Tag Archives: HSCT

What are the attributes of the specific DMTs?

Multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment has evolved rapidly, with 11 classes of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) now available in the UK. I will summarise them briefly and explain how they fit within a treatment paradigm for effective and safe use.

Maintenance therapies versus immune reconstitution: what’s the difference?

There is a divide between the two main treatment philosophies: maintenance ̶ escalation versus immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs).

An IRT is given as a short course – a one-off treatment in the case of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) or intermittently for alemtuzumab, cladribine or mitoxantrone. IRTs are not given continuously, and additional courses are given only if inflammatory activity recurs. IRTs can induce long-term remission and, in some cases, potentially a cure.

Maintenance therapies, by comparison, are given continuously without an interruption in dosing (‘continuous’ administration may be daily, one or more times weekly, monthly or even once every few months). Although maintenance therapies can induce long-term remission, they cannot, by definition, result in a cure. The recurrence or continuation of inflammatory activity indicates a suboptimal response to treatment and typically requires a treatment switch. Ideally, this switch should be an escalation to a more effective class of DMT.

An article in our list of key questions, entitled How do I want my MS to be treated?, provides a more detailed comparison of maintenance and IRT therapies, including frequency of administration, efficacy, risks, use in pregnancy, vaccine response and potential for a cure.

The DMTs currently licensed in the UK (in August 2024) are listed in the table under the relevant category.

table format updated 180625 SS

Disease-modifying therapies for MS licensed in the UK. *Please note, Bonspri is available in other markets but not the UK.

How effective are the different DMTs?

The measures used to assess the effectiveness of a DMT include its ability to reduce or prevent relapses, focal inflammatory activity (that is, new or enlarging lesions) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and disability progression. Additional factors that can help to assess the relative efficacy of DMTs include the proportion of clinical trial subjects who experience improvement in disability and the impact of the treatment on brain volume loss.

The MS-Selfie InfoCards are an easy-to-use resource to help people with MS compare the key features of each DMT. They contain bite-sized information designed to aid treatment choices and an overview of the key aspects of each DMT.

Efficacy of the licensed DMTs for MS can be visualised as pyramid, with the moderately effective treatments at the bottom and the more effective approaches at the top. What determines the most appropriate DMT efficacy level for an individual depends on several factors, such as baseline prognostic profile, family planning requirements, local or national treatment guidelines, socioeconomic factors, consideration of any co-existing illnesses, cognitive impairment, risk aversion and lifestyle issues.

Pyramid format updated 180625 SS

UK licensed DMTs for MS, in ascending order of efficacy.
HSCT/AHSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation/autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

What is the goal of treatment? Introducing NEIDA as a target

In the past, we used no evident disease activity (NEDA) as a treatment target. ‘Disease activity’ included progression or disease worsening independent of relapse activity (termed smouldering MS). Although some of the more effective DMTs may modify this stage of the disease, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching or stopping a DMT based simply on smouldering MS disease activity. 

Relapses and ongoing focal MRI activity are associated with a worse short-term to intermediate-term prognosis. These observations have led to the increasing adoption of ‘no evident inflammatory disease activity’ (NEIDA) as a new treatment target. For more information about treatment targets, please see the article in our key questions, Do I understand the concepts of treat-2-target and NEDA?

Many healthcare professionals (HCPs) remain sceptical of using NEIDA as a treatment target, fearing that this could lead to more people with MS being on ‘riskier’ high-efficacy therapies. However, achieving long-term remission, or NEIDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated-to-target of NEIDA from the outset do better than those whose treatment is escalated following breakthrough disease (at a clinical or subclinical/MRI level)1. I would, therefore, strongly encourage people with MS and their HCPs to adopt NEIDA as an initial treatment target.

Flipping the pyramid

The effectiveness, or relative effectiveness, of individual DMTs becomes less critical in the context of a treatment target of NEIDA. Choosing a DMT with a lower efficacy rate simply means that a greater proportion of treated people with MS will need to be switched to higher efficacy therapies over time to achieve NEIDA. We refer to the latter of these three approaches – starting with high-efficacy treatment – as flipping the pyramid. In recent trials of alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab and ublituximab, people with MS randomised to 2 years of lower efficacy DMTs (interferon-beta-1a or teriflunomide) had poorer outcomes than those receiving highly active therapy from the outset. Real-world data from registries also support this; groups of people with MS with delayed access to high-efficacy DMTs did worse than those who received high-efficacy treatments early.1,2

Horizontal versus vertical switching

If we consider the conventional step care paradigm, people with MS who switch horizontally from interferon-beta to glatiramer acetate, or vice-versa (i.e. from one moderate efficacy DMT to another moderate efficacy DMT) do less well than those who switch vertically to fingolimod, a highly effective DMT. Similarly, people with MS escalating to natalizumab, a very high-efficacy DMT, do better than those being escalated to the less effective, but still high-efficacy, DMT fingolimod. 

Continuous and intermittent immunosuppression

Another useful way of classifying DMTs is whether they are immunosuppressive, that is, they reduce the activation, or effectiveness, of the immune system. Drug regulators stipulate that a drug may be classified as immunosuppressive if it (1) causes significant lymphopaenia (low lymphocyte count) or leukopenia (low white blood cell count), (2) is associated with opportunistic infections, (3) reduces the antibody and immune response to vaccines and (4) increases the risk of secondary malignancies.

The duration and intensity of immunosuppression further determine the risks. For example, short-term or intermittent immunosuppression associated with IRTs front-loads the risks, which are substantially lower once the immune system has reconstituted itself. In comparison, long-term continuous or persistent immunosuppression, which occurs with some of the maintenance DMTs, accumulates problems over time, particularly opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies. You can read more detail on this topic in the key question How immunosuppressed am I? The following table summarises the main attributes of intermittent and persistent immunosuppression.

How immunosuppressed are you table updated format 180625 SS

The main characteristics of continuous (persistent) and short-term (intermittent) immunosuppression. Modified from Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.2
AHSCT, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Adverse effects, monitoring and risk reduction

The complications associated with immunosuppression vary from DMT to DMT. Each individual drug summary in the DMTs section of MS-Selfie contains detailed information about the main adverse events, key monitoring requirements, use (or contraindication) during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and response to vaccines. The MS-Selfie InfoCards provide bite-sized summaries of several practical aspects, including side effects, to enable easy comparison of any treatments you are considering; some of this information is collated below for easy reference.

Short-term versus long-term adverse effects

Each drug has been given scores from 1 to 10 based on published analyses of its short-term and long-term side effects. Short-term refers to side effects that emerge when a treatment is started and decrease in severity or disappear within days or weeks. A well-known example of short-term side effects on starting interferon-beta is flu-like symptoms that typically abate within 4 ̶ 8 weeks.

A long-term side effect persists for months or doesn’t disappear on continuing the DMT. Examples include intermittent but persistent flushing after taking dimethyl fumarate, or low B lymphocyte counts with anti-CD20 therapies that may lead to low antibody or immunoglobulin levels (hypogammaglobulinaemia).

A low score denotes few or rare side effects; a high score denotes many or frequent side effects. The score does not correlate to a percentage. More information can be found in each drug summary and the manufacturer’s Summary of Product Characteristics.

Scores for short-term and long-term side effects assigned to the individual DMTs summarised in the MS-Selfie InfoCards, based on a published network meta-analysis.3
Alem, alemtuzumab; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFN-beta; interferon-beta; Nat, natalizumab.

Monitoring and risk reduction

Numerous tests are carried out at the start of treatment, and ongoing monitoring is required for many factors, to reduce the risk from adverse events. The key question, How can I reduce my chances of adverse events on specific DMTs?, explains what needs to be done at the start of DMT administration (baseline) and during subsequent monitoring. The specifics vary from DMT to DMT; please refer to the individual summaries for details such as baseline tests, follow-up, infection prevention, cancer risk, pregnancy, breastfeeding and vaccination. It is important to remember that all licensed MS DMTs have had a thorough risk ̶ benefit assessment, and their benefits are considered to outweigh the potential risks.

Administration and other practical considerations

Routes and frequency of administration

The MS-Selfie InfoCards contain a symbol for each DMT, showing how it is administered. Some DMTs are available in more than one formulation (e.g. tablets and injection). The frequency of administration varies greatly from DMT to DMT; please consult the relevant summary in the DMTs section and discuss your preferences and priorities with your MS HCP.

The route of administration for each drug in the MS-Selfie InfoCards is clearly identified by the relevant symbol. (If a DMT is available in more than one formulation, there is a separate card for each delivery route.)

Number of clinic visits

It may be important for you to consider the frequency of clinic visits. This will depend on factors such as the delivery route of your DMT, the monitoring requirements of the drug regulators and the risk of specific side effects. The table below summarises the assessments from the MS-Selfie InfoCards. This is another factor to consider in discussions with your MS HCPs about the most appropriate DMT for you.

Conclusions

People with MS must understand the objectives of MS treatments and the different treatment strategies currently available to achieve these objectives. Although the MS therapeutic landscape is complex and hence may seem overwhelming, framing the choices using a relatively simple construct should help each individual to make informed decisions about managing their MS. MS-Selfie aims to guide you in the process of deciding on the most appropriate therapeutic strategy and specific DMT for treating your disease.

References

  1. Rotstein D, et al. Association of No Evidence of Disease Activity with no long-term disability progression in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2022;99:e209̶ ̶ 20.
  2. Giovannoni G. Disease-modifying treatments for early and advanced multiple sclerosis: a new treatment paradigm. Curr Opin Neurol 2018;31:233 ̶ 43.
  3. Samjoo IA, et al. Efficacy classification of modern therapies in multiple sclerosis. J Comp Eff Res 2021;10:495–507.

HSCT (haematopoietic stem cell transplant) – short summary

Summary

HSCT (haematopoietic stem cell transplant) is not a drug, it is a procedure that involves harvesting of stem cells that first need to be mobilised from the bone marrow using a ‘conditioning’ regimen of low-dose chemotherapy and growth factors. The stem cells are harvested from the blood and frozen down or stored. People with MS undergoing HSCT then have their immune system depleted with chemotherapy to a greater (myeloablative HSCT) or lesser extent (non-myeloablative HSCT). The stem cells are re-infused to allow more rapid recovery of bone marrow and immune function. HSCT is not a ‘licensed therapy’ for MS, but it is offered as a treatment for more active disease in many countries – typically for MS that has not responded to standard DMTs. HSCT is on the list of essential off-label DMTs because it is a generic procedure available in many countries. In other words, it can also be used for treating MS where access to high-cost licensed DMTs is limited. 

Types of HSCT

  • So-called myeloablative therapy aims to wipe out your immune system completely and replace it with a new immune system.
  • Non-myeloablative therapy is less intense: it partially depletes your immune system and allows it to be rebooted (partially). Non-myeloablative therapy is less toxic and less risky than myeloablative therapy but also less effective.

Mode of action

HSCT is an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT). It works by depleting your immune system and allowing it to reconstitute. The hope is that when the immune system has reconstituted, the autoimmune cells that cause MS are absent.

Efficacy

Very high.

Class

Non-selective IRT, short-term immunosuppression.

Immunosuppression

Yes, short-term, whilst the immune system is depleted. Once it reconstitutes itself, the immune system is competent.

Protocols

HSCT protocols of different intensities are used to treat MS. Those used in non-myeloablative therapy are less toxic and less risky than in myeloablative therapy but also less effective:

  • low intensity (non-myeloablative)
  • intermediate intensity (non-myeloablative)
  • high intensity (myeloablative).

Adverse events and events of particular interest

High doses of chemotherapy used as part of HSCT can cause serious adverse events. Some of the complications can be life-threatening.

Infection: during the first 6 weeks after HSCT, the risk of getting a serious bacterial or viral infection is high. You will be told what precautions to follow. It takes 3 ̶ 12 months after transplant for the immune system of most patients to recuperate.

Nausea and vomiting are common and are treated with antiemetics.

Mouth and throat pain is a short-term side effect of high-intensity chemotherapy.

Hair loss typically begins within 2 ̶ 3 weeks of treatment. Hair growth will return to normal once the treatment is finished.

Bleeding and bruising are a risk in the early weeks after HSCT; you may be susceptible to nosebleeds and bleeding gums. A platelet transfusion or red blood cell transfusion may be required.

Cardiotoxicity may result from chemotherapy, particularly in older people with MS and people who have received prior cardiotoxic drugs, for example, mitoxantrone.

Neurotoxicity is most likely in people with advanced MS and significant disability treated with high-intensity chemotherapy regimens.

Other complications may include lung problems, hepatic veno-occlusive disease, infertility, secondary autoimmune diseases, graft-versus-host disease, graft failure and secondary cancers.

Pharmacovigilance monitoring and derisking

  • During HSCT, blood tests are frequently done to monitor for bone marrow recovery. If relevant, peripheral blood may be checked for possible reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus or cytomegalovirus.
  • People with MS without antibodies to varicella zoster virus (VZV) should receive the VZV vaccine at least 6 weeks before HSCT to allow time to develop immunity.
  • You should receive advice about minimising your risk of exposure to listeriosis.
  • You may be offered antibiotics to reduce your chances of developing bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections.
  • Pregnancy is contraindicated, and breastfeeding should be discontinued before starting HSCT.
  • A rebaseline MRI is typically done at around 6 months after HSCT.
  • Some units recommend a routine revaccination programme approximately 2 years after HSCT, particularly for individuals who have received an intensive chemotherapy regimen.

Further details about HSCT

Switching-2-HSCT

Switching-2-HSCT (haematopoietic stem cell transplant)

Possible reasons to switch

  • HSCT is indicated as part of routine clinical care in the occasional patient with malignant MS who has failed licensed treatment options. In such patients, the benefits of HSCT outweigh the risks of the disease.
  • Provided you have sufficient reserve capacity in the brain and spinal cord, you will see spontaneous recovery from relapse-related disability once inflammation is switched off, and recovery mechanisms can proceed.
  • Please note the benefit ̶ risk ratio changes with more advanced disease; most HSCT units have age and disability cut-offs for people with MS.

Reasons for caution

  • There is a 0.3% ̶ 2% chance of dying from non-myeloablative HSCT, i.e. 1 in 330 to as high as 1 in 50.
  • The toxicity associated with the chemotherapy is severe, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, hair loss, bleeding, infections, infertility and neurotoxicity.
  • There is a chance of developing a secondary cancer.
  • The short-term risks and side effects from the intense chemotherapy used in myeloablative HSCT are much worse than with non-myeloablativeHSCT, including possible solid organ toxicity or the need for platelet and blood transfusions.
  • The risk of infertility from the chemotherapy used in HSCT is high in both men and women; pregnancy is contraindicated.
  • You may need to be revaccinated with all your childhood vaccines about 2 years after HSCT to restore your immune responses to these common infections. 

Weighing the risks

There are different intensities of bone marrow ablation. So-called myeloablative therapy aims to wipe out your immune system entirely and replace it with a new immune system. Non-myeloablative therapy is less intense: it partially depletes your immune system and allows it to be rebooted (partially). Non-myeloablative therapy is less toxic and less risky than myeloablative therapy, but also less effective. A recurrence of disease activity is therefore more likely after non-myeloablative HSCT than after myeloablativeHSCT

No person will sign up to HSCT believing they will die or develop complications. However, inevitably some will be unlucky and have serious complications, delayed adverse events or even die from the procedure. If you decide to have HSCT as part of a trial or routine care, you need to ask yourself: What if I am the unlucky one? Am I ready to leave my family and loved ones prematurely? If you answer ‘yes’ to both questions, you are ready to take the risks.

HSCT repeat course

HSCT is not a typical IRT in that it is usually given as a single one-off treatment. Therefore, breakthrough MS disease activity after HSCT usually triggers the introduction of another licensed DMT. However, there are case reports of patients with MS and other autoimmune diseases having repeat HSCT.

DMTs

HSCT is indicated as part of routine clinical care in the occasional patient with malignant MS who has already failed licensed treatment options. In such patients, the benefits of HSCT outweigh the risks of the disease. Provided the baseline screening tests are acceptable and there are no specific contraindications in an individual patient, I see no reason why HSCT can’t be used after any licensed DMTs. However, there are some specific caveats highlighted below.

Interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate

HSCT is indicated as part of routine clinical care in the occasional patient with malignant MS who has already failed licensed treatment options. In such patients, the benefits of HSCT outweigh the risks of the disease. No contraindications or specific issues.

Alemtuzumab and mitoxantrone (non-selective cell depleting DMTs)

A persistently low peripheral white cell count post-alemtuzumab or post-mitoxantrone, i.e. a neutrophil count <1000/mm³ or a total lymphocyte count <800/mm³, is a relative contraindication to HSCT. Another hit on the bone marrow and the primary and secondary lymphoid organs may worsen your leukopaenia and render you more immunosuppressed. The decision to use HSCT in this situation must be based on the potential benefits of HSCT versus its risks and the risks of untreated active MS. Please see the section on Special circumstances, below, relating to the possible development of chemotherapy-related cardiomyopathy post- mitoxantrone.

Cladribine (selective cell-depleting DMT)

A persistently low peripheral lymphocyte cell count post-cladribine, i.e. a total lymphocyte count <800/mm³, is a relative contraindication to HSCT. The effect of HSCT on primary and secondary lymphoid organs may worsen lymphopaenia. However, the decision to use HSCT after cladribine must be based on the potential benefits of HSCT versus the risks of lymphopaenia and the risks of untreated active MS. 

Anti-CD20 therapies (selective cell depleting DMTs)

As ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab and ublituximab are selective B cell-depleting agents, it is theoretically much safer to use HSCT after one of these DMTs than after the other less selective and non-selective agents. An anti-CD20 is the safest cell depleting DMT to use before HSCT.

S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod and ponesimod)

Chemotherapy is used before HSCT to ‘mobilise’ the stem cells (that is, cause them to move from the bone marrow into the blood). Therefore, an adequate wash-out period is needed after stopping an S1P modulator before starting the HSCT procedure to allow recovery of peripheral lymphocyte counts. To prevent persistent lymphopaenia post-HSCT, the peripheral lymphocyte counts must return towards normal (>800/mm³) or be normal (>1,000/mm³) before starting HSCT.  

Natalizumab

As HSCT is a non-selective IRT that can’t be rapidly reversed, it is critical to ensure against asymptomatic PML. Carry-over PML from natalizumab to HSCT would potentially be fatal. A baseline MRI scan and possibly a CSF examination must therefore be done before starting HSCT, to exclude possible PML.

Fumarates

Fumarates reduce the lymphocyte count by approximately 30% in people with MS, or by even more in some individuals. Therefore, patients with lymphopaenia while taking a fumarate may be more susceptible to developing clinically significant prolonged lymphopaenia post-HSCT

Teriflunomide

Because teriflunomide is an antiproliferative agent, it may delay or prevent the recovery of the peripheral white cell count post-HSCT. One option is to do an accelerated teriflunomide washout to prevent this potential problem. Interestingly, rheumatologists who use leflunomide, a prodrug converted to teriflunomide, don’t use an accelerated washout when using antiproliferative agents post-leflunomide.

Special circumstances

Specific comorbidities and adverse events may make it difficult to start HSCT after certain DMTs, for example, the development of chemotherapy-related cardiomyopathy post-mitoxantrone.

HSCT (haematopoietic stem cell transplant)

Summary

HSCT (haematopoietic stem cell transplant) is not a drug, it is a procedure that involves harvesting of stem cells that first need to be mobilised from the bone marrow using a ‘conditioning’ regimen of low-dose chemotherapy and growth factors. The stem cells are harvested from the blood and frozen down or stored. People with MS undergoing HSCT then have their immune system depleted with chemotherapy to a greater (myeloablative HSCT) or lesser extent (non-myeloablative HSCT). The stem cells are re-infused to allow more rapid recovery of bone marrow and immune function. HSCT is not a ‘licensed therapy’ for MS, but it is offered as a treatment for more active disease in many countries – typically for MS that has not responded to standard DMTs. HSCT is on the list of essential off-label DMTs because it is a generic procedure available in many countries. In other words, it can also be used for treating MS where access to high-cost licensed DMTs is limited. 

What is HSCT?

HSCT is simply a ‘rebranding’ of bone marrow transplantation (BMT). BMT refers to the harvesting of stem cells using a bone marrow aspirate, whereby a thick needle is inserted into the bone and the marrow is sucked out under pressure. This procedure is painful and is done under sedation. Haematologists have now developed an effective way of mobilising and harvesting stem cells from the blood without tapping the bone marrow. A small dose of chemotherapy is given, followed by growth factors so the stem cells spill over from the bone marrow into the blood. These stem cells are harvested and frozen and can then be given after chemotherapy (immunoablation therapy) has depleted your immune cells.

The introduction of the harvested stem cells speeds up bone marrow recovery after immune system ablation (depletion). More rapid bone marrow recovery makes BMT safer because you have less chance of getting a life-threatening infection or bleeding.

The stem cells in HSCT don’t go to the brain and spinal cord to repair the damage. This is a common misconception. Recovery of neurological function seen after HSCT is spontaneous endogenous repair, which we see with all the DMTs, particularly the highly effective treatments. Like other DMTs, HSCT is most effective when used early, before MS causes too much damage, or in younger people with MS (as we age, the nervous system’s ability to repair itself decreases).

Types of HSCT

There are different intensities of bone marrow ablation. So-called myeloablative therapy aims to wipe out your immune system entirely and replace it with a new immune system. Non-myeloablative therapy is less intense: it partially depletes your immune system and allows it to be rebooted (partially). Non-myeloablative therapy is less toxic and less risky than myeloablative therapy, but also less effective. A recurrence of disease activity is therefore more likely after non-myeloablative HSCT than after myeloablativeHSCT

Many in the field maintain that if you treat MS with HSCT you should use the more toxic and riskier myeloablativeHSCT. They argue that non-myeloablativeHSCT is no better than the high-efficacy drugs we already use, such as alemtuzumab, natalizumab and/or ocrelizumab. Trials are currently ongoing to compare alemtuzumab with non-myeloablativeHSCT and see if the potential benefits of non-myeloablativeHSCT warrant the risks.1,2,3

Non-myeloablative HSCT – risks

The chance of dying from non-myeloablativeHSCT is in the order of 0.3% ̶ 2%; i.e., a 1-in-330 risk to as high as 1-in-50. The toxicity associated with the chemotherapy is severe, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, hair loss, bleeding, infections, infertility and neurotoxicity. It seems that the more disabled you are, the worse the neurotoxicity. If you have lost a lot of nerve fibres and have reduced brain reserve, the chemotherapy worsens neurological function. This is why many BMT units stopped using this therapy in people with more advanced MS and why most units have an upper Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score limit as part of their inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Does your immune system return to normal post-HSCT? There is evidence that HSCT may rejuvenate the immune system and change the so-called ‘repertoire’ (memory) of your B and T cells. We don’t yet know what it means for MS, but we do know that HSCT may destroy memory cells from your previous vaccinations. So, you may need to be revaccinated with all your childhood vaccines at ~2 years after HSCT to restore your immune responses to these common infections. 

What about secondary autoimmunity?

There are data to suggest that people with MS treated with both myeloablativeHSCT and non-myeloablativeHSCT are at risk of developing secondary autoimmune diseases similar to those that occur after alemtuzumab treatment. This risk is lower than that seen with alemtuzumab, but there is a definite signal. At present I find it challenging to recommend non-myeloablativeHSCT over alemtuzumab, unless it is part of a controlled trial or the patient has already failed alemtuzumab.

Myeloablative HSCT – risks

The short-term risks from the intense chemotherapy needed to ablate the immune system with myeloablativeHSCT are much worse than with non-myeloablativeHSCT. Everything is worse: the diarrhoea tends to be bloody and protracted; mucositis is the norm (the lining of your mouth, throat and intestine slough); infections are more severe and are potentially life-threatening; there is the potential for solid organ toxicity (liver, lungs, kidneys and heart); your bone marrow takes longer to recover, and as a result you are more likely to need platelet and blood transfusions. MyeloablativeHSCT is not for the faint-hearted. Many HSCT enthusiasts in the autoimmune field assert that myeloablativeHSCT is the way to go; the failure rate from non-myeloablativeHSCT is too high. They argue that if you are going to take the risk of having HSCT, you might as well go for maximum efficacy with myeloablativeHSCT.

The Lazarus effect

The seemingly miraculous treatment effects of people with MS in wheelchairs getting up and walking are not unique to HSCT. We see these ‘Lazarus effects’ with other highly effective DMTs. Provided you have sufficient reserve capacity in the brain (brain reserve) and spinal cord (neurological reserve) you will see spontaneous recovery from relapse-related disability once inflammation is switched off and recovery mechanisms can proceed. Tragically these Lazarus-like examples create unrealistic expectations for people with more advanced disease. Once you have a fixed or progressive disability, you have most likely lost your neurological reserve. Even if you switch off inflammation with HSCT or another anti-inflammatory DMT, any significant recovery of function is unlikely. Many progressive MS trials have failed because the benefit:risk ratio changes with more advanced disease. This is why most HSCT or BMT units have age and disability cut-offs for people with MS.

Would I refer patients for HSCT?

Yes, I do. HSCT is indicated as part of routine clinical care in the small number of patients with malignant MS who has already failed licensed treatment options. In such patients, the benefits of HSCT outweigh the risks of the disease. In practice, however, people with MS are concerned chiefly about the infertility risk from HSCT. The risk of premature ovarian failure, or early menopause, following chemotherapy is over 40%; this dissuades many women. Similarly, for men, cyclophosphamide (the chemotherapy) hits the testes hard, so if you want to start or extend your family after HSCT you will need to bank sperm.

Weighing the risks

Please remember the human brain is hard-wired to be optimistic. I like the analogy of the gambler’s dilemma. No gambler places a bet or goes into a casino to lose money; they believe they will win. No person will sign up to HSCT believing they will die or develop complications. However, inevitably some will be unlucky and have serious complications, delayed adverse events or even die from the procedure. If you decide to have HSCT as part of a trial or routine care, you need to ask yourself: What if I am the unlucky one? Am I ready to leave my family and loved ones prematurely? If you answer ‘yes’ to both questions, you are ready to take the risks. In the same way, I warn my patients who sign up for alemtuzumab treatment that they should expect to develop a secondary autoimmune complication; if they don’t, they should count themselves lucky. If they are not prepared to develop a second autoimmune disease, they shouldn’t be treated with alemtuzumab.

Mode of action

HSCT is an immune reconstitution therapy (IRT). It works by depleting your immune system and allowing it to reconstitute. The hope is that when the immune system has reconstituted, the autoimmune cells that cause MS are absent.

Efficacy

Very high.

Class

Non-selective IRT, short-term immunosuppression.

Immunosuppression

Yes, short-term, whilst the immune system is depleted. Once it reconstitutes itself, the immune system is competent.

Protocols

The following are some examples of HSCT protocols used to treat MS.

Low intensity (non-myeloablative)

  • Cyclophosphamide plus anti-thymocyte globulin.
  • Cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine phosphate.

Intermediate intensity (non-myeloablative)

  • BEAM – a combination of BiCNU/carmustine, etoposide, Ara-C/cytarabine and melphalan.
  • BEAM plus anti-thymocyte globulin.
  • Cyclophosphamide plus thiotepa.
  • Total lymphoid irradiation plus melphalan.
  • Carmustine plus cyclophosphamide plus anti-thymocyte globulin.

High intensity (myeloablative)

  • Cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation plus anti-thymocyte globulin.
  • Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide plus anti-thymocyte globulin.
  • Busulfan plus anti-thymocyte globulin.

Adverse events and events of special interest

This is not a complete list of adverse events associated with HSCT. Please note some of the complications can be life-threatening.

Infection

During the first 6 weeks after HSCT, until the new stem cells start making white blood cells (engraftment), you can easily develop serious infections. Bacterial infections are most common, but viral infections that were controlled by your immune system can become active again. For example, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common cause of pneumonia in people who have had transplants and in people with MS who were already infected with CMV. Fungal infections can also be an issue. Even infections that cause only mild symptoms in people with normal immune systems can pose a danger. For instance, pneumocystis pneumonia (often called PCP) is easy to catch and can cause fever, cough, and serious breathing problems if your immune system is compromised. Antibiotics are often used to keep HSCT patients from getting this. You may be given antibiotics to try to prevent other infections until your blood counts reach a certain level.

While in the hospital, everyone who enters your room must wash their hands well. They may also wear gowns, shoe coverings, gloves, and masks. Since flowers and plants can carry bacteria and fungi, they are not allowed in your room. After engraftment, the risk of infection is lower, but it still can happen. It takes 3 months to one year after transplant for the immune system of most patients to work as well as it should. Because of the increased risk, you will continue to be watched closely for signs of infection, such as fever, cough, shortness of breath, or diarrhoea. Your doctor may check your blood often, and extra precautions will be needed to avoid exposure to germs. For the same reason, you may be told not to eat certain fresh fruits and vegetables. All your food must be well cooked and handled very carefully by you and family members. Certain foods may need to be avoided for a while. You will also be told to avoid contact with soil, faeces (both human and animal), aquariums, reptiles, and exotic pets. Your team may tell you to avoid being near disturbed soil, bird droppings, or mould. You need to wash your hands after touching pets. If you have a cat, you may need to remove the cat’s litter tray from where you eat or spend time.

Your transplant team will tell you and your family about the precautions you need to follow. Despite all these precautions, many patients develop fevers, one of the first signs of infection. If you do get a fever or other signs of infection, contact your doctor right away. Tests will be done to determine the cause of the infection (chest X-rays, urine tests, and blood cultures), and antibiotics will be started.

Nausea and vomiting

A common side effect from the chemotherapy given with HSCT, nausea and vomiting, is treated with antiemetics. No one drug can fully prevent or control chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting; hence, combination therapies are often required.

Mouth and throat pain

Mucositis (inflammation or sores in the mouth) is a short-term side effect that happens with high-intensity chemotherapy. It usually gets better within a few weeks of treatment, but it can make eating and drinking painful.

Hair loss

Hair loss is likely during HSCT, typically beginning within 2 ̶ 3 weeks of treatment. However, hair growth will return to normal once the treatment is finished.

Bleeding and transfusions

After HSCT, you are at risk for bleeding because the conditioning treatment destroys your body’s ability to make platelets (the blood cells that help blood to clot.) While you wait for your transplanted stem cells to start working, you must take special precautions to avoid injury and bleeding. Platelet counts are typically low for at least 3 weeks after HSCT. During this time, you might notice easy bruising and bleeding, such as nosebleeds and bleeding gums. A platelet transfusion may be required if your platelet count drops below a certain level. It also takes time for your bone marrow to start making red blood cells. If you become too anaemic, you might require red blood cell transfusions.

Cardiotoxicity

High doses of chemotherapy used as part of HSCT can cause cardiotoxicity. This is most common in older people with MS and people who have received prior cardiotoxic drugs, for example, mitoxantrone.

Neurotoxicity

Both the central and peripheral nervous systems are susceptible to the toxic effects of chemotherapy used as part of the conditioning regimen in HSCT. People with more advanced MS and significant disability are particularly sensitive to chemotherapy-induced worsening of disability. The effects on the peripheral nervous system are mainly due to length-dependent neuropathy, with loss of feeling in the ends of the extremities. Neurotoxicity is rarely a problem with low- and intermediate-intensity chemotherapy regimens.

Interstitial pneumonitis and other lung problems

Pneumonitis is a type of lung inflammation most common in the first 100 days after HSCT. Pneumonia caused by infection happens more often, but pneumonitis may be caused by chemotherapy rather than germs. It results from damage to the areas between the cells of the lungs (the so-called interstitial spaces). Pneumonitis tends to occur only with more intensive conditioning regimens.

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease is a serious problem in which tiny veins and other blood vessels inside the liver become blocked. It is very uncommon, and only happens in individuals who received the drugs busulfan or melphalan as part of their conditioning regimen and as part of allogeneic HSCT (from a donor) rather than autologous HSCT (AHSCT, i.e. from the patient).

Infertility

Many people with MS who have HSCT become infertile and cannot have children. This is not caused by the transplanted stem cells but rather by the high doses of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy used to ablate the immune system. These treatments affect normal and abnormal cells and damage the reproductive organs. If having children is important to you, or if it might be important in the future, there are ways to protect your fertility. If indicated, women should be offered GnRH agonists as ovarian protection throughout therapy or the possibility of egg harvesting and storage. The risk of infertility depends on the specific conditioning regimen. After chemotherapy, women find their menstrual periods become irregular or stop completely (amenorrhea). This doesn’t always mean you cannot get pregnant, so birth control should still be used before and after HSCT.

The drugs used during HSCT can also damage sperm, so men should use birth control to avoid starting a pregnancy during and for some time after the HSCT process. HSCT may cause temporary or permanent infertility for men as well; it is worth considering storing sperm before having a transplant (this process can take several days). Fertility returns in some men, but the timing is unpredictable.

Secondary autoimmunity

People with MS treated with HSCT are at risk of developing secondary autoimmune diseases similar to those that occur after alemtuzumab treatment. The risk of secondary autoimmunity after HSCT is about 10%, which is lower than after alemtuzumab. Does this mean that you must participate in the same type of pharmacovigilance required by patients treated with alemtuzumab? I am not sure about this, but all the patients I have referred for HSCT who have come through the procedure successfully are not enrolled in an intensive pharmacovigilance programme. All study subjects in our current trial of alemtuzumab versus non-myeloablativeHSCT are undergoing monthly blood and urine monitoring, which should allow us to assess the current pharmacovigilance requirement.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)

This adverse event is commonly reported on HSCT and BMT unit websites. It typically happens with allogeneic (donor) transplants when the immune cells from the donor see your body as foreign. Allogeneic transplants are not used to treat MS. Despite this, GVHD may occur with autologous HSCT if you receive a blood transfusion that contains live lymphocytes from the donor. The latter is prevented by irradiating all fresh blood products before administering them to HSCT patients. 

HSCT graft failure

Grafts fail when you have too few stem cells, either because the body does not accept them or they did not survive the mobilisation and storage procedure. In this case, we must wait for your bone marrow to recover spontaneously. Depending on the intensity of the conditioning regimen, this can take many weeks. During this period, you are very susceptible to infections and bleeding. Grafts rarely fail, but graft failure can result in death.

Secondary cancers caused by HSCT

There is a small chance of developing a secondary cancer after HSCT, which is caused by the chemotherapy damaging your cell’s DNA or the associated immunosuppression.

  • Lymphomas are most often associated with HSCT, especially the B cell types, which tend to be caused by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). When the immune system is suppressed after HSCT, EBV may result in proliferation of B cells and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (typically in patients receiving allogeneic HSCT).
  • Acute leukaemia is a type of cancer that can develop a few years after HSCT.
  • Myelodysplasia or myelodysplastic syndrome is a bone marrow disorder that may develop a few years after HSCT in which the bone marrow makes defective blood cells.
  • Solid tumours that develop many years later may include the skin, mouth, brain, liver, cervix, thyroid, breast or bone.

Risk factors for developing a secondary cancer include:

  • total lymphoid irradiation (though it is seldom used as part of HSCT regimens for MS)
  • the type of high-dose chemotherapy used in the conditioning treatment
  • age (older than 40 years at the time of transplant)
  • infection with certain viruses, i.e. EBV, CMV, hepatitis B or hepatitis C.

Pharmacovigilance monitoring requirements and derisking strategies

Baseline

Full blood count, urea and electrolytes, liver function tests, thyroid function tests, serum protein electrophoresis, serum immunoglobulin levels, serology (varicella zoster virus [VZV], human immunodeficiency virus-1 and -2, hepatitis B and C, syphilis, EBV and CMV), tuberculosis enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (TB ELISpot), up-to-date cervical smear and/or human papillomavirus testing and a pregnancy test. If indicated, some centres may assess the baseline function of the heart (ECG and cardiac ejection fraction) and lungs (lung function tests).

Follow-up

  • During HSCT, blood tests are frequently done to monitor for bone marrow recovery. If indicated, most units monitor peripheral blood EBV and CMV viral loads for EBV and CMV reactivation.
  • Once bone marrow function has recovered, blood tests are typically done 3 monthly for the first 2 years.
  • Endocrine work-up for women with persistent amenorrhea.

Infection prophylaxis

  • If you are VZV seronegative, you should receive the VZV vaccine at least 6 weeks before treatment with HSCT to allow sufficient time to develop immunity and protective antibodies.
  • To reduce your risk of developing listeriosis, which is a rare infection transmitted via food, you should receive advice about starting a listeriosis diet and a behavioural programme to minimise your chances of exposure to the infectious agent.

Depending on where you have your HSCT, you may also be offered antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce your chances of developing bacterial, fungal and parasitic infections.

Rebaselining

A rebaseline MRI needs to be done after HSCT. Most units do this after bone marrow recovery once patients have had time to recover from the HSCT procedure – typically at around 6 months.

Pregnancy

Pregnancy is contraindicated during HSCT as some chemotherapies are teratogenic and may harm the developing foetus. While having HSCT, women who might become pregnant should use effective birth control.

Breastfeeding

Some chemotherapy agents are excreted in human milk; therefore, breastfeeding should be discontinued before starting HSCT.

Vaccination

Immunisation is likely to be ineffective when given during or after HSCT. Immunisation with live virus vaccines is generally not recommended until after the immune system has reconstituted. Some units recommend a routine revaccination programme approximately 2 years after HSCT. The need for revaccination depends on the intensity of the chemotherapy regimen used during conditioning; the more intensive the regimen, the more likely you are to be revaccinated.

Switching-2-HSCT

HSCT repeat course

HSCT is not a typical IRT in that it is usually given as a single one-off treatment. Therefore, breakthrough MS disease activity after HSCT usually triggers the introduction of another licensed DMT. However, there are case reports of patients with MS and other autoimmune diseases having repeat HSCT.

DMTs

HSCT is indicated as part of routine clinical care in the occasional patient with malignant MS who has already failed licensed treatment options. In such patients, the benefits of HSCT outweigh the risks of the disease. Provided the baseline screening tests are acceptable and there are no specific contraindications in an individual patient, I see no reason why HSCT can’t be used after any licensed DMTs. However, there are some specific caveats highlighted below.

Interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate

HSCT is indicated as part of routine clinical care in the occasional patient with malignant MS who has already failed licensed treatment options. In such patients, the benefits of HSCT outweigh the risks of the disease. No contraindications or specific issues.

Alemtuzumab and mitoxantrone (non-selective cell depleting DMTs)

A persistently low peripheral white cell count post-alemtuzumab or post-mitoxantrone, i.e. a neutrophil count <1000/mm³ or a total lymphocyte count <800/mm³, is a relative contraindication to HSCT. Another hit on the bone marrow and the primary and secondary lymphoid organs may worsen your leukopaenia and render you more immunosuppressed. The decision to use HSCT in this situation must be based on the potential benefits of HSCT versus its risks and the risks of untreated active MS. 

Cladribine (selective cell-depleting DMT)

A persistently low peripheral lymphocyte cell count post-cladribine, i.e. a total lymphocyte count <800/mm³, is a relative contraindication to HSCT. The effect of HSCT on primary and secondary lymphoid organs may worsen lymphopaenia. However, the decision to use HSCT after cladribine must be based on the potential benefits of HSCT versus the risks of lymphopaenia and the risks of untreated active MS. 

Anti-CD20 therapies (selective cell depleting DMTs)

As ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, rituximab and ublituximab are selective B cell-depleting agents, it is theoretically much safer to use HSCT after one of these DMTs than after the other less selective and non-selective agents. An anti-CD20 is the safest cell depleting DMT to use before HSCT.

S1P modulators (fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod and ponesimod)

Chemotherapy is used before HSCT to ‘mobilise’ the stem cells (that is, cause them to move from the bone marrow into the blood). Therefore, an adequate wash-out period is needed after stopping an S1P modulator before starting the HSCT procedure to allow recovery of peripheral lymphocyte counts. To prevent persistent lymphopaenia post-HSCT, the peripheral lymphocyte counts must return towards normal (>800/mm³) or be normal (>1,000/mm³) before starting HSCT.  

Natalizumab

As HSCT is a non-selective IRT that can’t be rapidly reversed, it is critical to ensure against asymptomatic PML. Carry-over PML from natalizumab to HSCT would potentially be fatal. A baseline MRI scan and possibly a CSF examination must therefore be done before starting HSCT, to exclude possible PML.

Fumarates

Fumarates reduce the lymphocyte count by approximately 30% in people with MS, or by even more in some individuals. Therefore, patients with lymphopaenia while taking a fumarate may be more susceptible to developing clinically significant prolonged lymphopaenia post-HSCT

Teriflunomide

Because teriflunomide is an antiproliferative agent, it may delay or prevent the recovery of the peripheral white cell count post-HSCT. One option is to do an accelerated teriflunomide washout to prevent this potential problem. Interestingly, rheumatologists who use leflunomide, a prodrug converted to teriflunomide, don’t use an accelerated washout when using antiproliferative agents post-leflunomide.

Special circumstances

Specific comorbidities and adverse events may make it difficult to start HSCT after certain DMTs, for example, the development of chemotherapy-related cardiomyopathy post- mitoxantrone. 

References

  1. RCT comparing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus alemtuzumab, cladribine or ocrelizumab in MS (RAM-MS). ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03477500.
  2. Best available therapy versus autologous hematopoetic stem cell transplant for multiple sclerosis (BEAT-MS). ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04047628.
  3. StarMS HSCT trial opening at hospitals around the UK. MS Society, UK, October 2022.

Do I understand the concepts of treat-2-target and NEDA?

Has anyone discussed a treatment target with you, including the need to rebaseline your disease activity? Have the concepts of preventing end-organ damage to the central nervous system (the ‘end-organ’ in MS) and brain volume loss or atrophy been broached?

Key points

  • Achieving long-term remission is a well-established treatment target in MS and several other autoimmune diseases.
  • Key measures of MS disease activity are used to define composite treatment targets; they provide objective means for monitoring and decision-making.
  • To demonstrate a target of no evident disease activity (NEDA) requires a minimum of three criteria to be met: no relapses, no MRI activity and no disability progression.
  • More stringent definitions of NEDA targets have evolved and will continue to do so as new predictors of treatment response are developed.

If you are on a disease-modifying therapy (DMT), what is the objective or treatment target for your MS? This is another question to be answered before committing yourself to a specific treatment strategy.

Treat-2-target

Relapses and ongoing focal inflammatory activity on MRI (new or enlarging T2 lesions and T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions [Gd-enhancing]) are associated with poor outcomes. This has led to the adoption of ‘no evident disease activity’ (NEDA) as a treatment target in MS. NEDA, or NEDA-3, is a composite of three related measures of MS disease activity: (i) no relapses, (ii) no MRI activity (new or enlarging T2 lesions or Gd-enhancing lesions) and (iii) no disability progression. NEDA is an important goal for treating individuals with MS.

When to rebaseline

To use NEDA as a treatment target in day-to-day clinical practice, it is advisable to be ‘rebaselined’ after the onset of action of the DMT you have been started on. The timing of the MRI to provide a new baseline depends on the DMT concerned. The recommendations for immune reconstitution therapies (IRTs) are very different from those for maintenance therapies. In the case of an IRT (for example alemtuzumab or cladribine, which are given as short courses), breakthrough disease activity can be used as an indicator to retreat rather than necessarily to switch therapy. Therefore, a rebaselining MRI should be delayed until after the final course of therapy, e.g. 2 years, or close enough to the time when a third, or subsequent course, can be administered.

Determining treatment failure: IRTs

Questions remain of how many treatment cycles need to be given before considering that a specific IRT has not been effective.

  • For alemtuzumab, the threshold is three cycles under NHS England’s treatment algorithm (based on their cost-effectiveness analysis). Alemtuzumab is a biological or protein-based treatment, so the risk of developing neutralising anti-drug antibodies increases with each infusion.
  • Cladribine on the other hand is a small molecule, so neutralising antibodies are not a problem and there is no real limit on the number of courses that can be given.
  • Although HSCT tends to be a one-off treatment, there are rare reports of people with MS receiving more than one cycle.

Please note there are potentially cumulative risks associated with multiple cycles of an IRT: secondary malignancies in the case of HSCT and persistent lymphopaenia with cladribine. 

Determining treatment failure: maintenance therapies

In comparison to IRTs, if you have disease activity on a particular maintenance DMT, and provided you have been adherent to your treatment, this is usually interpreted as a suboptimal response or non-response and it should trigger a switch to another class of DMT

A criticism of NEDA is the omission of so-called ‘non-relapse-associated disease worsening’ as a component of the treatment target (in addition to evidence of incomplete recovery from relapses). I refer to this disease worsening as smouldering MS. Worsening disability in the absence of relapses may have little to do with ongoing focal inflammatory activity. It may simply represent a delayed dying-off of axons and nerve fibres following earlier focal inflammatory lesions. As a result, many neurologists feel uncomfortable switching, or stopping a DMT, based simply on non-relapse-associated worsening disability. For more information, please see Getting worse – smouldering MS.

Beyond NEDA-3

The definition of NEDA is evolving with clinical practice. Some centres are now testing for brain volume loss (that is, brain atrophy) and/or increased neurofilament light chain (NFL) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as part of the NEDA-3 treatment target. NEDA-4 builds on NEDA-3, by including the target of normalising brain atrophy rates to within the normal range. The problem we have found with this is that the measurement of brain atrophy in an individual with MS level is very unreliable. For example, dehydration, excessive alcohol consumption and some symptomatic medications can cause the brain to shrink temporarily. We, therefore, think that CSF NFL levels are a better treatment target, less prone to misinterpretation. Neurofilaments are proteins that are found in nerves and axons (nerve fibres) and are released in proportion to the amount of nerve fibre damage that occurs in MS. Normalising CSF NFL levels, which would indicate that nerve damage is stopped, is referred to as NEDA-5. From a scientific perspective, including a more objective end-organ biomarker makes sense and will almost certainly be incorporated into our treatment target in the future.  

Table format updated 180625 SS

The components of NEDA-recommended targets are expanding as our ability to measure predictors of treatment response grows.
CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; NEDA, no evident disease activity; NEIDA, no evident inflammatory disease activity; NFL, neurofilament light; PROMS, patient-related outcome measures.

End-organ damage

The combination of relapses, the development of new MRI lesions and brain volume loss over 2 years in clinical trials predicts quite accurately who will become disabled over the same time period. From a treatment perspective, it is important to stop relapses, new MRI lesions and brain volume loss if we are to prevent or slow down worsening disability. Therefore, we must go beyond NEIDA (no evident inflammatory activity), which refers to relapses and focal MRI activity, and normalise brain volume loss if we can. 

Alternatives to NEDA?

Many neurologists are critical of using NEDA as a treatment target in clinical practice, fearing that it encourages people with MS to take highly effective DMTs that they consider may be ‘more risky’ (see short summaries of the available DMTs for information about individual drugs). Such neurologists, therefore, promote a less proactive approach and allow for some residual MS disease activity, but at a lower level. This treatment target is referred to as minimal evidence of disease activity, or MEDA.

In my opinion, MEDA flies in the face of the science of focal inflammatory lesions being ‘bad’ and it is associated with poor short-term, intermediate and long-term outcomes. If most people with MS end up receiving so-called high-efficacy therapies because of breakthrough disease activity, then this is what they probably need, that is, to have their MS treated adequately. Compelling evidence has emerged from trials, large registries and real-world data that people with MS treated early with highly effective DMTs (flipping the pyramid) do better than those who have delayed access to more effective DMTs.1,2,3 You can find a short summary of some key findings on the MS Brain Health website.

Implementing NEDA in clinical practice

Please note that achieving long-term remission, or NEDA, is a well-established treatment target in other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune kidney disease and inflammatory bowel disease. People with MS treated to a target of NEDA do better than those with breakthrough disease activity. I would therefore strongly encourage you to discuss this treatment target with your own MS neurologist

The flowchart below illustrates how we implement a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy. The important take-home message is that the treatment targets in MS have moved; goal-setting and the active monitoring of outcomes is now required to achieve these goals. 

Treat to target NEDA algorithm

Recommended approaches to implementing a treat-2-target of NEDA strategy, using maintenance ̶ escalation or immune reconstitution therapy (IRT). The dotted lines indicate that if treatment fails you can either switch within the class (maintenance or IRT) or reassess the strategy. From Giovannoni, Curr Opin Neurol.4
Alem, alemtuzumab; Clad, cladribine; DMF, dimethyl fumarate; Fingo, fingolimod; GA, glatiramer acetate; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFNβ, interferon-beta; Mitox, mitoxantrone; NEDA, no evident disease activity; Nz, natalizumab; Ocre, ocrelizumab; Ofat, ofatumumab; Teri, teriflunomide.

There is also a clear need to update the definition of NEDA regularly as new technologies become available and are validated as predictors of treatment response. I therefore envisage the definition of NEDA changing still further in future to include more objective measures, particularly ones measuring end-organ damage and the inclusion of patient-related outcome measures.

References