen and paracetamol. Naproxen only needs to be taken during the second half of her cycle. She was screened for poor sleep hygiene, and she volunteered intermittent early morning waking due to bladder problems and anxiety. Both would need to be addressed as part of her fatigue management programme.

It was clear that the patient had both depression and anxiety, which were related to the impact of MS on her occupational and social functioning. This must be managed with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), mindfulness and an exercise programme. If this approach is not helpful, then I would suggest the judicious use of an antidepressant and, failing this, a referral to a psychiatrist and/or psychologist.

Fatigue resulting from other factors

Comorbidities and other diseases

Comorbidities and other diseases related to MS can cause fatigue and should be screened for. These include infections (see above). In people with more advanced MS, the urinary tract is most often affected, but other sites of infection include the sinuses, teeth, lungs, skin (intertrigo and pressure sores) and bowels.

Fatigue is common with thyroid disease; an underactive thyroid gland (hypothyroidism) and an overactive gland (hyperthyroidism, or thyrotoxicosis) cause fatigue. Diabetes, other endocrine (hormonal) problems, anaemia and heart, kidney, liver or lung diseases all cause fatigue.

Side effects of drugs

Fatigue is a common side effect of many medications, particularly drugs that cause sedation and some DMTs. Flu-like side effects from interferon-beta, for example, may make fatigue worse. Anticholinergics and antispasticity drugs are sedating, blunt cognition and may worsen MS-related fatigue. If you have fatigue, therefore, it is important to review your medications. MS is associated with polypharmacy, but some of the medications that cause or exacerbate fatigue can be reduced in dose, stopped or potentially replaced with alternatives that don’t exacerbate fatigue.

Lack of sleep and/or sleep disorders

Poor sleep means you feel tired in the morning. Most people with MS have poor sleep hygiene and almost half have an actual sleep disorder. A clue to this is how you feel in the morning and whether you have excessive daytime sleepiness. If you wake up in the morning and don’t feel refreshed and/or you fall asleep frequently during the day, you need a formal sleep assessment. You can complete the Epworth Sleepiness Scale online to see if you have a problem.

Depression and anxiety

Fatigue is a common symptom of depression and anxiety. Of the many online screening tools for depression and anxiety, the best one to use if you have MS is probably the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). 

Obesity

Being overweight requires additional energy to perform physical tasks, and obesity itself causes fatigue. Recently an association has been found between obesity and depression. Obesity also predisposes you to sleep disorders; obese people with MS are more likely to have obstructive sleep apnoea. For all these reasons you should engage with lifestyle and wellness programmes to manage obesity and fatigue. 

Deconditioning

Deconditioning is simply the term we use for being unfit. If you are unfit, performing a demanding physical task makes you tired. Deconditioning is treated with exercise, which paradoxically can reduce fatigue. Patients may claim that exercising makes their fatigue worse. Yes, that does happen, but if you persevere and get fitter your fatigue often improves. The important thing is to start a graded exercise programme and build up slowly. Exercise does some incredible things to the brain, many of which explain why it is effective at treating not only fatigue but also depression and anxiety. Exercise is a form of ‘disease-modifying therapy’ and hence everyone with MS should be participating in an exercise programme. 

Poor nutrition and ‘food coma’

Some people with MS are anorexic and eat very poorly; as a result, they have little energy. Although this is quite rare, I have had a few such patients over the years. Similarly, overnutrition may have the same effect. Some of the hormones your gut produces cause you to feel tired and want to sleep; this is the so-called siesta effect (also referred to as food coma or postprandial hypersomnolence). Reducing the size of your meals and changing your eating behaviour may improve this. Postprandial hypersomnolence has two components.

  1. A state of perceived low energy related to activation of the parasympathetic nervous system (which is part of the autonomic nervous system) in response to expansion of the stomach and duodenum from a meal. In general, the parasympathetic nervous system slows everything down. 
  2. A specific state of sleepiness triggered by the hormone cholecystokinin that helps digest food and regulate appetite. It is released in response to eating and to changes in the firing and activation of specific brain regions. The coupling, or interaction, of digestion and the brain is referred to as ‘neurohormonal modulation of sleep’ and it underlies the reflexes responsible for postprandial hypersomnolence. There is therefore a well-studied biological reason why we feel sleepy after eating a meal. 

Managing food coma – practical tips

The first patient who alerted me to the problem of food coma in MS was so affected by postprandial hypersomnolence that she now eats only one meal a day, late in the evening. She can then ‘crash’ and go to sleep about an hour after eating. She needs to be functional during the day but cannot do her professional work if she eats anything substantial during working hours because of her overwhelming desire to sleep. She has tried caffeine, modafinil and amantadine to counteract postprandial hypersomnolence, but all these substances had only a small effect.

Other patients reporting postprandial hypersomnolence derive some benefit from the judicious use of stimulants. You can start by self-medicating with caffeine, but this may have the drawback of worsening your bladder function. Please note, however, that it is not advisable to take stimulants later than about 3 pm or 4 pm because they have a long half-life and can cause insomnia.

Some patients find carbohydrate-rich foods particularly potent at inducing ‘food coma’. Indeed, glucose-induced insulin secretion is one of the drivers of this behavioural response. This may be why people who fast or eat very low-carbohydrate or ketogenic diets describe heightened alertness and an ability to concentrate for long periods. Another option is to reduce your meal size: instead of large meals, try eating multiple small snacks during the day.

Exercise has helped some patients deal with postprandial hypersomnolence. I am not sure exactly how exercise works – possibly by lowering glucose and insulin levels and improving insulin sensitivity. The latter will reduce hyperinsulinaemia, which not only causes postprandial hypersomnolence but is an important driver and component of metabolic syndrome and obesity.

Postprandial hypersomnolence will be worse if you already suffer from a sleep disorder and excessive daytime sleepiness. Most people with MS have a sleep disorder, so there is little point in focusing on postprandial hypersomnolence and ignoring the elephant in the room.

Using your energy effectively

One strategy to manage MS-related fatigue is to imagine your energy levels as a battery, i.e. you have only so much energy in the day. People with MS have smaller batteries than people without MS and therefore need to plan their day and activities to maximise their use of energy. For example, if you do something tiring in the morning, you should rest in the afternoon to conserve energy for evening activities. Similarly, if you find some activities very tiring, such as taking a hot shower or bath, plan to do this in the evening before bed.

Conclusion

It is apparent from this discussion that fatigue in MS is more complex than we realise. So be careful, or at least wary, if your neurologist simply wants to reach for the prescription pad to get you out of the consultation room. Any MS-related symptoms that can affect sleep need to be managed accordingly. Like other MS-related problems, a holistic and systematic approach is needed to manage and treat MS-related fatigue correctly. Not all fatigue is MS-related. This is why it is important to take a step backwards and ask yourself if your fatigue could be due to another disease process.

Reference

  1. Gold JE et al. Investigation of long COVID prevalence and its relationship to Epstein-Barr virus reactivation. Pathogens 2021;10:763.
Detail, DMTsDetail, Treatment strategy

What are the attributes of the specific DMTs?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment has evolved rapidly, with 11 classes of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) now available in the UK. I will summarise them briefly and explain how they fit within a treatment paradigm for effective and safe use.

Maintenance therapies versus immune reconstitution: what’s the difference?

There is a divide between the two main treatment philosophies: maintenance ̶ escalation versus immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs).

An IRT is given as a short course – a one-off treatment in the case of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) or intermittently for alemtuzumab, cladribine or mitoxantrone. IRTs are not given continuously, and additional courses are given only if inflammatory activity recurs. IRTs can induce long-term remission and, in some cases, potentially a cure.

Maintenance therapies, by comparison, are given continuously without an interruption in dosing (‘continuous’ administration may be daily, one or more times weekly, monthly or even once every few months). Although maintenance therapies can induce long-term remission, they cannot, by definition, result in a cure. The recurrence or continuation of inflammatory activity indicates a suboptimal response to treatment and typically requires a treatment switch. Ideally, this switch should be an escalation to a more effective class of DMT.

An article in our list of key questions, entitled How do I want my MS to be treated?, provides a more detailed comparison of maintenance and IRT therapies, including frequency of administration, efficacy, risks, use in pregnancy, vaccine response and potential for a cure.

The DMTs currently licensed in the UK (in August 2024) are listed in the table under the relevant category.

table format updated 180625 SS

Disease-modifying therapies for MS licensed in the UK. *Please note, Bonspri is available in other markets but not the UK.

How effective are the different DMTs?

The measures used to assess the effectiveness of a DMT include its ability to reduce or prevent relapses, focal inflammatory activity (that is, new or enlarging lesions) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and disability progression. Additional factors that can help to assess the relative efficacy of DMTs include the proportion of clinical trial subjects who experience improvement in disability and the impact of the treatment on brain volume loss.

The MS-Selfie InfoCards are an easy-to-use resource to help people with MS compare the key features of each DMT. They contain bite-sized information designed to aid treatment choices and an overview of the key aspects of each DMT.

Efficacy of the licensed DMTs for MS can be visualised as pyramid, with the moderately effective treatments at the bottom and the more effective approaches at the top. What determines the most appropriate DMT efficacy level for an individual depends on several factors, such as baseline prognostic profile, family planning requirements, local or national treatment guidelines, socioeconomic factors, consideration of any co-existing illnesses, cognitive impairment, risk aversion and lifestyle issues.

Pyramid format updated 180625 SS

UK licensed DMTs for MS, in ascending order of efficacy.
HSCT/AHSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation/autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

What is the goal of treatment? Introducing NEIDA as a target

In the past, we used no evident disease activity (NEDA) as a treatment target. ‘Disease activity’ included progression or disease worsening independent of relapse activity (termed smouldering MS). Although some of the more effective DMTs may modify this stage of the disease, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching or stopping a DMT based simply on smouldering MS disease activity. 

Relapses and ongoing focal MRI activity are associated with a worse short-term to intermediate-term prognosis. These observations have led to the increasing adoption of ‘no evident inflammatory disease activity’ (NEIDA) as a new treatment target. For more information about treatment targets, please see the article in our key questions, Do I understand the concepts of treat-2-target and NEDA?

Many healthcare professionals (HCPs) remain sceptical of using NEIDA as a treatment target, fearing that this could lead to more people with MS being on ‘riskier’ high-efficacy therapies. However, achieving long-term remission, or NEIDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated-to-target of NEIDA from the outset do better than those whose treatment is escalated following breakthrough disease (at a clinical or subclinical/MRI level)1. I would, therefore, strongly encourage people with MS and their HCPs to adopt NEIDA as an initial treatment target.

Flipping the pyramid

The effectiveness, or relative effectiveness, of individual DMTs becomes less critical in the context of a treatment target of NEIDA. Choosing a DMT with a lower efficacy rate simply means that a greater proportion of treated people with MS will need to be switched to higher efficacy therapies over time to achieve NEIDA. We refer to the latter of these three approaches – starting with high-efficacy treatment – as flipping the pyramid. In recent trials of alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab, people with MS randomised to 2 years of lower efficacy DMTs (interferon-beta-1a or teriflunomide) had poorer outcomes than those receiving highly active therapy from the outset. Real-world data from registries also support this; groups of people with MS with delayed access to high-efficacy DMTs did worse than those who received high-efficacy treatments early.1,2

Horizontal versus vertical switching

If we consider the conventional step care paradigm, people with MS who switch horizontally from interferon-beta to glatiramer acetate, or vice-versa (i.e. from one moderate efficacy DMT to another moderate efficacy DMT) do less well than those who switch vertically to fingolimod, a highly effective DMT. Similarly, people with MS escalating to natalizumab, a very high-efficacy DMT, do better than those being escalated to the less effective, but still high-efficacy, DMT fingolimod. 

Continuous and intermittent immunosuppression

Another useful way of classifying DMTs is whether they are immunosuppressive, that is, they reduce the activation, or effectiveness, of the immune system. Drug regulators stipulate that a drug may be classified as immunosuppressive if it (1) causes significant lymphopaenia (low lymphocyte count) or leukopenia (low white blood cell count), (2) is associated with opportunistic infections, (3) reduces the antibody and immune response to vaccines and (4) increases the risk of secondary malignancies.

The duration and intensity of immunosuppression further determine the risks. For example, short-term or intermittent immunosuppression associated with IRTs front-loads the risks, which are substantially lower once the immune system has reconstituted itself. In comparison, long-term continuous or persistent immunosuppression, which occurs with some of the maintenance DMTs, accumulates problems over time, particularly opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies. You can read more detail on this topic in the key question How immunosuppressed am I? The following table summarises the main attributes of intermittent and persistent immunosuppression.

How immunosuppressed are you table updated format 180625 SS

The main characteristics of continuous (persistent) and short-term (intermittent) immunosuppression. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.2
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Adverse effects, monitoring and risk reduction

The complications associated with immunosuppression vary from DMT to DMT. Each individual drug summary in the DMTs section of MS-Selfie contains detailed information about the main adverse events, key monitoring requirements, use (or contraindication) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and response to vaccines. The MS-Selfie InfoCards provide bite-sized summaries of several practical aspects, including side effects, to enable easy comparison of any treatments you are considering; some of this information is collated below for easy reference.

Short-term versus long-term adverse effects

Each drug has been given scores from 1 to 10 based on published analyses of its short-term and long-term side effects. Short-term refers to side effects that emerge when a treatment is started and decrease in severity or disappear within days or weeks. A well-known example of short-term side effects on starting interferon-beta is flu-like symptoms that typically abate within 4 ̶ 8 weeks.

A long-term side effect persists for months or doesn’t disappear on continuing the DMT. Examples include intermittent but persistent flushing after taking dimethyl fumarate, or low B lymphocyte counts with anti-CD20 therapies that may lead to low antibody or immunoglobulin levels (hypogammaglobulinaemia).

A low score denotes few or rare side effects; a high score denotes many or frequent side effects. The score does not correlate to a percentage. More information can be found in each drug summary and the manufacturer’s Summary of Product Characteristics.

Scores for short-term and long-term side effects assigned to the individual DMTs summarised in the MS-Selfie InfoCards, based on a published network meta-analysis.3
Alem, alemtuzumab; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFN-beta; interferon-beta; Nat, natalizumab.

Monitoring and risk reduction

Numerous tests are carried out at the start of treatment, and ongoing monitoring is required for many factors, to reduce the risk from adverse events. The key question, How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?, explains what needs to be done at the start of DMT administration (baseline) and during subsequent monitoring. The specifics vary from DMT to DMT; please refer to the individual summaries for details such as baseline tests, follow-up, infection prevention, cancer risk, pregnancy, breastfeeding and vaccination. It is important to remember that all licensed MS DMTs have had a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment, and their benefits are considered to outweigh the potential risks.

Administration and other practical considerations

Routes and frequency of administration

The MS-Selfie InfoCards contain a symbol for each DMT, showing how it is administered. Some DMTs are available in more than one formulation (e.g. tablets and injection). The frequency of administration varies greatly from DMT to DMT; please consult the relevant summary in the DMTs section and discuss your preferences and priorities with your MS HCP.

The route of administration for each drug in the MS-Selfie InfoCards is clearly identified by the relevant symbol. (If a DMT is available in more than one formulation, there is a separate card for each delivery route.)

Number of clinic visits

It may be important for you to consider the frequency of clinic visits. This will depend on factors such as the delivery route of your DMT, the monitoring requirements of the drug regulators and the risk of specific side effects. The table below summarises the assessments from the MS-Selfie InfoCards. This is another factor to consider in discussions with your MS HCPs about the most appropriate DMT for you.

Conclusions

People with MS must understand the objectives of MS treatments and the different treatment strategies currently available to achieve these objectives. Although the MS therapeutic landscape is complex and hence may seem overwhelming, framing the choices using a relatively simple construct should help each individual to make informed decisions about managing their MS. MS-Selfie aims to guide you in the process of deciding on the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and specific DMT for treating your disease.

References

  1. Rotstein D, et al. Association of No Evidence of Disease Activity with no long-term disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2022;99:e209̶ ̶ 20.
  2. Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.
  3. Samjoo IA, et al. Efficacy classification of modern therapies in multiple sclerosis. J Comp Eff Res 2021;10:495–507.
DMTsSafety, Monitoring MS

How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?

The complications associated with immunosuppression vary from DMT to DMT. You will find it helpful to understand what investigations to expect before and during treatment and how these may vary depending on the DMT(s) you are considering.

Key points

  • Numerous tests are carried out at the start of your treatment (baseline); these include blood, urine and tests for a range of infections.
  • Some patients will need tests or procedures specific to their DMT that are inappropriate for everyone with MS – for example, vaccination against some infections; pregnancy and/or genetic counselling; prevention of cardiovascular complications; and management of infusion reactions.
  • Ongoing monitoring is required for many but not all of the above factors.
  • All licensed MS DMTs have had a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment, and their benefits are considered to outweigh the potential risks.

Standard tests … and why we do them

If you have read the article on immunosuppression, you will know that immunosuppressive DMTs may reduce white blood cell counts and antibody responses to vaccines and increase the likelihood of some infections and cancers. However, we can reduce the risk of many complications associated with long-term immunosuppression (we use the shorthand ‘de-risk’). This article explains what needs to be done at the start of DMT administration (baseline) and during subsequent monitoring. The specifics, however, vary from DMT to DMT.

Baseline tests

Tests at baseline (before starting DMT administration) include full blood count, platelets, liver, kidney and thyroid function tests, and a urine screen. Recording baseline immunoglobulin levels is particularly important if you are about to start an anti-CD20 therapy (ocrelizumab, ofatumumab or rituximab) so that we have a reference level for future comparisons. 

Serum protein electrophoresis is done for patients considering starting interferon-beta; having a so-called monoclonal gammopathy (an abnormal immunoglobulin) is a contraindication to starting an interferon-beta formulation in people with MS. The drug has been associated with a form of capillary leak syndrome, leading in rare cases to death from an adult respiratory distress syndrome.

The table below summarises the routine investigations required at baseline; subsequent sections provide further detail.

Tests routinely carried out at the start of treatment (baseline).
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DMT, disease-modifying therapy; EBV, Epstein ̶ Barr virus; ECG, electrocardiogram; FBC, full blood count; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HPV, human papillomavirus; JCV, JC virus; LFTs, liver function tests; MMR, measles/mumps/rubella; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PCP, pneumocystis pneumonia; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; TB ELISpot, tuberculosis enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot; TFTs, thyroid function tests; U&E, urea and electrolytes; VZV, varicella zoster virus.

Infection screening

At our centre, we screen for a relatively large number of infectious diseases so that we can treat any subclinical infection before starting a DMT. This is particularly relevant for HIV-1 and 2, hepatitis B and C, syphilis and tuberculosis (TB).  

Screening for the JC virus (JCV), which causes progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), is only really needed for people with MS considering starting natalizumab. Even if you are JCV positive, you can be treated with natalizumab for 6 ̶ 12 months and sometimes longer if you are prepared to take on the risk of PML and the extra monitoring required to detect PML early. 

We only check measles/mumps/rubella (MMR) status in patients without documentation of full vaccination as children. We check varicella zoster virus (VZV) status before starting immunosuppression and vaccinate seronegative individuals. Currently, we are still using the live VZV vaccine. This will change, and we will likely be offering all people with MS in the UK the component inactive VZV vaccine (Shingrix, that has had its licence extended) to reduce the chances of zoster reactivation in all adults starting immunosuppression. This new Shingrix indication is similar to the pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax). Our centre is only recommending Pneumovax in patients about to start an anti-CD20. However, when Shingrix becomes available on the NHS, it will make sense to bundle this with the Pneumovax and make it routine for all people with MS before starting immunosuppressive therapy. Please check with your healthcare team which products are available locally.

Routine tests and monitoring for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) are only needed for subjects undergoing autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT), which causes profound short-term immunosuppression that can result in CMV and EBV reactivation. CMV reactivation also occurs with alemtuzumab, so this needs to be considered when investigating patients who develop complications after receiving alemtuzumab (please see Opportunistic infection in MS). 

For patients starting long-term immunosuppression, it is advisable to screen for active human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (by cervical smear or vaginal swab) and for warts or active infection with molluscum contagiosum. Warts are caused by HPV skin infection; molluscum contagiosum is due to a relatively benign pox virus that typically affects young children but occasionally affects adults. Warts and molluscum contagiosum can spread rapidly in patients receiving alemtuzumab, so I recommend treating these skin infections before starting immunosuppression for MS. 

Vaccinations

We encourage all patients to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and seasonal flu; outside the flu vaccine season, we remind people to get vaccinated during the next vaccine season. 

Hepatitis B, meningococcal and Haemophilus influenzae vaccines are considered only for people with MS who are at high risk of infection and have not had these vaccines as part of a national vaccine programme, i.e. healthcare and laboratory workers for hepatitis B, school and university students and military recruits for meningococcal vaccine and paediatric patients for Haemophilus influenzae. 

The issue around having the HPV vaccine as an adult is more complex. For example, in the UK, the NHS does not cover the cost of the vaccine for people over 25. In addition, most people have only had the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil-4), which covers about two-thirds of the strains that cause cancer. Some people with MS may want to upgrade their immunity with the polyvalent vaccine (Gardasil-9) that covers over 95% of the cancer-causing strains of HPV. For more information on HPV vaccination, please see Case study: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and ocrelizumab.

MMR is a live vaccine given in childhood (see MMR vaccine: to vaccinate or not? ). Owing to vaccine hesitancy, however, many people do not receive this vaccine as children. Therefore, if an adult with MS is about to start immunosuppressive therapy and has not been vaccinated against MMR, we advise them to do so. This is particularly important for people about to start natalizumab because these viruses are neurotropic and can infect the brain. Natalizumab blocks immune response within the brain; hence, exposure to a neurotropic virus could cause serious infection, similar to what we see with the JC virus – which causes PML.

Travel vaccines for people who travel as part of their work or plan to travel shortly need to be considered. In particular, the yellow fever vaccine is a live vaccine (made from a weakened yellow fever virus strain) and it should ideally be given before someone starts on immunosuppressive therapy. 

Cardiovascular screening

You may need an ECG (electrocardiogram), to rule out an abnormal heart rhythm or electrical conduction abnormality and to check your left ventricular function (ejection fraction). These abnormalities are a relative contraindication to using the S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, ponesimod), which may affect the conduction of the heart. In patients treated with mitoxantrone, the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) must be done at baseline and regularly monitored because mitoxantrone is toxic to the heart. If the LVEF drops significantly, further dosing of mitoxantrone is contraindicated. 

Pregnancy, family planning and genetic testing

Many chemotherapy agents used in AHSCT for ablating (extracting) the bone marrow are toxic to the ovaries and testes. Therefore, patients receive counselling before treatment and can have eggs (oocytes) or sperm banked for future use. Egg banking is also a consideration for women with MS being treated with mitoxantrone. Men receiving mitoxantrone do not need to bank sperm, however, because mitoxantrone does not cross the testes ̶ blood barrier. 

Genetic testing is only required at present if you wish to receive siponimod. Siponimod is metabolised by a specific liver enzyme (biological catalyst) with two functional variants – slow metabolising and fast metabolising. People who carry two slow-metabolising variants of the enzyme cannot receive siponimod. Intermediate metabolisers (those that carry one slow- and one fast-metabolising version of the enzyme) receive low-dose siponimod, while those with two fast-metabolising enzymes receive high-dose siponimod. 

Protecting against progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

I have included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing for JCV among the baseline tests. This is specific to patients at high risk of developing PML who are switching from natalizumab to a depleting immune reconstitution therapy such as alemtuzumab or another therapy that depletes their immune system (e.g. cladribine or an anti-CD20 therapy). These tests are done to exclude asymptomatic PML, which will otherwise be carried over to the new treatment. The effects of these immunosuppressive therapies on your immune system cannot be rapidly reversed, which is a problem because immune reconstitution is needed to clear PML. Most MS centres do not mandate CSF testing in this situation because it does not always reveal the presence of PML. However, I still request this test on my patients to gain as much information as possible on which to base potentially life-changing decisions.

Prophylactic antivirals and antibiotics

Patients in our centre undergoing AHSCT or receiving alemtuzumab will be given antivirals and antibiotics to reduce the likelihood of certain infections. This is particularly relevant for listeriosis, which is a rare infection transmitted via food. We also encourage all our patients to start and maintain a specific diet to reduce the chances of listeriosis. The risk of listeriosis is only present for a short period when both the adaptive and innate immune systems are compromised, that is, for 4 weeks after receiving alemtuzumab, so we recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for 4 weeks. Our online resource provides more information about listeriosis. If you live in the UK, you can order our free listeriosis prevention kit, which contains a booklet (also downloadable) and various practical items to help keep you safe.

Strategies for limiting the risks from immune reconstitution therapies and infusion DMTs.

Infusion reactions

When you use agents that cause cell lysis (breakdown), such as alemtuzumab and intravenous anti-CD20 therapies, the contents of cells cause infusion reactions. To prevent such reactions or reduce their severity, we pretreat patients with corticosteroids, antihistamines and antipyretics. The exact protocols for each DMT differ; for example, ocrelizumab infusion reactions are generally only a problem with the first and second doses; therefore, many centres don’t give steroids with the third and subsequent infusions. The latter was particularly important during the COVID-19 pandemic when it was shown that the recent administration of high-dose steroids increased your chances of severe COVID-19. 

Ongoing monitoring

Once someone has been treated with a DMT, ongoing monitoring is required. What gets monitored and how frequently depends on the individual DMT. For a list of DMTs associated with important adverse events, please see our summary Table in ‘De-risking’ guide: monitoring requirements of individual DMTs.

The regulatory authorities usually put in place specific monitoring requirements, which can differ worldwide. It is important that you also enrol in your national cancer screening programmes. Being on chronic immunosuppression increases your chances of developing secondary malignancies, so please remain vigilant. 

Tests carried out regularly as part of ongoing monitoring.
FBC, full blood count; LFTs, liver function tests; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; TFTs, thyroid function tests; U&E, urea and electrolytes.

I want to reassure you that all licensed MS DMTs have undergone a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment by the drug regulators, and the benefits of these treatments are considered to outweigh the potential risks. On balance, the level of immunosuppression associated with MS DMTs is typically mild to moderate; hence, the complications are relatively uncommon. MS is a serious disease and, if left to run its natural course, would result in most patients becoming disabled. To learn more about the natural course of MS, please read the section entitled What are the consequences of not treating MS?

DMTsSafety, Monitoring MS

‘De-risking’ guide: monitoring requirements of individual DMTs

Before you start taking a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), your MS team will carry out routine tests and investigations, many of which are repeated during subsequent monitoring or before switching to another DMT. The regulatory authorities that license the drugs specify their monitoring requirements. What gets monitored and how frequently depends on the individual DMT.

All licensed MS DMTs have undergone a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment by the drug regulators, and the benefits of these treatments are considered to outweigh the potential risks. The table below summarises the main monitoring requirements of individual DMTs or DMT classes. For more detailed information, see the post on reducing your chances of adverse events.

AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; EBV, Epstein ̶ Barr virus; ECG, electrocardiogram; HPV, human papillomavirus; JCV, JC virus; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

DMTs, Treatment strategy

How immunosuppressed am I?

Do you understand the difference between short-term intermittent and long-term continuous immunosuppression? Here we address another of the key questions to consider before deciding on a specific disease-modifying therapy (DMT).

Key points

  • Immunosuppressive disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) reduce the immune system’s effectiveness.
  • It is important to weigh up the benefits and risks of short-term versus continuous immunosuppression.
  • Non-selective DMTs suppress the adaptive and innate immune systems; selective DMTs do not affect the innate immune system and are thus associated with a low risk of bacterial infections.
  • The implications of immunosuppression need to be considered within the context of other health and lifestyle factors.

Which DMTs cause immunosuppression?

A useful way of thinking about DMTs is based on whether they are immunosuppressive. Broadly speaking, an immunosuppressive is any DMT that reduces the immune system’s activation or effectiveness. 

From a regulatory perspective, for a drug to be classified as immunosuppressive, it should: 

  • cause significant lymphopaenia or leukopenia (reduced white cell counts)
  • be associated with opportunistic infections (infections that don’t occur in people with a normal, healthy immune system)
  • reduce antibody and/or T-cell responses to vaccines 
  • increase the risk of secondary malignancies. 

Based on the above criteria, the interferon-beta preparations and glatiramer acetate are immunomodulatory rather than immunosuppressive. Teriflunomide is also an immunomodulatory therapy with the potential, albeit small, to cause immunosuppression. In real life, however, very few people with MS treated with teriflunomide develop significant lymphopaenia or leukopenia; if they do, we tend to stop the drug. The other licensed DMTs are immunosuppressive to a greater or lesser degree. 

Short-term versus continuous immunosuppression

The duration and intensity of immunosuppression further determine the risks. Short-term or intermittent immunosuppression associated with an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT) front-loads the risks, which decrease substantially once the immune system has reconstituted itself. In comparison, long-term continuous or persistent immunosuppression, which occurs with most maintenance DMTs, accumulates problems over time, particularly opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies.

Live vaccines are, in general, contraindicated in patients on continuous immunosuppressive therapies. However, someone with MS on an IRT who has reconstituted their immune system can tolerate and respond to live vaccines. The benefits of administering live vaccines always need to be balanced against the risks of the vaccine.

How immunosuppressed are you table updated format 180625 SS

The main characteristics of continuous persistent and short-term (intermittent) immunosuppression. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Selective versus non-selective immunosuppression

Immunosuppression that accompanies DMTs may be selective or non-selective. Non-selective therapies deplete and/or suppress both the adaptive immune system (T cells and B cells) and the innate immune system (monocytes, neutrophils and natural killer [NK] cells). Alemtuzumab, AHSCT (autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation) and mitoxantrone are non-selective and are therefore associated with acute bacterial infections such as listeriosis, nocardiosis and cytomegalovirus reactivation. In comparison, anti-CD20 agents (ocrelizumab and ofatumumab) and cladribine are selective, do not affect the innate immune system and are therefore associated with a low risk of acute bacterial infections. 

How immunosuppressed are you_MET vs IRT_2 Dec 2024

Classification of disease-modifying therapies for relapsing forms of MS. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.1
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Other considerations

Please note that the implications of immunosuppression are not black and white but interact with other factors such as:

These factors have been highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in relation to the risk of severe COVID-19 and the variations in vaccine responses among people with MS (including waning of the immune response).

It is important to realise that we can derisk (reduce the risk of) some complications associated with long-term immunosuppression and the use of DMTs. Please see the post entitled How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?

References

  1. Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.
Diagnosis

Am I sure that I have MS?

The multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis rate is around 5% and this has major implications for individuals and the treatment of MS.

Key points

  • A wrong diagnosis of MS may have financial, social and psychological consequences for the individuals concerned, affecting major life decisions.
  • Some MS treatments have life-threatening complications and should only be prescribed for people with a clear diagnosis of MS.
  • Some of the diseases that mimic MS can be made worse by disease-modifying treatments for MS.
  • Diagnostic criteria for MS have evolved and now take account of clinical, electrical, laboratory and magnetic resonance imaging findings.

A case study

She had been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis 8 years ago and had been taking interferon-beta since her diagnosis. I told her that I didn’t think she had MS and that her diagnosis was almost certainly complicated migraine with aura. The lesions on her magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan were non-specific white matter lesions and not inflammatory. Her neurological examination, spinal fluid analysis and evoked potentials (EPs) were normal. What clinched the non-MS diagnosis for me was the history of neurological events, which were too short-lived and migratory to be MS attacks. The final piece of the jigsaw was that a special MRI sequence showed none of her white matter lesions had a central vein, which told me that none of her white matter lesions was an MS lesion.  Her anger was palpable. She was angry because she had decided not to start a family and had changed her career because of the fear of becoming disabled in the future and not being able to work or look after a child.  This case illustrates why I always try to review the diagnosis of patients referred to me with MS and why it is important to answer this question before starting a disease-modifying therapy (DMT).   

Making a diagnosis of MS

Unfortunately, there is no single test to diagnose MS. Rather, MS is diagnosed by combining a set of clinical and MRI findings, electrical or neurophysiological investigations and laboratory tests. If these tests fulfil a set of so-called MS diagnostic criteria, the healthcare professional (HCP) or neurologist makes a diagnosis of MS. 

The underlying principles of diagnosing MS are to show the dissemination of lesions in space and time and exclude possible mimics of MS. The diagnostic criteria have evolved over time from 1) being based purely on clinical attacks,1 to 2) include electrical and spinal fluid tests as well as clinical attacks,2 and 3) to add on the use of MRI to help confirm dissemination in time and space.3–6  

Dissemination in time 

This means that two attacks or MS lesions must occur at least 30 days apart or that oligoclonal bands (OCBs) of immunoglobulins can be detected in the spinal fluid.

Dissemination in space 

This requires MS lesions to occur in different locations, for example, the optic nerve and the spinal cord. 

Electrical tests

The electrical or neurophysiological tests are called evoked potential (EPs) and test electrical conduction in a particular pathway. They can show lesions in nerve pathways that are not evident on the neurological examination or seen on MRI. The EPs can also show slow electrical conduction, which is one of the hallmarks of diseases that affect myelin, the insulation around nerves that is responsible for speeding up the electrical conduction of nerve impulses.

Laboratory tests

The laboratory tests are typically done to exclude other diseases that can mimic MS. Examining the spinal fluid for the presence of OCBs is useful in helping to make an MS diagnosis. OCBs are the fingerprint of a specific type of immune activation within the central nervous system (CNS). The OCB fingerprint is relatively specific for the diagnosis of MS in the correct clinical context. (OCBs are also found in CNS infections and other autoimmune diseases, but these are relatively easy to differentiate from MS.)

Please be aware that you may have MS according to the latest diagnostic criteria when you could not be diagnosed with MS using past criteria.

Why is a correct diagnosis important?

Neurologists get the diagnosis wrong in approximately 5% of people with MS. In other words, one in 20 people who have a diagnosis of MS in life does not have MS when their brain is studied post mortem. This data is based on a large study in a region of Denmark.7 More recently, a study from a specialist MS centre in the United States reported a misdiagnosis rate of approximately 15% in patients with presumed MS referred to their centre for treatment.8 

Why is getting the diagnosis of MS correct so important? Firstly, some MS treatments have life-threatening complications; you don’t want to expose people without MS to these complications. More concerning is that some of the diseases that mimic MS can be made worse by MS DMTs. Finally, a diagnosis of MS has many psychological, social, financial and economic implications. Even if you turn out to have ‘benign disease’, just having a diagnosis of MS, has implications for your life choices and may impact your ability to get insurance cover, to name obvious examples. I, therefore, advise you to make sure you have MS and not an MS mimic.

Common MS mimics

References

  1. Schumacher GA, et al. Problems of experimental trials of therapy in multiple sclerosis: Report by the Panel on the Evaluation of Experimental Trials of Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1965;122:552–68.
  2. Poser CM, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227–31.
  3. McDonald WI, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–7.
  4. Polman CH, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 2005;58:840–6.
  5. Polman CH, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292–302.
  6. Thompson AJ, et al. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–73.
  7. Engell T. A clinico-pathoanatomical study of multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1988;78:39–44.
  8. Kaisey M, et al. Incidence of multiple sclerosis misdiagnosis in referrals to two academic centers. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2019;30:51–6.
Diagnosis, Stages of MS

Do I have active MS?

Before deciding to start a disease-modifying therapy you need to know if you have active MS.

Key points

  • To qualify for a disease-modifying treatment for MS you must have active disease.
  • Active MS is characterised by relapses (new symptomatic or asymptomatic lesions); the clinical diagnosis of relapse may be supported by MRI or CSF evidence of activity.
  • Different levels of disease activity qualify for different types of DMT.
  • Diagnostic criteria for MS have evolved considerably over the past two decades; this has helped to make treatment decisions earlier and easier, both for MS neurologists and for people with MS.

To be eligible for disease-modifying therapy (DMT) you must have ‘active MS’. This term is increasingly used to refer to current or recent evidence of focal inflammatory activity, i.e. new lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or a relapse. Inflammation damages axons, or nerve processes. When a lesion develops, the effects of inflammatory mediators can cut (transect) axons, demyelinate them or stop them from working.

By contrast, the gradual worsening of disability that occurs in people with more advanced MS (which may, or may not, occur in the presence of focal inflammatory activity) has many potential causes, only one of which is focal inflammation.

Signs of active MS

Relapses

When a new MS lesion occurs in an eloquent part of the central nervous system it causes new symptoms or exacerbates old ones – this is usually interpreted as a relapse. Relapses, by definition, last at least 24 hours in the absence of infection or fever.

Criteria for ‘active’ MS accepted by many MS health professionals. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; NFL, neurofilament light.
*Some neurologists accept 24 months, 36 months or even more when assessing MRI activity. There is no international consensus on the gap between the baseline and new MRI scan to define active disease.

Asymptomatic lesions

Most focal MS disease activity does not cause any overt symptoms because the brain has a way of compensating for damage. For every clinical relapse, there are at least 10 or more lesions on MRI. Therefore, what we see clinically in terms of relapses is the tip of the iceberg. Even standard MRI is relatively insensitive in detecting and monitoring MS disease activity; it misses new lesions that are smaller than 3 ̶ 4 mm in size and does not detect most lesions that occur in the grey matter of the brain (cortex and deep grey matter nuclei, e.g. thalamus and basal ganglia). Therefore, MRI scans also reveal just the tip of the iceberg. This is one of the reasons we also use cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament levels as a marker of this microscopic activity.

Disease activity levels

Inactive MS

Many people with MS experience frequent intermittent symptoms or ‘pseudorelapses’ that come on when they are tired, after exercise or have a raised body temperature from a fever, exercise, hot bath or a warm environment. These intermittent symptoms are usually quite stereotyped and last minutes to hours. They are indicative of a previously damaged pathway but do not represent a relapse or disease activity.

Active MS

Most neurologists require evidence of disease activity in the last 12 months, with some of us accepting a 24-month or 36-month window if there is no serial or regular MRI support. However, if you have had no relapses or MRI evidence of new lesions in the last 24 months, then your MS is defined as inactive. (This does not mean your MS is necessarily stable; you could have worsening disability as part of the progressive or smouldering phase of the disease.) Inactive MS needs to be monitored in case it reactivates, in which case you could become eligible for treatment.

Inactive MS - format updated 180625 SS

Schematic showing different levels of MS disease activity.
*Some neurologists accept MRI activity in the last 24 months, 36 months or even longer as a criterion for active MS.

Highly active MS and rapidly evolving severe MS

Active MS has been divided into an additional two categories that have implications for DMT prescribing (depending on where you live).

  • Highly active MS describes MS with unchanged or increased relapse rates, or ongoing severe relapses compared with the previous year, despite treatment with beta-interferon or another so-called first-line therapy. In England, patients in this subgroup are eligible for natalizumab, alemtuzumab, fingolimod and cladribine.
  • Rapidly evolving severe MS (RES) is defined as two disabling relapses and MRI evidence of activity within a 12-month period. In England, patients in this subgroup are eligible for natalizumab, alemtuzumab and cladribine.

Evolution of diagnostic criteria

In the early 2000s, disease activity was defined using clinical criteria only; you needed at least two documented relapses in the last 2 years to be eligible for DMT.1 This meant that a neurologist had to examine you to confirm abnormalities compatible with a relapse. However, many people with MS without rapid access to a neurologist would recover before being assessed, meaning that their relapses often could not be documented. This was very frustrating for someone wanting to start a DMT. If patients had MRI evidence to support recent disease activity, how could we deny them access to a DMT because they were not seen in a timely way to have their relapse documented in the clinical notes?

In 2009, the criteria for diagnosing MS incorporated MRI into the definition to allow us to treat so-called high-risk patients with CIS (clinically isolated syndromes compatible with demyelination). These criteria required patients with CIS to have nine or more T2 lesions on MRI or at least one gadolinium-enhancing lesion. These MRI criteria were based on the McDonald diagnostic criteria at the time.2 These eligibility criteria evolved further in 2014, once alemtuzumab was licensed, to include clinical or MRI activity.

References

  1. McDonald WI, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–7.
  2. Polman CH, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 2011;69:292–302.